Filosofía de las ciencias sociales : desarrollo, enfoques y compromisos ontológicos

La filosofía de las ciencias sociales tradicionalmente ha ocupado un rol secundario den-tro de la filosofía de las ciencias. Sin embargo, esta situación ha cambiado en las últimas décadas. Dado lo anterior, en este artículo muestro el desarrollo de una filosofía de las ciencias sociales motivada tan...

Full description

Autores:
Armijo Torres, Álvaro
Tipo de recurso:
https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Universidad El Bosque
Repositorio:
Repositorio U. El Bosque
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/6310
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6310
https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v21i42.3478
Palabra clave:
Filosofía de las ciencias sociales
Pospositivismo
Realismo científico
Constructivismo social
Idealización en ciencias
Empirismo abstracto
Philosophy of social sciences
Postpositivism
Scientific realism
Social constructivism
Idealization in science
Abstracted empirism
Rights
License
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
id UNBOSQUE2_74f108363fb4425c3f04f3b18935c11b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/6310
network_acronym_str UNBOSQUE2
network_name_str Repositorio U. El Bosque
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Filosofía de las ciencias sociales : desarrollo, enfoques y compromisos ontológicos
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv Philosophy of Social Sciences: Development, Approaches and Ontological Commitments
title Filosofía de las ciencias sociales : desarrollo, enfoques y compromisos ontológicos
spellingShingle Filosofía de las ciencias sociales : desarrollo, enfoques y compromisos ontológicos
Filosofía de las ciencias sociales
Pospositivismo
Realismo científico
Constructivismo social
Idealización en ciencias
Empirismo abstracto
Philosophy of social sciences
Postpositivism
Scientific realism
Social constructivism
Idealization in science
Abstracted empirism
title_short Filosofía de las ciencias sociales : desarrollo, enfoques y compromisos ontológicos
title_full Filosofía de las ciencias sociales : desarrollo, enfoques y compromisos ontológicos
title_fullStr Filosofía de las ciencias sociales : desarrollo, enfoques y compromisos ontológicos
title_full_unstemmed Filosofía de las ciencias sociales : desarrollo, enfoques y compromisos ontológicos
title_sort Filosofía de las ciencias sociales : desarrollo, enfoques y compromisos ontológicos
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Armijo Torres, Álvaro
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Armijo Torres, Álvaro
dc.contributor.orcid.none.fl_str_mv 0000-0002-4964-3723
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Filosofía de las ciencias sociales
Pospositivismo
Realismo científico
Constructivismo social
Idealización en ciencias
Empirismo abstracto
topic Filosofía de las ciencias sociales
Pospositivismo
Realismo científico
Constructivismo social
Idealización en ciencias
Empirismo abstracto
Philosophy of social sciences
Postpositivism
Scientific realism
Social constructivism
Idealization in science
Abstracted empirism
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv Philosophy of social sciences
Postpositivism
Scientific realism
Social constructivism
Idealization in science
Abstracted empirism
description La filosofía de las ciencias sociales tradicionalmente ha ocupado un rol secundario den-tro de la filosofía de las ciencias. Sin embargo, esta situación ha cambiado en las últimas décadas. Dado lo anterior, en este artículo muestro el desarrollo de una filosofía de las ciencias sociales motivada tanto por la filosofía de las ciencias como por las ciencias sociales. En lo práctico, tres son las ideas desarrolladas: 1) existe una conexión entre filo-sofía de las ciencias sociales y filosofía de las ciencias; 2) dicha conexión se explica a partir de las transformaciones recientes en filosofía de las ciencias, y 3) esta conexión ofrece nuevos enfoques para comprender la realidad social y la práctica de las ciencias sociales.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-03T16:29:52Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-03T16:29:52Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0124-4620
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6310
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v21i42.3478
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
identifier_str_mv 0124-4620
instname:Universidad El Bosque
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6310
https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v21i42.3478
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 21 Núm 42, 2021, 37-72.
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/3478
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Baert, Patrick. Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Towards Pragmatism. Cambridge: Po-lity Press, 2005.
