Explorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sostenibles

El interés por la sostenibilidad en la investigación del consumidor ha crecido significativamente, destacando dos áreas clave: el consumo basado en acceso y el anti-consumo. Aunque se han exploradas principalmente por separado, este estudio examina su relación a través de una revisión sistemática de...

Full description

Autores:
Rosales Díaz, Daniela Andrea
Tipo de recurso:
Doctoral thesis
Fecha de publicación:
2024
Institución:
Universidad de los Andes
Repositorio:
Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/75775
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/1992/75775
Palabra clave:
Consumo sostenible
Anti-consumo
Consumo basado en acceso
Administración
Rights
openAccess
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
id UNIANDES2_21767c28d1cdc1be7f7f94459c58b2ef
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/75775
network_acronym_str UNIANDES2
network_name_str Séneca: repositorio Uniandes
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Explorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sostenibles
title Explorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sostenibles
spellingShingle Explorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sostenibles
Consumo sostenible
Anti-consumo
Consumo basado en acceso
Administración
title_short Explorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sostenibles
title_full Explorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sostenibles
title_fullStr Explorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sostenibles
title_full_unstemmed Explorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sostenibles
title_sort Explorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sostenibles
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Rosales Díaz, Daniela Andrea
dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv Trujillo Valencia, Carlos Andrés
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Rosales Díaz, Daniela Andrea
dc.contributor.jury.none.fl_str_mv Moros Cañon, Lina Maria
Carrero Bosch, Isabel
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv Consumo sostenible
topic Consumo sostenible
Anti-consumo
Consumo basado en acceso
Administración
dc.subject.keyword.none.fl_str_mv Anti-consumo
Consumo basado en acceso
dc.subject.themes.spa.fl_str_mv Administración
description El interés por la sostenibilidad en la investigación del consumidor ha crecido significativamente, destacando dos áreas clave: el consumo basado en acceso y el anti-consumo. Aunque se han exploradas principalmente por separado, este estudio examina su relación a través de una revisión sistemática de la literatura con el desarrollo de un marco integrado que esclarece su relación. Para profundizar en esta conexión, se presenta el desarrollo y validación de una escala de anti-consumo orientado al ambiente (EOA), diseñada para medir comportamientos de reducción de consumo con motivaciones ambientales. Mediante análisis factoriales exploratorios y confirmatorios, la escala se estructuró en cuatro dimensiones, diferenciándose de otros estilos de anti-consumo como la frugalidad, la simplificación voluntaria y el minimalismo. Además, se llevó a cabo un análisis experimental para distinguir entre el EOA y el anti-consumo impulsado por motivaciones personales (PMA), explorando su impacto en la preferencia por el consumo basado en acceso y la elección de servicios sostenibles. Se evaluó el papel del mindfulness y el enfoque de presentación del servicio como moderadores en esta relación. Los hallazgos resaltan la importancia de considerar las diversas motivaciones detrás del anti-consumo y su influencia en comportamientos de consumo sostenible, ofreciendo nuevas perspectivas teóricas y recomendaciones para futuras investigaciones.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2024-12-10
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2025-01-29T15:52:36Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2025-01-29T15:52:36Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Trabajo de grado - Doctorado
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.content.none.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TD
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1992/75775
dc.identifier.instname.none.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad de los Andes
dc.identifier.reponame.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/
url https://hdl.handle.net/1992/75775
identifier_str_mv instname:Universidad de los Andes
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca
repourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv Agarwal, R. (2013). Anti-consumption: A literature review. http://vslir.iima.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/11718/11488
Amasawa, E., Shibata, T., Sugiyama, H., & Hirao, M. (2020). Environmental potential of reusing, renting, and sharing consumer products: Systematic analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118487. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.118487
Amel, E. L., Manning, C. M., & Scott, B. A. (2009). Mindfulness and sustainable behavior: Pondering attention and awareness as means for increasing green behavior. Ecopsychology, 1(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1089/ECO.2008.0005
Arekrans, J., Sopjani, L., Laurenti, R., & Ritzén, S. (2022). Barriers to access-based consumption in the circular transition: A systematic review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 184, 106364. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2022.106364
Baer, R. A., Walsh, E., & Lykins, E. L. B. (2009). Assessment of mindfulness. Clinical Handbook of Mindfulness, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09593-6_10
Baer, R., Smith, G., Assessment, K. A.-, & 2004, undefined. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Journals.Sagepub.ComRA Baer, GT Smith, KB AllenAssessment, 2004•journals.Sagepub.Com, 11(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104268029
Balderjahn, I., Peyer, M., Seegebarth, B., Wiedmann, K. P., & Weber, A. (2018). The many faces of sustainability-conscious consumers: A category-independent typology. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318302583
Bardhi F, & Eckhardt G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881–898. https://doi.org/10.1086/66
Basci, E. (2014). A revisited concept of anti-consumption for marketing. Academia.Edu, 5(7). https://www.academia.edu/download/49034543/A_revisited_concept_of_anti-consumption_for_marketing.pdf
Battle, A., Ryding, D., & Henninger, C. E. (2018). Access-Based Consumption: A New Business Model for Luxury and Secondhand Fashion Business? Palgrave Advances in Luxury, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71985-6_3/COVER
Baumeister, C., & Wangenheim, F. V. (2014). Access vs. Ownership: Understanding Consumers’ Consumption Mode Preference. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2463076
Black, I. (2010). Sustainability through anti-consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/CB.340
Black, I., & Cherrier, H. (2010). Anti‐consumption as part of living a sustainable lifestyle: Daily practices, contextual motivations and subjective values. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.337
Bollen, K. (2014). Structural equations with latent variables. https://books.google.com/books?hl=es&lr=&id=DPBjBAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Kenneth+A.+Bollen.+Su+libro+%22Structural+Equations+with+Latent+Variables%22+(1989)&ots=JPs8Z4a-1T&sig=PY9afdYtTYx-mLWcUJ0h99ZmNSM
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11205-004-8207-8
Buenstorf, G., & Cordes, C. (2007). Can sustainable consumption be learned? https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/31843
Chang, H. H. (2021). Exploring consumer behavioral predispositions toward voluntary simplicity. Current Psychology, 40(2), 731–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-018-9994-4/METRICS
Chatzidakis, A., & Lee, M. S. W. (2012). Anti-Consumption as the Study of Reasons against. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/0276146712462892, 33(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146712462892
Cherrier, H., Black, I. R., & Lee, M. (2011). Intentional non-consumption for sustainability: Consumer resistance and/or anti-consumption? European Journal of Marketing, 45(11), 1757–1767. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111167397
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Dassopoulos, A. (2015). Anti-Consumption Tactics. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Consumption and Consumer Studies, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118989463.WBECCS006
Eckhardt, G. M., & Bardhi, F. (2016). The Relationship between Access Practices and Economic Systems. Https://Doi.Org/10.1086/684684, 1(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1086/684684
Edbring, E., Lehner, M., & Mont, O. (2016). Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: motivations and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2015.10.107
Fishman, E., Washington, S., & Haworth, N. (2014). Bike share’s impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 31, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2014.05.013
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Garcia de Frutos, N., Ortega-Egea, J. M., & Martínez-del-Río, J. (2015). Anti-Consumption for Environmental Sustainability: Review and Multilevel Research Directions. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015(1), 16304. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2015.16304ABSTRACT
García-de-Frutos, Ortega-Egea, & Martínez-del-Río. (2018). Anti-consumption for Environmental Sustainability: Conceptualization, Review, and Multilevel Research Directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-016-3023-Z
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378802500207
Gregory, H. (2023). Our Accumulation Addiction: The Harm of Overconsumption and Rehabilitation Treatments for our Minds and the Environment. https://digitalcommons.slc.edu/undergrad_selectedworks/16/
Grimshorn, C., Jordan, M., Klasson, M., & Bertilsson, J. (2015). Ownership-a challenged Consumer Ideal.
