Intertwining the structures of science policy techno-scientific knowledge and the scientific workforce in Colombia

Background: Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy (STIP) in Colombia has evolved over time, yet significant gaps remain in its alignment with national research structures and the scientific workforce. While scientific production has increased, there is still a disconnect between policy prioriti...

Full description

Autores:
Cortés Sánchez, Julián David
Tipo de recurso:
Doctoral thesis
Fecha de publicación:
2025
Institución:
Universidad de los Andes
Repositorio:
Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/76031
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/1992/76031
Palabra clave:
Política científica y tecnológica
Indicadores cienciométricos
Redes de investigación
Innovación tecnológica
Fuerza laboral científica
Science and technology policy
Scientometric indicators
Research networks
Technological innovation
Scientific workforce
Ingeniería
Ciencia política
Sociología
Rights
openAccess
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
id UNIANDES2_3984b245c6357ba1fba81bb4fa027626
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/76031
network_acronym_str UNIANDES2
network_name_str Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intertwining the structures of science policy techno-scientific knowledge and the scientific workforce in Colombia
title Intertwining the structures of science policy techno-scientific knowledge and the scientific workforce in Colombia
spellingShingle Intertwining the structures of science policy techno-scientific knowledge and the scientific workforce in Colombia
Política científica y tecnológica
Indicadores cienciométricos
Redes de investigación
Innovación tecnológica
Fuerza laboral científica
Science and technology policy
Scientometric indicators
Research networks
Technological innovation
Scientific workforce
Ingeniería
Ciencia política
Sociología
title_short Intertwining the structures of science policy techno-scientific knowledge and the scientific workforce in Colombia
title_full Intertwining the structures of science policy techno-scientific knowledge and the scientific workforce in Colombia
title_fullStr Intertwining the structures of science policy techno-scientific knowledge and the scientific workforce in Colombia
title_full_unstemmed Intertwining the structures of science policy techno-scientific knowledge and the scientific workforce in Colombia
title_sort Intertwining the structures of science policy techno-scientific knowledge and the scientific workforce in Colombia
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Cortés Sánchez, Julián David
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv Ramírez Cajiao, María Catalina
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Cortés Sánchez, Julián David
dc.contributor.jury.none.fl_str_mv Montes Jiménez, Felipe
Chalela, Salim
Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida
dc.contributor.researchgroup.none.fl_str_mv Facultad de Ingeniería::TESO
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Política científica y tecnológica
Indicadores cienciométricos
Redes de investigación
Innovación tecnológica
Fuerza laboral científica
topic Política científica y tecnológica
Indicadores cienciométricos
Redes de investigación
Innovación tecnológica
Fuerza laboral científica
Science and technology policy
Scientometric indicators
Research networks
Technological innovation
Scientific workforce
Ingeniería
Ciencia política
Sociología
dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv Science and technology policy
Scientometric indicators
Research networks
Technological innovation
Scientific workforce
dc.subject.themes.none.fl_str_mv Ingeniería
Ciencia política
Sociología
description Background: Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy (STIP) in Colombia has evolved over time, yet significant gaps remain in its alignment with national research structures and the scientific workforce. While scientific production has increased, there is still a disconnect between policy priorities and the realities of the research community. Objectives: This study aims to analyze the relationship between STIP, national research fronts, and the structure of the scientific workforce in Colombia. It explores how policies influence inventive structures and academic production while evaluating the adequacy of traditional academic age criteria. Methods: Network analysis, co-word analysis, and bibliographic coupling techniques were used to assess funding policies and their relationship with research fronts. Public funding calls and bibliometric databases were analyzed to establish correlations between investment in science and research structures in the country. Results: Findings suggest a misalignment between STIP priorities and national research fronts. Although funded research fields have diversified, the composition of the research community remains rigid. Additionally, inconsistencies in academic age classification were identified, underestimating research experience in middle-low-income countries. Conclusions: This study highlights the need to rethink STIP in Colombia to foster better integration between policies, research fronts, and the scientific workforce. It recommends adjusting impact measurement indicators and strengthening the alignment between public policies and the evolving research ecosystem.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2025-02-07T14:17:05Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2025-02-07T14:17:05Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2025-02-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Trabajo de grado - Doctorado
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.content.none.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1992/76031
dc.identifier.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad de los Andes
dc.identifier.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/
url https://hdl.handle.net/1992/76031
identifier_str_mv instname:Universidad de los Andes
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca
repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv Ahrweiler, P., Schilperoord, M., Pyka, A., & Gilbert, N. (2015). Modelling research policy: Ex-ante evaluation of complex policy instruments. JASSS, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2927
Arnold, E. (2004). Evaluating research and innovation policy: A systems world needs systems evaluations. Research Evaluation, 13(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154404781776509
Avellar, A. P. M. D., & Botelho, M. D. R. A. (2018). Impact of innovation policies on small, medium and large Brazilian firms. Applied Economics, 50(55), 5979–5995. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1489109
Block, H.-J., & Krull, W. (1990). What are the consequences? Reflections on the impact of evaluations conducted by a science policy advisory body. Scientometrics, 19(5–6), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020705
Börner, K., Klavans, R., Patek, M., Zoss, A. M., Biberstine, J. R., Light, R. P., Larivière, V., & Boyack, K. W. (2012). Design and update of a classification system: The ucsd map of science. PLoS ONE, 7(7), e39464. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039464
Bozeman, B., & Link, A. N. (2015). Toward an assessment of impacts from US technology and innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 42(3), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu058
Brown, R. (2021). Mission-oriented or mission adrift? A critical examination of mission-oriented innovation policies. European Planning Studies, 29(4), 739–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1779189
Burbano, P. P., & Cardona, M. N. (2011). Los cuellos de botella del desarrollo endógeno territorial, desde la perspectiva del sistema de ciencia, tecnología e innovación en Colombia. CTS: Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, ISSN 1668-0030, Vol. 6, No. 17, 2011, 6(17), 7. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3716768&info=resumen&idioma=ENG
Bush, V. (1945). Science, the endless frontier - A Report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director ofthe Office of Scientific Research and Development.
