Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers?
The Program for Psychosocial Care and Comprehensive Health for Victims serves, on a yearly basis, an average of 25,000 users in northern Colombia alone. The program is implemented by multidisciplinary teams comprised of psychologists, social workers, and community facilitators, who step in at the in...
- Autores:
-
Ramos‐Vidal, Ignacio
Palacio, Jorge
Domínguez de la Ossa, Elsy
Wehdking, Ingrid
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional UTB
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/10425
- Palabra clave:
- Colombia
Conditional process analysis
Implementation
Network analysis
Program evaluation
Sense of community
LEMB
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
| id |
UTB2_a8767dacc3d73b7df5ef9ef3054c01ba |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/10425 |
| network_acronym_str |
UTB2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional UTB |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers? |
| title |
Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers? |
| spellingShingle |
Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers? Colombia Conditional process analysis Implementation Network analysis Program evaluation Sense of community LEMB |
| title_short |
Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers? |
| title_full |
Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers? |
| title_fullStr |
Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers? |
| title_sort |
Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers? |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Ramos‐Vidal, Ignacio Palacio, Jorge Domínguez de la Ossa, Elsy Wehdking, Ingrid |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Ramos‐Vidal, Ignacio Palacio, Jorge Domínguez de la Ossa, Elsy Wehdking, Ingrid |
| dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv |
Colombia Conditional process analysis Implementation Network analysis Program evaluation Sense of community |
| topic |
Colombia Conditional process analysis Implementation Network analysis Program evaluation Sense of community LEMB |
| dc.subject.armarc.none.fl_str_mv |
LEMB |
| description |
The Program for Psychosocial Care and Comprehensive Health for Victims serves, on a yearly basis, an average of 25,000 users in northern Colombia alone. The program is implemented by multidisciplinary teams comprised of psychologists, social workers, and community facilitators, who step in at the individual, family, and community levels. An attempt has been made to determine the effect generated by the timeframe through which professionals have been engaged with the program‐filling positions of centrality and betweenness within the networks of information exchange and user referral, including the potential mediating effect from the structure of the egocentric network of implementers in the two aforementioned networks and the moderating effect of the sense of belonging to a team of professionals. Both centrality and betweenness are positional measures describing the location actors occupied within the network structure. Centrality reflects the nominations made and receipt by an actor in a network and is considered an individual indicator of prominence and power. Betweenness shows the times that an actor act as a bridge among two actors in a network and it is considered an indicator of strategic positioning in social networks. An egocentric network is the local structure of relationships that each implementer maintains with his or her direct contacts. In this study, 112 active implementers were included, mostly women (n = 97, 88.2%), who had been working on the program for 16.9 months on average (SD = 14.7). Through conditional process analysis, it has been shown that the time that the implementers have been working on the program and the sense of belonging to the task team are relevant factors that interact with each other toward explaining the level of centrality and betweenness of professionals in the information exchange and user referral networks |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-26 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-28T20:07:51Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-28T20:07:51Z |
| dc.date.submitted.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-28 |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.hasVersion.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
| dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Ramos‐Vidal, I., Palacio, J., Domínguez de la Ossa, E., & Wehdking, I. (2021). Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers? Journal of Community Psychology, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22634 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/10425 |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22634 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar |
| identifier_str_mv |
Ramos‐Vidal, I., Palacio, J., Domínguez de la Ossa, E., & Wehdking, I. (2021). Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers? Journal of Community Psychology, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22634 Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar Repositorio Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/10425 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22634 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessRights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.cc.*.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv |
23 Páginas |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cartagena de Indias |
| dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
The Journal of Community Psychology - vol. 59 n° 1 |
| institution |
