¿Acerca de qué nos habla la química? Nuevos argumentos en favor de la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico
Si bien la química como disciplina tiene una larguísima historia, los impresionantes éxitos de la mecánica cuántica en el siglo XX han conducido a concebirla como una rama de la física sobre la base de un enfoque netamente reduccionista. El propósito del presente trabajo consiste en abordar el tema...
- Autores:
-
Lombardi, Olimpia
- Tipo de recurso:
- https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2013
- Institución:
- Universidad El Bosque
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio U. El Bosque
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/6273
- Palabra clave:
- Química
Física
Reducción
Autonomía
Ontología
Chemistry
Physics
Reduction
Autonomy
Ontology
- Rights
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
| id |
UNBOSQUE2_b20df2cf8288608400bb9235494a73d2 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/6273 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNBOSQUE2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio U. El Bosque |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
¿Acerca de qué nos habla la química? Nuevos argumentos en favor de la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico |
| dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
About What does Chemistry speak? New arguments for the ontological autonomy of the chemical world |
| title |
¿Acerca de qué nos habla la química? Nuevos argumentos en favor de la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico |
| spellingShingle |
¿Acerca de qué nos habla la química? Nuevos argumentos en favor de la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico Química Física Reducción Autonomía Ontología Chemistry Physics Reduction Autonomy Ontology |
| title_short |
¿Acerca de qué nos habla la química? Nuevos argumentos en favor de la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico |
| title_full |
¿Acerca de qué nos habla la química? Nuevos argumentos en favor de la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico |
| title_fullStr |
¿Acerca de qué nos habla la química? Nuevos argumentos en favor de la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico |
| title_full_unstemmed |
¿Acerca de qué nos habla la química? Nuevos argumentos en favor de la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico |
| title_sort |
¿Acerca de qué nos habla la química? Nuevos argumentos en favor de la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Lombardi, Olimpia |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Lombardi, Olimpia |
| dc.contributor.orcid.none.fl_str_mv |
0000-0003-2204-7902 |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Química Física Reducción Autonomía Ontología |
| topic |
Química Física Reducción Autonomía Ontología Chemistry Physics Reduction Autonomy Ontology |
| dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv |
Chemistry Physics Reduction Autonomy Ontology |
| description |
Si bien la química como disciplina tiene una larguísima historia, los impresionantes éxitos de la mecánica cuántica en el siglo XX han conducido a concebirla como una rama de la física sobre la base de un enfoque netamente reduccionista. El propósito del presente trabajo consiste en abordar el tema de la relación entre química y física tal como ha sido discutido en la reciente filosofía de la química. El objetivo final, en sintonía con artículos previos, es defender la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico desde una perspectiva anti-reduccionista, tomando en consideración ciertas críticas directas a tales trabajos formuladas durante los últimos años. |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01-01 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-03T16:03:22Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-03T16:03:22Z |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| format |
https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0124-4620 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6273 |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v13i26.1645 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad El Bosque |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque |
| dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co |
| identifier_str_mv |
0124-4620 instname:Universidad El Bosque reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6273 https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v13i26.1645 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 13 Núm 26, 2013, 105-144 |
| dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1645 |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Amann, A. “Must a molecule have a shape?”. South African Journal of Chemistry45 (1992): 29-38. Baird, D., Scerri, E. & McIntyre, L., Eds. Philosophy of Chemistry:Synthesis of a New Discipline. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006. Boston Studies in the Philo-sophy of Science 242. Benfey, T. “Reflections on the philosophy of chemistry and a rallying call for our discipline”. Foundations of Chemistry 2 (2000): 195-205. Bishop, R. & Atmanspacher, H. “Contextual emergence in the description of properties”. Foundations of Physics 36 (2006): 1753-1777. Castagnino, M. & Lombardi, O. “Self-induced decoherence: A new approach”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2004): 73-107. Cat, J. “The unity of science”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. E. N. Zalta. 2007. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/scien-ti fic-unit y/>. Chamizo, J. A. “The public image of chemistry”. Educacion Química 22 (2011): 320-331. Daintith, J. Dictionary of Chemistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Dirac, P. A. M. “Quantum mechanics of many-electron systems”. Proceedings of the Royal Society A338 (1929): 714-733. Emerson, K. “The quantum mechanical explanation of the periodic system”. Journal of Chemical Education 76 (1999): 1189. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. “Can quantum-mechanical descrip-tion of physical reality be considered complete?”. Physical Review 47 (1935): 777-780. Estany, A. “¿Es posible una filosofía de la química?”. Investigación y Ciencia 420 (2011 septiembre): 52-53. French, S. & Krause, D. Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical and Formal Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Hacking, I. Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pre s s, 1983. Hawkes, S. J. “Unsaturated bonds should not be represented in introductory chemistry by orbital overlap”. Chemistry. Bulgarian Journal of Chemical Education 16 (2007): 90-91. Hendry, R. “Models and approximations in quantum chemistry”. Idealiza-tionIX: Idealization in Contemporary Physics. Ed. N. Shanks. Amsterdam: Rodopi, (1998): 123-42. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 63.—. “Is there downwards causation in chemistry?”. Philosophy of chemistry: synthesis of a new discipline. Berlin: Springer (2006): 173-189.—. “Ontological reduction and molecular structure”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2010): 183-191. Hettema, H. Reducing Chemistry to Physics: Limits, Models, Consequences. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 2012. Hoffmann, R. “What might philosophy of science look like if chemists built it?”. Synthese 155 (2007): 321-336. Humphreys, C. J. “Electron seen in orbit”. Nature 401 (1999): 49-52. tatani, J., Levesque, J., Zeidler, D., Niikura, H., Pépin, H., Kieffer, J. C., Corkum, P. B. & Villeneuve, D. M. “Tomographic imaging of molecular or bit a l s”. Nature 432 (2004): 867-871. Jacoby, M. “Picture-perfect orbitals”. Chemical & Engineering News 77 (1999): 8. Kemeny, J. G. & Oppenheim, P. “On reduction”. Philosophical Studies 7 (1956 ): 6 -19 Kochen, S. & Specker, E. “The problem of hidden variables in quantum m e c h a n i c s”. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17 (1967): 59-87. Koolage, W. J. & Hall, R. “Chemical action: what is it, and why does it really matter?”. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (2011): 1401-1417. Labarca, M. & Lombardi, O. “Irreversibilidad y pluralismo ontológico”. Scientiae Studia 5 (2007): 139-167.—. “The end of the dream of unity”. Current Science 94 (2008): 438-439.—. “Why orbitals do not exist?”. Foundations of Chemistry 12 (2010): 149-157.—. “On the autonomous existence of chemical entities”. Current Physical Chemistry 1 (2011): 69-75 Le Poidevin, R. “Missing elements and missing premises: A combinatorial arguments for the ontological reduction of chemistry”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2005): 117-134. Lombardi, O. “Determinism, internalism and objectivity”. Between Chance and Choice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Determinism. Eds. H. Atmans-pacher & R. Bishop. Thorverton: Imprint-Academic, 2002. Lombardi, O. & Labarca, M. “The ontological autonomy of the chemical w or ld ”. Foundations of Chemistry 7 (2005): 125-148.—. “The ontological autonomy of the chemical world: A response to Ne e d h a m”. Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2006): 81-92. Lombardi, O. & Martínez González, J. C. “Entre mecánica cuántica y estruc-turas químicas: ¿a qué refiere la química cuántica?”, Scientiae Studia 10 (2012): 649-670. Lombardi, O. & Pérez Ransanz, A. R. “Lenguaje, ontología y relaciones interteóricas: en favor de un genuino pluralismo ontológico”. Revista Arbor. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura 187 (2011): 43-52.—. Los Múltiples Mundos de la Ciencia. Un Realismo Pluralista y su Aplicación a la Filosofía de la Física. México: UNAM-Siglo XXI, 2012 Luisi, P. L. “Emergence in chemistry: Chemistry as the embodiment of emer-gence”. Foundations of Chemistry 4 (2002): 183-200. Manafu, A. “Internal realism and the problem of ontological autonomy: A critical note on Lombardi and Labarca”. Foundations of Chemistry 15 (2012): 225-228. McIntyre, L. “The philosophy of chemistry: ten years later”. Synthese 155 (2007a): 291-292.—. “Emergence and reduction in chemistry: ontological or epistemological c onc e pt s ? ”. Synthese 155 (2007b): 337-343. Mulder, P. “On the alleged non-existence of orbitals”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2010): 178-182.—. “Are orbitals observable?”. Hyle - International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 17 (2011): 24-35. Mulliken, R. S. Life of a Scientist. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986. Nagel, E. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961. Needham, P. “Ontological reduction: A comment on Lombardi-Labarca”. Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2006): 73-80.—. “Nagel’s analysis of reduction: Comments in defense as well as critique”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2010): 163-170. Nelson, P. “How do electrons get across nodes?”. Journal of Chemical Educa-tion 67 (1990): 643-647 Neurath, O. “Pseudorracionalismo de la falsación”. Redes 10 (2002): 87-118. Trad. de “Pseudorationalism of falsification”. 1935. Philosophical Papers 1913-1946. Ed. R. Cohen y M. Neurath. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983. 121-131. Newman, M. “Chemical supervenience”. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2008): 49-62. Nye, M. J. From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry - Dynamics of Matter and Dynamics of Disciplines 1800-1950. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993. Pagliaro, P. “On shapes, molecules and models: an insight into chemical methodology”. European Journal of Chemistry 1 (2010): 276-281. Pascual, J. I., Gómez-Herrero, J., Rogero, C., Baró, A. M., Sánchez-Portal, D., Artacho, E., Ordejón, P. & Sovvler, J. M. “Seeing molecular orbitals”. Chemical Physical Letters 321 (2000): 78-82. Pérez Ransanz, A. R. Kuhn y el Cambio Científico. México: Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1999. Primas, H. Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism. Berlin: Springer, 1983.—. “Hierarchic quantum descriptions and their associated ontologies”. Sympo-sium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1994. Ed. K. V. Laurikainen, C. Montonen y K. Sunnarborg. Gif-sur-Yvette: Editions Frontières, 1994.—. “Emergence in exact natural sciences”. Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica 91 (1998): 83-98. Putnam, H. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pre s s, 1981 Richman, R. “In defense of quantum numbers”. Journal of Chemical Educa-tion 76 (1999a): 608.—. “The use of one-electron quantum numbers to describe polyatomic s y s t e m s”. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1999b): 175-83. Rohrlich, F. “Pluralistic ontology and theory reduction in the physical sciences”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (1988): 295-312. Scerri, E. “The electronic configuration model, quantum mechanics and reduction”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (1991): 309-25.—. “Has chemistry been at least approximately reduced to quantum mecha-n i c s ? ”. P S A 1994 . Vol. 1. Eds. D. Hull, M. Forbes & R. Burian. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, 1994. 160-170.—. “The periodic table and the electron”. American Scientist 85 (1997): 546 -553.—. “The failure of reduction and how to resist disunity of the sciences in the context of chemical education”. Science & Education 9 (2000a): 405-425.—. “Realism, reduction and the ‘intermediate position’”. Of Minds and Mole-cules. New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry. Eds. N. Bhushan & S. Rosenfeld. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000b. 51-72.—. “Have orbitals really been observed?”. Journal of Chemical Education 77 (2000c): 1492-1494.—. “The recently claimed observation of atomic orbitals and some related philosophical issues”. Philosophy of Science 68 (2001): S76-S88.