Casadella, V., & Tahi, S. (2023). National Innovation Systems in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries: Re-evaluation of Indicators and Lessons for a Learning Economy in Senegal. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(3), 2107–2137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00945-8
Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA). (2022). The Agreement. The Agreement. https://coara.eu/agreement/the-agreement-full-text/
Cortés, J. D. (2021). Research on Innovation in China and Latin America: Bibliometric Insights in the Field of Business, Management, and Decision Sciences. Latin American Business Review, 23(2), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2021.1930551
Cortés, J. D., & Andrade, D. A. (2022). The Colombian scientific elite—Science mapping and a comparison with Nobel Prize laureates using a composite citation indicator. Plos One, 17(5), e0269116. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269116
Cortés, J. D., Guix, M., & Carbonell, K. B. (2021). Innovation for sustainability in the Global South: bibliometric findings from management & business and STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) fields in developing countries. Heliyon, 7(8), e07809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07809
Cortés, J. D., Lin, X., & Xun, X. (2022). Research on Innovation in Business and Management about China and Latin America: Bibliometric Insights Using Google Scholar, Dimensions and Microsoft Academic. Chinese Economy, 55(3), 208–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2021.1958451
Cortés, J. D., & Ramírez Cajiao, M. C. (2024). The policy is dead, long live the policy—Revealing science, technology, and innovation policy priorities and government transitions via network analysis. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(2), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00295
Cortés, J. D., & Ramírez-Cajiao, M. C. (n.d.). Interweaving the Structure of Science Policy Patents Classification and National Research Fronts. Under Review.
Cortés, J. D., & Ramírez-Cajiao, M. C. (2023a). The Content Structure of Science Technology and Innovation Policy — Applying co-word analysis to funding calls in Colombia. In I. Sserwanga, A. Goulding, H. Moulaison-Sandy, J. T. Du, A. L. Soares, V. Hessami, & R. D. Frank (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)2 (pp. 187–196). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Cortés, J. D., & Ramírez-Cajiao, M. C. (2023b). The Content Structure of Science Technology and Innovation Policy — Applying co-word analysis to funding calls in Colombia. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)2.
Cortés, J. D., & Ramírez-Cajiao, M. C. (2024a). Mapping the Inventive Structure in Middle-Low Income Countries—The Patent Network of Colombia. In l. Sserwanga et al. (Ed.), Wisdom, Well-Being, Win-Win. iConference 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 14596, pp. 131–137). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57860-1_10
Cortés, J. D., & Ramírez-Cajiao, M. C. (2024b). The Missing Linkage Between Science Technology and Innovation Policy and the Scientific Workforce—Evidence from Colombia. In l. Sserwanga et al. (Ed.), Wisdom, Well-Being, Win-Win. iConference 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 14596, pp. 288–297). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57850-2_21
Cortés, J. D., Robinson-García, N., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., & Ramírez-Cajiao, M. C. (2024a). Academic Age Standards Underestimate Global South Career Stages and Research Capacity Building — An Outlook of the Scientific Workforce of Colombia. Under Review.
Cortés, J. D., Robinson-García, N., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., & Ramírez-Cajiao, M. C. (2024b). The Scholarly Age—Beyond the Academic Age Using Techno-Scientific, Knowledge Appropriation and Mentoring Outputs. In l. Sserwanga et al. (Ed.), Wisdom, Well-Being, Win-Win. iConference 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 14596, pp. 321–330). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57850-2_24
Cortés-Sánchez, J. D. (2016). Eficiencia en el uso de bases de datos digitales para la producción científica en universidades de Colombia. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 39(2), e130. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2016.2.1320
Crouch, D., Irvine, J., & Martin, B. R. (1986). Bibliometric analysis for science policy: An evaluation of the United Kingdom’s research performance in ocean currents and protein crystallography. Scientometrics, 9(5–6), 239–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017247
Davis, S. W. (1989). The Impact of Funding on the Formulation of Research Policy. Accountability in Research, 1(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989628908573772
DNP, 2021. (2021). Búsqueda bibliográfica. https://www.dnp.gov.co/atencion-al-ciudadano/Paginas/busqueda.aspx
Ebert, R. H. (1973). Biomedical Research Policy — A Re-Evaluation. New England Journal of Medicine, 289(7), 348–351. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197308162890705
Edler, J., Berger, M., Dinges, M., & Gök, A. (2012a). The practice of evaluation in innovation policy in Europe. Research Evaluation, 21(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs014
Edler, J., Berger, M., Dinges, M., & Gök, A. (2012b). The practice of evaluation in innovation policy in Europe. Research Evaluation, 21(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs014
Fog, L. (2013). Historia social e institucional de Colciencias. In M. Salazar (Ed.), Colciencias cuarenta años: entre la legitimidad, la normatividad y la práctica (pp. 23–24). OCyT - Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Universidad del Rosario.
Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., Petersen, A. M., Radicchi, F., Sinatra, R., Uzzi, B., Vespignani, A., Waltman, L., Wang, D., & Barabási, A. L. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Technology-policy-and-economic-performance-%3A-from-Freeman/2ad10ed0ed082b06eb2a9e16998d3658172fcc64
Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar. (2007). Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar - 50 Años (C. Forero, Ed.). Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar.
Gingras, Y. (2014). Bibliometrics and research evaluation - Uses and abuses. The MIT Press.
Gök, A., & Edler, J. (2012). The use of behavioural additionality evaluation in innovation policy making. Research Evaluation, 21(4), 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs015
Gök, A., Rigby, J., & Shapira, P. (2016). The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: Evidence from six smaller European countries. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 715–730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23406
Hicks, D., & Isett, K. R. (2020). Powerful numbers: Exemplary quantitative studies of science that had policy impact. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 969–982. https://doi.org/10.1162/QSS_A_00060
Himanen, L., Auranen, O., Puuska, H.-M., & Nieminen, M. (2009). Influence of research funding and science policy on university research performance: A comparison of five countries. Science and Public Policy, 36(6), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234209X461006
Huang, Y., Glänzel, W., & Zhang, L. (2021). Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains. Scientometrics, 126(7), 6201–6224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03821-x
Inglesi-Lotz, R., & Pouris, A. (2011). Scientometric impact assessment of a research policy instrument: The case of rating researchers on scientific outputs in South Africa. Scientometrics, 88(3), 747–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0440-8
Intarakumnerd, P., Chairatana, P., & Tangchitpiboon, T. (2002). National innovation system in less successful developing countries: the case of Thailand. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1445–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00074-4
Isaksen, A., Normann, R. H., & Spilling, O. R. (2017). Do general innovation policy tools fit all? Analysis of the regional impact of the Norwegian Skattefunn scheme. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-017-0068-x
Ito, A., Li, Z., & Wang, M. (2017). Multi-level and Multi-route Innovation Policies in China: A Programme Evaluation Based on Firm-level Data. Millennial Asia, 8(1), 78–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399616686866
Jasinski, A. H. (2003). Has innovation policy an influence on innovation? The case of a country in transition. Science and Public Policy, 30(6), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780245
Katz, J. S. (2000). Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 27(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154300781782156
Katz, J. S. (2016). What Is a Complex Innovation System? PLOS ONE, 11(6), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156150
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated. Universal-Publishers.