Benton, Ted e Ian Craib. Philosophy of Social Science The Philosophical Foundations of Social Thought. 2nd ed. New York, NJ: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2011.
Berger, Peter L. y Thomas Luckmann. La construcción social de la realidad. Trad. Silvia Zuleta. 18th ed. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 2003.
Bhaskar, Roy. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contempo-rary Human Sciences. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 1998.
Boyd, Richard. “Realism, Anti-Foundationalism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds”. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 61.1/2 (1991): 127-148. <www.jstor.org/stable/4320174>
Brand, Jennie E. y Juli Simon Thomas. “Causal Effect Heterogeneity”. Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research. Ed. Stephen L. Morgan. Dordrecht: Sprin-ger, 2013. 189-214.
Bukve, Oddbjørn. Designing Social Science Research. Cham: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2019.
Bunge, Mario. The Sociology-Philosophy Connection. London: Transaction Publi-shers, 2013.
Carnap, Rudolf. The Unity of Science. Trad. Max Black. London: Thoemmes Press, 1935.
Cartwright, Nancy y Eleonora Montuschi, eds. Philosophy of Social Science. A New Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Chakravartty, Anjan. “Scientific Realism”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Edward N. Zalta, 2017. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/scientific-realism/>
Dilthey, Wilhelm. Introducción a las ciencias del espíritu. Trad. Eugenio Imaz. Méxi-co, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1949.
Elster, Jon. Explaining Social Behavior More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Epstein, Brian. “Social Ontology”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Ed-ward N. Zalta, Summer 2018 Edition. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/social-ontology/>
Collins, Randall. “Sociology Proscience or Antiscience?” American Sociological Re-view 54.1 (1989): 124-139. <https://doi.org/10.2307/2095666>
della Porta, Donatella y Michael Keating. “How many Approaches in the Social Sciences? An Epistemological Introduction”. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective. Eds. Donatella della Porta y Michael Keating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 19-39.
Feyerabend, Paul. Against Method. 3rd ed. New York, NJ: Verso, 1993.
Goldthorpe, John H. Sociology as a Population Science. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 2016.
Guala, Francesco. “Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Naturalism and Anti-Natura-lism in the Philosophy of Social Science”. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Ed. Paul Humphreys. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 43-64.
Hacking, Ian. ¿La construcción social de qué? Trad. Jesús Sánchez Navarro. Barcelona: Paidós, 2001.
Harp, Randall y Kareem Khalifa. “Realism and Antirealism”. The Routledge Com-panion to Philosophy of Social Science. Eds. Lee McIntyre y Alex Rosenberg. London: Routledge, 2017. 254-269.
Hempel, Carl G. Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1964.
Holland, Paul. “Statistics and Causal Inference”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81.396 (1986): 945-960. <https://doi.org/10.2307/2289064>
Jarvie, Ian C. y Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, eds. Thesage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences. London: SAGE Publications, 2011.
Kampourakis, Kostas y Tobias Uller. Philosophy of Science for Biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Kellert, Stephen H. et ál., eds. “Introduction: The Pluralist Stance”. Scientific Plura-lism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2006. vii-xviii.
Kitcher, Philip. “Toward a Pragmatist Philosophy of Science”. Theoria. An Interna-tional Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 28.2 (2013): 185-231. <https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.7014>
Kratochwil, Friedrich. “Constructivism: What It Is (not) and How It Matters”. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Eds. Donatella della Porta y Michael Keating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 80-98
Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Kuorikoski, Jaakko y Caterina Marchionni. “Evidential Diversity and the Triangu-lation of Phenomena”. Philosophy of Science 83.2 (2016): 227-247. <https://doi.org/10.1086/684960>
Latour, Bruno y Steve Woolgar. La vida en el laboratorio. La construcción de los hechos científicos. Trad. Eulalia Pérez Sedeño. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 2003.
Lewens, Tim. The Meaning of Science. An Introduction to Philosophy of Science. New York, NJ: Basic Books, 2016.
Little, Daniel. A New Social Ontology of Government. Consent, Coordination, and Authority. Cham: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2010.