—. “Have orbitals really been observed? (author reply)”. Journal of Chemical Education 79 (2002): 210.—. “Just how ab initio is ab initio quantum chemistry?”. Foundations of Chemistry 6 (2004): 93-116.—. “Editorial 20”. Foundations of Chemistry 7 (2005a): 119-123.—. “Some aspects of the metaphysics of chemistry and the nature of the e lement s”, Hyle - International Journal for the Philosophy of Chemistry 11 (2005b): 127-145.—. “Normative and descriptive philosophy of science and the role of chemistry”. Baird, Scerri & McIntyre. 119-128.—. “The ambiguity of reduction”. Hyle - International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 13 (2007): 67-81.—. “General introduction to the papers”. Collected Papers on Philosophy of Chemistry. Londres: Imperial College Press, 2008a. 1-22.—. “Philosophy of chemistry, reduction, emergence and chemical education”. Advances in Teaching Physical Chemistry. Eds. M. Ellison & T. Schoolcraft. Washington: American Chemical Society, 2008b. 59-72. Scerri, E. & McIntyre, L. “The case for the philosophy of chemistry”. Synthese111 (19 9 7 ): 213 -232 . Schuster, P. “‘Less is more’ and the art of modeling complex phenomena: simplification may but need not be the key to handle large networks”. Complexity 11 (2005): 11-13 Schwarz, W. H. E. & Wang, S. G. “Some solved problems of the periodic system of chemical elements”. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry110 (2010): 1455-1465. Sklar, L. Physics and Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Ströhle, A. “Molecularization in nutritional science: a view from philosophy of science”. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 54 (2010): 1385-1404. Tinoco Jr. I., Sauer, K., Wang, J. C. y Puglisi, J. D. Physical Chemistry - Prin-ciples and Applications in Biological Sciences. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002. Torretti, R. “El realismo científico y la ciencia como es”. Escritos Filosóficos 19 8 6 -2 0 0 6 . Santiago de Chile: Universidad Diego Portales, 2007. 75-98. Trad. de “Scientific realism and scientific practice”. The Reality of the Unob-servable: Observability, Unobservability and their Impact on the Issue of cientific Realism. Ed. E. Agazzi & M. Pauri. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000. 113 -12 2 .—. Manuel Kant. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales, 2005. Van Brakel, J. “Chemistry as the science of the transformation of substances”. Synthese 111 (19 9 7 ): 253 -2 82 .—. Philosophy of Chemistry. Between the Manifest and the Scientific Image.Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2000a.—. “The nature of chemical substances”. Of Minds and Molecules. New Philo-sophical Perspectives on Chemistry. Eds. N. Bhushan & S. Rosenfeld. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000b. 162-184. Vancik, H. “Opus magnum: An outline for the philosophy of chemistry”. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1999): 242-256. Vemulapalli, G. K. y Byerly, H. “Remnants of reductionism”. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1999): 17-41. Vesterinen, V. M. & Aksela, M. “A novel course of chemistry as a scientific discipline: how do prospective perceive nature of chemistry through visits to research groups”. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 10 (2009): 132-141.—. “Quantitative analysis of representations of nature of science in nordic upper secondary school textbooks using framework of analysis based on philosophy of chemistry”. Science & Education 22 (2013): 1839-1855.—. “Design of chemistry teacher education course on nature of science”. Science & Education 22 (2013): 2193-2225. Vihalemm, R. “The autonomy of chemistry: old and new problems”. Founda-tions of Chemistry 12 (2010): 97-107. Wang, S. G. & Schwarz, W. H. E. “On closed-shell interactions, polar cova-lences, d shell holes, and direct images of orbitals: the case of Cuprite”. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 39 (2000): 1757-1762.—. “PSE - Icon of chemistry: The periodic system of chemical elements in the new century”. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 48 (2009): 3404-3415. Wasserman, E. & Schaefer, H. F. “Methylene geometry”. Science 233 (1986): 829. Wilson, M. “John Earman’s A Primer on Determinism”. Philosophy of Science56 (1989): 502-532. Woolley, R. G. “Must a molecule have a shape?”. American Chemical Society100 (1978): 1073-78.—. “Natural optical activity and the molecular hypothesis”. Structure and Bonding 52 (1982): 1-35. Yam, P. “Seeing the bonds”. Scientific American 281 (1999): 28. Zuo, J. M., Kim, M., O’Keefe, M. & Spence, J. C. H. “Direct observation of d-orbital holes and Cu-Cu Bonding in Cu2O”. Nature 401 (1999): 49-52. Zurer, P. “Chemistry’s top five achievements”. Chemical & Engineering News 77 (1999): 38-40. |
| dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acceso abierto |
| dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Acceso abierto https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia |
| institution |
Universidad El Bosque |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/66ef166a-d6e1-4c3c-a4f0-3e3e9a07f8f7/download https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/245255c0-e21f-46cc-a8fc-e22b859af518/download https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/849afe18-cef7-4cfb-b27f-c94ae199bda3/download https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/3ca3a12b-1578-456f-bbb7-6298119ccd0a/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4e0300059376247dd2ecdbfdfeceacc7 934f4ca17e109e0a05eaeaba504d7ce4 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 0550b0e02f178397f0ed7e90c611d1b9 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bibliotecas@biteca.com |
| _version_ |
1849967193167495168 |
| spelling |
Lombardi, Olimpia0000-0003-2204-79022021-11-03T16:03:22Z2021-11-03T16:03:22Z2013-01-010124-4620https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6273https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v13i26.1645instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquerepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coSi bien la química como disciplina tiene una larguísima historia, los impresionantes éxitos de la mecánica cuántica en el siglo XX han conducido a concebirla como una rama de la física sobre la base de un enfoque netamente reduccionista. El propósito del presente trabajo consiste en abordar el tema de la relación entre química y física tal como ha sido discutido en la reciente filosofía de la química. El objetivo final, en sintonía con artículos previos, es defender la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico desde una perspectiva anti-reduccionista, tomando en consideración ciertas críticas directas a tales trabajos formuladas durante los últimos años.Although chemistry as a scientific discipline has a very long history, the impressive success of quantum mechanics during the 20th century has led to conceiving it as a branch of physics, on the basis of a markedly reductionist approach. The purpose of the present work consists in facing the issue of the relationship between chemistry and physics as it has been discussed in the present-day philosophy of chemistry. The final goal, in line with previous articles, is to advocate for the autonomy of chemistry from an anti-reductionist perspective, taking into account certain direct criticisms directed to those works during the last yearsapplication/pdfspaRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 13 Núm 26, 2013, 105-144https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1645Amann, A. “Must a molecule have a shape?”. South African Journal of Chemistry45 (1992): 29-38.Baird, D., Scerri, E. & McIntyre, L., Eds. Philosophy of Chemistry:Synthesis of a New Discipline. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006. Boston Studies in the Philo-sophy of Science 242.Benfey, T. “Reflections on the philosophy of chemistry and a rallying call for our discipline”. Foundations of Chemistry 2 (2000): 195-205.Bishop, R. & Atmanspacher, H. “Contextual emergence in the description of properties”. Foundations of Physics 36 (2006): 1753-1777.Castagnino, M. & Lombardi, O. “Self-induced decoherence: A new approach”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2004): 73-107.Cat, J. “The unity of science”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. E. N. Zalta. 2007. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/scien-ti fic-unit y/>.Chamizo, J. A. “The public image of chemistry”. Educacion Química 22 (2011): 320-331.Daintith, J. Dictionary of Chemistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Dirac, P. A. M. “Quantum mechanics of many-electron systems”. Proceedings of the Royal Society A338 (1929): 714-733.Emerson, K. “The quantum mechanical explanation of the periodic system”. Journal of Chemical Education 76 (1999): 1189.Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. “Can quantum-mechanical descrip-tion of physical reality be considered complete?”. Physical Review 47 (1935): 777-780.Estany, A. “¿Es posible una filosofía de la química?”. Investigación y Ciencia 420 (2011 septiembre): 52-53.French, S. & Krause, D. Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical and Formal Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Hacking, I. Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pre s s, 1983.Hawkes, S. J. “Unsaturated bonds should not be represented in introductory chemistry by orbital overlap”. Chemistry. Bulgarian Journal of Chemical Education 16 (2007): 90-91.Hendry, R. “Models and approximations in quantum chemistry”. Idealiza-tionIX: Idealization in Contemporary Physics. Ed. N. Shanks. Amsterdam: Rodopi, (1998): 123-42. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 63.—. “Is there downwards causation in chemistry?”. Philosophy of chemistry: synthesis of a new discipline. Berlin: Springer (2006): 173-189.—. “Ontological reduction and molecular structure”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2010): 183-191.Hettema, H. Reducing Chemistry to Physics: Limits, Models, Consequences. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 2012.Hoffmann, R. “What might philosophy of science look like if chemists built it?”. Synthese 155 (2007): 321-336.Humphreys, C. J. “Electron seen in orbit”. Nature 401 (1999): 49-52.tatani, J., Levesque, J., Zeidler, D., Niikura, H., Pépin, H., Kieffer, J. C., Corkum, P. B. & Villeneuve, D. M. “Tomographic imaging of molecular or bit a l s”. Nature 432 (2004): 867-871.Jacoby, M. “Picture-perfect orbitals”. Chemical & Engineering News 77 (1999): 8.Kemeny, J. G. & Oppenheim, P. “On reduction”. Philosophical Studies 7 (1956 ): 6 -19Kochen, S. & Specker, E. “The problem of hidden variables in quantum m e c h a n i c s”. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17 (1967): 59-87.Koolage, W. J. & Hall, R. “Chemical action: what is it, and why does it really matter?”. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (2011): 1401-1417.Labarca, M. & Lombardi, O. “Irreversibilidad y pluralismo ontológico”. Scientiae Studia 5 (2007): 139-167.—. “The end of the dream of unity”. Current Science 94 (2008): 438-439.—. “Why orbitals do not exist?”. Foundations of Chemistry 12 (2010): 149-157.—. “On the autonomous existence of chemical entities”. Current Physical Chemistry 1 (2011): 69-75Le Poidevin, R. “Missing elements and missing premises: A combinatorial arguments for the ontological reduction of chemistry”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2005): 117-134.Lombardi, O. “Determinism, internalism and objectivity”. Between Chance and Choice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Determinism. Eds. H. Atmans-pacher & R. Bishop. Thorverton: Imprint-Academic, 2002.Lombardi, O. & Labarca, M. “The ontological autonomy of the chemical w or ld ”. Foundations of Chemistry 7 (2005): 125-148.—. “The ontological autonomy of the chemical world: A response to Ne e d h a m”. Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2006): 81-92.Lombardi, O. & Martínez González, J. C. “Entre mecánica cuántica y estruc-turas químicas: ¿a qué refiere la química cuántica?”, Scientiae Studia 10 (2012): 649-670.Lombardi, O. & Pérez Ransanz, A. R. “Lenguaje, ontología y relaciones interteóricas: en favor de un genuino pluralismo ontológico”. Revista Arbor. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura 187 (2011): 43-52.—. Los Múltiples Mundos de la Ciencia. Un Realismo Pluralista y su Aplicación a la Filosofía de la Física. México: UNAM-Siglo XXI, 2012Luisi, P. L. “Emergence in chemistry: Chemistry as the embodiment of emer-gence”. Foundations of Chemistry 4 (2002): 183-200.Manafu, A. “Internal realism and the problem of ontological autonomy: A critical note on Lombardi and Labarca”. Foundations of Chemistry 15 (2012): 225-228.McIntyre, L. “The philosophy of chemistry: ten years later”. Synthese 155 (2007a): 291-292.—. “Emergence and reduction in chemistry: ontological or epistemological c onc e pt s ? ”. Synthese 155 (2007b): 337-343.Mulder, P. “On the alleged non-existence of orbitals”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2010): 178-182.—. “Are orbitals observable?”. Hyle - International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 17 (2011): 24-35.Mulliken, R. S. Life of a Scientist. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.Nagel, E. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961.Needham, P. “Ontological reduction: A comment on Lombardi-Labarca”. Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2006): 73-80.—. “Nagel’s analysis of reduction: Comments in defense as well as critique”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2010): 163-170.Nelson, P. “How do electrons get across nodes?”. Journal of Chemical Educa-tion 67 (1990): 643-647Neurath, O. “Pseudorracionalismo de la falsación”. Redes 10 (2002): 87-118. Trad. de “Pseudorationalism of falsification”. 