Li, Y., Mao, J., Zhang, L., Wang, D., Shen, S., & Huang, Y. (2022). How scientific research incorporates policy: an examination using the case of China’s science and technology evaluation system. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04215-3
Louder, E., Wyborn, C., Cvitanovic, C., & Bednarek, A. T. (2021). A synthesis of the frameworks available to guide evaluations of research impact at the interface of environmental science, policy and practice. Environmental Science and Policy, 116, 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.006
Lundvall, B.-Å. (2010). Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (B.-Å. Lundvall, Ed.). Anthem Press.
Martin, B. R. (2016). Twenty challenges for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv077
Mazzucato, M. (2015). The Entrepreneurial State: debunking public vs. private sector myths. PublicAffairs.
Mazzucato, M., & Dibb, G. (2019). Missions: A beginner’s guide.
McNie, E. C., Parris, A., & Sarewitz, D. (2016). Improving the public value of science: A typology to inform discussion, design and implementation of research. Research Policy, 45(4), 884–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.004
Meyer-Krahmer, F. (1984). Evaluation of Industrial Innovation Policy–Concepts, Methods and Lessons. Review of Policy Research, 3(3–4), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00142.x
MinCiencias. (2022). Plan de convocatorias ASCTeI 2023-2024 | Minciencias. https://minciencias.gov.co/plan-convocatorias-asctei-2023-2024
MinCiencias. (2023). La Ciencia en Cifras. https://minciencias.gov.co/la-ciencia-en-cifras
Nalimov, V. V. (1966). Kolichestvennye metody issledovaniya protsesa razvitiya nauki (Quantitative methods of research of scientific evolution). Voprosy Filisofii, 12, 38–47.
Nalimov, V. V, & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Наукометрия, Изучение развития Hауки как информационного процесса [Naukometriya, the Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process] (en Ruso). Nauka.
Neal, H., Smith, T., & McCormick, J. (2008). Beyond Sputnik - U.S. Science Policy in the Twenty-First Century. In Beyond Sputnik. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/MPUB.22958
Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología-OCyT, & OCyT. (2021). Atlas del Conocimiento. https://atlasdelconocimiento.ocyt.org.co/general/
OCyT. (2020). Tableros CTeI 2020 – Portal de datos 2021. Tablero de Indicadores. https://portal.ocyt.org.co/tableros-ctei-2020/
Papon, P. (1979). Centres of decision in french science policy: The contrasting influences of scientific experts and administrators. Research Policy, 8(4), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(79)90004-0
Pardo Martínez, C. I., & Cotte Poveda, A. (2021a). Science, technology, innovation, theory and evidence: the new institutionality in Colombia. Quality and Quantity, 55(3), 845–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11135-020-01032-3/TABLES/11
Pardo Martínez, C. I., & Cotte Poveda, A. (2021b). Science, technology, innovation, theory and evidence: the new institutionality in Colombia. Quality and Quantity, 55(3), 845–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11135-020-01032-3/TABLES/11
Pianta, M., & Sirilli, G. (1997). Impact of innovation policies: Evidence from the Italian innovation survey. Science and Public Policy, 24(4), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/24.4.245
Pohoryles, R. J. (2006). Innocult revisited: The impact of EU research programmes on national research policies, key actors and research collaboration. Innovation, 19(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610600607999
Rigby, J. (2011a). Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: New dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation. Research Evaluation, 20(5), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X13164389670392
Rigby, J. (2011b). Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: New dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation. Research Evaluation, 20(5), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X13164389670392
Rodríguez-Navarro, A., & Brito, R. (2022). The link between countries’ economic and scientific wealth has a complex dependence on technological activity and research policy. Scientometrics, 127(5), 2871–2896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04313-w
Rousseau, R. (2021). Naukometriya, Nalimov and Mul’chenko. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management , 15(1), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2021.1943042
Salazar, M. (2017). The Colombian system of science, technology and innovation in transition: how governance is being affected. In Research Handbook on Innovation Governance for Emerging Economies. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471911.00015
Samara, E., Georgiadis, P., & Bakouros, I. (2012). The impact of innovation policies on the performance of national innovation systems: A system dynamics analysis. Technovation, 32(11), 624–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.06.002
Schnellenbach, J. (2024). A Behavioral Economics Perspective on the Entrepreneurial State and Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy. In M. Henrekson, C. Sandström, & M. Stenkula (Eds.), Moonshots and the New Industrial Policy: Questioning the Mission Economy (pp. 61–76). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49196-2_4
SCImago. (2020). SJR - International Science Ranking. https://bit.ly/3Ih0qMa
Scopus. (2022). Scopus - Document search. https://bit.ly/3KhKoDn
Shibayama, S., & Baba, Y. (2015). Impact-oriented science policies and scientific publication practices: The case of life sciences in Japan. Research Policy, 44(4), 936–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.012
Shiffrin, R. M., & Börner, K. (2004). Mapping knowledge domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(SUPPL. 1), 5183–5185. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307852100
Svarc, J., Laznjak, J., & Perkovic, J. (2011). Unintended consequences of innovation policy programmes: Social evaluation of the technological projects programme in Croatia. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 13(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2011.13.1.77
Tenner, E. (2018). The Efficiency Paradox: What Big Data Can’t Do. Knopf.
The World Bank. (2022). DataBank. DataBank. https://databank.worldbank.org/home.aspx
The World Bank - Data. (2021). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) . https://bit.ly/3qzhwia
Torregrosa-Hetland, S., Pelkonen, A., Oksanen, J., & Kander, A. (2019). The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013. Research Policy, 48(6), 1373–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.001
UNESCO. (2010). National science, technology and innovation systems in Latin America and the Caribbean (G. A. Lemarchand, Ed.). UNESCO Office Montevideo.
