validación del cuestionario de metas de logro-revisado en estudiantes universitarios Argentinos (A-AGQ-R)
Se evaluaron las propiedades psicométricas de una adaptación al español del AGQ-R (Elliot & Murayama, 2008) en una muestra de estudiantes universitarios argentinos (292). Se confirmaron las estructuras factoriales y dimensionales hipotetizadas, las cuales también demostraron ser superior...
- Autores:
-
Sánchez Rosas, Javier
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2015
- Institución:
- Universidad de San Buenaventura
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio USB
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/25573
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10819/25573
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.641
- Palabra clave:
- achievement goal
adaptation
validity
achievement emotion
task value
self-efficacy
metas de logro
adaptación
validez
emoción de logro
valor de la tarea
autoeficacia
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- International Journal of Psychological Research - 2015
| id |
SANBUENAV2_960a0ae279fb430443f4684bc660b4e4 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/25573 |
| network_acronym_str |
SANBUENAV2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio USB |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
validación del cuestionario de metas de logro-revisado en estudiantes universitarios Argentinos (A-AGQ-R) |
| dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
validación del cuestionario de metas de logro-revisado en estudiantes universitarios Argentinos (A-AGQ-R) |
| title |
validación del cuestionario de metas de logro-revisado en estudiantes universitarios Argentinos (A-AGQ-R) |
| spellingShingle |
validación del cuestionario de metas de logro-revisado en estudiantes universitarios Argentinos (A-AGQ-R) achievement goal adaptation validity achievement emotion task value self-efficacy metas de logro adaptación validez emoción de logro valor de la tarea autoeficacia |
| title_short |
validación del cuestionario de metas de logro-revisado en estudiantes universitarios Argentinos (A-AGQ-R) |
| title_full |
validación del cuestionario de metas de logro-revisado en estudiantes universitarios Argentinos (A-AGQ-R) |
| title_fullStr |
validación del cuestionario de metas de logro-revisado en estudiantes universitarios Argentinos (A-AGQ-R) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
validación del cuestionario de metas de logro-revisado en estudiantes universitarios Argentinos (A-AGQ-R) |
| title_sort |
validación del cuestionario de metas de logro-revisado en estudiantes universitarios Argentinos (A-AGQ-R) |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Sánchez Rosas, Javier |
| dc.contributor.author.eng.fl_str_mv |
Sánchez Rosas, Javier |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
achievement goal adaptation validity achievement emotion task value self-efficacy |
| topic |
achievement goal adaptation validity achievement emotion task value self-efficacy metas de logro adaptación validez emoción de logro valor de la tarea autoeficacia |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
metas de logro adaptación validez emoción de logro valor de la tarea autoeficacia |
| description |
Se evaluaron las propiedades psicométricas de una adaptación al español del AGQ-R (Elliot & Murayama, 2008) en una muestra de estudiantes universitarios argentinos (292). Se confirmaron las estructuras factoriales y dimensionales hipotetizadas, las cuales también demostraron ser superiores a otros modelos alternativos. Los valores de consistencia interna para cada escala fue elevada. Se obtuvo evidencias de la utilidad de las escalas al evaluar los efectos de las cuatro metas de logro sobre valor de la tarea, autoeficacia social académica, disfrute, vergüenza y rendimiento académico. De esta manera, el A-AGQ-R sería un instrumento con buenas propiedades de validez y confiabilidad. Finalmente, estos resultados brindan una versión validada del AGQ-R para su uso en estudiantes universitarios argentinos. |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z 2025-07-31T16:10:32Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z 2025-07-31T16:10:32Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-01 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv |
Journal article |
| dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.21500/20112084.641 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-7922 |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-2084 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10819/25573 |
| dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.641 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.21500/20112084.641 2011-7922 2011-2084 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10819/25573 https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.641 |
| dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/641/441 |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
23 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv |
1 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv |
10 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.eng.fl_str_mv |
8 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.eng.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Psychological Research |
| dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv |
Arbuckle, J.L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: IBM. Babakus, E., Ferguson, C. E. & Joreskog, K G, (1987). The sensitivity of confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis to violations of measurement scale and distributional assumptions. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 2228. Dolan, C. V. (1994), Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 5, and 7 response categories: A comparison of categorical variable estimators using simulated data. British journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 309-326. Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., Nussbeck, F. W., & Trierweiler, L. I. (2003). Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait–multimethod models: A multiple-indicator CT-C (M-1) model. Psychological Methods, 8, 38–60. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 149–169. Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. En Andrew J. Elliot & Carol Dweck (eds.). Handbook of competence and motivation, 52-72. New York, London: The Guilford Press. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232. Elliot, A. J., & Fryer, J. W. (2008). The goal construct in psychology. