Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes
To compare the safety, tolerability, and antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan with enalapril at different altitudes. A total of 142 adult Colombian outpatients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were recruited in 3 cities at different altitudes (Bogotá at 2600 m, Medellı́n at 1538 m and...
- Autores:
-
Botero, R.
Matiz, H.
Marı́a, E.
Orejarena, H.
Blanco, M.
Velez, J.R.
Del Portillo, H.
- Tipo de recurso:
- https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2000
- Institución:
- Universidad El Bosque
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio U. El Bosque
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/5284
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5284
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(99)00194-1
- Palabra clave:
- Valsartan
Enalapril
Angiotensin II receptor blocker
AT1 antagonist
Indapamide
Essential hypertension
- Rights
- License
- Acceso abierto
| id |
UNBOSQUE2_9aedba974435437d65e6075b2676350a |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/5284 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNBOSQUE2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio U. El Bosque |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes |
| dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes |
| title |
Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes |
| spellingShingle |
Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes Valsartan Enalapril Angiotensin II receptor blocker AT1 antagonist Indapamide Essential hypertension |
| title_short |
Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes |
| title_full |
Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes |
| title_fullStr |
Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes |
| title_sort |
Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Botero, R. Matiz, H. Marı́a, E. Orejarena, H. Blanco, M. Velez, J.R. Del Portillo, H. |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Botero, R. Matiz, H. Marı́a, E. Orejarena, H. Blanco, M. Velez, J.R. Del Portillo, H. |
| dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv |
Valsartan Enalapril Angiotensin II receptor blocker AT1 antagonist Indapamide Essential hypertension |
| topic |
Valsartan Enalapril Angiotensin II receptor blocker AT1 antagonist Indapamide Essential hypertension |
| description |
To compare the safety, tolerability, and antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan with enalapril at different altitudes. A total of 142 adult Colombian outpatients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were recruited in 3 cities at different altitudes (Bogotá at 2600 m, Medellı́n at 1538 m and Barranquilla at 100 m) and randomized in an open label fashion to receive either valsartan 80 mg once daily or enalapril 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks. Those patients not responding at 4 weeks received additional 1.25 mg indapamide daily during the remaining trial period. The primary efficacy variable was the change in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) from baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary efficacy variables included the change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (SSBP). The primary criterion for tolerability was the incidence of adverse experiences. Both valsartan and enalapril reduced mean SDBP and SSBP with similar efficacy, independent of altitude. Adverse events irrespective of relationship to trial drug were reported by 12 patients (18.8%) on valsartan and by 15 (23.4%) patients on enalapril. Enalapril was associated with a significantly (P<0.05) higher rate of dry cough and more cases of headache than valsartan. Valsartan 80 mg once daily is as effective as enalapril 20 mg once daily in reducing blood pressure, with tolerability profile at least as good as enalapril’s. |
| publishDate |
2000 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2000 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-09T18:46:05Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-09T18:46:05Z |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.local.none.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1874-1754 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5284 |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(99)00194-1 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad El Bosque |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque |
| dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co |
| identifier_str_mv |
1874-1754 instname:Universidad El Bosque reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5284 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(99)00194-1 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Cardiology, 1874-1754, Vol. 72, No. 3, 2000, p. 247-254 |
| dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.internationaljournalofcardiology.com/article/S0167-5273(99)00194-1/fulltext |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acceso abierto |
| dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Acceso abierto |
| dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv |
2000 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Acceso abierto https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 2000 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Cardiology |
| institution |
Universidad El Bosque |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/c3c663d2-3648-4554-9d31-9fe5ed890f31/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bibliotecas@biteca.com |
| _version_ |
1849967271565328384 |
| spelling |
Botero, R.Matiz, H.Marı́a, E.Orejarena, H.Blanco, M.Velez, J.R.Del Portillo, H.2021-02-09T18:46:05Z2021-02-09T18:46:05Z20001874-1754https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5284https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(99)00194-1instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquerepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coapplication/pdfengElsevierInternational Journal of CardiologyInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1874-1754, Vol. 72, No. 3, 2000, p. 247-254https://www.internationaljournalofcardiology.com/article/S0167-5273(99)00194-1/fulltextEfficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudesEfficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudesArtículo de revistahttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85ValsartanEnalaprilAngiotensin II receptor blockerAT1 antagonistIndapamideEssential hypertensionTo compare the safety, tolerability, and antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan with enalapril at different altitudes. A total of 142 adult Colombian outpatients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were recruited in 3 cities at different altitudes (Bogotá at 2600 m, Medellı́n at 1538 m and Barranquilla at 100 m) and randomized in an open label fashion to receive either valsartan 80 mg once daily or enalapril 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks. Those patients not responding at 4 weeks received additional 1.25 mg indapamide daily during the remaining trial period. The primary efficacy variable was the change in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) from baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary efficacy variables included the change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (SSBP). The primary criterion for tolerability was the incidence of adverse experiences. Both valsartan and enalapril reduced mean SDBP and SSBP with similar efficacy, independent of altitude. Adverse events irrespective of relationship to trial drug were reported by 12 patients (18.8%) on valsartan and by 15 (23.4%) patients on enalapril. Enalapril was associated with a significantly (P<0.05) higher rate of dry cough and more cases of headache than valsartan. Valsartan 80 mg once daily is as effective as enalapril 20 mg once daily in reducing blood pressure, with tolerability profile at least as good as enalapril’s.Acceso abiertohttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Acceso abierto2000http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/c3c663d2-3648-4554-9d31-9fe5ed890f31/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52falseAnonymousREAD20.500.12495/5284oai:pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com:20.500.12495/52842022-05-05T19:54:15.901Zmetadata.onlyhttps://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.comRepositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquebibliotecas@biteca.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 |