UNESCO. (2015). UNESCO science report: towards 2030. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000235406
Vasen, F., Sarthou, N. F., Romano, S. A., Gutiérrez, B. D., & Pintos, M. (2023). Turning academics into researchers: The development of National Researcher Categorization Systems in Latin America. Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1093/RESEVAL/RVAD021
Villaveces, J. L., & Forero-Pineda, C. (2007). Cincuenta años de ciencia en Colombia. In C. Forero-Pineda (Ed.), Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar - 50 Años2 (pp. 97–133). Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar.
WIPO. (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023. Global Innovation Index - Colombia. https://www.wipo.int/gii-ranking/en/colombia
dc.rights.en.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv 185 páginas en 9 archivos
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de los Andes
dc.publisher.program.none.fl_str_mv Doctorado en Ingeniería
dc.publisher.faculty.none.fl_str_mv Facultad de Ingeniería
dc.publisher.department.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de los Andes
institution Universidad de los Andes
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/ce0b5171-771f-4258-98b2-e0835bc9dfc4/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/7ad97ce6-a57d-4995-b6f3-260a222dc2d2/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/d89668fe-9464-454f-ba30-eb17630932e0/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/ae654bcf-5f6c-4478-ab31-1d25a129dfd5/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/28fcc114-e902-437f-ae37-5dac538b130d/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/c0b73443-a504-4e9b-8591-2d2950572c53/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/0bc0eae4-670e-4925-91ff-cc876a8346ce/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/4d86cb7e-e191-4253-8e7e-f48a2ff2fed7/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/5613146f-53c7-4cfe-a4ee-d3231a89dbd3/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/71689dc0-ee58-4e03-96b4-fc77c145e36a/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/0b0782bb-b58c-41ef-847b-5b1964f0207e/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/e9c261e6-3c82-4d90-a047-c91b0a573a81/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/5c3c8ce1-8439-4c8d-be6c-a9660ab756ac/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/b1074868-9be8-40e4-8f45-81942f93cba2/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/51651f31-ae5f-4ad2-8d06-8258cdcb9118/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/e11a6ce0-e292-416e-9b76-5ced54dd37b6/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/7975fd55-a7bc-4ae6-a49b-69e0c796571d/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/1dcafa5b-d48e-4f0d-bc59-89fb7d94241e/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/1ddeac6b-d618-4137-8382-12e948951153/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/d0976eb0-e9b5-4ff4-b2f6-0dc2ff60eaf9/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/d33e88c4-e6ad-4271-96fd-9e1956017157/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/c5d020fd-b0e4-475b-a882-288f6149285c/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/60314352-68b0-45d6-9f98-caa522c66d56/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/2af53e3e-840e-4fe3-84c2-4cd6f1c88f7d/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/2d532c98-a3d4-46e1-b10c-35e8d4db9276/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/4cffd7ae-ae5d-4a49-b1c5-503640f507f0/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/6a476bcd-9283-454d-9f98-678e8d814f6e/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/f7b12e02-e1ac-463e-9449-5d0416a02ed1/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/553eaaaa-af4b-4d79-a560-7385b8f8090b/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/e622e8dd-463a-47cf-879b-ca4af806b94c/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/ac6f0bb2-969f-4573-84de-df2d3f877c2a/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/1e80c2c9-9b8c-4af8-a871-3d78247d2e1a/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ae9e573a68e7f92501b6913cc846c39f
6a8910a0623fc917cb0a1b5823dab707
3e4af58992c19d09ce4f99fb9bcc3b60
f5ad5ad0877b358a094d7bb5c72c7898
3f2b5fc658d3b1d084293a6ad27c69a1
75fde4bcef22989b375b7591bf9191bf
edd6a04bfd48d7f20bd0d6b62f0982bf
7305e4b90d964cf848579215054c2e28
7028cb0297ad4b40741ea64721c40492
d277de11c689beac4de89f7977fab290
99582bd4d8d64c3c9b4853c56394071f
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
072186d1775a8c750cfb5eedb1dad187
d558bd52439a207cbf466e4b48a1ddfb
a69a0d97a38c6151517010e0ef4bcccf
f2af50f7dd14ac5a5c6d8aab97c1b14b
8a917a1ae65f61288290944b80cbea91
278424fb28531172cee9e2b1ba4f1355
d7aee75b643f2b775d15b143ce6ad0a1
2d866c0e4b8c3f8179766b2c23ef48e7
e38129657cbec86b92cf2f1acaa01e5d
7a7c61dbbee40ccb02cb9d5d2275a32d
5a00e3f5411794ea2ed1e61c5a6718d3
0a9295e0b320f1e0d680a044df31abc5
f1a71b1dcc10323f7b687549e0021fa4
8d3a29fece7438c60f530421e702c80e
7f414ccfc4293244d2e2c4cb9663193e
fd4598921824f0669d3ecc2078a06ce0
ba76c8a6d5b214199311145594c3f6b5
fb30bfa97e31efdd821af2d89ba55392
6e53ea8288e4062f4ff4e75c9d5d4541
edb9de76b892ea6bcd4a025945eff9a0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional Séneca
repository.mail.fl_str_mv adminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.co
_version_ 1828159158415785984
spelling Ramírez Cajiao, María Catalinavirtual::23879-1Cortés Sánchez, Julián DavidMontes Jiménez, Felipevirtual::23880-1Chalela, SalimChinchilla-Rodríguez, ZaidaFacultad de Ingeniería::TESO2025-02-07T14:17:05Z2025-02-07T14:17:05Z2025-02-07https://hdl.handle.net/1992/76031instname:Universidad de los Andesreponame:Repositorio Institucional Sénecarepourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/Background: Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy (STIP) in Colombia has evolved over time, yet significant gaps remain in its alignment with national research structures and the scientific workforce. While scientific production has increased, there is still a disconnect between policy priorities and the realities of the research community. Objectives: This study aims to analyze the relationship between STIP, national research fronts, and the structure of the scientific workforce in Colombia. It explores how policies influence inventive structures and academic production while evaluating the adequacy of traditional academic age criteria. Methods: Network analysis, co-word analysis, and bibliographic coupling techniques were used to assess funding policies and their relationship with research fronts. Public funding calls and bibliometric databases were analyzed to establish correlations between investment in science and research structures in the country. Results: Findings suggest a misalignment between STIP priorities and national research fronts. Although funded research fields have diversified, the composition of the research community remains rigid. Additionally, inconsistencies in academic age classification were identified, underestimating research experience in middle-low-income countries. Conclusions: This study highlights the need to rethink STIP in Colombia to foster better integration between policies, research fronts, and the scientific workforce. It recommends adjusting impact measurement indicators and strengthening the alignment between public policies and the evolving research ecosystem.Antecedentes: Las políticas