Realismo pitagórico y realismo cantoriano en la física cuántica no relativista

El carácter fundamentalmente probabilista de la teoría cuántica cuestionó el realismo como filosofía básica de la ciencia, si bien ciertas interpretaciones instrumentalistas podrían no amenazar por sí solas la existencia de un mundo exterior e independiente de nuestra conciencia. La falta de un valo...

Full description

Autores:: Alemañ Berenguer, Rafael Andrés

Tipo de recurso:: https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501

Fecha de publicación:: 2012

Institución:: Universidad El Bosque

Repositorio:: Repositorio U. El Bosque

Idioma:: spa

id	UNBOSQUE2_7456fdfc46556eae78549f80acfa3554
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/6278
network_acronym_str	UNBOSQUE2
network_name_str	Repositorio U. El Bosque
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Realismo pitagórico y realismo cantoriano en la física cuántica no relativista
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv	Pitagoric and cantorian realism in the non-relativistic quantum physics
title	Realismo pitagórico y realismo cantoriano en la física cuántica no relativista
spellingShingle	Realismo pitagórico y realismo cantoriano en la física cuántica no relativista Objetividad Función Medida Magnitud Distribución Objectivity Function Measurement Magnitude Distribution
title_short	Realismo pitagórico y realismo cantoriano en la física cuántica no relativista
title_full	Realismo pitagórico y realismo cantoriano en la física cuántica no relativista
title_fullStr	Realismo pitagórico y realismo cantoriano en la física cuántica no relativista
title_full_unstemmed	Realismo pitagórico y realismo cantoriano en la física cuántica no relativista
title_sort	Realismo pitagórico y realismo cantoriano en la física cuántica no relativista
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Alemañ Berenguer, Rafael Andrés
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv	Alemañ Berenguer, Rafael Andrés
dc.contributor.orcid.none.fl_str_mv	0000-0002-3612-8167
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Objetividad Función Medida Magnitud Distribución
topic	Objetividad Función Medida Magnitud Distribución Objectivity Function Measurement Magnitude Distribution
dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv	Objectivity Function Measurement Magnitude Distribution
description	El carácter fundamentalmente probabilista de la teoría cuántica cuestionó el realismo como filosofía básica de la ciencia, si bien ciertas interpretaciones instrumentalistas podrían no amenazar por sí solas la existencia de un mundo exterior e independiente de nuestra conciencia. La falta de un valor definido para tales magnitudes antes de la medición alentó la suposición de que tales valores “no existen” antes de la medida. Una reinterpretación de nuestras ideas sobre las magnitudes físicas, considerándolas formal-mente representadas por conjuntos de valores en lugar de valores numéricos concretos, ayudaría a disipar toda sombra de irrealidad física.
publishDate	2012
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2012-07-01
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-11-03T16:04:48Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-11-03T16:04:48Z
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv	https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv	https://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format	https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0124-4620
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6278
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v12i25.1658
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	instname:Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv	repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
identifier_str_mv	0124-4620 instname:Universidad El Bosque reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co
url	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6278 https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v12i25.1658
