Experiencia en implante de lentes intraoculares fáquicos retroiridianos en el Hospital Militar Central de Bogotá, Colombia durante el período 2015-2018

Objetivo: Describir los resultados refractivos y complicaciones de los pacientes a los que se les realizó implante de lente intraocular fáquico retroiridiano en el Hospital Militar Central, Bogotá-Colombia durante el periodo 2015-2018. Métodos: Este artículo fue diseñado como un estudio tipo serie d...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
Repositorio:
Repositorio UMNG
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.unimilitar.edu.co:10654/32929
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/10654/32929
Palabra clave:
lente intraocular faquico
puerto central
lente de colamero implantable
miopia
colombia
OFTALMOLOGIA
IMPLANTES ARTIFICIALES
LENTES INTRAOCULARES
LENTES OFTALMICOS
Phakic Intraocular Lens
central hole
implantable collamer lens
myopia
Colombia
Rights
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
id UNIMILTAR2_b154a0b09c5b5ac9091288b1618697eb
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.unimilitar.edu.co:10654/32929
network_acronym_str UNIMILTAR2
network_name_str Repositorio UMNG
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Experiencia en implante de lentes intraoculares fáquicos retroiridianos en el Hospital Militar Central de Bogotá, Colombia durante el período 2015-2018
dc.title.titleenglish.spa.fl_str_mv Implant experience of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses in the Central Military Hospital of Bogotá, Colombia during the period 2015-2018
title Experiencia en implante de lentes intraoculares fáquicos retroiridianos en el Hospital Militar Central de Bogotá, Colombia durante el período 2015-2018
spellingShingle Experiencia en implante de lentes intraoculares fáquicos retroiridianos en el Hospital Militar Central de Bogotá, Colombia durante el período 2015-2018
lente intraocular faquico
puerto central
lente de colamero implantable
miopia
colombia
OFTALMOLOGIA
IMPLANTES ARTIFICIALES
LENTES INTRAOCULARES
LENTES OFTALMICOS
Phakic Intraocular Lens
central hole
implantable collamer lens
myopia
Colombia
title_short Experiencia en implante de lentes intraoculares fáquicos retroiridianos en el Hospital Militar Central de Bogotá, Colombia durante el período 2015-2018
title_full Experiencia en implante de lentes intraoculares fáquicos retroiridianos en el Hospital Militar Central de Bogotá, Colombia durante el período 2015-2018
title_fullStr Experiencia en implante de lentes intraoculares fáquicos retroiridianos en el Hospital Militar Central de Bogotá, Colombia durante el período 2015-2018
title_full_unstemmed Experiencia en implante de lentes intraoculares fáquicos retroiridianos en el Hospital Militar Central de Bogotá, Colombia durante el período 2015-2018
title_sort Experiencia en implante de lentes intraoculares fáquicos retroiridianos en el Hospital Militar Central de Bogotá, Colombia durante el período 2015-2018
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv lente intraocular faquico
puerto central
lente de colamero implantable
miopia
colombia
topic lente intraocular faquico
puerto central
lente de colamero implantable
miopia
colombia
OFTALMOLOGIA
IMPLANTES ARTIFICIALES
LENTES INTRAOCULARES
LENTES OFTALMICOS
Phakic Intraocular Lens
central hole
implantable collamer lens
myopia
Colombia
dc.subject.mesh.spa.fl_str_mv OFTALMOLOGIA
IMPLANTES ARTIFICIALES
LENTES INTRAOCULARES
LENTES OFTALMICOS
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Phakic Intraocular Lens
central hole
implantable collamer lens
myopia
Colombia
description Objetivo: Describir los resultados refractivos y complicaciones de los pacientes a los que se les realizó implante de lente intraocular fáquico retroiridiano en el Hospital Militar Central, Bogotá-Colombia durante el periodo 2015-2018. Métodos: Este artículo fue diseñado como un estudio tipo serie de casos, donde se valoraron los ojos que tenían implante lente intraocular fáquico retroiridiano ICL V4c para la corrección de la miopía moderada a alta. La agudeza visual sin corrección (AVSC) y con corrección (AVCC), refracción, presión intraocular (PIO), densidad de células endoteliales y complicaciones, fueron evaluados durante 6 meses. Resultados: El estudio incluyó 46 ojos de 27 pacientes. El equivalente esférico (EE) promedio fue: -7,33 0,66DP, tras 6 meses postquirúrgicos el EE mejoro a -0,3110DP, con el 83% de ojos dentro del rango  0.50DP de objetivo