de ciencia, tecnología e innovación (PCTI) en Colombia han evolucionado a lo largo del tiempo, pero su alineación con la estructura de la investigación nacional y la fuerza laboral científica sigue siendo un desafío. A pesar del crecimiento de la producción científica, persisten lagunas en la conexión entre la PCTI y las dinámicas de la comunidad investigadora. Objetivos: Este estudio busca analizar la relación entre la PCTI, los frentes de investigación nacionales y la estructura de la fuerza laboral científica en Colombia. Se exploran cómo las políticas influyen en la estructura inventiva y la producción académica, además de evaluar la adecuación de los criterios tradicionales para medir la edad académica. Métodos: Se emplearon técnicas de análisis de redes, co-ocurrencia de palabras y acoplamiento bibliográfico para evaluar las políticas de financiamiento y su relación con los frentes de investigación. Se analizaron datos de convocatorias públicas y bases bibliográficas para establecer correlaciones entre la inversión en ciencia y la estructura de la investigación en el país. Resultados: Los hallazgos sugieren una desconexión entre las prioridades de la PCTI y los frentes de investigación nacionales. Aunque se han diversificado los campos financiados, la composición de la comunidad investigadora sigue siendo rígida. Además, se identificaron inconsistencias en la clasificación de la edad académica, lo que subestima la experiencia investigadora en países de renta media-baja. Conclusiones: Este estudio destaca la necesidad de repensar la estructura de las PCTI en Colombia para fomentar una mayor integración entre políticas, frentes de investigación y la fuerza laboral científica. Se recomienda ajustar los indicadores de medición de impacto y fortalecer la alineación entre las políticas públicas y la evolución del ecosistema de investigación.Universidad de Los Andes - Beca Impacto PaísUniversidad del Rosario - Programa de apoyo a estudios doctorales | Fondo para la ciencia abiertaMax Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR) - Summer program in computational social sciences and bibliodemographicsConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas - Programa de apoyo a investigadores visitantesUniversidad de Granada - Programa de apoyo a investigadores visitantesGeorgia Institute of Technology - RESPECT doctoral fellowshipDoctorado185 páginas en 9 archivosapplication/pdfengUniversidad de los AndesDoctorado en IngenieríaFacultad de IngenieríaDepartamento de Ingeniería IndustrialAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Intertwining the structures of science policy techno-scientific knowledge and the scientific workforce in ColombiaTrabajo de grado - Doctoradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06Texthttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TDPolítica científica y tecnológicaIndicadores cienciométricosRedes de investigaciónInnovación tecnológicaFuerza laboral científicaScience and technology policyScientometric indicatorsResearch networksTechnological innovationScientific workforceIngenieríaCiencia políticaSociologíaAhrweiler, P., Schilperoord, M., Pyka, A., & Gilbert, N. (2015). Modelling research policy: Ex-ante evaluation of complex policy instruments. JASSS, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2927Arnold, E. (2004). Evaluating research and innovation policy: A systems world needs systems evaluations. Research Evaluation, 13(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154404781776509Avellar, A. P. M. D., & Botelho, M. D. R. A. (2018). Impact of innovation policies on small, medium and large Brazilian firms. Applied Economics, 50(55), 5979–5995. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1489109Block, H.-J., & Krull, W. (1990). What are the consequences? Reflections on the impact of evaluations conducted by a science policy advisory body. Scientometrics, 19(5–6), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020705Börner, K., Klavans, R., Patek, M., Zoss, A. M., Biberstine, J. R., Light, R. P., Larivière, V., & Boyack, K. W. (2012). Design and update of a classification system: The ucsd map of science. PLoS ONE, 7(7), e39464. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039464Bozeman, B., & Link, A. N. (2015). Toward an assessment of impacts from US technology and innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 42(3), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu058Brown, R. (2021). Mission-oriented or mission adrift? A critical examination of mission-oriented innovation policies. European Planning Studies, 29(4), 739–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1779189Burbano, P. P., & Cardona, M. N. (2011). Los cuellos de botella del desarrollo endógeno territorial, desde la perspectiva del sistema de ciencia, tecnología e innovación en Colombia. CTS: Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, ISSN 1668-0030, Vol. 6, No. 17, 2011, 6(17), 7. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3716768&info=resumen&idioma=ENGBush, V. (1945). Science, the endless frontier - A Report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director ofthe Office of Scientific Research and Development.Casadella, V., & Tahi, S. (2023). National Innovation Systems in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries: Re-evaluation of Indicators and Lessons for a Learning Economy in Senegal. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(3), 2107–2137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00945-8Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA). (2022). The Agreement. The Agreement. https://coara.eu/agreement/the-agreement-full-text/Cortés, J. D. (2021). Research on Innovation in China and Latin America: Bibliometric Insights in the Field of Business, Management, and Decision Sciences. Latin American Business Review, 23(2), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2021.1930551Cortés, J. D., & Andrade, D. A. (2022). The Colombian scientific elite—Science mapping and a comparison with Nobel Prize laureates using a composite citation indicator. Plos One, 17(5), e0269116. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269116Cortés, J. D., Guix, M., & Carbonell, K. B. (2021). Innovation for sustainability in the Global South: bibliometric findings from management & business and STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) fields in developing countries. Heliyon, 7(8), e07809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07809Cortés, J. D., Lin, X., & Xun, X. (2022). Research on Innovation in Business and Management about China and Latin America: Bibliometric Insights Using Google Scholar, Dimensions and Microsoft Academic. Chinese Economy, 55(3), 208–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2021.1958451Cortés, J. D., & Ramírez Cajiao, M. C. (2024). The policy is dead, long live the policy—Revealing science, technology, and innovation policy priorities and government transitions via network analysis. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(2), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00295Cortés, J. D., & Ramírez-Cajiao, M. C. (n.d.). Interweaving the Structure of Science Policy Patents Classification and National Research Fronts. Under Review.Cortés, J. D., & Ramírez-Cajiao, M. C. (2023a). The Content Structure of Science Technology and Innovation Policy — Applying co-word analysis to funding calls in Colombia. In I. Sserwanga, A. Goulding, H. Moulaison-Sandy, J. T. Du, A. L. Soares, V. Hessami, & R. D. Frank (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)2 (pp. 187–196). Springer Nature Switzerland.Cortés, J. D., & Ramírez-Cajiao, M. C. (2023b). The Content Structure of Science Technology and Innovation Policy — Applying co-word analysis to funding calls in Colombia. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)2.Cortés, J. D., & Ramírez-Cajiao, M. C. (2024a). Mapping the Inventive Structure in Middle-Low Income Countries—The Patent Network of Colombia. In l. Sserwanga et al. (Ed.), Wisdom, Well-Being, Win-Win. iConference 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 14596, pp. 131–137). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57860-1_10Cortés, J. D., & Ramírez-Cajiao, M. C. (2024b). The Missing Linkage Between Science Technology and Innovation Policy and the Scientific Workforce—Evidence from Colombia. In l. Sserwanga et al. (Ed.), Wisdom, Well-Being, Win-Win. iConference 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 14596, pp. 288–297). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57850-2_21Cortés, J. D., Robinson-García, N., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., & Ramírez-Cajiao, M. C. (2024a). Academic Age Standards Underestimate Global South Career Stages and Research Capacity Building — An Outlook of the Scientific Workforce of Colombia. Under Review.Cortés, J. D., Robinson-García, N., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., & Ramírez-Cajiao, M. C. (2024b). The Scholarly Age—Beyond the Academic Age Using Techno-Scientific, Knowledge Appropriation and Mentoring Outputs. In l. Sserwanga et al. (Ed.), Wisdom, Well-Being, Win-Win. iConference 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 14596, pp. 321–330). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57850-2_24Cortés-Sánchez, J. D. (2016). Eficiencia en el uso de bases de datos digitales para la producción científica en universidades de Colombia. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 39(2), e130. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2016.2.1320Crouch, D., Irvine, J., & Martin, B. R. (1986). Bibliometric analysis for science policy: An evaluation of the United Kingdom’s research performance in ocean currents and protein crystallography. Scientometrics, 9(5–6), 239–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017247Davis, S. W. (1989). The Impact of Funding on the Formulation of Research Policy. Accountability in Research, 1(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989628908573772DNP, 2021. (2021). Búsqueda bibliográfica. https://www.dnp.gov.co/atencion-al-ciudadano/Paginas/busqueda.aspxEbert, R. H. (1973). Biomedical Research Policy — A Re-Evaluation. New England Journal of Medicine, 289(7), 348–351. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197308162890705Edler, J., Berger, M., Dinges, M., & Gök, A. (2012a). The practice of evaluation in innovation policy in Europe. Research Evaluation, 21(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs014Edler, J., Berger, M., Dinges, M., & Gök, A. (2012b). The practice of evaluation in innovation policy in Europe. Research Evaluation, 21(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs014Fog, L. (2013). Historia social e institucional de Colciencias. In M. Salazar (Ed.), Colciencias cuarenta años: entre la legitimidad, la normatividad y la práctica (pp. 23–24). OCyT - Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Universidad del Rosario.Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., Petersen, A. M., Radicchi, F., Sinatra, R., Uzzi, B., Vespignani, A., Waltman, L., Wang, D., & Barabási, A. L. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Technology-policy-and-economic-performance-%3A-from-Freeman/2ad10ed0ed082b06eb2a9e16998d3658172fcc64Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar. (2007). Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar - 50 Años (C. Forero, Ed.). Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar.Gingras, Y. (2014). Bibliometrics and research evaluation - Uses and abuses. The MIT Press.Gök, A., & Edler, J. (2012). The use of behavioural additionality evaluation in innovation policy making. Research Evaluation, 21(4), 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs015Gök, A., Rigby, J., & Shapira, P. (2016). The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: Evidence from six smaller European countries. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 715–730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23406Hicks, D., & Isett, K. R. (2020). Powerful numbers: Exemplary quantitative studies of science that had policy impact. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 969–982. https://doi.org/10.1162/QSS_A_00060Himanen, L., Auranen, O., Puuska, H.-M., & Nieminen, M. (2009). Influence of research funding and science policy on university research performance: A comparison of five countries. Science and Public Policy, 36(6), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234209X461006Huang, Y., Glänzel, W., & Zhang, L. (2021). Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains. Scientometrics, 126(7), 6201–6224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03821-xInglesi-Lotz, R., & Pouris, A. (2011). Scientometric impact assessment of a research policy instrument: The case of rating researchers on scientific outputs in South Africa. Scientometrics, 88(3), 747–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0440-8Intarakumnerd, P., Chairatana, P., & Tangchitpiboon, T. (2002). National innovation system in less successful developing countries: the case of Thailand. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1445–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00074-4Isaksen, A., Normann, R. H., & Spilling, O. R. (2017). Do general innovation policy tools fit all? Analysis of the regional impact of the Norwegian Skattefunn scheme. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-017-0068-xIto, A., Li, Z., & Wang, M. (2017). Multi-level and Multi-route Innovation Policies in China: A Programme Evaluation Based on Firm-level Data. Millennial Asia, 8(1), 78–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399616686866Jasinski, A. H. (2003). Has innovation policy an influence on innovation? The case of a country in transition. Science and Public Policy, 30(6), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780245Katz, J. S. (2000). Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 27(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154300781782156Katz, J. S. (2016). What Is a Complex Innovation System? PLOS ONE, 11(6), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156150Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated. Universal-Publishers.Li, Y., Mao, J., Zhang, L., Wang, D., Shen, S., & Huang, Y. (2022). How scientific research incorporates policy: an examination using the case of China’s science and technology evaluation system. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04215-3Louder, E., Wyborn, C., Cvitanovic, C., & Bednarek, A. T. (2021). A synthesis of the frameworks available to guide evaluations of research impact at the interface of environmental science, policy and practice. Environmental Science and Policy, 116, 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.006Lundvall, B.-Å. (2010). Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (B.