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10425/1/Ramos-Vidal_et_al_jcop.22634_Elsy%20Mercedes%20Doming.pdf https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10425/2/license_rdf https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10425/3/license.txt https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10425/4/Ramos-Vidal_et_al_jcop.22634_Elsy%20Mercedes%20Doming.pdf.txt https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10425/5/Ramos-Vidal_et_al_jcop.22634_Elsy%20Mercedes%20Doming.pdf.jpg |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
93e86890800316ee9f533877115ac05c 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 e20ad307a1c5f3f25af9304a7a7c86b6 8c21b3c310dfc0df409578232b956198 e8bc717861ab142f7d9f87793d25bc08 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional UTB |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorioutb@utb.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1814021586285494272 |
| spelling |
Ramos‐Vidal, Ignaciofaf95230-97a2-47da-b0e6-2469ff6aa095Palacio, Jorge485b9478-0631-45ee-bdec-0cdc4c29de60Domínguez de la Ossa, Elsyd5204dd9-c044-463f-8ada-4da31848cbb2Wehdking, Ingrida31e8c74-4abc-4aeb-9e73-8ceb708a3d322022-01-28T20:07:51Z2022-01-28T20:07:51Z2021-05-262022-01-28Ramos‐Vidal, I., Palacio, J., Domínguez de la Ossa, E., & Wehdking, I. (2021). Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers? Journal of Community Psychology, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22634https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/10425https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22634Universidad Tecnológica de BolívarRepositorio Universidad Tecnológica de BolívarThe Program for Psychosocial Care and Comprehensive Health for Victims serves, on a yearly basis, an average of 25,000 users in northern Colombia alone. The program is implemented by multidisciplinary teams comprised of psychologists, social workers, and community facilitators, who step in at the individual, family, and community levels. An attempt has been made to determine the effect generated by the timeframe through which professionals have been engaged with the program‐filling positions of centrality and betweenness within the networks of information exchange and user referral, including the potential mediating effect from the structure of the egocentric network of implementers in the two aforementioned networks and the moderating effect of the sense of belonging to a team of professionals. Both centrality and betweenness are positional measures describing the location actors occupied within the network structure. Centrality reflects the nominations made and receipt by an actor in a network and is considered an individual indicator of prominence and power. Betweenness shows the times that an actor act as a bridge among two actors in a network and it is considered an indicator of strategic positioning in social networks. An egocentric network is the local structure of relationships that each implementer maintains with his or her direct contacts. In this study, 112 active implementers were included, mostly women (n = 97, 88.2%), who had been working on the program for 16.9 months on average (SD = 14.7). Through conditional process analysis, it has been shown that the time that the implementers have been working on the program and the sense of belonging to the task team are relevant factors that interact with each other toward explaining the level of centrality and betweenness of professionals in the information exchange and user referral networks23 Páginasapplication/pdfenghttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2The Journal of Community Psychology - vol. 59 n° 1Which factors explain information exchange and user referral among program implementers?info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1ColombiaConditional process analysisImplementationNetwork analysisProgram evaluationSense of communityLEMBCartagena de IndiasAnderson-Carpenter, K. D., Watson-Thompson, J., Jones, M. D., & Chaney, L. (2017). Improving community readiness for change through coalition capacity building: Evidence from a multisite intervention. Journal of Community Psychology, 45(4), 486-499. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21860Angrist, S. S. (1975). Evaluation research: Possibilities and limitations. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 11(1), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637501100107Bauer, M. S., Damschroder, L., Hagedorn, H., Smith, J., & Kilbourne, A. M. (2015). An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychology, 3(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9Berkel, C., Mauricio, A., M., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. N. (2011). Putting the pieces together: An integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0186-1Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Analytic TechnologiesBrass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 518-539. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392937Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K. (Eds.). (2017). Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice. Oxford University Press.Buchan, J. (2010). Reviewing the benefits of health workforce stability. Human Resources for Health, 8(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-8-29Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1287-1335. https://doi.org/10.1086/228667Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.Campo-Arias, A., Sanabria, A. R., Ospino, A., Guerra, V. M., & Caamaño, B. H. (2017). Polivictimización por el conflicto armado y sufrimiento emocional en el Departamento del Magdalena, Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 46(3), 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcp.2016.06.005Carnovale, S., & Yeniyurt, S. (2015). The role of ego network structure in facilitating ego network innovations. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(2), 22-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12075Chavis, D. M., Lee, K. S., & Acosta, J. D. (2008). The Sense of Community (SCI) Revised: The reliability and validity of the SCI-2. 