The parody defense against trademark bullies: analysis of the Louis Vuitton vs. Mob Case

The present note aims to give a better understanding of parody as an exception to the exclusive rights provided to copyright holders and trademark owners. With this purpose, the note uses the Louis Vuitton vs. MOB case as a reference. 

Autores:
Molano Lozano, Daniela
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad Externado de Colombia
Repositorio:
Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/26141
Acceso en línea:
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/26141
https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n24.10
Palabra clave:
Parody
Intellectual property
Luis Vuitton
MOB
Famous marks
Supreme Court
copyright infringement
trademark infringement
trademark dilution
Rights
openAccess
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id uexternad2_df7c8600d3c01b8b9261e7c531bd750b
oai_identifier_str oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/26141
network_acronym_str uexternad2
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
spelling Molano Lozano, Daniela2017-12-12T00:00:00Z2025-04-09T19:11:22Z2017-12-12T00:00:00Z2025-04-09T19:11:22Z2017-12-12The present note aims to give a better understanding of parody as an exception to the exclusive rights provided to copyright holders and trademark owners. With this purpose, the note uses the Louis Vuitton vs. MOB case as a reference. application/pdftext/html10.18601/16571959.n24.102346-21161657-1959https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/26141https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n24.10spaCentro de Estudios de la Propiedad Intelectualhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/5204/6271https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/5204/6342Núm. 24 , Año 2017 : Julio-Diciembre22124213Revista La Propiedad InmaterialErgowerx Int´l, LLC v. Maxell Corp. of Am., 18 F. Supp.3d 430, 451(S.D.N.Y.2014).Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. My Other Bag Inc., 156 F. Supp. 3d 425 (S.D.N.Y. 2016).Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v My Other Bag, Inc.14-CV-3419(JMF). Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. My Other Bag, Inc., No. 16-241-cv (2d Cir. Dec. 22, 2016).Louis Vuitton Looking to Take “My Other Bag” Case to Supreme Court. May 22, 2017.Machado Pontes, Leonardo. Trademark and freedom of speech: A comparison between the US and the EU System in the awakening of Johan Deckmyn v. Helena Vandersteen. Geneva: ompi, 2015, p. 2.Mandelson, Peter. Trademark trolls: Here to stay? inta Bulletin. New York: International Trademark Association, 2015, 70(21).Mead, Frank. Cocaine, coffee mugs, sex, and bug killing floor wax: Welcome to the realm of parody and the likelihood of confusion. Thomas Jefferson Law Review. San Diego: Thomas Jefferson School of Law, 1999, 21, p. 305. issn: 1090-5278.Polaroid Corp. v. Polarard Elecs. Corp., 287 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1961).Sakulin, Wolfgang. Trademark protection and freedom of expression: An Inquiry into the conflict between trademark rights and freedom of expression under European. Alphen aan den Rijin, The Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2010, pp. 6-7.Screen shot taken from the official website of My Other Bag. (9/10/2017).Success Rate of a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Press.The world’s most valuable brands. Forbes Magazine. issn: 0015-6914.Tommy Hilfiger, 221 F. Supp.2d at 417 (quoting Hormel Foods, 73 F.3d at 503).info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/5204ParodyIntellectual propertyLuis VuittonMOBFamous marksSupreme Courtcopyright infringementtrademark infringementtrademark dilutionThe parody defense against trademark bullies: analysis of the Louis Vuitton vs. Mob CaseThe parody defense against trademark bullies: analysis of the Louis Vuitton vs. Mob CaseArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2563https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/7ef458f9-84cd-4954-8c2e-d4659f130800/downloadef21de0f07ea7ba04c8e4e59317de40fMD51001/26141oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/261412025-04-09 14:11:22.549https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv The parody defense against trademark bullies: analysis of the Louis Vuitton vs. Mob Case
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv The parody defense against trademark bullies: analysis of the Louis Vuitton vs. Mob Case
title The parody defense against trademark bullies: analysis of the Louis Vuitton vs. Mob Case
spellingShingle The parody defense against trademark bullies: analysis of the Louis Vuitton vs. Mob Case
