Analysis of the judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C 161/17 (Cordoba case)

Esta reseña aborda los elementos más importantes de la decisión del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (TJUE) en el caso Córdoba. El Tribunal determinó que el re-posteo no autorizado de fotografías constituye un acto de comunicación al público y, por tanto, una infracción de los derechos de au...

Full description

Autores:: Melian Pérez, Gabriel Ernesto

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2021

Institución:: Universidad Externado de Colombia

Repositorio:: Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia

Idioma:: spa

id	uexternad2_c89020149bcb5d2ea6e30d020f2b740e
oai_identifier_str	oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/26220
network_acronym_str	uexternad2
network_name_str	Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Analysis of the judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C 161/17 (Cordoba case)
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Analysis of the judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C 161/17 (Cordoba case)
title	Analysis of the judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C 161/17 (Cordoba case)
spellingShingle	Analysis of the judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C 161/17 (Cordoba case) Derecho de autor; comunicación pública; hipervínculos; nuevo público; agotamiento del derecho Copyright; Communication to the public; Hyperlinks; New Public; Exhaustion of the right
title_short	Analysis of the judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C 161/17 (Cordoba case)
title_full	Analysis of the judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C 161/17 (Cordoba case)
title_fullStr	Analysis of the judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C 161/17 (Cordoba case)
title_full_unstemmed	Analysis of the judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C 161/17 (Cordoba case)
title_sort	Analysis of the judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C 161/17 (Cordoba case)
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Melian Pérez, Gabriel Ernesto
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Melian Pérez, Gabriel Ernesto
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Derecho de autor; comunicación pública; hipervínculos; nuevo público; agotamiento del derecho
topic	Derecho de autor; comunicación pública; hipervínculos; nuevo público; agotamiento del derecho Copyright; Communication to the public; Hyperlinks; New Public; Exhaustion of the right
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Copyright; Communication to the public; Hyperlinks; New Public; Exhaustion of the right
description	Esta reseña aborda los elementos más importantes de la decisión del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (TJUE) en el caso Córdoba. El Tribunal determinó que el re-posteo no autorizado de fotografías constituye un acto de comunicación al público y, por tanto, una infracción de los derechos de autor. Esta sentencia aclara el alcance del derecho de “comunicación al público” en el marco de la Directiva Infosoc y la legalidad del re-posteo de material que se encuentra protegido por derechos de autor en Internet. Su aportación más importante radica en establecer las diferencias entre el uso de links y framing con respecto a los casos de re-posting. En este comentario se analizará si sigue siendo adecuado continuar utilizando el criterio de “nuevo público” para identificar infracciones del derecho de “comunicación al público”.
publishDate	2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-06-16T20:06:51Z 2025-04-09T19:12:33Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-06-16T20:06:51Z 2025-04-09T19:12:33Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2021-06-16
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.18601/16571959.n31.10
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2346-2116
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	1657-1959
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/26220
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n31.10
identifier_str_mv	10.18601/16571959.n31.10 2346-2116 1657-1959
url	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/26220 https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n31.10
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7276/9985 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7276/10190
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 31 , Año 2021 : Enero-Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	281
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	31
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	271
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Association Littéraire et artistique internationale. Opinion on case C/161/17. Retrieved on 13/7/2020 from [https://www.alai.org/en/assets/files/resolutions/180529-opinion-land-nordrhein-westfalen-en.pdf ]. Aplin, Tanya. Copyright Law in the Digital Society: The Challenges of Multimedia, London, Hart Publishing, 2005. Ficsor, Mihály. “Svensson: honest attempt at establishing due balance concerning the use of hyperlinks, spoiled by the erroneous ‘new public’ theory”, Retrieved on 9/7/2020 from [http://www.copyrightseesaw.net/en/papers?page=5]. Hugenholtz P. B. and Van Velze, S. C. “Communication to a new public? three reasons why EU copyright law can do without a ‘New public’”, In iic-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, April, 2016, 47(7), p. 797-816. Synodinou, T. E. “The Renckhoff case: 6 degrees of separation from the lawful user”, In Era Forum, vol. 20, n.º 1, July 2019, pp. 21-33. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Gabriel Ernesto Melian Pérez - 2021