Gruen, A. (2017). Design and the creation of meaningful consumption practices in access-based consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(3–4), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1229688
Haider, M., Shannon, R., & Moschis, G. P. (2022). Sustainable Consumption Research and the Role of Marketing: A Review of the Literature (1976–2021). Sustainability , 14(7), 3999. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14073999
Helm, S., & Subramaniam, B. (2019). Exploring Socio-Cognitive Mindfulness in the Context of Sustainable Consumption. Sustainability 2019, Vol. 11, Page 3692, 11(13), 3692. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11133692
Henninger, C. E., Brydges, T., Iran, S., & Vladimirova, K. (2021). Collaborative fashion consumption – A synthesis and future research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319, 128648. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.128648
Heyman, G. M. (2023). Overconsumption as a function of how individuals make choices: A paper in honor of Howard Rachlin’s contributions to psychology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 119(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/JEAB.821
Höpfl, L., Grimlitza, M., Lang, I., & Wirzberger, M. (2024). Promoting sustainable behavior: addressing user clusters through targeted incentives. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2024 11:1, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03581-6
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/met/3/4/424/
Hüttel, A., Ziesemer, F., Peyer, M., & Balderjahn, I. (2018). To purchase or not? Why consumers make economically (non-)sustainable consumption choices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 827–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.11.019
Hutter, K., & Hoffmann, S. (2013). Carrotmob and Anti-consumption: Same Motives but Different Willingness to Make Sacrifices? Journal of Macromarketing, 33(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146712470457
Iyer, R., & JA Muncy, J. (2009). Purpose and object of anti-consumption. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 160–168. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296308000386
Jang, Bae, & Kim. (2021). Servitization experience measurement and the effect of servitization experience on brand resonance and customer retention. Journal of Business Research, 130, 384–397. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296320301764?casa_token=afQVNtaJb0gAAAAA:S2xDhGzUwFoQHK3uOUTqco3rSuWhUHi06PVEXwi6WH-PyOnJ0pU_Ygam1TV496PfTjFcwhnljMA
Ji, T., Li, K., Sun, Q., & Duan, Z. (2024). Urban transport emission prediction analysis through machine learning and deep learning techniques. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 135, 104389. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2024.104389
Jovic, E., Jacob, J., Emily, A. E., Ae, J., & Brinkerhoff, M. B. (2009). well-being: Mindfulness meditation, pro-environmental behavior and personal quality of life in a survey from the social justice and ecological sustainability movement. Springer, 93(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9308-6
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2013). Full catastrophe living, revised edition: how to cope with stress, pain and illness using mindfulness meditation. https://books.google.com/books?hl=es&lr=&id=iedJAAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT14&dq=Kabat-Zinn,+2013&ots=j_5FrCCxIB&sig=s8fvRDgYX00mJ1PU0j9_FU24nJ8
Kabra, A., Belavina, E., & Girotra, K. (2019). Bike-Share Systems: Accessibility and Availability. Management Science, 66(9), 3803–3824. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.2019.3407
Kadel, L. (2021). Mindfulness for sustainable consumption behaviour - inisghts into consumer culture. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-445547
Karjalainen, L. E., & Juhola, S. (2021). Urban transportation sustainability assessments: a systematic review of literature. Transport Reviews, 41(5), 659–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1879309
Khan, J., & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2019). Factors explaining shared clothes consumption in China: Individual benefit or planet concern? International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 24(4), e1652. https://doi.org/10.1002/NVSM.1652
Khaw-Ngern, K., Klomkul, L., Peuchthonglang, P., & Khaw-Ngern, C. (2021). Consumption based on Mindful Mindset: A Solution to Plastic Pollution. PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 58(1), 1393–1398. www.psychologyandeducation.net
Kjellberg, H. (2008). Market practices and over‐consumption. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 11(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253860802033688
Koning, J. de, Lavanga, M., & Spekkink, W. (2024). Exploring the clothing overconsumption of young adults: An experimental study with communication interventions. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624024193
Kraus, L., Proff, H., Doi, K., & Fillone, A. M. (2021). Sustainable Urban Transportation Criteria and Measurement—A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 7113, 13(13), 7113. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13137113
Kropfeld, M., Nepomuceno, M., & Dantas DC. (2018). The ecological impact of anticonsumption lifestyles and environmental concern. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 37(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618810448
Kuanr, A., Pradhan, D., & Chaudhuri, H. R. (2020). I (do not) consume; therefore, I am: Investigating materialism and voluntary simplicity through a moderated mediation model. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/MAR.21305
Lang, C. (2018). Perceived risks and enjoyment of access-based consumption: identifying barriers and motivations to fashion renting. Fashion and Textiles, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40691-018-0139-Z/FIGURES/1
Lang, C., & Joyner Armstrong, C. M. (2018). Collaborative consumption: The influence of fashion leadership, need for uniqueness, and materialism on female consumers’ adoption of clothing renting and swapping. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 13, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2017.11.005
Lastovicka, Bettencourt, Hughner, & Kuntze. (1999). Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: Theory and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 85–98. https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article-abstract/26/1/85/1916418
Lawson, S. J., Gleim, M. R., Perren, R., & Hwang, J. (2016). Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2615–2623. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2016.04.021
Lee, H. J. (2019). The effect of anti-consumption lifestyle on consumer’s attitude and purchase intention toward commercial sharing systems. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(5), 1422–1441. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-06-2018-0218/FULL/XML
Lee, J., & Haley, E. (2022). Green consumer segmentation: consumer motivations for purchasing pro-environmental products. International Journal of Advertising, 41(8), 1477–1501. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2022.2038431
Lee, M. S. (2022). Anti-consumption research: A foundational and contemporary overview. Current Opinion in Psychology, , 45, 101319.