refractivo y el 100% de ojos dentro de 1.00 DP. La AVSC promedio fue: 0,17 0,03 logMAR. Los índices de eficacia y seguridad fueron:0,68 y 0,82 respectivamente. En ningún caso hubo perdida de líneas de visión durante el seguimiento. La PIO se mantuvo estable en el tiempo, no se presentaron cataratas u opacidad del cristalino y la pérdida de células endoteliales fue del 0,2% tras 6 meses de seguimiento. CONCLUSIÓN: Los resultados tras el implante de este nuevo tipo de lente respecto a todos los parámetros tomados en cuenta han sido promisorios, lo cual siguiere el uso del lente ICL V4c como una alternativa viable para el manejo de la miopía moderada- alta en Colombia. Palabras clave: Phakic Intraocular Lens, central hole, implantable collamer lens, myopia, Colombia.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-24T17:09:41Z
2019-12-30T19:05:30Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-24T17:09:41Z
2019-12-30T19:05:30Z
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-06
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Trabajo de grado
dc.type.dcmi-type-vocabulary.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10654/32929
url http://hdl.handle.net/10654/32929
dc.language.spa.fl_str_mv spa
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.spa.fl_str_mv pdf
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.spatial.spa.fl_str_mv Medicina
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
dc.publisher.department.spa.fl_str_mv Facultad de Medicina
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv Oftalmología
institution Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
dc.source.bibliographicCitation.spa.fl_str_mv Miao H, Chen X, Tian M, Chen Y, Wang X, Zhou X. Refractive outcomes and optical quality after implantation of posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lens with a central hole (ICL V4c). BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):1–7.
Galvis V, Tello A, Camacho PA, Parra MM, Merayo-Lloves J. Los factores bioambientales asociados a la miopía: una revisión actualizada. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol [Internet]. 2017;92(7):307–25. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2016.11.016
Walline JJ. Myopia control: A review. Eye Contact Lens. 2016;42(1):3–8.
Malecaze F, Porterie M, Cassagne M. Phakic intraocular lenses. Cataract. 2013;50(6):80–99.
Hug TE. Myopia. Pract Manag Pediatr Ocul Disord Strabismus A Case-based Approach. 2016;379:45–9.
Brenner LF, Alió JL, Vega-Estrada A, Baviera J, Beltrán J, Cobo-Soriano R. Clinical grading of post-LASIK ectasia related to visual limitation and predictive factors for vision loss. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(10):1817–26.
Alfonso JF, Lisa C, Fernández-Vega L, Almanzar D, Pérez-Vives C, Montés-Micó R. Prevalence of cataract after collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens implantation for myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(4):800–5.
Higueras-Esteban A, Ortiz-Gomariz A, Gutiérrez-Ortega R, Villa-Collar C, Abad-Montes JP, Fernandes P, et al. Intraocular pressure after implantation of the Visian implantable Collamer lens with CentraFLOW without iridotomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(4):800–6.
Gonzalez-Lopez F, Bilbao-Calabuig R, Mompean B, De Rojas V, Luezas J, Djodeyre MR, et al. Intraocular pressure during the early postoperative period after 100 consecutive implantations of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses with a central hole. J Cataract Refract Surg [Internet]. 2013;39(12):1859–63. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.06.020
Dejaco-Ruhswurm I, Scholz U, Pieh S, Hanselmayer G, Lackner B, Italon C, et al. Long-term endothelial changes in phakic eyes with posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(9):1589–93.
Packer M. Meta-analysis and review: Effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1059–77.
Packer M. The implantable collamer lens with a central port: Review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:2427–38.
Visian ICL (Implantable Collamer Lens) for Myopia: Directions for Use. STAAR Surgical. Available from: http://staar.com/file/ PKG-02012_Rev_2_DFU-for-MICL-Visian-ICL.pdf. Accessed April 3 2018. Visian ICL (Implantable Collamer Lens) for Myopia: Directions for Use. STAAR Surgical. Available from: http://staar.com/file/ PKG-02012_Rev_2_DFU-for-MICL-Visian-ICL.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2018.