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Gabriel Ernesto Melian Pérez - 2021 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf text/html
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Centro de Estudios de la Propiedad Intelectual
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/7276
institution	Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/4d895e9d-dd27-4220-802f-90219a1d163e/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	fd2471a8faa7ab9ffe2d40be5c84d859
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_	1831928506679820288
spelling	Melian Pérez, Gabriel Ernesto2021-06-16T20:06:51Z2025-04-09T19:12:33Z2021-06-16T20:06:51Z2025-04-09T19:12:33Z2021-06-16Esta reseña aborda los elementos más importantes de la decisión del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (TJUE) en el caso Córdoba. El Tribunal determinó que el re-posteo no autorizado de fotografías constituye un acto de comunicación al público y, por tanto, una infracción de los derechos de autor. Esta sentencia aclara el alcance del derecho de “comunicación al público” en el marco de la Directiva Infosoc y la legalidad del re-posteo de material que se encuentra protegido por derechos de autor en Internet. Su aportación más importante radica en establecer las diferencias entre el uso de links y framing con respecto a los casos de re-posting. En este comentario se analizará si sigue siendo adecuado continuar utilizando el criterio de “nuevo público” para identificar infracciones del derecho de “comunicación al público”.This note discusses the most important elements of the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Cordoba case. The Court ruled that the unauthorized republication of photographs constitutes an act of communication to the public and therefore a copyright infringement. This ruling clarified the scope of the right of “communication to the public” in the framework of the Infosoc Directive and the legality of republishing copyrighted material on the Internet. Its most important contribution is to establish the differences between the use of links and framing with respect to re-posting cases. This commentary analyses whether it is still appropriate to continue using the criteria of “new public” to identify infringements of the right of “communication to the public”.application/pdftext/html10.18601/16571959.n31.102346-21161657-1959https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/26220https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n31.10spaCentro de Estudios de la Propiedad Intelectualhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7276/9985https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/7276/10190Núm. 31 , Año 2021 : Enero-Junio28131271Revista La Propiedad InmaterialAssociation Littéraire et artistique internationale. Opinion on case C/161/17. Retrieved on 13/7/2020 from [https://www.alai.org/en/assets/files/resolutions/180529-opinion-land-nordrhein-westfalen-en.pdf ].Aplin, Tanya. Copyright Law in the Digital Society: The Challenges of Multimedia, London, Hart Publishing, 2005.Ficsor, Mihály. “Svensson: honest attempt at establishing due balance concerning the use of hyperlinks, spoiled by the erroneous ‘new public’ theory”, Retrieved on 9/7/2020 from [http://www.copyrightseesaw.net/en/papers?page=5].Hugenholtz P. B. and Van Velze, S. C. “Communication to a new public? three reasons why EU copyright law can do without a ‘New public’”, In iic-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, April, 2016, 47(7), p. 797-816.Synodinou, T. E. “The Renckhoff case: 6 degrees of separation from the lawful user”, In Era Forum, vol. 20, n.º 1, July 2019, pp. 21-33. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Gabriel Ernesto Melian Pérez - 2021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/7276Derecho de autor;comunicación pública;hipervínculos;nuevo público;agotamiento del derechoCopyright;Communication to the public;Hyperlinks;New Public;Exhaustion of the rightAnalysis of the judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C 161/17 (Cordoba case)Analysis of the judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C 161/17 (Cordoba case)Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2627https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/4d895e9d-dd27-4220-802f-90219a1d163e/downloadfd2471a8faa7ab9ffe2d40be5c84d859MD51001/26220oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/262202025-04-09 14:12:33.762https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Gabriel Ernesto Melian Pérez - 2021https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

Analysis of the judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C 161/17 (Cordoba case)

Publicaciones similares