Lee, M. S. W., Dewhirst, T., & Cherrier, H. (2018). Introduction to the Special Section: The Domain and Intersection of Anticonsumption, Marketing, and Public Policy. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 37(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618811852/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_0743915618811852-FIG2.JPEG
Lee, S. H. N., & Chow, P. S. (2020). Investigating consumer attitudes and intentions toward online fashion renting retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101892. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2019.101892
Leider, S., & Şahin, Ö. (2014). Contracts, Biases, and Consumption of Access Services. Https://Doi.Org/10.1287/Mnsc.2013.1889, 60(9), 2198–2222. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.2013.1889
Li, D., & Atkinson, L. (2020). The role of psychological ownership in consumer happiness. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(6), 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-09-2019-3420/FULL/XML
Lim, W. M. (2017). Inside the sustainable consumption theoretical toolbox: Critical concepts for sustainability, consumption, and marketing. Journal of Business Research.
Lučić, A., & Uzelac, M. (2024). Addressing global overconsumption: positioning the anti-consumption through communication appeals. Corporate Communications, 29(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-08-2023-0114/FULL/HTML
Makri, K., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Mai, R., & Dinhof, K. (2020). What we know about anticonsumption: An attempt to nail jelly to the wall. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 177–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/MAR.21319
Malik, F., & Ishaq, M. I. (2023). Impact of minimalist practices on consumer happiness and financial well-being. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, 103333. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2023.103333
Marlatt, G. A., & Kristeller, J. L. (1999). Mindfulness and meditation. American Psychological Association, 67. https://doi.org/10.1037/10327-004
Meissner, M. (2019). Against accumulation: lifestyle minimalism, de-growth and the present post-ecological condition. Journal of Cultural Economy, 12(3), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2019.1570962
Milne, G. R., Villarroel Ordenes, F., & Kaplan, B. (2020). Mindful Consumption: Three Consumer Segment Views. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUSMJ.2019.09.003
Mu, X., & Li, C. (2021). Research on Clothing Rental Model under Sharing Economy. E3S Web of Conferences, 253, 01075. https://doi.org/10.1051/E3SCONF/202125301075
Nawaz, S., Jiang, Y., Nawaz, M. Z., Manzoor, S. F., & Zhang, R. (2021). Mindful Consumption, Ego-Involvement, and Social Norms Impact on Buying SHC: Role of Platform Trust and Impulsive Buying Tendency. SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211056621/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_21582440211056621-FIG2.JPEG
Nepomuceno, M., & Laroche, M. (2016). Do I fear death? The effects of mortality salience on anti‐consumption lifestyles. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 50(1), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12100
Nicolae, C.-A. (2024). Understanding sustainable purchasing behavior in Romania: Drivers, barriers, and environmental participation. Management & Marketing, 19(2), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2024-0016
Nie, X., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Janakiraman, N. (2022). How Does Global–Local Identity Affect Consumer Preference for Access-Based Consumption? Investigating the Mediating Role of Consumption Openness. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/00222437211055130, 59(3), 555–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437211055130
Nijland, & Van Meerkerk. (2017). Mobility and environmental impacts of car sharing in the Netherlands. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIST.2017.02.001
Noland, R. B., Smart, M. J., & Guo, Z. (2016). Bikeshare trip generation in New York City. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2016.08.030
Ortega Egea, J. M., García De Frutos, N., Manuel, J., & Egea, O. (2020). Behavioral prediction of environmentally oriented anticonsumption and consumption: A multilevel study of five Eurobarometer surveys. Wiley Online LibraryJM Ortega Egea, N Garcia de FrutosPsychology & Marketing, 2020•Wiley Online Library, 37(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21302
Ozanne, L. K., & Ballantine, P. W. (2010). Sharing as a form of anti-consumption? An examination of toy library users. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/CB.334
Philp, M., & Nepomuceno, M. V. (2020). When the frugal become wasteful: An examination into how impression management can initiate the end‐stages of consumption for frugal consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21303
Poppelaars, F., Bakker, C., & van Engelen, J. (2018). Does Access Trump Ownership? Exploring Consumer Acceptance of Access-Based Consumption in the Case of Smartphones. Sustainability 2018, Vol. 10, Page 2133, 10(7), 2133. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10072133
Pradhan, B., Kishore, K., & Gokhale, N. (2023). Social media influencers and consumer engagement: A review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(6), 2106–2130. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJCS.12901
Reyes-Rubiano, L., Serrano-Hernandez, A., Montoya-Torres, J. R., & Faulin, J. (2021). The Sustainability Dimensions in Intelligent Urban Transportation: A Paradigm for Smart Cities. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 10653, 13(19), 10653. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU131910653
Ryu, H., Basu, M., & Saito, O. (2019). What and how are we sharing? A systematic review of the sharing paradigm and practices. Sustainability Science, 14(2), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-018-0638-2/TABLES/2
Seegebarth, B., Peyer, M., Balderjahn, I., & Wiedmann K. (2015). The sustainability roots of anticonsumption lifestyles and initial insights regarding their effects on consumers’ well‐being. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 50(1), 68–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12077
Shafqat, T., Ishaq, M. I., & Ahmed, A. (2023). Fashion consumption using minimalism: Exploring the relationship of consumer well-being and social connectedness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 71, 103215. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2022.103215
Shah, K. J., Pan, S. Y., Lee, I., Kim, H., You, Z., Zheng, J. M., & Chiang, P. C. (2021). Green transportation for sustainability: Review of current barriers, strategies, and innovative technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 326, 129392. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.129392
Sheth, J., Sethia, N., & 2011. (2011). Mindful consumption: a customer-centric approach to sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 21-39., 39(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0216-3
Strähle, J., & Erhardt, C. (2017). Collaborative Consumption 2.0: An Alternative to Fast Fashion Consumption. Green Fashion Retail, 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2440-5_8