Lisa C, Naveiras M, Alfonso-Bartolozzi B, Belda-Salmerón L, Montés-Micó R, Alfonso JF. Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole to correct myopia: One-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(6):1153–9.
United States Food and Drug Administration clinical trial of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) for moderate to high myopia: Three-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1683–92.
STAAR Surgical Announces Approval By Health Canada of Its EVO Visian ICL for Surgeons and Their Patients in Canada. http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=71327&p=irol-newsArticle_print&ID=2168212. Accessed August 1, 2016. 1. STAAR Surgical Announces Approval By Health Canada of Its EVO Visian ICL for Surgeons and Their Patients in Canada. http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=71327&p=irol-newsArticle_print&ID=2168212. Accessed August 1, 2016.
Pineda R, Chauhan T. Phakic intraocular lenses and their special indications. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11(4):422–8.
Cao X, Wang Y, Xie C, Tong J, Shen Y, Wu W. Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole for moderate-to-high myopia First experience in China. Med (United States). 2016;95(36):4–9.
Alfonso JF, Lisa C, Fernández-Vega Cueto L, Belda-Salmerón L, Madrid-Costa D, Montés-Micó R. Clinical outcomes after implantation of a posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole for myopic correction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(6):915–21.
Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shiratani T. Early clinical outcomes of implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central hole (Hole ICL) for moderate to high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(3):409–12.
Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Kobashi H, Igarashi A, Komatsu M, Nakamura A, et al. Three-year follow-up of posterior chamber toric phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of high myopic astigmatism in eyes with keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(2):177–83.
Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Saito A, Igarashi A, Kobashi H. Comparison of Optical Quality and Intraocular Scattering after Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens with and without a Central Hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) Implantation Using the Double-Pass Instrument. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):1–5.
Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Kitazawa Y, Kojima T, Nakamura T, et al. Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation: Comparative, multicentre study in 351 eyes with low-to-moderate or high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(2):177–81.
Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shiratani T. Intraindividual comparison of visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole implantation for moderate to high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2012;154(3):486-494.e1. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.001
Icl V. The New EVO + Evolution in Visual Freedom The New EVO Visian ICL Evolution in Visual Freedom. 2016;(September).
Shiratani T, Shimizu K, Fujisawa K, Uga S, Nagano K, Murakami Y. Crystalline lens changes in porcine eyes with implanted phakic IOL (ICL) with a central hole. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(5):719–28.
Lu Y, Yang N, Li X, Kong J. Four-year Follow-up of the Changes in Anterior Segment After Phakic Collamer Lens Implantation. Am J Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2017;178:140–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.020
Tian Y, Jiang HB, Jiang J, Wen D, Xia XB, Song WT, et al. Comparison of Implantable Collamer Lens Visian ICL V4 and ICL V4c for high myopia: A cohort study. Med (United States). 2017;96(25):1–5.
Eom Y, Kim DW, Ryu D, Kim JH, Yang SK, Song JS, et al. Ring-shaped dysphotopsia associated with posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lenses with a central hole. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(3):e170–8.
Teng H, Zhang H. Comparison of Artisan iris-claw intraocular lens implantation and posterior chamber intraocular lens sulcus fixation for aphakic eyes. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014;7(2):283–7.
Rizk IM, El-khouly SE, Sewelam AM. Visual performance after implantation of two types of phakic foldable intraocular lenses for correction of high myopia. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019;
McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Moore JE. The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: The quality of vision (QoV) questionnaire. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(11):5537–45.
Tian M, Chen X, Zhou X, Wang X, Miao H, Chen Y. Refractive outcomes and optical quality after implantation of posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lens with a central hole (ICL V4c). BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):1–7.
Peŕez-Vives C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D, Garciá-Lázaro S, Monteś-Micó R. Visual quality comparison of conventional and Hole-Visian implantable collamer lens at different degrees of decentering. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(1):59–64.
Uozato H, Shimizu K, Kawamorita T, Ohmoto F. Modulation transfer function of intraocular collamer lens with a central artificial hole. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(7):1081–5.