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivational science (pp. 235-250). New York: Guilford Press. Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461– 475. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613–628. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Boston: Pearson. González, A. J., Donolo, D. S., Rinaudo, M. C., & Paoloni, P. V. (2010). Metas de logro y autodeterminación en universitarios: diferencias individuales y perfiles motivacionales. REME, 13, 34, 4. Greene, B. A., Miller, R.B., Crowson, M., Duke, B. L. & A key, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school student's cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perception and motivation. Contemporary educational psychology, 29(4), 462-482. Guan, J., Xiang, P., McBride, R., & Bruene, A. (2006). Achievement goals, social goals and students’ reported persistence and effort in high school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 58-74. Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105–122. Huang, C. (2011). Achievement Goals and Achievement Emotions: A Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 1-30. Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. B., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 398–416. Hutchinson, S, R., & Olmos, A (1998). Behavior of descriptive fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis using ordered categorical data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5, 344-364. Johnson, D. R., & Creech, J.C. (1983) Ordinal measures in multiple indicator models: A simulation study of categorization error. American Sociological Review, 48, 398-407. Liem, A. D., Lau, S. & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512. Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., et al. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Available at http://www.umich.edu/%7Epals/manuals.html. Montero, I., & León, O. (2007). A Guide for Naming Research Studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 847-862. Moreno, J. A., González-Cutre, D., & Sicilia, A. (2007). Metas de logro 2 x 2 en estudiantes españoles de EF. Revista de Educación, 347, 299-317. Murayama, K., Elliot, A., & Yamagata, S. (2011). Separation of performance-approach and performance-avoidance achievement goals: A broader analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 238-256. Nicholls, J. G., Patashnick, M., & Nolen, S. B. (1985). Adolescents’ theories of education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 683-692. Olaz, F. (2006). Construcción de una escala de autoeficacia para estudiantes universitarios. Comunicación presentada en el primer encuentro nacional de Evaluación Psicológica y Educativa. Córdoba: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 583–597. Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement Goals and Achievement Emotions: Testing a Model of Their Joint Relations With Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115–135. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36-48. Pérez, C. J. M. (2007). Manual de Usuario de la plataforma de encuestas en línea: Lime Survey, Versión 1.0, Licencia de Documentación Libre GNU. Pérez, E., Medrano, L., & Sánchez Rosas, J. (2014). Path Analysis: conceptos básicos y ejemplos de aplicación. Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 5, 52-66. Pintrich, P., Smith, D., García, T., & McKeachie, W. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813. Sánchez Rosas, J. (2011). Cómo evaluar las emociones académicas. Adaptación del Cuestionario de Emociones de Logro. IIICongreso de Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Sánchez Rosas, J., Piotti, A., Sánchez, V., Pereira, A., & Debat, E. (2011). Implicancias del interés, la importancia y la utilidad de los materiales y contenidos de aprendizaje para las emociones académicas. III Congreso de Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Skaalvik, E. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and task avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 71–81. Sterba, S. K., & Foster, E. M. (2008). Self-selected sample. In P. J. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (pp. 806-808). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications. Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49–78. |
| dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Psychological Research - 2015 |
| dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
International Journal of Psychological Research - 2015 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv |
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia) |
| dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/641 |
| institution |
Universidad de San Buenaventura |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/cd64c4a4-d17e-4882-9f93-fb86d6203865/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
1a8498b2457eaecb43e62441bf82dc43 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
| _version_ |
1851053537916616704 |
| spelling |
Sánchez Rosas, Javier2015-01-01T00:00:00Z2025-07-31T16:10:32Z2015-01-01T00:00:00Z2025-07-31T16:10:32Z2015-01-01Se evaluaron las propiedades psicométricas de una adaptación al español del AGQ-R (Elliot & Murayama, 2008) en una muestra de estudiantes universitarios argentinos (292). Se confirmaron las estructuras factoriales y dimensionales hipotetizadas, las cuales también demostraron ser superiores a otros modelos alternativos. Los valores de consistencia interna para cada escala fue elevada. Se obtuvo evidencias de la utilidad de las escalas al evaluar los efectos de las cuatro metas de logro sobre valor de la tarea, autoeficacia social académica, disfrute, vergüenza y rendimiento académico. De esta manera, el A-AGQ-R sería un instrumento con buenas propiedades de validez y confiabilidad. Finalmente, estos resultados brindan una versión validada del AGQ-R para su uso en estudiantes universitarios argentinos.The psychometric properties of a Spanish adaptation of the AGQ-R (Elliot & Murayama, 2008) were tested in a sample of Argentinean university students (292). The hypothesized factor and dimensional structures of the measure were confirmed and shown to be superior to a host of alternatives. Each of the four achievement goal factors had a high degree of internal consistency. Effects of the four achievement goals scales on task value, social academic self-efficacy, enjoyment, shame, and academic performance, provided support to utility of the scales. The A-AGQ-R provides a measure that attested valid and reliable scores. Finally, these findings provide a validated version of the AGQ-R for its use in Argentinean university students.application/pdf10.21500/20112084.6412011-79222011-2084https://hdl.handle.net/10819/25573https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.641engUniversidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/641/441231108International Journal of Psychological ResearchArbuckle, J.L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: IBM.Babakus, E., Ferguson, C. E. & Joreskog, K G, (1987). The sensitivity of confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis to violations of measurement scale and distributional assumptions. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 2228.Dolan, C. V. (1994), Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 5, and 7 response categories: A comparison of categorical variable estimators using simulated data. British journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 309-326.Eid, M., Lischetzke, T., Nussbeck, F. W., & Trierweiler, L. I. (2003). Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait–multimethod models: A multiple-indicator CT-C (M-1) model. Psychological Methods, 8, 38–60.Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 149–169.Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. En Andrew J. Elliot & Carol Dweck (eds.). Handbook of competence and motivation, 52-72. New York, London: The Guilford Press.Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.Elliot, A. J., & Fryer, J. W. (2008). The goal construct in psychology. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivational science (pp. 235-250). New York: Guilford Press.Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461– 475.Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613–628.Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Boston: Pearson.González, A. J., Donolo, D. S., Rinaudo, M. C., & Paoloni, P. V. (2010). Metas de logro y autodeterminación en universitarios: diferencias individuales y perfiles motivacionales. REME, 13, 34, 4.Greene, B. A., Miller, R.B., Crowson, M., Duke, B. L. & A key, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school student's cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perception and motivation. Contemporary educational psychology, 29(4), 462-482.Guan, J., Xiang, P., McBride, R., & Bruene, A. (2006). Achievement goals, social goals and students’ reported persistence and effort in high school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 58-74.Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105–122.Huang, C. (2011). Achievement Goals and Achievement Emotions: A Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 1-30.Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. B., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 398–416.Hutchinson, S, R., & Olmos, A (1998). Behavior of descriptive fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis using ordered categorical data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5, 344-364.Johnson, D. R., & Creech, J.C. (1983) Ordinal measures in multiple indicator models: A simulation study of categorization error. American Sociological Review, 48, 398-407.Liem, A. D., Lau, S. & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512.Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., et al. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Available at http://www.umich.edu/%7Epals/manuals.html.Montero, I., & León, O. (2007). A Guide for Naming Research Studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 847-862.Moreno, J. A., González-Cutre, D., & Sicilia, A. (2007). Metas de logro 2 x 2 en estudiantes españoles de EF. Revista de Educación, 347, 299-317.Murayama, K., Elliot, A., & Yamagata, S. (2011). Separation of performance-approach and performance-avoidance achievement goals: A broader analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 238-256.Nicholls, J. G., Patashnick, M., & Nolen, S. B. (1985). Adolescents’ theories of education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 683-692.Olaz, F. (2006). Construcción de una escala de autoeficacia para estudiantes universitarios. Comunicación presentada en el primer encuentro nacional de Evaluación Psicológica y Educativa. Córdoba: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 583–597.Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement Goals and Achievement Emotions: Testing a Model of Their Joint Relations With Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115–135.Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36-48.Pérez, C. J. M. (2007). Manual de Usuario de la plataforma de encuestas en línea: Lime Survey, Versión 1.0, Licencia de Documentación Libre GNU.Pérez, E., Medrano, L., & Sánchez Rosas, J. (2014). Path Analysis: conceptos básicos y ejemplos de aplicación. Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 5, 52-66.Pintrich, P., Smith, D., García, T., & McKeachie, W. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.Sánchez Rosas, J. (2011). Cómo evaluar las emociones académicas. Adaptación del Cuestionario de Emociones de Logro. IIICongreso de Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.Sánchez Rosas, J., Piotti, A., Sánchez, V., Pereira, A., & Debat, E. (2011). Implicancias del interés, la importancia y la utilidad de los materiales y contenidos de aprendizaje para las emociones académicas. III Congreso de Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Skaalvik, E. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and task avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 71–81.Sterba, S. K., & Foster, E. M. (2008). Self-selected sample. In P. J. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (pp. 806-808). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49–78.International Journal of Psychological Research - 2015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/641achievement goaladaptationvalidityachievement emotiontask valueself-efficacymetas de logroadaptaciónvalidezemoción de logrovalor de la tareaautoeficaciavalidación del cuestionario de metas de logro-revisado en estudiantes universitarios Argentinos (A-AGQ-R)validación del cuestionario de metas de logro-revisado en estudiantes universitarios Argentinos (A-AGQ-R)Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2580https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/cd64c4a4-d17e-4882-9f93-fb86d6203865/download1a8498b2457eaecb43e62441bf82dc43MD5110819/25573oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/255732025-07-31 11:10:32.368https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
