Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes

To compare the safety, tolerability, and antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan with enalapril at different altitudes. A total of 142 adult Colombian outpatients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were recruited in 3 cities at different altitudes (Bogotá at 2600 m, Medellı́n at 1538 m and...

Full description

Autores:
Botero, R.
Matiz, H.
Marı́a, E.
Orejarena, H.
Blanco, M.
Velez, J.R.
Del Portillo, H.
Tipo de recurso:
https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Fecha de publicación:
2000
Institución:
Universidad El Bosque
Repositorio:
Repositorio U. El Bosque
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/5284
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5284
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(99)00194-1
Palabra clave:
Valsartan
Enalapril
Angiotensin II receptor blocker
AT1 antagonist
Indapamide
Essential hypertension
Rights
License
Acceso abierto
id UNBOSQUE2_9aedba974435437d65e6075b2676350a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/5284
network_acronym_str UNBOSQUE2
network_name_str Repositorio U. El Bosque
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes
title Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes
spellingShingle Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes
Valsartan
Enalapril
Angiotensin II receptor blocker
AT1 antagonist
Indapamide
Essential hypertension
title_short Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes
title_full Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes
title_sort Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudes
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Botero, R.
Matiz, H.
Marı́a, E.
Orejarena, H.
Blanco, M.
Velez, J.R.
Del Portillo, H.
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Botero, R.
Matiz, H.
Marı́a, E.
Orejarena, H.
Blanco, M.
Velez, J.R.
Del Portillo, H.
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv Valsartan
Enalapril
Angiotensin II receptor blocker
AT1 antagonist
Indapamide
Essential hypertension
topic Valsartan
Enalapril
Angiotensin II receptor blocker
AT1 antagonist
Indapamide
Essential hypertension
description To compare the safety, tolerability, and antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan with enalapril at different altitudes. A total of 142 adult Colombian outpatients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were recruited in 3 cities at different altitudes (Bogotá at 2600 m, Medellı́n at 1538 m and Barranquilla at 100 m) and randomized in an open label fashion to receive either valsartan 80 mg once daily or enalapril 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks. Those patients not responding at 4 weeks received additional 1.25 mg indapamide daily during the remaining trial period. The primary efficacy variable was the change in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) from baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary efficacy variables included the change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (SSBP). The primary criterion for tolerability was the incidence of adverse experiences. Both valsartan and enalapril reduced mean SDBP and SSBP with similar efficacy, independent of altitude. Adverse events irrespective of relationship to trial drug were reported by 12 patients (18.8%) on valsartan and by 15 (23.4%) patients on enalapril. Enalapril was associated with a significantly (P<0.05) higher rate of dry cough and more cases of headache than valsartan. Valsartan 80 mg once daily is as effective as enalapril 20 mg once daily in reducing blood pressure, with tolerability profile at least as good as enalapril’s.
publishDate 2000
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2000
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-09T18:46:05Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-09T18:46:05Z
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.local.none.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1874-1754
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5284
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(99)00194-1
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
identifier_str_mv 1874-1754
instname:Universidad El Bosque
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5284
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(99)00194-1
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv International Journal of Cardiology, 1874-1754, Vol. 72, No. 3, 2000, p. 247-254
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://www.internationaljournalofcardiology.com/article/S0167-5273(99)00194-1/fulltext
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv Acceso abierto
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Acceso abierto
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv 2000
rights_invalid_str_mv Acceso abierto
https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
2000
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv International Journal of Cardiology
institution Universidad El Bosque
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/c3c663d2-3648-4554-9d31-9fe5ed890f31/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliotecas@biteca.com
_version_ 1849967271565328384
spelling Botero, R.Matiz, H.Marı́a, E.Orejarena, H.Blanco, M.Velez, J.R.Del Portillo, H.2021-02-09T18:46:05Z2021-02-09T18:46:05Z20001874-1754https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5284https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(99)00194-1instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquerepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coapplication/pdfengElsevierInternational Journal of CardiologyInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1874-1754, Vol. 72, No. 3, 2000, p. 247-254https://www.internationaljournalofcardiology.com/article/S0167-5273(99)00194-1/fulltextEfficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudesEfficacy and safety of valsartan compared with enalapril at different altitudesArtículo de revistahttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85ValsartanEnalaprilAngiotensin II receptor blockerAT1 antagonistIndapamideEssential hypertensionTo compare the safety, tolerability, and antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan with enalapril at different altitudes. A total of 142 adult Colombian outpatients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were recruited in 3 cities at different altitudes (Bogotá at 2600 m, Medellı́n at 1538 m and Barranquilla at 100 m) and randomized in an open label fashion to receive either valsartan 80 mg once daily or enalapril 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks. Those patients not responding at 4 weeks received additional 1.25 mg indapamide daily during the remaining trial period. The primary efficacy variable was the change in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) from baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary efficacy variables included the change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (SSBP). The primary criterion for tolerability was the incidence of adverse experiences. Both valsartan and enalapril reduced mean SDBP and SSBP with similar efficacy, independent of altitude. Adverse events irrespective of relationship to trial drug were reported by 12 patients (18.8%) on valsartan and by 15 (23.4%) patients on enalapril. Enalapril was associated with a significantly (P<0.05) higher rate of dry cough and more cases of headache than valsartan. Valsartan 80 mg once daily is as effective as enalapril 20 mg once daily in reducing blood pressure, with tolerability profile at least as good as enalapril’s.Acceso abiertohttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Acceso abierto2000http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/c3c663d2-3648-4554-9d31-9fe5ed890f31/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52falseAnonymousREAD20.500.12495/5284oai:pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com:20.500.12495/52842022-05-05T19:54:15.901Zmetadata.onlyhttps://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.comRepositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquebibliotecas@biteca.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