1935. Philosophical Papers 1913-1946. Ed. R. Cohen y M. Neurath. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983. 121-131.Newman, M. “Chemical supervenience”. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2008): 49-62.Nye, M. J. From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry - Dynamics of Matter and Dynamics of Disciplines 1800-1950. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Pagliaro, P. “On shapes, molecules and models: an insight into chemical methodology”. European Journal of Chemistry 1 (2010): 276-281.Pascual, J. I., Gómez-Herrero, J., Rogero, C., Baró, A. M., Sánchez-Portal, D., Artacho, E., Ordejón, P. & Sovvler, J. M. “Seeing molecular orbitals”. Chemical Physical Letters 321 (2000): 78-82.Pérez Ransanz, A. R. Kuhn y el Cambio Científico. México: Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1999.Primas, H. Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism. Berlin: Springer, 1983.—. “Hierarchic quantum descriptions and their associated ontologies”. Sympo-sium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1994. Ed. K. V. Laurikainen, C. Montonen y K. Sunnarborg. Gif-sur-Yvette: Editions Frontières, 1994.—. “Emergence in exact natural sciences”. Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica 91 (1998): 83-98.Putnam, H. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pre s s, 1981Richman, R. “In defense of quantum numbers”. Journal of Chemical Educa-tion 76 (1999a): 608.—. “The use of one-electron quantum numbers to describe polyatomic s y s t e m s”. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1999b): 175-83.Rohrlich, F. “Pluralistic ontology and theory reduction in the physical sciences”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (1988): 295-312.Scerri, E. “The electronic configuration model, quantum mechanics and reduction”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (1991): 309-25.—. “Has chemistry been at least approximately reduced to quantum mecha-n i c s ? ”. P S A 1994 . Vol. 1. Eds. D. Hull, M. Forbes & R. Burian. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, 1994. 160-170.—. “The periodic table and the electron”. American Scientist 85 (1997): 546 -553.—. “The failure of reduction and how to resist disunity of the sciences in the context of chemical education”. Science & Education 9 (2000a): 405-425.—. “Realism, reduction and the ‘intermediate position’”. Of Minds and Mole-cules. New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry. Eds. N. Bhushan & S. Rosenfeld. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000b. 51-72.—. “Have orbitals really been observed?”. Journal of Chemical Education 77 (2000c): 1492-1494.—. “The recently claimed observation of atomic orbitals and some related philosophical issues”. Philosophy of Science 68 (2001): S76-S88.—. “Have orbitals really been observed? (author reply)”. Journal of Chemical Education 79 (2002): 210.—. “Just how ab initio is ab initio quantum chemistry?”. Foundations of Chemistry 6 (2004): 93-116.—. “Editorial 20”. Foundations of Chemistry 7 (2005a): 119-123.—. “Some aspects of the metaphysics of chemistry and the nature of the e lement s”, Hyle - International Journal for the Philosophy of Chemistry 11 (2005b): 127-145.—. “Normative and descriptive philosophy of science and the role of chemistry”. Baird, Scerri & McIntyre. 119-128.—. “The ambiguity of reduction”. Hyle - International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 13 (2007): 67-81.—. “General introduction to the papers”. Collected Papers on Philosophy of Chemistry. Londres: Imperial College Press, 2008a. 1-22.—. “Philosophy of chemistry, reduction, emergence and chemical education”. Advances in Teaching Physical Chemistry. Eds. M. Ellison & T. Schoolcraft. Washington: American Chemical Society, 2008b. 59-72.Scerri, E. & McIntyre, L. “The case for the philosophy of chemistry”. Synthese111 (19 9 7 ): 213 -232 .Schuster, P. “‘Less is more’ and the art of modeling complex phenomena: simplification may but need not be the key to handle large networks”. Complexity 11 (2005): 11-13Schwarz, W. H. E. & Wang, S. G. “Some solved problems of the periodic system of chemical elements”. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry110 (2010): 1455-1465.Sklar, L. Physics and Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Ströhle, A. “Molecularization in nutritional science: a view from philosophy of science”. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 54 (2010): 1385-1404.Tinoco Jr. I., Sauer, K., Wang, J. C. y Puglisi, J. D. Physical Chemistry - Prin-ciples and Applications in Biological Sciences. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002.Torretti, R. “El realismo científico y la ciencia como es”. Escritos Filosóficos 19 8 6 -2 0 0 6 . Santiago de Chile: Universidad Diego Portales, 2007. 75-98. Trad. de “Scientific realism and scientific practice”. The Reality of the Unob-servable: Observability, Unobservability and their Impact on the Issue of cientific Realism. Ed. E. Agazzi & M. Pauri. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000. 113 -12 2 .—. Manuel Kant. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales, 2005.Van Brakel, J. “Chemistry as the science of the transformation of substances”. Synthese 111 (19 9 7 ): 253 -2 82 .—. Philosophy of Chemistry. Between the Manifest and the Scientific Image.Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2000a.—. “The nature of chemical substances”. Of Minds and Molecules. New Philo-sophical Perspectives on Chemistry. Eds. N. Bhushan & S. Rosenfeld. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000b. 162-184.Vancik, H. “Opus magnum: An outline for the philosophy of chemistry”. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1999): 242-256.Vemulapalli, G. K. y Byerly, H. “Remnants of reductionism”. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1999): 17-41.Vesterinen, V. M. & Aksela, M. “A novel course of chemistry as a scientific discipline: how do prospective perceive nature of chemistry through visits to research groups”. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 10 (2009): 132-141.—. “Quantitative analysis of representations of nature of science in nordic upper secondary school textbooks using framework of analysis based on philosophy of chemistry”. Science & Education 22 (2013): 1839-1855.—. “Design of chemistry teacher education course on nature of science”. Science & Education 22 (2013): 2193-2225.Vihalemm, R. “The autonomy of chemistry: old and new problems”. Founda-tions of Chemistry 12 (2010): 97-107.Wang, S. G. & Schwarz, W. H. E. “On closed-shell interactions, polar cova-lences, d shell holes, and direct images of orbitals: the case of Cuprite”. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 39 (2000): 1757-1762.—. “PSE - Icon of chemistry: The periodic system of chemical elements in the new century”. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 48 (2009): 3404-3415.Wasserman, E. & Schaefer, H. F. “Methylene geometry”. Science 233 (1986): 829.Wilson, M. “John Earman’s A Primer on Determinism”. Philosophy of Science56 (1989): 502-532.Woolley, R. G. “Must a molecule have a shape?”. American Chemical Society100 (1978): 1073-78.—. “Natural optical activity and the molecular hypothesis”. Structure and Bonding 52 (1982): 1-35.Yam, P. “Seeing the bonds”. Scientific American 281 (1999): 28.Zuo, J. M., Kim, M., O’Keefe, M. & Spence, J. C. H. “Direct observation of d-orbital holes and Cu-Cu Bonding in Cu2O”. Nature 401 (1999): 49-52.Zurer, P. “Chemistry’s top five achievements”. Chemical & Engineering News 77 (1999): 38-40.Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Acceso abiertohttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2QuímicaFísicaReducciónAutonomíaOntologíaChemistryPhysicsReductionAutonomyOntology¿Acerca de qué nos habla la química? Nuevos argumentos en favor de la autonomía ontológica del mundo químicoAbout What does Chemistry speak? New arguments for the ontological autonomy of the chemical worldArtículo de revistahttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la CienciaORIGINALRCFC2013.jpgRCFC2013.jpgimage/jpeg127136https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/66ef166a-d6e1-4c3c-a4f0-3e3e9a07f8f7/download4e0300059376247dd2ecdbfdfeceacc7MD51trueAnonymousREADCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-81031https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/245255c0-e21f-46cc-a8fc-e22b859af518/download934f4ca17e109e0a05eaeaba504d7ce4MD52falseAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/849afe18-cef7-4cfb-b27f-c94ae199bda3/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILRCFC2013.jpg.jpgRCFC2013.jpg.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4948https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/3ca3a12b-1578-456f-bbb7-6298119ccd0a/download0550b0e02f178397f0ed7e90c611d1b9MD54falseAnonymousREAD20.500.12495/6273oai:pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com:20.500.12495/62732021-11-04T03:03:20.165Zhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalopen.accesshttps://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.comRepositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquebibliotecas@biteca.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 |