2nd International Community Psychology Conference. Society for Community Research and Action, Lisbon: Portugal (4-6 de June).Cross, W., West, J., Wyman, P. A., Schmeelk-Cone, K., Xia, Y., Tu, X., & Forgatch, M. (2015). Observational measures of implementer fidelity for a school-based preventive intervention: Development, reliability, and validity. Prevention Science, 16(1), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-014-0488-9Cross, W., & Wyman, P. A. (2006). Training and motivational factors as predictors of job satisfaction and anticipated job retention among implementers of a school-based prevention program. Journal of Primary Prevention, 27(2), 195-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-0018-4Cross, W. F., & West, J. C. (2011). Examining implementer fidelity: Conceptualizing and measuring adherence and competence. Journal of Children's Services, 6(1), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.5042/jcs.2011.0123Dariotis, J. K., Bumbarger, B. K., Duncan, L. G., & Greenberg, M. T. (2008). How do implementation efforts relate to program adherence? Examining the role of organizational, implementer, and program factors. Journal of Community Psychology, 36(6), 744-760. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20255Derzon, J. H., Sale, E., Springer, J. F., & Brounstein, P. (2005). Estimating intervention effectiveness: Synthetic projection of field evaluation results. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26(4), 321-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-5391-5Dolcini, M. M., Gandelman, A. A., Vogan, S. A., Kong, C., Leak, T. N., King. A. J., & O'Leary, A. (2010). Translating HIV interventions into practice: Community-based organizations' experiences with the diffusion of effective behavioral interventions (DEBIs). Social Science & Medicine, 71(10), 1839-1846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.08.011Duncan, E. M., Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Davey, P., Maxwell, S., McKay, G. A., McLay, J., Ross, S., Ryan, C., Webb, D. J., Bond, C., & PROTECT Study, G. (2012). Learning curves, taking instructions, and patient safety: Using a theoretical domains framework in an interview study to investigate prescribing errors among trainee doctors. Implementation Science, 7, 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-86Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3-4), 327-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0Elwy, A. R., Kim, B., Plumb, D. N., Wang, S., Gifford, A. L., Asch, S. M., & Palinkas, L. A. (2020). The connectedness of mental health providers referring patients to a treatment study for post-traumatic stress: A social network study. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 47, 197-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-019-00945-yEverett, M., & Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Ego network betweenness. Social Networks, 27(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.007Fujimoto, K., Valente, T. W., & Pentz, M. A. (2009). Network structural influences on the adoption of evidence-based prevention in communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 37(7), 830-845. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20333Gest, S. D., Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., Bierman, K. L., & Moody, J. (2011). Strengthening prevention program theories and evaluations: Contributions from social network analysis. Prevention Science, 12(4), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0229-2Gittell, J. H., Logan, C., Cronenwett, J., Foster, T. C., Freeman, R., Godfrey, M., & Vidal, D. C. (2020). Impact of relational coordination on staff and patient outcomes in outpatient surgical clinics. Health Care Management Review, 45(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000192Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.xHayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.Hong, G., Cho, Y., Froese, F. J., & Shin, M. (2016). The effect of leadership styles, rank, and seniority on affective organizational commitment: A comparative study of US and Korean employees. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23(2). 340-362. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-03-2014-0034Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 277-303. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393414Kierkegaard, P., Kaushal, R., & Vest, J. R. (2014). How could health information exchange better meet the needs of care practitioners? Applied Clinical Informatics, 5(04), 861-877. https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2014-06-RA-0055Lang, G., Stengård, E., & Wynne, R. (2016). Developing a scale measuring perceived knowledge and skills dimensions for mental health promotion: A pilot test using a convenience sample. The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 11(1), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMHTEP-02-2015-0005Lardier Jr., D. T., Bergeson, C., Bermea, A. M., Herr, K. G., Forenza, B., Garcia-Reid, P., & Reid, R. J. (2019). Community coalitions as spaces for collective voice, action, and the sharing of resources. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(1), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22096Luke, D. A., & Harris, J. K. (2007). Network analysis in public health: History, methods, and applications. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 69-93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144132Marsden, P. V., & Friedkin, N. E. (1993). Network studies of social influence. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(1), 127-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124193022001006McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1%3C6::AID-JCOP2290140103%3E...Mizruchi, M. S., & Marquis, C. (2006). Egocentric, sociocentric, or dyadic?: Identifying the appropriate level of analysis in the study of organizational networks. Social Networks, 28(3), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.06.002Palinkas, L. A., Garcia, A., Aarons, G., Finno-Velasquez, M., Fuentes, D., Holloway, I., & Chamberlain, P. (2018). Measuring collaboration and communication to increase implementation of evidence-based practices: The cultural exchange inventory. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 14(1), 35-61. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426417X15034893021530Palinkas, L. A., Holloway, I. W., Rice, E., Brown, C. H., Valente, T. W., & Chamberlain, P. (2013). Influence network linkages across implementation strategy conditions in a randomized controlled trial of two strategies for scaling up evidence-based practices in public youth-serving systems. Implementation Science, 8(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-133Patterson, M. S., Prochnow, T., Richardson, R. G., & Jackson, K. P. (2020). Using network analysis to conduct a system-wide program evaluation within a university. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, 101783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101783Popelier, L. (2018). A scoping review on the current and potential use of social network analysis for evaluation purposes. Evaluation, 24(3), 325-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389018782219Ramos-Vidal, I., Caballero, C., Colorado, Y., Villamil, I., & Uribe, A. (2020). La evaluación estructural de programas de intervención psicosocial: la experiencia del Programa PAPSIVI en Colombia. Editorial de la Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. https://doi.org/10.18566/978-958-764-680-1Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free PressSmith, J. D., Schneider, B. H., Smith, P. K., & Ananiadou, K. (2004). The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: A synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33, 547-560Valente, T. W., Coronges, K., Lakon, C., & Costenbader, E. (2008). How correlated are network centrality measures? Connections, 28(1), 16-26.Valente, T. W., Palinkas, L. A., Czaja, S., Chu, K. H., & Brown, C. H. (2015). Social network analysis for program implementation. PLOS One, 10(6), e0131712. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131712Valente, T. W., & Pitts, S. R. (2017). An appraisal of social network theory and analysis as applied to public health: Challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Public Health, 38, 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044528Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Klingner, J. K., Swanson, E. A., Boardman, A., Stillman-Spisak, S. J., & Leroux, A. J. (2013). Collaborative strategic reading: Findings from experienced implementers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(2), 137-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2012.741661Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., Blachman, M., Dunville, R., & Saul, J. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3-4), 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9174-zWasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2013). Análisis de redes sociales. Métodos y aplicaciones. Colección Clásicos Contemporáneos No. 10. Ediciones CIS-Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.Wensing, M., Van Lieshout, J., Koetsenruiter, J., & Reeves, D. (2010). Information exchange networks for chronic illness care in primary care practices: An observational study. Implementation Science, 5(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-3Woltmann, E. M., & Whitley, R. (2007). The role of staffing stability in the implementation of integrated dual disorders treatment: An exploratory study. Journal of Mental Health, 16(6), 757-769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230701496402Yousefi-Nooraie, R., Khan, S., Gutberg, J., & Baker, G. R. (2019). A network analysis perspective to implementation: The example of health links to promote coordinated care. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 42(4), 395-421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278718772887Ramos-Vidal, I., Caballero, C., Colorado, Y., Villamil, I., & Uribe, A. (2020). La evaluación estructural de programas de intervención psicosocial: la experiencia del Programa PAPSIVI en Colombia, Editorial de la Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. http://doi.org/10.18566/978-958-764-680-1.http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1ORIGINALRamos-Vidal_et_al_jcop.22634_Elsy Mercedes Doming.pdfRamos-Vidal_et_al_jcop.22634_Elsy Mercedes Doming.pdfapplication/pdf1082361https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10425/1/Ramos-Vidal_et_al_jcop.22634_Elsy%20Mercedes%20Doming.pdf93e86890800316ee9f533877115ac05cMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10425/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83182https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10425/3/license.txte20ad307a1c5f3f25af9304a7a7c86b6MD53TEXTRamos-Vidal_et_al_jcop.22634_Elsy Mercedes Doming.pdf.txtRamos-Vidal_et_al_jcop.22634_Elsy Mercedes Doming.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain75223https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10425/4/Ramos-Vidal_et_al_jcop.22634_Elsy%20Mercedes%20Doming.pdf.txt8c21b3c310dfc0df409578232b956198MD54THUMBNAILRamos-Vidal_et_al_jcop.22634_Elsy Mercedes Doming.pdf.jpgRamos-Vidal_et_al_jcop.22634_Elsy Mercedes Doming.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg67798https://repositorio.utb.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12585/10425/5/Ramos-Vidal_et_al_jcop.22634_Elsy%20Mercedes%20Doming.pdf.jpge8bc717861ab142f7d9f87793d25bc08MD5520.500.12585/10425oai:repositorio.utb.edu.co:20.500.12585/104252022-01-29 02:26:28.49Repositorio Institucional UTBrepositorioutb@utb.edu.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 |