Szamatowicz, M., & Paundra, J. (2019). Access or Ownership? The effect of car attributes and collective Access or Ownership? The effect of car attributes and collective psychological ownership on the preference for car subscription psychological ownership on the preference for car subscription services services. Psychological Research on Urban Society, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v2i1.44
Teixeira, I. P. (2023). The connection between mindfulness, sustainable consumption and consumer well-being. https://comum.rcaap.pt/handle/10400.26/45185
Tukker, & Tischner. (2006). Product-services as a research field: past, present and future. Reflections from a decade of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(17), 1552–1556. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652606000862?casa_token=9Mm3CaBpgCsAAAAA:aNyOVGiu-X5SuolPIYSsAJXnlkxJFNeIDagyjZ6YNsBkmmQyRbTYfTyqN_hZbBCSRYagdEhfyVk
Tunn, V. S. C., Fokker, R., Luijkx, K. A., De Jong, S. A. M., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2019). Making ours mine: Increasing consumer acceptance of access-based PSS through temporary product customisation. Sustainability, 44(1), 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010274
Van Den Berge, Magnier, & Mugge. (2021). Too good to go? Consumers’ replacement behaviour and potential strategies for stimulating product retention. Current Opinion in Psychology, 39, 66–71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X20301226
Vedolin, L. (2023). Mindfulness and Consumption: Routes Toward Consumer Self-Control [Copenhagen Business School]. https://doi.org/10.22439/PHD.25.2023
Vesterinen, & Syrjälä. (2022). Sustainable anti-consumption of clothing: A systematic literature review. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 100061. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784322000158
Vladimirova, K. (2021). Consumption corridors in fashion: deliberations on upper consumption limits in minimalist fashion challenges. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1891673
Webster. (1975). Determining the characteristics of the socially conscious consumer. Journal of Consumer Research. https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article-abstract/2/3/188/1785204
Wei, X., Lo, C. K. Y., Jung, S., & Choi, T. M. (2021). From co-consumption to co-production: A systematic review and research synthesis of collaborative consumption practices. Journal of Business Research, 129, 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.02.027
Whittaker, T. A. (2012). Using the Modification Index and Standardized Expected Parameter Change for Model Modification. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2010.531299
Wilson, A. V., & Bellezza, S. (2022). Consumer Minimalism. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 796–816. https://doi.org/10.1093/JCR/UCAB038
Xu, R., Zurich, E., & Ilic, A. (2014). Product as a service: Enabling physical products as service end-points. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Runhua-Xu-2/publication/281865585_Product_as_a_Service_Enabling_Physical_Products_as_Service_End-Points/links/56438aac08ae451880a348af/Product-as-a-Service-Enabling-Physical-Products-as-Service-End-Points.pdf
Yan, R. N., Diddi, S., & Bloodhart, B. (2021). Predicting clothing disposal: The moderating roles of clothing sustainability knowledge and self-enhancement values. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 3, 100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLRC.2021.100029
Yiğit, M. K. (2020). Consumer mindfulness and impulse buying behavior: testing moderator effects of hedonic shopping value and mood. Innovative Marketing, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.21511/im.16(4).2020.03
Zavestoski, S. (2001). Environmental concern and anti-consumerism in the self-concept: Do they share the same basis? Exploring Sustainable Consumption, 173–189. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080439204500136
Zheng, F., Gu, F., Zhang, W., & Guo, J. (2019). Is Bicycle Sharing an Environmental Practice? Evidence from a Life Cycle Assessment Based on Behavioral Surveys. Sustainability 2019, Vol. 11, Page 1550, 11(6), 1550. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11061550
Ziesemer, F., Hüttel, A., & Balderjahn, I. (2021). Young people as drivers or inhibitors of the sustainability movement: The case of anti-consumption. Journal of Consumer Policy, 44(3), 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-021-09489-x
dc.rights.en.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv 210 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de los Andes
dc.publisher.program.none.fl_str_mv Doctorado en Administración
dc.publisher.faculty.none.fl_str_mv Facultad de Administración
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de los Andes
institution Universidad de los Andes
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/48c0b70a-b658-4419-9ca1-061d1b2cfd5a/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/c7943ffb-a8d1-43a0-a23b-9eb2181461df/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/a288c1fe-8295-408a-a104-4f025cd3897e/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/1fb3e1aa-cbce-422e-9818-ae290c5e2082/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/f031e8fc-b17f-49ba-bac5-77799b9df951/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/47684c80-0a17-4eb6-8b01-c35f1e25fb4d/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/a1dcc05e-f902-483b-b658-8a0d54b2acc6/download
https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/bad62e8a-2317-4eee-83cf-ee13deacf1fc/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ae9e573a68e7f92501b6913cc846c39f
80dd9eb814351f72c2595ae2e33239f3
f25c782b2f4823686b43a0bf038e7008
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
b190cad08bacfa3a9f850a3453add6fe
052d18d9489cde6408cdc318bb0b9275
c51f10c207180585a460a4f4dbe831e6
d56e0824c37e025805c1742696bdea2b
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional Séneca
repository.mail.fl_str_mv adminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.co
_version_ 1828159172837900288
spelling Trujillo Valencia, Carlos Andrésvirtual::22771-1Rosales Díaz, Daniela AndreaMoros Cañon, Lina Mariavirtual::22772-1Carrero Bosch, Isabel2025-01-29T15:52:36Z2025-01-29T15:52:36Z2024-12-10https://hdl.handle.net/1992/75775instname:Universidad de los Andesreponame:Repositorio Institucional Sénecarepourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/El interés por la sostenibilidad en la investigación del consumidor ha crecido significativamente, destacando dos áreas clave: el consumo basado en acceso y el anti-consumo. Aunque se han exploradas principalmente por separado, este estudio examina su relación a través de una revisión sistemática de la literatura con el desarrollo de un marco integrado que esclarece su relación. Para profundizar en esta conexión, se presenta el desarrollo y validación de una escala de anti-consumo orientado al ambiente (EOA), diseñada para medir comportamientos de reducción de consumo con motivaciones ambientales. Mediante análisis factoriales exploratorios y confirmatorios, la escala se estructuró en cuatro dimensiones, diferenciándose de otros