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 12 Núm 25, 2012, 61-82.
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1658
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Albert, David & Loewer, Barry. “Wanted dead or alive: two attempts to solve Schrödinger’s paradox”, Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association1 (1990): 277-285. Álvarez-Galindo, Gabriel & García-Alcaine, Guillermo. “Localidad einstein-iana y mecánica cuántica”. Revista Española de Física 19.1 (2005): 43-50. Aspect, Alain; Dalibar, Jean & Roger, Gerard. “Experimental tests of Bell`s inequalities using time-varying analyzers”. Physiscal Revew Letters 49 (1982): 1084-1087. Bahns, Dorothea; Doplicher, Sergio; Fredenhagen, Klaus & Piacitelli, Gherardo. “Ultraviolet Finite Quantum Field Theory on Quantum Space-t i m e ”. Commun. Math. Phys. 237.1-2 (2003): 221-241. Bell, John S. Lo decible y lo indecible en mecánica cuántica. Madrid: Alianza, 199 0. Bene, Gyula. & Dieks, Dennis. “A perspectival version of the modal inter-pretation of quantum mechanics and the origin of macroscopic behavior”, Foundations of Physics 32 (2002): 645-671. Berkovitz, Joseph & Hemmo, Meir. “Can modal interpretations of quantum mechanics be reconciled with relativity?”. Philosophy of Science 72 (2005): 789-801. Birkhoff, Garrett & Von Neumann, John. “The Logic of Quantum Me c h a n i c s”. Annals of Mathematics 37 (1936): 823-843. Bohm, David & Hiley, Basil. The Undivided Universe. An Ontological Inter-pretation of Quantum Theory. Londres: Routledge, 1993. Bub, Jeffrey. Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-sity Press, 1997 Bunge, Mario. Foundations of Physics, New York: Spinger-Verlag, 1967a.—. Quantum theory and reality. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1967b.—, ed. Problems in the foundations of physics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1971.—. The Furniture of the World. Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel, 1977.—. Filosofía de la Física. Barcelona: Ariel, 1982.—. Epistemología. Barcelona: Ariel, 1985. Busch, Paul. “Can «Unsharp Objectification» Solve the Quantum Measure-ment Problem?”. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 37.1 (1998): 241-247. Busch, Paul; Lahti, Pekka. & Mittelstaedt, Peter. The Quantum Theory of Measurement. 2ª ed. Berlin: Springer, 1996. Busch, Paul. & Shimony, Abner. “Insolubility of the quantum measurement problem for unsharp observables”. Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 27.4 (1996) 397- 40 4. Cabello, Adán; Estebaranz, José M & Garcia, Guillermo. “Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem: A proof with 18 vectors”. Physics Letters.A 212 (1996): 183 -187. Cassinello, Andrés. “La indeterminación en mecánica cuántica”. Revista de la Real Sociedad Española de Física 21.4 (2007): 42-53. D’Espagnat, Bernard. On Physics and Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton Univer-sity Press, 2006. Dickson, Michael. “Wavefunction tails in the modal interpretation”. Proceed-ings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1 (1994): 366-376. Doplicher, Sergio; Fredenhagen, Klaus & Roberts, John E. “The quantum structure of spacetime at the Planck scale and quantum fields”. Commun. Math. Phys. 172.1 (1995): 187-220 Einstein, Albert; Podolsky, Boris & Rosen, Nathan. “Can quantum-mechan-ical description of reality be considered complete?”. Physical Review 47 (1935): 777-780 Elby, Andrew. “Why «modal» interpretations of quantum mechanics don’t solve the measurement problem”. Foundations of Physics Letters 6 (1993): 5 -19. Fock, Vladimir A. “Remarks on Bohr’s article on his discussions with Einstein”. Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 66 (1958): 599-607 Gleason, Andrew M. “Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space”. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 6 (1957): 885-893. Gottfried, Kurt. “Does Quantum Mechanics Carry the Seeds of its own Destruction?” Quantum Reflections. Eds. D. Amati D, J. Ellis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 165-185. Halvorson, Hans & Clifton, Rob. “No Place for Particles in Relativistic Quantum Theory?”