Little, Daniel. “Philosophy of Sociology”. Philosophies of the Sciences. A Guide. Ed. Fritz Allhoff. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 293-323.
Livingstone Smith, David. “Naturalism”. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Social Science. Eds. Lee McIntyre y Alex Rosenberg. London: Routledge, 2017. 159-168.
Mäki, Uskali. “Reglobalizing Realism by Going Local, or (How) Should Our For-mulations of Scientific Realism be Informed about the Sciences?” Erkenntnis 63.1 (2005): 231-251. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-3227-6>
McIntyre, Lee y Alex Rosenberg, eds. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of So-cial Science. London: Routledge, 2017.
Mills, C. Wright. The Sociological Imagination. 40th Anniversary Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Morgan, Mary S. y Till Grüne-Yanoff. “Modeling Practices in the Social and Hu-man Sciences. An Interdisciplinary Exchange”. Perspectives on Science 21.2 (2013):143-156. <https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00089>
Morgan, Stephen L. y Christopher Winship. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. Methods and Principles for Social Research. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Odenbaugh, Jay y Paul Griffiths. “Philosophy of Biology”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2020 Edition, <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/biology-philosophy/>
Okasha, Samir. Philosophy of Biology. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Papineau, David. “Naturalism”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Ed-ward N. Zalta, Summer 2021 Edition. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/naturalism/>
Popper, Karl R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge, 2002.
Potochnik, Angela. “The Diverse Aims of Science”. Studies in History and Philo-sophy of Science Part A 53.1 (2015): 1-10. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shp-sa.2015.05.008>
Psillos, Stathis. Scientific Realism. How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge, 1999.
Risjord, Mark. Philosophy of Social Science: A Contemporary Introduction. London: Routledge, 2014.
Rorty, Richard. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Prince-ton University Press, 1980.
Schuster, Federico. “Los desafíos del realismo en la filosofía de las ciencias socia-les”. Ontología social: una disciplina de frontera. Eds. Jaime Ramos Arenas y Carlos Andrés Ramírez. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2018. 193-220.
Taylor, Charles. “Interpretation and the Sciences of Man”. The Review of Metaphysics 25.1 (1971): 3-51. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/20125928>
Winch, Peter. The Idea of Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. 2nd ed. Lon-don: Routledge, 1990.
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv Acceso abierto
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Acceso abierto
https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia
institution Universidad El Bosque
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/cc98cbb7-cacf-42e5-8f02-1198a9c9c1d4/download
https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/40d316e0-19e6-4180-92ee-a6ed26caa86f/download
https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/59bbe47d-92a9-4045-b909-e2a5c69113d7/download
https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/5b6aa4f7-5e2c-4775-ad92-de4caff61f80/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 88370780bde08d6ed8e83771d201ef96
934f4ca17e109e0a05eaeaba504d7ce4
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
7c734de781832308fe51743ba4b55015
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliotecas@biteca.com
_version_ 1849967251391774720
spelling Armijo Torres, Álvaro0000-0002-4964-37232021-11-03T16:29:52Z2021-11-03T16:29:52Z2021-01-010124-4620https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6310https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v21i42.3478instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquerepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coLa filosofía de las ciencias sociales tradicionalmente ha ocupado un rol secundario den-tro de la filosofía de las ciencias. Sin embargo, esta situación ha cambiado en las últimas décadas. Dado lo anterior, en este artículo muestro el desarrollo de una filosofía de las ciencias sociales motivada tanto por la filosofía de las ciencias como por las ciencias sociales. En lo práctico, tres son las ideas desarrolladas: 1) existe una conexión entre filo-sofía de las ciencias sociales y filosofía de las ciencias; 2) dicha conexión se explica a partir de las transformaciones recientes en filosofía de las ciencias, y 3) esta conexión ofrece nuevos enfoques para comprender la realidad social y la práctica de las ciencias sociales.Philosophy of the social sciences has traditionally occupied a secondary role within the philosophy of science. However, this situation has changed in recent decades. Given the above, in this article I show the development of a philosophy of social sciences motivated by both the philosophy of science and the social sciences. Three are the main ideas developed in this paper: 1) there is a connection between the philosophy of the social sciences and the philosophy of science; 2) this connection is explained from the recent transformations in the philosophy of science and 3) this connection offers new approaches to understanding the social reality and the practice of the social sciences.application/pdfspaRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 21 Núm 42, 2021, 37-72.https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/3478Baert, Patrick. Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Towards Pragmatism. Cambridge: Po-lity Press, 2005.Benton, Ted e Ian Craib. Philosophy of Social Science The Philosophical Foundations of Social Thought. 2nd ed. New York, NJ: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2011.Berger, Peter L. y Thomas Luckmann. La construcción social de la realidad. Trad. Silvia Zuleta. 18th ed. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 2003.Bhaskar, Roy. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contempo-rary Human Sciences. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 1998.Boyd, Richard. “Realism, Anti-Foundationalism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds”. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 61.1/2 (1991): 127-148. <www.jstor.org/stable/4320174>Brand, Jennie E. y Juli Simon Thomas. “Causal Effect Heterogeneity”. Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research. Ed. Stephen L. Morgan. Dordrecht: Sprin-ger, 2013. 189-214.Bukve, Oddbjørn. Designing Social Science Research. Cham: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2019.Bunge, Mario. The Sociology-Philosophy Connection. London: Transaction Publi-shers, 2013.Carnap, Rudolf. The Unity of Science. Trad. Max Black. London: Thoemmes Press, 1935.Cartwright, Nancy y Eleonora Montuschi, eds. Philosophy of Social Science. A New Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Chakravartty, Anjan. “Scientific Realism”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Edward N. Zalta, 2017. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/scientific-realism/>Dilthey, Wilhelm. Introducción a las ciencias del espíritu. Trad. Eugenio Imaz. Méxi-co, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1949.Elster, Jon. Explaining Social Behavior More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Epstein, Brian. “Social Ontology”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Ed-ward N. Zalta, Summer 2018 Edition. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/social-ontology/>Collins, Randall. “Sociology Proscience or Antiscience?” American Sociological Re-view 54.1 (1989): 124-139. <https://doi.org/10.2307/2095666>della Porta, Donatella y Michael Keating. “How many Approaches in the Social Sciences? An Epistemological Introduction”. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective. Eds. Donatella della Porta y Michael Keating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 19-39.Feyerabend, Paul. Against Method. 3rd ed. New York, NJ: Verso, 1993.Goldthorpe, John H. Sociology as a Population Science. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 2016.Guala, Francesco. “Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Naturalism and Anti-Natura-lism in the Philosophy of Social Science”. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Ed. Paul Humphreys. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 43-64.Hacking, Ian. ¿La construcción social de qué? Trad. Jesús Sánchez Navarro. Barcelona: Paidós, 2001.Harp, Randall y Kareem Khalifa. “Realism and Antirealism”. The Routledge Com-panion to Philosophy of Social Science. Eds. Lee McIntyre y Alex Rosenberg. London: Routledge, 2017. 254-269.Hempel, Carl G. Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1964.Holland, Paul. “Statistics and Causal Inference”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81.396 (1986): 945-960. <https://doi.org/10.2307/2289064>Jarvie, Ian C. y Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, eds. Thesage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences. London: SAGE Publications, 2011.Kampourakis, Kostas y Tobias Uller. Philosophy of Science for Biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Kellert, Stephen H. et ál., eds. “Introduction: The Pluralist Stance”. Scientific Plura-lism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2006. vii-xviii.Kitcher, Philip. “Toward a Pragmatist Philosophy of Science”. Theoria. An Interna-tional Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 28.2 (2013): 185-231. <https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.7014>Kratochwil, Friedrich. “Constructivism: What It Is (not) and How It Matters”. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Eds. Donatella della Porta y Michael Keating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 80-98Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.Kuorikoski, Jaakko y Caterina Marchionni. “Evidential Diversity and the Triangu-lation of Phenomena”. Philosophy of Science 83.2 (2016): 227-247. <https://doi.org/10.1086/684960>Latour, Bruno y Steve Woolgar. La vida en el laboratorio. La construcción de los hechos científicos. Trad. Eulalia Pérez Sedeño. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 2003.Lewens, Tim. The Meaning of Science. An Introduction to Philosophy of Science. New York, NJ: Basic Books, 2016.Little, Daniel. A New Social Ontology of Government. Consent, Coordination, and Authority. Cham: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2010.Little, Daniel. “Philosophy of Sociology”. Philosophies of the Sciences. A Guide. Ed. Fritz Allhoff. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 293-323.Livingstone Smith, David. “Naturalism”. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Social Science. Eds. Lee McIntyre y Alex Rosenberg. London: Routledge, 2017. 159-168.Mäki, Uskali. “Reglobalizing Realism by Going Local, or (How) Should Our For-mulations of Scientific Realism be Informed about the Sciences?” Erkenntnis 63.1 (2005): 231-251. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-3227-6>McIntyre, Lee y Alex Rosenberg, eds. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of So-cial Science. London: Routledge, 2017.Mills, C. Wright. The Sociological Imagination. 40th Anniversary Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Morgan, Mary S. y Till Grüne-Yanoff. “Modeling Practices in the Social and Hu-man Sciences. An Interdisciplinary Exchange”. Perspectives on Science 21.2 (2013):143-156. <https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00089>Morgan, Stephen L. y Christopher Winship. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. Methods and Principles for Social Research. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Odenbaugh, Jay y Paul Griffiths. “Philosophy of Biology”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2020 Edition, <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/biology-philosophy/>Okasha, Samir. Philosophy of Biology. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Papineau, David. “Naturalism”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Ed-ward N. Zalta, Summer 2021 Edition. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/naturalism/>Popper, Karl R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge, 2002.Potochnik, Angela. “The Diverse Aims of Science”. Studies in History and Philo-sophy of Science Part A 53.1 (2015): 1-10. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shp-sa.2015.05.008>Psillos, Stathis. Scientific Realism. How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge, 1999.Risjord, Mark. Philosophy of Social Science: A Contemporary Introduction. London: Routledge, 2014.Rorty, Richard. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Prince-ton University Press, 1980.Schuster, Federico. “Los desafíos del realismo en la filosofía de las ciencias socia-les”. Ontología social: una disciplina de frontera. Eds. Jaime Ramos Arenas y Carlos Andrés Ramírez. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2018. 193-220.Taylor, Charles. “Interpretation and the Sciences of Man”. The Review of Metaphysics 25.1 (1971): 3-51. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/20125928>Winch, Peter. The Idea of Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. 2nd ed. Lon-don: Routledge, 1990.Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Acceso abiertohttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Filosofía de las ciencias socialesPospositivismoRealismo científicoConstructivismo socialIdealización en cienciasEmpirismo abstractoPhilosophy of social sciencesPostpositivismScientific realismSocial constructivismIdealization in scienceAbstracted empirismFilosofía de las ciencias sociales : desarrollo, enfoques y compromisos ontológicosPhilosophy of Social Sciences: Development, Approaches and Ontological CommitmentsArtículo de revistahttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la CienciaORIGINALRCFC2021.jpgRCFC2021.jpgimage/jpeg51866https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/cc98cbb7-cacf-42e5-8f02-1198a9c9c1d4/download88370780bde08d6ed8e83771d201ef96MD51trueAnonymousREADCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-81031https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/40d316e0-19e6-4180-92ee-a6ed26caa86f/download934f4ca17e109e0a05eaeaba504d7ce4MD52falseAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/59bbe47d-92a9-4045-b909-e2a5c69113d7/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILRCFC2021.jpg.jpgRCFC2021.jpg.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg2930https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/5b6aa4f7-5e2c-4775-ad92-de4caff61f80/download7c734de781832308fe51743ba4b55015MD54falseAnonymousREAD20.500.12495/6310oai:pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com:20.500.12495/63102021-11-05T03:02:41.528Zhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalopen.accesshttps://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.comRepositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquebibliotecas@biteca.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

Publicaciones similares