estilos de anti-consumo como la frugalidad, la simplificación voluntaria y el minimalismo. Además, se llevó a cabo un análisis experimental para distinguir entre el EOA y el anti-consumo impulsado por motivaciones personales (PMA), explorando su impacto en la preferencia por el consumo basado en acceso y la elección de servicios sostenibles. Se evaluó el papel del mindfulness y el enfoque de presentación del servicio como moderadores en esta relación. Los hallazgos resaltan la importancia de considerar las diversas motivaciones detrás del anti-consumo y su influencia en comportamientos de consumo sostenible, ofreciendo nuevas perspectivas teóricas y recomendaciones para futuras investigaciones.Fundación Ceiba "PARA LA FORMACIÓN DEL TALENTO HUMANO DE ALTO NIVEL PARA EL FORTALECIMIENTO DE NECESIDADES ESTRATÉGICAS DE CTEI DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE NARIÑO"Doctorado210 páginasapplication/pdfspaUniversidad de los AndesDoctorado en AdministraciónFacultad de AdministraciónAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Explorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sosteniblesTrabajo de grado - Doctoradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06Texthttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TDConsumo sostenibleAnti-consumoConsumo basado en accesoAdministraciónAgarwal, R. (2013). Anti-consumption: A literature review. http://vslir.iima.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/11718/11488Amasawa, E., Shibata, T., Sugiyama, H., & Hirao, M. (2020). Environmental potential of reusing, renting, and sharing consumer products: Systematic analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118487. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.118487Amel, E. L., Manning, C. M., & Scott, B. A. (2009). Mindfulness and sustainable behavior: Pondering attention and awareness as means for increasing green behavior. Ecopsychology, 1(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1089/ECO.2008.0005Arekrans, J., Sopjani, L., Laurenti, R., & Ritzén, S. (2022). Barriers to access-based consumption in the circular transition: A systematic review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 184, 106364. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2022.106364Baer, R. A., Walsh, E., & Lykins, E. L. B. (2009). Assessment of mindfulness. Clinical Handbook of Mindfulness, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09593-6_10Baer, R., Smith, G., Assessment, K. A.-, & 2004, undefined. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Journals.Sagepub.ComRA Baer, GT Smith, KB AllenAssessment, 2004•journals.Sagepub.Com, 11(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104268029Balderjahn, I., Peyer, M., Seegebarth, B., Wiedmann, K. P., & Weber, A. (2018). The many faces of sustainability-conscious consumers: A category-independent typology. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318302583Bardhi F, & Eckhardt G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881–898. https://doi.org/10.1086/66Basci, E. (2014). A revisited concept of anti-consumption for marketing. Academia.Edu, 5(7). https://www.academia.edu/download/49034543/A_revisited_concept_of_anti-consumption_for_marketing.pdfBattle, A., Ryding, D., & Henninger, C. E. (2018). Access-Based Consumption: A New Business Model for Luxury and Secondhand Fashion Business? Palgrave Advances in Luxury, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71985-6_3/COVERBaumeister, C., & Wangenheim, F. V. (2014). Access vs. Ownership: Understanding Consumers’ Consumption Mode Preference. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2463076Black, I. (2010). Sustainability through anti-consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/CB.340Black, I., & Cherrier, H. (2010). Anti‐consumption as part of living a sustainable lifestyle: Daily practices, contextual motivations and subjective values. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.337Bollen, K. (2014). Structural equations with latent variables. https://books.google.com/books?hl=es&lr=&id=DPBjBAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Kenneth+A.+Bollen.+Su+libro+%22Structural+Equations+with+Latent+Variables%22+(1989)&ots=JPs8Z4a-1T&sig=PY9afdYtTYx-mLWcUJ0h99ZmNSMBraun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706QP063OABrown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11205-004-8207-8Buenstorf, G., & Cordes, C. (2007). Can sustainable consumption be learned? https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/31843Chang, H. H. (2021). Exploring consumer behavioral predispositions toward voluntary simplicity. Current Psychology, 40(2), 731–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-018-9994-4/METRICSChatzidakis, A., & Lee, M. S. W. (2012). Anti-Consumption as the Study of Reasons against. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/0276146712462892, 33(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146712462892Cherrier, H., Black, I. R., & Lee, M. (2011). Intentional non-consumption for sustainability: Consumer resistance and/or anti-consumption? European Journal of Marketing, 45(11), 1757–1767. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111167397Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613Dassopoulos, A. (2015). Anti-Consumption Tactics. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Consumption and Consumer Studies, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118989463.WBECCS006Eckhardt, G. M., & Bardhi, F. (2016). The Relationship between Access Practices and Economic Systems. Https://Doi.Org/10.1086/684684, 1(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1086/684684Edbring, E., Lehner, M., & Mont, O. (2016). Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: motivations and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2015.10.107Fishman, E., Washington, S., & Haworth, N. (2014). Bike share’s impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 31, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2014.05.013Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104Garcia de Frutos, N., Ortega-Egea, J. M., & Martínez-del-Río, J. (2015). Anti-Consumption for Environmental Sustainability: Review and Multilevel Research Directions. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015(1), 16304. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2015.16304ABSTRACTGarcía-de-Frutos, Ortega-Egea, & Martínez-del-Río. (2018). Anti-consumption for Environmental Sustainability: Conceptualization, Review, and Multilevel Research Directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-016-3023-ZGerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378802500207Gregory, H. (2023). Our Accumulation Addiction: The Harm of Overconsumption and Rehabilitation Treatments for our Minds and the Environment. https://digitalcommons.slc.edu/undergrad_selectedworks/16/Grimshorn, C., Jordan, M., Klasson, M., & Bertilsson, J. (2015). Ownership-a challenged Consumer Ideal.Gruen, A. (2017). Design and the creation of meaningful consumption practices in access-based consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(3–4), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1229688Haider, M., Shannon, R., & Moschis, G. P. (2022). Sustainable Consumption Research and the Role of Marketing: A Review of the Literature (1976–2021). Sustainability , 14(7), 3999. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14073999Helm, S., & Subramaniam, B. (2019). Exploring Socio-Cognitive Mindfulness in the Context of Sustainable Consumption. Sustainability 2019, Vol. 11, Page 3692, 11(13), 3692. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11133692Henninger, C. E., Brydges, T., Iran, S., & Vladimirova, K. (2021). Collaborative fashion consumption – A synthesis and future research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319, 128648. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.128648Heyman, G. M. (2023). Overconsumption as a function of how individuals make choices: A paper in honor of Howard Rachlin’s contributions to psychology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 119(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/JEAB.821Höpfl, L., Grimlitza, M., Lang, I., & Wirzberger, M. (2024). Promoting sustainable behavior: addressing user clusters through targeted incentives. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2024 11:1, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03581-6Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/met/3/4/424/Hüttel, A., Ziesemer, F., Peyer, M., & Balderjahn, I. (2018). To purchase or not? Why consumers make economically (non-)sustainable consumption choices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 827–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.11.019Hutter, K., & Hoffmann, S. (2013). Carrotmob and Anti-consumption: Same Motives but Different Willingness to Make Sacrifices? Journal of Macromarketing, 33(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146712470457Iyer, R., & JA Muncy, J. (2009). Purpose and object of anti-consumption. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 160–168. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296308000386Jang, Bae, & Kim. (2021). Servitization experience measurement and the effect of servitization experience on brand resonance and customer retention. Journal of Business Research, 130, 384–397. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296320301764?casa_token=afQVNtaJb0gAAAAA:S2xDhGzUwFoQHK3uOUTqco3rSuWhUHi06PVEXwi6WH-PyOnJ0pU_Ygam1TV496PfTjFcwhnljMAJi, T., Li, K., Sun, Q., & Duan, Z. (2024). Urban transport emission prediction analysis through machine learning and deep learning techniques. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 135, 104389. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2024.104389Jovic, E., Jacob, J., Emily, A. E., Ae, J., & Brinkerhoff, M. B. (2009). well-being: Mindfulness meditation, pro-environmental behavior and personal quality of life in a survey from the social justice and ecological sustainability movement. Springer, 93(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9308-6Kabat-Zinn, J. (2013). Full catastrophe living, revised edition: how to cope with stress, pain and illness using mindfulness meditation. https://books.google.com/books?hl=es&lr=&id=iedJAAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT14&dq=Kabat-Zinn,+2013&ots=j_5FrCCxIB&sig=s8fvRDgYX00mJ1PU0j9_FU24nJ8Kabra, A., Belavina, E., & Girotra, K. (2019). Bike-Share Systems: Accessibility and Availability. Management Science, 66(9), 3803–3824. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.2019.3407Kadel, L. (2021). Mindfulness for sustainable consumption behaviour - inisghts into consumer culture. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-445547Karjalainen, L. E., & Juhola, S. (2021). Urban transportation sustainability assessments: a systematic review of literature. Transport Reviews, 41(5), 659–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1879309Khan, J., & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2019). Factors explaining shared clothes consumption in China: Individual benefit or planet concern? International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 24(4), e1652. https://doi.org/10.1002/NVSM.1652Khaw-Ngern, K., Klomkul, L., Peuchthonglang, P., & Khaw-Ngern, C. (2021). Consumption based on Mindful Mindset: A Solution to Plastic Pollution. PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 58(1), 1393–1398. www.psychologyandeducation.netKjellberg, H. (2008). Market practices and over‐consumption. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 11(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253860802033688Koning, J. de, Lavanga, M., & Spekkink, W. (2024). Exploring the clothing overconsumption of young adults: An experimental study with communication interventions. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624024193Kraus, L., Proff, H., Doi, K., & Fillone, A. M. (2021). Sustainable Urban Transportation Criteria and Measurement—A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 7113, 13(13), 7113. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13137113Kropfeld, M., Nepomuceno, M., & Dantas DC. (2018). The ecological impact of anticonsumption lifestyles and environmental concern. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 37(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618810448Kuanr, A., Pradhan, D., & Chaudhuri, H. R. (2020). I (do not) consume; therefore, I am: Investigating materialism and voluntary simplicity through a moderated mediation model. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/MAR.21305Lang, C. (2018). Perceived risks and enjoyment of access-based consumption: identifying barriers and motivations to fashion renting. Fashion and Textiles, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40691-018-0139-Z/FIGURES/1Lang, C., & Joyner Armstrong, C. M. (2018). Collaborative consumption: The influence of fashion leadership, need for uniqueness, and materialism on female consumers’ adoption of clothing renting and swapping. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 13, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2017.11.005Lastovicka, Bettencourt, Hughner, & Kuntze. (1999). Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: Theory and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 85–98. https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article-abstract/26/1/85/1916418Lawson, S. J., Gleim, M. R., Perren, R., & Hwang, J. (2016). Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2615–2623. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2016.04.021Lee, H. J. (2019). The effect of anti-consumption lifestyle on consumer’s attitude and purchase intention toward commercial sharing systems. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(5), 1422–1441. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-06-2018-0218/FULL/XMLLee, J., & Haley, E. (2022). Green consumer segmentation: consumer motivations for purchasing pro-environmental products. International Journal of Advertising, 41(8), 1477–1501. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2022.2038431Lee, M. S. (2022). Anti-consumption research: A foundational and contemporary overview. Current Opinion in Psychology, , 45, 101319.Lee, M. S. W., Dewhirst, T., & Cherrier, H. (2018). Introduction to the Special Section: The Domain and Intersection of Anticonsumption, Marketing, and Public Policy. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 37(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618811852/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_0743915618811852-FIG2.JPEGLee, S. H. N., & Chow, P. S. (2020). Investigating consumer attitudes and intentions toward online fashion renting retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101892. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2019.101892Leider, S., & Şahin, Ö. (2014). Contracts, Biases, and Consumption of Access Services. Https://Doi.Org/10.1287/Mnsc.2013.1889, 60(9), 2198–2222. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.2013.1889Li, D., & Atkinson, L. (2020). The role of psychological ownership in consumer happiness. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(6), 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-09-2019-3420/FULL/XMLLim, W. M. (2017). Inside the sustainable consumption theoretical toolbox: Critical concepts for sustainability, consumption, and marketing. Journal of Business Research.Lučić, A., & Uzelac, M. (2024). Addressing global overconsumption: positioning the anti-consumption through communication appeals. Corporate Communications, 29(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-08-2023-0114/FULL/HTMLMakri, K., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Mai, R., & Dinhof, K. (2020). What we know about anticonsumption: An attempt to nail jelly to the wall. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 177–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/MAR.21319Malik, F., & Ishaq, M. I. (2023). Impact of minimalist practices on consumer happiness and financial well-being. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, 103333. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2023.103333Marlatt, G. A., & Kristeller, J. L. (1999). Mindfulness and meditation. American Psychological Association, 67. https://doi.org/10.1037/10327-004Meissner, M. (2019). Against accumulation: lifestyle minimalism, de-growth and the present post-ecological condition. Journal of Cultural Economy, 12(3), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2019.1570962Milne, G. R., Villarroel Ordenes, F., & Kaplan, B. (2020). Mindful Consumption: Three Consumer Segment Views. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUSMJ.2019.09.003Mu, X., & Li, C. (2021). Research on Clothing Rental Model under Sharing Economy. E3S Web of Conferences, 253, 01075. https://doi.org/10.1051/E3SCONF/202125301075Nawaz, S., Jiang, Y., Nawaz, M. Z., Manzoor, S. F., & Zhang, R. (2021). Mindful Consumption, Ego-Involvement, and Social Norms Impact on Buying SHC: Role of Platform Trust and Impulsive Buying Tendency. SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211056621/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_21582440211056621-FIG2.JPEGNepomuceno, M., & Laroche, M. (2016). Do I fear death? The effects of mortality salience on anti‐consumption lifestyles. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 50(1), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12100Nicolae, C.-A. (2024). Understanding sustainable purchasing behavior in Romania: Drivers, barriers, and environmental participation. Management & Marketing, 19(2), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2024-0016Nie, X., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Janakiraman, N. (2022). How Does Global–Local Identity Affect Consumer Preference for Access-Based Consumption? Investigating the Mediating Role of Consumption Openness. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/00222437211055130, 59(3), 555–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437211055130Nijland, & Van Meerkerk. (2017). Mobility and environmental impacts of car sharing in the Netherlands. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIST.2017.02.001Noland, R. B., Smart, M. J., & Guo, Z. (2016). Bikeshare trip generation in New York City. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2016.08.030Ortega Egea, J. M., García De Frutos, N., Manuel, J., & Egea, O. (2020). Behavioral prediction of environmentally oriented anticonsumption and consumption: A multilevel study of five Eurobarometer surveys. Wiley Online LibraryJM Ortega Egea, N Garcia de FrutosPsychology & Marketing, 2020•Wiley Online Library, 37(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21302Ozanne, L. K., & Ballantine, P. W. (2010). Sharing as a form of anti-consumption? An examination of toy library users. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/CB.334Philp, M., & Nepomuceno, M. V. (2020). When the frugal become wasteful: An examination into how impression management can initiate the end‐stages of consumption for frugal consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21303Poppelaars, F., Bakker, C., & van Engelen, J. (2018). Does Access Trump Ownership? Exploring Consumer Acceptance of Access-Based Consumption in the Case of Smartphones. Sustainability 2018, Vol. 10, Page 2133, 10(7), 2133. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10072133Pradhan, B., Kishore, K., & Gokhale, N. (2023). Social media influencers and consumer engagement: A review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(6), 2106–2130. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJCS.12901Reyes-Rubiano, L., Serrano-Hernandez, A., Montoya-Torres, J. R., & Faulin, J. (2021). The Sustainability Dimensions in Intelligent Urban Transportation: A Paradigm for Smart Cities. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 10653, 13(19), 10653. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU131910653Ryu, H., Basu, M., & Saito, O. (2019). What and how are we sharing? A systematic review of the sharing paradigm and practices. Sustainability Science, 14(2), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-018-0638-2/TABLES/2Seegebarth, B., Peyer, M., Balderjahn, I., & Wiedmann K. (2015). The sustainability roots of anticonsumption lifestyles and initial insights regarding their effects on consumers’ well‐being. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 50(1), 68–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12077Shafqat, T., Ishaq, M. I., & Ahmed, A. (2023). Fashion consumption using minimalism: Exploring the relationship of consumer well-being and social connectedness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 71, 103215. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2022.103215Shah, K. J., Pan, S. Y., Lee, I., Kim, H., You, Z., Zheng, J. M., & Chiang, P. C. (2021). Green transportation for sustainability: Review of current barriers, strategies, and innovative technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 326, 129392. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.129392Sheth, J., Sethia, N., & 2011. (2011). Mindful consumption: a customer-centric approach to sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 21-39., 39(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0216-3Strähle, J., & Erhardt, C. (2017). Collaborative Consumption 2.0: An Alternative to Fast Fashion Consumption. Green Fashion Retail, 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2440-5_8Szamatowicz, M., & Paundra, J. (2019). Access or Ownership? The effect of car attributes and collective Access or Ownership? The effect of car attributes and collective psychological ownership on the preference for car subscription psychological ownership on the preference for car subscription services services. Psychological Research on Urban Society, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v2i1.44Teixeira, I. P. (2023). The connection between mindfulness, sustainable consumption and consumer well-being. https://comum.rcaap.pt/handle/10400.26/45185Tukker, & Tischner. (2006). Product-services as a research field: past, present and future. Reflections from a decade of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(17), 1552–1556. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652606000862?casa_token=9Mm3CaBpgCsAAAAA:aNyOVGiu-X5SuolPIYSsAJXnlkxJFNeIDagyjZ6YNsBkmmQyRbTYfTyqN_hZbBCSRYagdEhfyVkTunn, V. S. C., Fokker, R., Luijkx, K. A., De Jong, S. A. M., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2019). Making ours mine: Increasing consumer acceptance of access-based PSS through temporary product customisation. Sustainability, 44(1), 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010274Van Den Berge, Magnier, & Mugge. (2021). Too good to go? Consumers’ replacement behaviour and potential strategies for stimulating product retention. Current Opinion in Psychology, 39, 66–71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X20301226Vedolin, L. (2023). Mindfulness and Consumption: Routes Toward Consumer Self-Control [Copenhagen Business School]. https://doi.org/10.22439/PHD.25.2023Vesterinen, & Syrjälä. (2022). Sustainable anti-consumption of clothing: A systematic literature review. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 100061. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784322000158Vladimirova, K. (2021). Consumption corridors in fashion: deliberations on upper consumption limits in minimalist fashion challenges. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1891673Webster. (1975). Determining the characteristics of the socially conscious consumer. Journal of Consumer Research. https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article-abstract/2/3/188/1785204Wei, X., Lo, C. K. Y., Jung, S., & Choi, T. M. (2021). From co-consumption to co-production: A systematic review and research synthesis of collaborative consumption practices. Journal of Business Research, 129, 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.02.027Whittaker, T. A. (2012). Using the Modification Index and Standardized Expected Parameter Change for Model Modification. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2010.531299Wilson, A. V., & Bellezza, S. (2022). Consumer Minimalism. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 796–816. https://doi.org/10.1093/JCR/UCAB038Xu, R., Zurich, E., & Ilic, A. (2014). Product as a service: Enabling physical products as service end-points. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Runhua-Xu-2/publication/281865585_Product_as_a_Service_Enabling_Physical_Products_as_Service_End-Points/links/56438aac08ae451880a348af/Product-as-a-Service-Enabling-Physical-Products-as-Service-End-Points.pdfYan, R. N., Diddi, S., & Bloodhart, B. (2021). Predicting clothing disposal: The moderating roles of clothing sustainability knowledge and self-enhancement values. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 3, 100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLRC.2021.100029Yiğit, M. K. (2020). Consumer mindfulness and impulse buying behavior: testing moderator effects of hedonic shopping value and mood. Innovative Marketing, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.21511/im.16(4).2020.03Zavestoski, S. (2001). Environmental concern and anti-consumerism in the self-concept: Do they share the same basis? Exploring Sustainable Consumption, 173–189. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080439204500136Zheng, F., Gu, F., Zhang, W., & Guo, J. (2019). Is Bicycle Sharing an Environmental Practice? Evidence from a Life Cycle Assessment Based on Behavioral Surveys. Sustainability 2019, Vol. 11, Page 1550, 11(6), 1550. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11061550Ziesemer, F., Hüttel, A., & Balderjahn, I. (2021). Young people as drivers or inhibitors of the sustainability movement: The case of anti-consumption. Journal of Consumer Policy, 44(3), 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-021-09489-x201624714Publicationhttps://scholar.google.es/citations?user=bOYaOJgAAAAJvirtual::22771-1https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000577146virtual::22771-1https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001389002virtual::22772-1aa092878-88cd-4f29-b018-b36a3711e04fvirtual::22771-1aa092878-88cd-4f29-b018-b36a3711e04fvirtual::22771-1d584611c-6ed4-4a46-bda0-5dd0799394e2virtual::22772-1d584611c-6ed4-4a46-bda0-5dd0799394e2virtual::22772-1LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82535https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/48c0b70a-b658-4419-9ca1-061d1b2cfd5a/downloadae9e573a68e7f92501b6913cc846c39fMD51ORIGINALAutorizacion tesis Bilbioteca copia firmada.pdfAutorizacion tesis Bilbioteca copia firmada.pdfHIDEapplication/pdf229366https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/c7943ffb-a8d1-43a0-a23b-9eb2181461df/download80dd9eb814351f72c2595ae2e33239f3MD52Explorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sosteniblesExplorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sosteniblesapplication/pdf4132991https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/a288c1fe-8295-408a-a104-4f025cd3897e/downloadf25c782b2f4823686b43a0bf038e7008MD53CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/1fb3e1aa-cbce-422e-9818-ae290c5e2082/download4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD54TEXTAutorizacion tesis Bilbioteca copia firmada.pdf.txtAutorizacion tesis Bilbioteca copia firmada.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain2034https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/f031e8fc-b17f-49ba-bac5-77799b9df951/downloadb190cad08bacfa3a9f850a3453add6feMD55Explorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sostenibles.txtExplorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sostenibles.txtExtracted texttext/plain101163https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/47684c80-0a17-4eb6-8b01-c35f1e25fb4d/download052d18d9489cde6408cdc318bb0b9275MD57THUMBNAILAutorizacion tesis Bilbioteca copia firmada.pdf.jpgAutorizacion tesis Bilbioteca copia firmada.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg10993https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/a1dcc05e-f902-483b-b658-8a0d54b2acc6/downloadc51f10c207180585a460a4f4dbe831e6MD56Explorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sostenibles.jpgExplorando el vínculo entre los estilos de vida de anti-consumo y las intenciones de acceso a servicios sostenibles.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg6576https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/bitstreams/bad62e8a-2317-4eee-83cf-ee13deacf1fc/downloadd56e0824c37e025805c1742696bdea2bMD581992/75775oai:repositorio.uniandes.edu.co:1992/757752025-03-05 09:12:55.342http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.uniandes.edu.coRepositorio institucional Sénecaadminrepositorio@uniandes.edu.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

Publicaciones similares