. Philosophy of Science 69 (2002): 1-28. Heisenberg, Werner. Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper & Row, 1958. Hiley, Basil J. “Foundations of Quantum Mechanics”. Contemporary Physics18 (1977): 411-414. Jammer, Max. The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. An Historical Perspective. New York: John Wiley & S on s, 1974.—. The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. New York: McGraw-H i l l, 1996 . Jauch, Josef M & Piron, Constantin. “Can Hidden variables be Excluded in Quantum Mechanics?”. Helvetica Physica Acta 36 (1963): 827-837. Kochen, Simon & Specker, Ernst. “The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics”. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17 (1967): 5 9 - 8 7. Mackey, George. The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Benjamin, 1963 Mittelstaedt, Peter. Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1975.—. “The Constitution of Objects in Kant’s Philosophy and in Modern Phy s i c s”. Kant and Contemporary Epistemology. Ed. P. Parrini. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994. 169-181.—. The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Measurement Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 Musgrave, Alan. “Discussion: Realism About What?”. Philosophy of Science 59 (1992): 691-697. Omelyanovskij, Mykhailo E; Tagliagambe, Silvano & Geymonat, Ludovico. L’ interpretazione Materialistica della Mecánica Quantistica. Milán: Feltrineli, 1972 . Popper, Karl. “The Propensity Interpretation of Probability”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 10 (1959): 25-42. Pusey, Matthew; Barrett, Jonathan & Rudolph, Terry. “The quantum state cannot be interpreted statistically”. Quantum Physics (2011). En línea. < ht t p://x x x .l a n l.g ov/a b s /1111.332 8v1>. Rescher N. Scientific Realism. A Critical Reappraisal. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987. Schroedinger, Erwin. “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik”, Naturwissenschaften 23 (1935): 807-812; 823-838; 844-849 Stapp, Henry P. “S-Matrix Interpretation of Quantum Theory”, Physical ReviewD 3 (1971): 1303-1320. an Fraassen, Bas. “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox”, Synthese 29 (1974) 291-309. —. Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991 Von Neumann, John. Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1932 Wheeler, John A & Zurek, Wojciech H., eds. Quantum Theory and Measure-ment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv	Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv	Acceso abierto
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv	https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Acceso abierto https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia
institution	Universidad El Bosque
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/1882d58b-ba2a-4d78-9476-ab23237b5497/download https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/9be0e277-2f75-4147-98e8-f759989416f5/download https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/aac15cd2-a4b8-4f34-b55c-07862f0ddfdb/download https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/e44741df-0359-4d0c-b254-78f32de20ecd/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	4c17f88ede5c145c221241117c741322 934f4ca17e109e0a05eaeaba504d7ce4 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 36157ec6abb5ac9b43f0da3e30516d79
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bibliotecas@biteca.com
_version_	1849967233032257536