Ieong A, Hau SCH, Rubin GS, Allan BDS. Quality of life in high myopia before and after implantable Collamer lens implantation. Ophthalmology [Internet]. 2010;117(12):2295–300. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.055
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repository.unimilitar.edu.co/bitstream/10654/32929/1/ARTICULO%20CODIGO%20PROYECTO%202018-043.pdf
http://repository.unimilitar.edu.co/bitstream/10654/32929/2/license.txt
http://repository.unimilitar.edu.co/bitstream/10654/32929/3/ARTICULO%20CODIGO%20PROYECTO%202018-043.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8884ea42fa2c62cd6454f68fe34c625d
7a29f5e8927c2a6e79997c6d46eb1201
d5f924fa038751c728690e536059d007
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UMNG
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliodigital@unimilitar.edu.co
_version_ 1837098467424468992
spelling Medicina2019-12-24T17:09:41Z2019-12-30T19:05:30Z2019-12-24T17:09:41Z2019-12-30T19:05:30Z2019-11-06http://hdl.handle.net/10654/32929Objetivo: Describir los resultados refractivos y complicaciones de los pacientes a los que se les realizó implante de lente intraocular fáquico retroiridiano en el Hospital Militar Central, Bogotá-Colombia durante el periodo 2015-2018. Métodos: Este artículo fue diseñado como un estudio tipo serie de casos, donde se valoraron los ojos que tenían implante lente intraocular fáquico retroiridiano ICL V4c para la corrección de la miopía moderada a alta. La agudeza visual sin corrección (AVSC) y con corrección (AVCC), refracción, presión intraocular (PIO), densidad de células endoteliales y complicaciones, fueron evaluados durante 6 meses. Resultados: El estudio incluyó 46 ojos de 27 pacientes. El equivalente esférico (EE) promedio fue: -7,33 0,66DP, tras 6 meses postquirúrgicos el EE mejoro a -0,3110DP, con el 83% de ojos dentro del rango  0.50DP de objetivo refractivo y el 100% de ojos dentro de 1.00 DP. La AVSC promedio fue: 0,17 0,03 logMAR. Los índices de eficacia y seguridad fueron:0,68 y 0,82 respectivamente. En ningún caso hubo perdida de líneas de visión durante el seguimiento. La PIO se mantuvo estable en el tiempo, no se presentaron cataratas u opacidad del cristalino y la pérdida de células endoteliales fue del 0,2% tras 6 meses de seguimiento. CONCLUSIÓN: Los resultados tras el implante de este nuevo tipo de lente respecto a todos los parámetros tomados en cuenta han sido promisorios, lo cual siguiere el uso del lente ICL V4c como una alternativa viable para el manejo de la miopía moderada- alta en Colombia. Palabras clave: Phakic Intraocular Lens, central hole, implantable collamer lens, myopia, Colombia.1.Introduccion 2.Metodologia 3.Resultados 4.Discusion 5.Conclusiones 6.BibliografiaAIM: Describe the refractive results and complications of patients who underwent phakic intraocular lens implantation at the Central Military Hospital, Bogota-Colombia during the 2015-2018 period. Methods: This article was designed as a case series study, where the eyes that had ICL V4c phakic intraocular lens implant for the correction of moderate to high myopia were evaluated. Undercorrected distance (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) visual acuity, refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density and adverse events were evaluated at 6 months. Results: The study included 46 eyes of 27 patients. The mean spherical equivalent (EE) was: -7.33  0.66DP, 6 months after surgery the EE was -0.31  10DP, with 83% of eyes within the range of 0.50 DP for refractive objective and 100% of eyes within  1.00 DP. The mean AVSC was: 0.17  0.03logMAR. The efficacy and safety indices were: 0.68 and 0.82 respectively. In no case there was loss of visual acuity lines during the follow-up. The IOP remained stable over time, there were no cataracts or opacity of the lens and the loss of endothelial cells was 0.2% after 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Good results were obtained in UDVA, refraction and stable intraocular pressures during follow-up, which suggest the use of the ICL V4c lens as an alternative for the management of moderate-high myopia in Colombia for patients in whom refractive surgery with laser excimer cannot be performed.pdfapplication/pdfspaspaUniversidad Militar Nueva GranadaFacultad de MedicinaOftalmologíahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadashttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2lente intraocular faquicopuerto centrallente de colamero implantablemiopiacolombiaOFTALMOLOGIAIMPLANTES ARTIFICIALESLENTES INTRAOCULARESLENTES OFTALMICOSPhakic Intraocular Lenscentral holeimplantable collamer lensmyopiaColombiaExperiencia en implante de lentes intraoculares fáquicos retroiridianos en el Hospital Militar Central de Bogotá, Colombia durante el período 2015-2018Implant experience of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses in the Central Military Hospital of Bogotá, Colombia during the period 2015-2018info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisTrabajo de gradoTexthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fMiao H, Chen X, Tian M, Chen Y, Wang X, Zhou X. Refractive outcomes and optical quality after implantation of posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lens with a central hole (ICL V4c). BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):1–7.Galvis V, Tello A, Camacho PA, Parra MM, Merayo-Lloves J. Los factores bioambientales asociados a la miopía: una revisión actualizada. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol [Internet]. 2017;92(7):307–25. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2016.11.016Walline JJ. Myopia control: A review. Eye Contact Lens. 2016;42(1):3–8.Malecaze F, Porterie M, Cassagne M. Phakic intraocular lenses. Cataract. 2013;50(6):80–99.Hug TE. Myopia. Pract Manag Pediatr Ocul Disord Strabismus A Case-based Approach. 2016;379:45–9.Brenner LF, Alió JL, Vega-Estrada A, Baviera J, Beltrán J, Cobo-Soriano R. Clinical grading of post-LASIK ectasia related to visual limitation and predictive factors for vision loss. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(10):1817–26.Alfonso JF, Lisa C, Fernández-Vega L, Almanzar D, Pérez-Vives C, Montés-Micó R. Prevalence of cataract after collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens implantation for myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(4):800–5.Higueras-Esteban A, Ortiz-Gomariz A, Gutiérrez-Ortega R, Villa-Collar C, Abad-Montes JP, Fernandes P, et al. Intraocular pressure after implantation of the Visian implantable Collamer lens with CentraFLOW without iridotomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(4):800–6.Gonzalez-Lopez F, Bilbao-Calabuig R, Mompean B, De Rojas V, Luezas J, Djodeyre MR, et al. Intraocular pressure during the early postoperative period after 100 consecutive implantations of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses with a central hole. J Cataract Refract Surg [Internet]. 2013;39(12):1859–63. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.06.020Dejaco-Ruhswurm I, Scholz U, Pieh S, Hanselmayer G, Lackner B, Italon C, et al. Long-term endothelial changes in phakic eyes with posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(9):1589–93.Packer M. Meta-analysis and review: Effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1059–77.Packer M. The implantable collamer lens with a central port: Review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:2427–38.Visian ICL (Implantable Collamer Lens) for Myopia: Directions for Use. STAAR Surgical. Available from: http://staar.com/file/ PKG-02012_Rev_2_DFU-for-MICL-Visian-ICL.pdf. Accessed April 3 2018. Visian ICL (Implantable Collamer Lens) for Myopia: Directions for Use. STAAR Surgical. Available from: http://staar.com/file/ PKG-02012_Rev_2_DFU-for-MICL-Visian-ICL.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2018.Lisa C, Naveiras M, Alfonso-Bartolozzi B, Belda-Salmerón L, Montés-Micó R, Alfonso JF. Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole to correct myopia: One-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(6):1153–9.United States Food and Drug Administration clinical trial of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) for moderate to high myopia: Three-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1683–92.STAAR Surgical Announces Approval By Health Canada of Its EVO Visian ICL for Surgeons and Their Patients in Canada. http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=71327&p=irol-newsArticle_print&ID=2168212. Accessed August 1, 2016. 1. STAAR Surgical Announces Approval By Health Canada of Its EVO Visian ICL for Surgeons and Their Patients in Canada. http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=71327&p=irol-newsArticle_print&ID=2168212. Accessed August 1, 2016.Pineda R, Chauhan T. Phakic intraocular lenses and their special indications. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11(4):422–8.Cao X, Wang Y, Xie C, Tong J, Shen Y, Wu W. Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole for moderate-to-high myopia First experience in China. Med (United States). 2016;95(36):4–9.Alfonso JF, Lisa C, Fernández-Vega Cueto L, Belda-Salmerón L, Madrid-Costa D, Montés-Micó R. Clinical outcomes after implantation of a posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole for myopic correction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(6):915–21.Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shiratani T. Early clinical outcomes of implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central hole (Hole ICL) for moderate to high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(3):409–12.Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Kobashi H, Igarashi A, Komatsu M, Nakamura A, et al. Three-year follow-up of posterior chamber toric phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of high myopic astigmatism in eyes with keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(2):177–83.Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Saito A, Igarashi A, Kobashi H. Comparison of Optical Quality and Intraocular Scattering after Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens with and without a Central Hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) Implantation Using the Double-Pass Instrument. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):1–5.Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Kitazawa Y, Kojima T, Nakamura T, et al. Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation: Comparative, multicentre study in 351 eyes with low-to-moderate or high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(2):177–81.Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shiratani T. Intraindividual comparison of visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole implantation for moderate to high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2012;154(3):486-494.e1. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.001Icl V. The New EVO + Evolution in Visual Freedom The New EVO Visian ICL Evolution in Visual Freedom. 2016;(September).Shiratani T, Shimizu K, Fujisawa K, Uga S, Nagano K, Murakami Y. Crystalline lens changes in porcine eyes with implanted phakic IOL (ICL) with a central hole. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(5):719–28.Lu Y, Yang N, Li X, Kong J. Four-year Follow-up of the Changes in Anterior Segment After Phakic Collamer Lens Implantation. Am J Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2017;178:140–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.020Tian Y, Jiang HB, Jiang J, Wen D, Xia XB, Song WT, et al. Comparison of Implantable Collamer Lens Visian ICL V4 and ICL V4c for high myopia: A cohort study. Med (United States). 2017;96(25):1–5.Eom Y, Kim DW, Ryu D, Kim JH, Yang SK, Song JS, et al. Ring-shaped dysphotopsia associated with posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lenses with a central hole. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(3):e170–8.Teng H, Zhang H. Comparison of Artisan iris-claw intraocular lens implantation and posterior chamber intraocular lens sulcus fixation for aphakic eyes. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014;7(2):283–7.Rizk IM, El-khouly SE, Sewelam AM. Visual performance after implantation of two types of phakic foldable intraocular lenses for correction of high myopia. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019;McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Moore JE. The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: The quality of vision (QoV) questionnaire. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(11):5537–45.Tian M, Chen X, Zhou X, Wang X, Miao H, Chen Y. Refractive outcomes and optical quality after implantation of posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lens with a central hole (ICL V4c). BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):1–7.Peŕez-Vives C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D, Garciá-Lázaro S, Monteś-Micó R. Visual quality comparison of conventional and Hole-Visian implantable collamer lens at different degrees of decentering. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(1):59–64.Uozato H, Shimizu K, Kawamorita T, Ohmoto F. Modulation transfer function of intraocular collamer lens with a central artificial hole. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(7):1081–5.Ieong A, Hau SCH, Rubin GS, Allan BDS. Quality of life in high myopia before and after implantable Collamer lens implantation. Ophthalmology [Internet]. 2010;117(12):2295–300. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.055EspecializaciónMedicina y Ciencias de la Salud - OftalmologíaUribe Vargas, SimonSierra Suarez, Diego Fernandouribe_simon@hotmail.comdiego.sierra@hospitalmilitar.gov.coEspecialista en OftalmologíaORIGINALARTICULO CODIGO PROYECTO 2018-043.pdfTrabajo de gradoapplication/pdf914439http://repository.unimilitar.edu.co/bitstream/10654/32929/1/ARTICULO%20CODIGO%20PROYECTO%202018-043.pdf8884ea42fa2c62cd6454f68fe34c625dMD51LICENSElicense.txttext/plain3420http://repository.unimilitar.edu.co/bitstream/10654/32929/2/license.txt7a29f5e8927c2a6e79997c6d46eb1201MD52THUMBNAILARTICULO CODIGO PROYECTO 2018-043.pdf.jpgARTICULO CODIGO PROYECTO 2018-043.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6339http://repository.unimilitar.edu.co/bitstream/10654/32929/3/ARTICULO%20CODIGO%20PROYECTO%202018-043.pdf.jpgd5f924fa038751c728690e536059d007MD5310654/32929oai:repository.unimilitar.edu.co:10654/329292020-03-10 12:17:54.445Repositorio Institucional UMNGbibliodigital@unimilitar.edu.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

Publicaciones similares