Parody
Intellectual property
Luis Vuitton
MOB
Famous marks
Supreme Court
copyright infringement
trademark infringement
trademark dilution
title_short The parody defense against trademark bullies: analysis of the Louis Vuitton vs. Mob Case
title_full The parody defense against trademark bullies: analysis of the Louis Vuitton vs. Mob Case
title_fullStr The parody defense against trademark bullies: analysis of the Louis Vuitton vs. Mob Case
title_full_unstemmed The parody defense against trademark bullies: analysis of the Louis Vuitton vs. Mob Case
title_sort The parody defense against trademark bullies: analysis of the Louis Vuitton vs. Mob Case
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Molano Lozano, Daniela
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Molano Lozano, Daniela
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Parody
Intellectual property
Luis Vuitton
MOB
Famous marks
Supreme Court
copyright infringement
trademark infringement
trademark dilution
topic Parody
Intellectual property
Luis Vuitton
MOB
Famous marks
Supreme Court
copyright infringement
trademark infringement
trademark dilution
description The present note aims to give a better understanding of parody as an exception to the exclusive rights provided to copyright holders and trademark owners. With this purpose, the note uses the Louis Vuitton vs. MOB case as a reference. 
publishDate 2017
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-12T00:00:00Z
2025-04-09T19:11:22Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-12T00:00:00Z
2025-04-09T19:11:22Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-12
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.18601/16571959.n24.10
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2346-2116
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1657-1959
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/26141
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n24.10
identifier_str_mv 10.18601/16571959.n24.10
2346-2116
1657-1959
url https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/26141
https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n24.10
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/5204/6271
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/5204/6342
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 24 , Año 2017 : Julio-Diciembre
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 221
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 24
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 213
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Ergowerx Int´l, LLC v. Maxell Corp. of Am., 18 F. Supp.3d 430, 451(S.D.N.Y.2014).
Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. My Other Bag Inc., 156 F. Supp. 3d 425 (S.D.N.Y. 2016).
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v My Other Bag, Inc.14-CV-3419(JMF). Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. My Other Bag, Inc., No. 16-241-cv (2d Cir. Dec. 22, 2016).
Louis Vuitton Looking to Take “My Other Bag” Case to Supreme Court. May 22, 2017.
Machado Pontes, Leonardo. Trademark and freedom of speech: A comparison between the US and the EU System in the awakening of Johan Deckmyn v. Helena Vandersteen. Geneva: ompi, 2015, p. 2.
Mandelson, Peter. Trademark trolls: Here to stay? inta Bulletin. New York: International Trademark Association, 2015, 70(21).
Mead, Frank. Cocaine, coffee mugs, sex, and bug killing floor wax: Welcome to the realm of parody and the likelihood of confusion. Thomas Jefferson Law Review. San Diego: Thomas Jefferson School of Law, 1999, 21, p. 305. issn: 1090-5278.
Polaroid Corp. v. Polarard Elecs. Corp., 287 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1961).
Sakulin, Wolfgang. Trademark protection and freedom of expression: An Inquiry into the conflict between trademark rights and freedom of expression under European. Alphen aan den Rijin, The Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2010, pp. 6-7.
Screen shot taken from the official website of My Other Bag. (9/10/2017).
Success Rate of a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Press.
The world’s most valuable brands. Forbes Magazine. issn: 0015-6914.
Tommy Hilfiger, 221 F. Supp.2d at 417 (quoting Hormel Foods, 73 F.3d at 503).
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Centro de Estudios de la Propiedad Intelectual
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/5204
institution Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/7ef458f9-84cd-4954-8c2e-d4659f130800/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ef21de0f07ea7ba04c8e4e59317de40f
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_ 1831928474254704640

Publicaciones similares