spelling	Alemañ Berenguer, Rafael Andrés0000-0002-3612-81672021-11-03T16:04:48Z2021-11-03T16:04:48Z2012-07-010124-4620https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/6278https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v12i25.1658instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquerepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coEl carácter fundamentalmente probabilista de la teoría cuántica cuestionó el realismo como filosofía básica de la ciencia, si bien ciertas interpretaciones instrumentalistas podrían no amenazar por sí solas la existencia de un mundo exterior e independiente de nuestra conciencia. La falta de un valor definido para tales magnitudes antes de la medición alentó la suposición de que tales valores “no existen” antes de la medida. Una reinterpretación de nuestras ideas sobre las magnitudes físicas, considerándolas formal-mente representadas por conjuntos de valores en lugar de valores numéricos concretos, ayudaría a disipar toda sombra de irrealidad física.The probabilistic character of quantum measures put in question the proper role of the realism as basic philosophy for science, even though certain instrumentalist interpreta-tions might not threaten by itself the existence of an external world independent of the observer conscience. The lack of a defined value for such magnitudes previously to the measure encouraged the supposition that such values “did not exist” before there being measured. A reformulation of our ideas about physical magnitudes, regarding them as formally represented by sets of values instead of sharp numeric values would help to dissipate any unreality shade in physical sciences.application/pdfspaRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 0124-4620, Vol. 12 Núm 25, 2012, 61-82.https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1658Albert, David & Loewer, Barry. “Wanted dead or alive: two attempts to solve Schrödinger’s paradox”, Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association1 (1990): 277-285.Álvarez-Galindo, Gabriel & García-Alcaine, Guillermo. “Localidad einstein-iana y mecánica cuántica”. Revista Española de Física 19.1 (2005): 43-50.Aspect, Alain; Dalibar, Jean & Roger, Gerard. “Experimental tests of Bell`s inequalities using time-varying analyzers”. Physiscal Revew Letters 49 (1982): 1084-1087.Bahns, Dorothea; Doplicher, Sergio; Fredenhagen, Klaus & Piacitelli, Gherardo. “Ultraviolet Finite Quantum Field Theory on Quantum Space-t i m e ”. Commun. Math. Phys. 237.1-2 (2003): 221-241.Bell, John S. Lo decible y lo indecible en mecánica cuántica. Madrid: Alianza, 199 0.Bene, Gyula. & Dieks, Dennis. “A perspectival version of the modal inter-pretation of quantum mechanics and the origin of macroscopic behavior”, Foundations of Physics 32 (2002): 645-671.Berkovitz, Joseph & Hemmo, Meir. “Can modal interpretations of quantum mechanics be reconciled with relativity?”. Philosophy of Science 72 (2005): 789-801.Birkhoff, Garrett & Von Neumann, John. “The Logic of Quantum Me c h a n i c s”. Annals of Mathematics 37 (1936): 823-843.Bohm, David & Hiley, Basil. The Undivided Universe. An Ontological Inter-pretation of Quantum Theory. Londres: Routledge, 1993.Bub, Jeffrey. Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-sity Press, 1997Bunge, Mario. Foundations of Physics, New York: Spinger-Verlag, 1967a.—. Quantum theory and reality. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1967b.—, ed. Problems in the foundations of physics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1971.—. The Furniture of the World. Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel, 1977.—. Filosofía de la Física. Barcelona: Ariel, 1982.—. Epistemología. Barcelona: Ariel, 1985.Busch, Paul. “Can «Unsharp Objectification» Solve the Quantum Measure-ment Problem?”. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 37.1 (1998): 241-247.Busch, Paul; Lahti, Pekka. & Mittelstaedt, Peter. The Quantum Theory of Measurement. 2ª ed. Berlin: Springer, 1996.Busch, Paul. & Shimony, Abner. “Insolubility of the quantum measurement problem for unsharp observables”. Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 27.4 (1996) 397- 40 4.Cabello, Adán; Estebaranz, José M & Garcia, Guillermo. “Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem: A proof with 18 vectors”. Physics Letters.A 212 (1996): 183 -187.Cassinello, Andrés. “La indeterminación en mecánica cuántica”. Revista de la Real Sociedad Española de Física 21.4 (2007): 42-53.D’Espagnat, Bernard. On Physics and Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton Univer-sity Press, 2006.Dickson, Michael. “Wavefunction tails in the modal interpretation”. Proceed-ings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1 (1994): 366-376.Doplicher, Sergio; Fredenhagen, Klaus & Roberts, John E. “The quantum structure of spacetime at the Planck scale and quantum fields”. Commun. Math. Phys. 172.1 (1995): 187-220Einstein, Albert; Podolsky, Boris & Rosen, Nathan. “Can quantum-mechan-ical description of reality be considered complete?”. Physical Review 47 (1935): 777-780Elby, Andrew. “Why «modal» interpretations of quantum mechanics don’t solve the measurement problem”. Foundations of Physics Letters 6 (1993): 5 -19.Fock, Vladimir A. “Remarks on Bohr’s article on his discussions with Einstein”. Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 66 (1958): 599-607Gleason, Andrew M. “Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space”. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 6 (1957): 885-893.Gottfried, Kurt. “Does Quantum Mechanics Carry the Seeds of its own Destruction?” Quantum Reflections. Eds. D. Amati D, J. Ellis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 165-185.Halvorson, Hans & Clifton, Rob. “No Place for Particles in Relativistic Quantum Theory?”. Philosophy of Science 69 (2002): 1-28.Heisenberg, Werner. Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper & Row, 1958.Hiley, Basil J. “Foundations of Quantum Mechanics”. Contemporary Physics18 (1977): 411-414.Jammer, Max. The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. An Historical Perspective. New York: John Wiley & S on s, 1974.—. The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. New York: McGraw-H i l l, 1996 .Jauch, Josef M & Piron, Constantin. “Can Hidden variables be Excluded in Quantum Mechanics?”. Helvetica Physica Acta 36 (1963): 827-837.Kochen, Simon & Specker, Ernst. “The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics”. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17 (1967): 5 9 - 8 7.Mackey, George. The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Benjamin, 1963Mittelstaedt, Peter. Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1975.—. “The Constitution of Objects in Kant’s Philosophy and in Modern Phy s i c s”. Kant and Contemporary Epistemology. Ed. P. Parrini. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994. 169-181.—. The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Measurement Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998Musgrave, Alan. “Discussion: Realism About What?”. Philosophy of Science 59 (1992): 691-697.Omelyanovskij, Mykhailo E; Tagliagambe, Silvano & Geymonat, Ludovico. L’ interpretazione Materialistica della Mecánica Quantistica. Milán: Feltrineli, 1972 .Popper, Karl. “The Propensity Interpretation of Probability”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 10 (1959): 25-42.Pusey, Matthew; Barrett, Jonathan & Rudolph, Terry. “The quantum state cannot be interpreted statistically”. Quantum Physics (2011). En línea. < ht t p://x x x .l a n l.g ov/a b s /1111.332 8v1>.Rescher N. Scientific Realism. A Critical Reappraisal. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.Schroedinger, Erwin. “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik”, Naturwissenschaften 23 (1935): 807-812; 823-838; 844-849Stapp, Henry P. “S-Matrix Interpretation of Quantum Theory”, Physical ReviewD 3 (1971): 1303-1320.an Fraassen, Bas. “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox”, Synthese 29 (1974) 291-309. —. Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991Von Neumann, John. Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1932Wheeler, John A & Zurek, Wojciech H., eds. Quantum Theory and Measure-ment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Acceso abiertohttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2ObjetividadFunciónMedidaMagnitudDistribuciónObjectivityFunctionMeasurementMagnitudeDistributionRealismo pitagórico y realismo cantoriano en la física cuántica no relativistaPitagoric and cantorian realism in the non-relativistic quantum physicsArtículo de revistahttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la CienciaORIGINALRCFC2012.jpgRCFC2012.jpgimage/jpeg105082https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/1882d58b-ba2a-4d78-9476-ab23237b5497/download4c17f88ede5c145c221241117c741322MD51trueAnonymousREADCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-81031https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/9be0e277-2f75-4147-98e8-f759989416f5/download934f4ca17e109e0a05eaeaba504d7ce4MD52falseAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/aac15cd2-a4b8-4f34-b55c-07862f0ddfdb/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILRCFC2012.jpg.jpgRCFC2012.jpg.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4205https://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com/bitstreams/e44741df-0359-4d0c-b254-78f32de20ecd/download36157ec6abb5ac9b43f0da3e30516d79MD54falseAnonymousREAD20.500.12495/6278oai:pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com:20.500.12495/62782021-11-04T03:03:36.031Zhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacionalopen.accesshttps://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.comRepositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquebibliotecas@biteca.comTk9URTogUExBQ0UgWU9VUiBPV04gTElDRU5TRSBIRVJFClRoaXMgc2FtcGxlIGxpY2Vuc2UgaXMgcHJvdmlkZWQgZm9yIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgcHVycG9zZXMgb25seS4KCk5PTi1FWENMVVNJVkUgRElTVFJJQlVUSU9OIExJQ0VOU0UKCkJ5IHNpZ25pbmcgYW5kIHN1Ym1pdHRpbmcgdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLCB5b3UgKHRoZSBhdXRob3Iocykgb3IgY29weXJpZ2h0Cm93bmVyKSBncmFudHMgdG8gRFNwYWNlIFVuaXZlcnNpdHkgKERTVSkgdGhlIG5vbi1leGNsdXNpdmUgcmlnaHQgdG8gcmVwcm9kdWNlLAp0cmFuc2xhdGUgKGFzIGRlZmluZWQgYmVsb3cpLCBhbmQvb3IgZGlzdHJpYnV0ZSB5b3VyIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gKGluY2x1ZGluZwp0aGUgYWJzdHJhY3QpIHdvcmxkd2lkZSBpbiBwcmludCBhbmQgZWxlY3Ryb25pYyBmb3JtYXQgYW5kIGluIGFueSBtZWRpdW0sCmluY2x1ZGluZyBidXQgbm90IGxpbWl0ZWQgdG8gYXVkaW8gb3IgdmlkZW8uCgpZb3UgYWdyZWUgdGhhdCBEU1UgbWF5LCB3aXRob3V0IGNoYW5naW5nIHRoZSBjb250ZW50LCB0cmFuc2xhdGUgdGhlCnN1Ym1pc3Npb24gdG8gYW55IG1lZGl1bSBvciBmb3JtYXQgZm9yIHRoZSBwdXJwb3NlIG9mIHByZXNlcnZhdGlvbi4KCllvdSBhbHNvIGFncmVlIHRoYXQgRFNVIG1heSBrZWVwIG1vcmUgdGhhbiBvbmUgY29weSBvZiB0aGlzIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gZm9yCnB1cnBvc2VzIG9mIHNlY3VyaXR5LCBiYWNrLXVwIGFuZCBwcmVzZXJ2YXRpb24uCgpZb3UgcmVwcmVzZW50IHRoYXQgdGhlIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gaXMgeW91ciBvcmlnaW5hbCB3b3JrLCBhbmQgdGhhdCB5b3UgaGF2ZQp0aGUgcmlnaHQgdG8gZ3JhbnQgdGhlIHJpZ2h0cyBjb250YWluZWQgaW4gdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLiBZb3UgYWxzbyByZXByZXNlbnQKdGhhdCB5b3VyIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gZG9lcyBub3QsIHRvIHRoZSBiZXN0IG9mIHlvdXIga25vd2xlZGdlLCBpbmZyaW5nZSB1cG9uCmFueW9uZSdzIGNvcHlyaWdodC4KCklmIHRoZSBzdWJtaXNzaW9uIGNvbnRhaW5zIG1hdGVyaWFsIGZvciB3aGljaCB5b3UgZG8gbm90IGhvbGQgY29weXJpZ2h0LAp5b3UgcmVwcmVzZW50IHRoYXQgeW91IGhhdmUgb2J0YWluZWQgdGhlIHVucmVzdHJpY3RlZCBwZXJtaXNzaW9uIG9mIHRoZQpjb3B5cmlnaHQgb3duZXIgdG8gZ3JhbnQgRFNVIHRoZSByaWdodHMgcmVxdWlyZWQgYnkgdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLCBhbmQgdGhhdApzdWNoIHRoaXJkLXBhcnR5IG93bmVkIG1hdGVyaWFsIGlzIGNsZWFybHkgaWRlbnRpZmllZCBhbmQgYWNrbm93bGVkZ2VkCndpdGhpbiB0aGUgdGV4dCBvciBjb250ZW50IG9mIHRoZSBzdWJtaXNzaW9uLgoKSUYgVEhFIFNVQk1JU1NJT04gSVMgQkFTRUQgVVBPTiBXT1JLIFRIQVQgSEFTIEJFRU4gU1BPTlNPUkVEIE9SIFNVUFBPUlRFRApCWSBBTiBBR0VOQ1kgT1IgT1JHQU5JWkFUSU9OIE9USEVSIFRIQU4gRFNVLCBZT1UgUkVQUkVTRU5UIFRIQVQgWU9VIEhBVkUKRlVMRklMTEVEIEFOWSBSSUdIVCBPRiBSRVZJRVcgT1IgT1RIRVIgT0JMSUdBVElPTlMgUkVRVUlSRUQgQlkgU1VDSApDT05UUkFDVCBPUiBBR1JFRU1FTlQuCgpEU1Ugd2lsbCBjbGVhcmx5IGlkZW50aWZ5IHlvdXIgbmFtZShzKSBhcyB0aGUgYXV0aG9yKHMpIG9yIG93bmVyKHMpIG9mIHRoZQpzdWJtaXNzaW9uLCBhbmQgd2lsbCBub3QgbWFrZSBhbnkgYWx0ZXJhdGlvbiwgb3RoZXIgdGhhbiBhcyBhbGxvd2VkIGJ5IHRoaXMKbGljZW5zZSwgdG8geW91ciBzdWJtaXNzaW9uLgo=

Realismo pitagórico y realismo cantoriano en la física cuántica no relativista

Publicaciones similares