Feed and neurodegenerative diseases: a socio-scientific issue for developing argumentative skills
The article shows the results of a research project whose objective was to promote the development of argumentative skills in a group of trainee teachers of the Chemistry degree program at the National Pedagogical University, through the design and application of a didacti...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6702
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/13617
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/praxis_saber/article/view/11452
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/13617
- Palabra clave:
- discourse
education
nutrition
biochemistry
nervous system disease
discurso
educación
alimentación
bioquímica
enfermedad del sistema nervioso
discurso
educação
nutrição
bioquímica
doença do sistema nervoso
- Rights
- License
- Derechos de autor 2021 Maria José Jose Cortés Parra, Rodrigo Rodríguez Cepeda
Summary: | The article shows the results of a research project whose objective was to promote the development of argumentative skills in a group of trainee teachers of the Chemistry degree program at the National Pedagogical University, through the design and application of a didactic unit on the implications of food chemistry in the development and prevention of the Parkinson’s disease [PD] as a socio-scientific issue. Activities such as open questions, discussion forums, and search for possible nutritional alternatives in the prevention and treatment for the PD were implemented. In each stage, the level of argumentation wasidentified, and the conceptual content of each argument was analyzed. It should be noted that the students were able to achieve a higher level of argumentation than the initial one by using the knowledge acquired in the solution and search for alternatives through active and reflective learning. They built arguments based on theoretical and experimental grounds on different aspects of this controversy. |
---|