-Å. Lundvall, Ed.). Anthem Press.Martin, B. R. (2016). Twenty challenges for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv077Mazzucato, M. (2015). The Entrepreneurial State: debunking public vs. private sector myths. PublicAffairs.Mazzucato, M., & Dibb, G. (2019). Missions: A beginner’s guide.McNie, E. C., Parris, A., & Sarewitz, D. (2016). Improving the public value of science: A typology to inform discussion, design and implementation of research. Research Policy, 45(4), 884–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.004Meyer-Krahmer, F. (1984). Evaluation of Industrial Innovation Policy–Concepts, Methods and Lessons. Review of Policy Research, 3(3–4), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00142.xMinCiencias. (2022). Plan de convocatorias ASCTeI 2023-2024 | Minciencias. https://minciencias.gov.co/plan-convocatorias-asctei-2023-2024MinCiencias. (2023). La Ciencia en Cifras. https://minciencias.gov.co/la-ciencia-en-cifrasNalimov, V. V. (1966). Kolichestvennye metody issledovaniya protsesa razvitiya nauki (Quantitative methods of research of scientific evolution). Voprosy Filisofii, 12, 38–47.Nalimov, V. V, & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Наукометрия, Изучение развития Hауки как информационного процесса [Naukometriya, the Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process] (en Ruso). Nauka.Neal, H., Smith, T., & McCormick, J. (2008). Beyond Sputnik - U.S. Science Policy in the Twenty-First Century. In Beyond Sputnik. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/MPUB.22958Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología-OCyT, & OCyT. (2021). Atlas del Conocimiento. https://atlasdelconocimiento.ocyt.org.co/general/OCyT. (2020). Tableros CTeI 2020 – Portal de datos 2021. Tablero de Indicadores. https://portal.ocyt.org.co/tableros-ctei-2020/Papon, P. (1979). Centres of decision in french science policy: The contrasting influences of scientific experts and administrators. Research Policy, 8(4), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(79)90004-0Pardo Martínez, C. I., & Cotte Poveda, A. (2021a). Science, technology, innovation, theory and evidence: the new institutionality in Colombia. Quality and Quantity, 55(3), 845–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11135-020-01032-3/TABLES/11Pardo Martínez, C. I., & Cotte Poveda, A. (2021b). Science, technology, innovation, theory and evidence: the new institutionality in Colombia. Quality and Quantity, 55(3), 845–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11135-020-01032-3/TABLES/11Pianta, M., & Sirilli, G. (1997). Impact of innovation policies: Evidence from the Italian innovation survey. Science and Public Policy, 24(4), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/24.4.245Pohoryles, R. J. (2006). Innocult revisited: The impact of EU research programmes on national research policies, key actors and research collaboration. Innovation, 19(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610600607999Rigby, J. (2011a). Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: New dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation. Research Evaluation, 20(5), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X13164389670392Rigby, J. (2011b). Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: New dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation. Research Evaluation, 20(5), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X13164389670392Rodríguez-Navarro, A., & Brito, R. (2022). The link between countries’ economic and scientific wealth has a complex dependence on technological activity and research policy. Scientometrics, 127(5), 2871–2896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04313-wRousseau, R. (2021). Naukometriya, Nalimov and Mul’chenko. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management , 15(1), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2021.1943042Salazar, M. (2017). The Colombian system of science, technology and innovation in transition: how governance is being affected. In Research Handbook on Innovation Governance for Emerging Economies. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471911.00015Samara, E., Georgiadis, P., & Bakouros, I. (2012). The impact of innovation policies on the performance of national innovation systems: A system dynamics analysis. Technovation, 32(11), 624–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.06.002Schnellenbach, J. (2024). A Behavioral Economics Perspective on the Entrepreneurial State and Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy. In M. Henrekson, C. Sandström, & M. Stenkula (Eds.), Moonshots and the New Industrial Policy: Questioning the Mission Economy (pp. 61–76). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49196-2_4SCImago. (2020). SJR - International Science Ranking. https://bit.ly/3Ih0qMaScopus. (2022). Scopus - Document search. https://bit.ly/3KhKoDnShibayama, S., & Baba, Y. (2015). Impact-oriented science policies and scientific publication practices: The case of life sciences in Japan. Research Policy, 44(4), 936–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.012Shiffrin, R. M., & Börner, K. (2004). Mapping knowledge domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(SUPPL. 1), 5183–5185. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307852100Svarc, J., Laznjak, J., & Perkovic, J. (2011). Unintended consequences of innovation policy programmes: Social evaluation of the technological projects programme in Croatia. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 13(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2011.13.1.77Tenner, E. (2018). The Efficiency Paradox: What Big Data Can’t Do. Knopf.The World Bank. (2022). DataBank. DataBank. https://databank.worldbank.org/home.aspxThe World Bank - Data. (2021). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) . https://bit.ly/3qzhwiaTorregrosa-Hetland, S., Pelkonen, A., Oksanen, J., & Kander, A. (2019). The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013. Research Policy, 48(6), 1373–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.001UNESCO. (2010). National science, technology and innovation systems in Latin America and the Caribbean (G. A. Lemarchand, Ed.). UNESCO Office Montevideo.UNESCO. (2015). UNESCO science report: towards 2030. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000235406Vasen, F., Sarthou, N. F., Romano, S. A., Gutiérrez, B. D., & Pintos, M. (2023). Turning academics into researchers: The development of National Researcher Categorization Systems in Latin America. Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1093/RESEVAL/RVAD021Villaveces, J. L., & Forero-Pineda, C. (2007). Cincuenta años de ciencia en Colombia. In C. Forero-Pineda (Ed.), Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar - 50 Años2 (pp. 97–133). Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar.WIPO. (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023. Global Innovation Index - Colombia. https://www.wipo.int/gii-ranking/en/colombia200612468Publicationcfcbb0cd-ae46-4ca7-ae39-d28f80f03f73virtual::23879-1cfcbb0cd-ae46-4ca7-ae39-d28f80f03f73virtual::23879-168bc76e3-56f4-4749-ad9c-44183b982dc1virtual::23880-168bc76e3-56f4-4749-ad9c-44183b982dc1virtual::23880-1https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000104086virtual::23879-1https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001422815virtual::23880-1LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82535https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/ce0b5171-771f-4258-98b2-e0835bc9dfc4/downloadae9e573a68e7f92501b6913cc846c39fMD51ORIGINALStructure st&p in colombia.pdfStructure st&p in colombia.pdfapplication/pdf2266831https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/7ad97ce6-a57d-4995-b6f3-260a222dc2d2/download6a8910a0623fc917cb0a1b5823dab707MD52sm_chapter 1.pdfsm_chapter 1.pdfapplication/pdf558290https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/d89668fe-9464-454f-ba30-eb17630932e0/download3e4af58992c19d09ce4f99fb9bcc3b60MD55sm_chapter 2.pdfsm_chapter 2.pdfapplication/pdf916730https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/ae654bcf-5f6c-4478-ab31-1d25a129dfd5/downloadf5ad5ad0877b358a094d7bb5c72c7898MD56sm_chapter 3.pdfsm_chapter 3.pdfapplication/pdf1006870https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/28fcc114-e902-437f-ae37-5dac538b130d/download3f2b5fc658d3b1d084293a6ad27c69a1MD57sm_chapter 4.pdfsm_chapter 4.pdfapplication/pdf365845https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/c0b73443-a504-4e9b-8591-2d2950572c53/download75fde4bcef22989b375b7591bf9191bfMD58sm_chapter 5.pdfsm_chapter 5.pdfapplication/pdf461158https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/0bc0eae4-670e-4925-91ff-cc876a8346ce/downloadedd6a04bfd48d7f20bd0d6b62f0982bfMD59sm_chapter 6.pdfsm_chapter 6.pdfapplication/pdf538300https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/4d86cb7e-e191-4253-8e7e-f48a2ff2fed7/download7305e4b90d964cf848579215054c2e28MD510sm_chapter 7.pdfsm_chapter 7.pdfapplication/pdf1539679https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/5613146f-53c7-4cfe-a4ee-d3231a89dbd3/download7028cb0297ad4b40741ea64721c40492MD511sm_chapter 8.pdfsm_chapter 8.pdfapplication/pdf860733https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/71689dc0-ee58-4e03-96b4-fc77c145e36a/downloadd277de11c689beac4de89f7977fab290MD512Autorización Cortés Sánchez.pdfAutorización Cortés Sánchez.pdfHIDEapplication/pdf273640https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/0b0782bb-b58c-41ef-847b-5b1964f0207e/download99582bd4d8d64c3c9b4853c56394071fMD513CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/e9c261e6-3c82-4d90-a047-c91b0a573a81/download4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD53TEXTStructure st&p in colombia.pdf.txtStructure st&p in colombia.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain100658https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/5c3c8ce1-8439-4c8d-be6c-a9660ab756ac/download072186d1775a8c750cfb5eedb1dad187MD514sm_chapter 1.pdf.txtsm_chapter 1.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain27108https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/b1074868-9be8-40e4-8f45-81942f93cba2/downloadd558bd52439a207cbf466e4b48a1ddfbMD516sm_chapter 2.pdf.txtsm_chapter 2.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain54258https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/51651f31-ae5f-4ad2-8d06-8258cdcb9118/downloada69a0d97a38c6151517010e0ef4bcccfMD518sm_chapter 3.pdf.txtsm_chapter 3.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain73695https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/e11a6ce0-e292-416e-9b76-5ced54dd37b6/downloadf2af50f7dd14ac5a5c6d8aab97c1b14bMD520sm_chapter 4.pdf.txtsm_chapter 4.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain26221https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/7975fd55-a7bc-4ae6-a49b-69e0c796571d/download8a917a1ae65f61288290944b80cbea91MD522sm_chapter 5.pdf.txtsm_chapter 5.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain24836https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/1dcafa5b-d48e-4f0d-bc59-89fb7d94241e/download278424fb28531172cee9e2b1ba4f1355MD524sm_chapter 6.pdf.txtsm_chapter 6.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain16789https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/1ddeac6b-d618-4137-8382-12e948951153/downloadd7aee75b643f2b775d15b143ce6ad0a1MD526sm_chapter 7.pdf.txtsm_chapter 7.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain54307https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/d0976eb0-e9b5-4ff4-b2f6-0dc2ff60eaf9/download2d866c0e4b8c3f8179766b2c23ef48e7MD528sm_chapter 8.pdf.txtsm_chapter 8.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain27813https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/d33e88c4-e6ad-4271-96fd-9e1956017157/downloade38129657cbec86b92cf2f1acaa01e5dMD530Autorización Cortés Sánchez.pdf.txtAutorización Cortés Sánchez.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain2041https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/c5d020fd-b0e4-475b-a882-288f6149285c/download7a7c61dbbee40ccb02cb9d5d2275a32dMD532THUMBNAILStructure st&p in colombia.pdf.jpgStructure st&p in colombia.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg6245https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/60314352-68b0-45d6-9f98-caa522c66d56/download5a00e3f5411794ea2ed1e61c5a6718d3MD515sm_chapter 1.pdf.jpgsm_chapter 1.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg9448https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/2af53e3e-840e-4fe3-84c2-4cd6f1c88f7d/download0a9295e0b320f1e0d680a044df31abc5MD517sm_chapter 2.pdf.jpgsm_chapter 2.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg13041https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/2d532c98-a3d4-46e1-b10c-35e8d4db9276/downloadf1a71b1dcc10323f7b687549e0021fa4MD519sm_chapter 3.pdf.jpgsm_chapter 3.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg9891https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/4cffd7ae-ae5d-4a49-b1c5-503640f507f0/download8d3a29fece7438c60f530421e702c80eMD521sm_chapter 4.pdf.jpgsm_chapter 4.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg9929https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/6a476bcd-9283-454d-9f98-678e8d814f6e/download7f414ccfc4293244d2e2c4cb9663193eMD523sm_chapter 5.pdf.jpgsm_chapter 5.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg8715https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/f7b12e02-e1ac-463e-9449-5d0416a02ed1/downloadfd4598921824f0669d3ecc2078a06ce0MD525sm_chapter 6.pdf.jpgsm_chapter 6.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg9921https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/553eaaaa-af4b-4d79-a560-7385b8f8090b/downloadba76c8a6d5b214199311145594c3f6b5MD527sm_chapter 7.pdf.jpgsm_chapter 7.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg12438https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/e622e8dd-463a-47cf-879b-ca4af806b94c/downloadfb30bfa97e31efdd821af2d89ba55392MD529sm_chapter 8.pdf.jpgsm_chapter 8.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg9978https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/ac6f0bb2-969f-4573-84de-df2d3f877c2a/download6e53ea8288e4062f4ff4e75c9d5d4541MD531Autorización Cortés Sánchez.pdf.jpgAutorización Cortés Sánchez.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg11330https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/1e80c2c9-9b8c-4af8-a871-3d78247d2e1a/downloadedb9de76b892ea6bcd4a025945eff9a0MD5331992/76031oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/760312025-03-05 10:11:30.221http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.uniandes.edu.coRepositorio institucional Sénecaadminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.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

Publicaciones similares