Quality assessment of acute viral bronchiolitis clinical practice guidelines
Recently, in an attempt to reduce variability in clinical practice and produce better results for patients, several clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the appropriate diagnosis and management of bronchiolitis in infants have been developed. However, the quality of available CPGs for bronchiolit...
- Autores:
-
Rodriguez‐Martinez, Carlos E.
Sossa‐Briceño, Monica P.
Acuña‐Cordero, Ranniery
- Tipo de recurso:
- https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad El Bosque
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio U. El Bosque
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/5366
- Palabra clave:
- Bronchiolitis
Clinical practice guideline
Health care quality assessment
- Rights
- License
- Acceso abierto
| id |
UNBOSQUE2_706677e392c9285ac4136ffd2a0c64b4 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/5366 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNBOSQUE2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio U. El Bosque |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Rodriguez‐Martinez, Carlos E.Sossa‐Briceño, Monica P.Acuña‐Cordero, Ranniery2021-02-18T13:48:42Z2021-02-18T13:48:42Z1365-2753https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5366https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12446instname:Universidad El Bosquereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquerepourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.coapplication/pdfengJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1365-2753, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2017, p. 37-43https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jep.12446Quality assessment of acute viral bronchiolitis clinical practice guidelinesQuality assessment of acute viral bronchiolitis clinical practice guidelinesArtículo de revistahttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85BronchiolitisClinical practice guidelineHealth care quality assessmentJournal of Evaluation in Clinical PracticeRecently, in an attempt to reduce variability in clinical practice and produce better results for patients, several clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the appropriate diagnosis and management of bronchiolitis in infants have been developed. However, the quality of available CPGs for bronchiolitis management has not yet been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of acute viral bronchiolitis CPGs. We performed a systematic and exhaustive search of CPGs on bronchiolitis published from 2000 to 2014. Three independent appraisers assessed the quality of the CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. A standardized score was calculated for each of the six domains, and the CPGS were rated as recommended, recommended with modifications, or not recommended. Six CPGs published between the years 2000 and 2014 were selected from a total of 111 citations. There was substantial agreement among reviewers (ICC: 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61–0.89). The domains that scored the highest were ‘scope and purpose’, with a mean value of 92.1% (range: 77.8–100%), and ‘clarity of presentation’ [83.3% (69.4–91.7%)]. Those that scored the lowest were ‘applicability’ [44.3% (8.3–77.1%)], and ‘stakeholder involvement’ [66.7% (47.2–94.4%)]. Three CPGS were evaluated as being recommended with modifications, and only two were recommended for use in clinical practice. Available bronchiolitis CPGs vary in quality, and the findings of the present study are useful for identifying aspects or domains where there is room for improvement in future CPGs.Acceso abiertohttps://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Acceso abierto2017-02http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf220.500.12495/5366oai:pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.com:20.500.12495/53662022-05-02T17:37:48.222Zmetadata.onlyhttps://pruebas-update-repositorio-unbosque.cloudbiteca.comRepositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosquebibliotecas@biteca.com |
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Quality assessment of acute viral bronchiolitis clinical practice guidelines |
| dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
Quality assessment of acute viral bronchiolitis clinical practice guidelines |
| title |
Quality assessment of acute viral bronchiolitis clinical practice guidelines |
| spellingShingle |
Quality assessment of acute viral bronchiolitis clinical practice guidelines Bronchiolitis Clinical practice guideline Health care quality assessment |
| title_short |
Quality assessment of acute viral bronchiolitis clinical practice guidelines |
| title_full |
Quality assessment of acute viral bronchiolitis clinical practice guidelines |
| title_fullStr |
Quality assessment of acute viral bronchiolitis clinical practice guidelines |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Quality assessment of acute viral bronchiolitis clinical practice guidelines |
| title_sort |
Quality assessment of acute viral bronchiolitis clinical practice guidelines |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Rodriguez‐Martinez, Carlos E. Sossa‐Briceño, Monica P. Acuña‐Cordero, Ranniery |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Rodriguez‐Martinez, Carlos E. Sossa‐Briceño, Monica P. Acuña‐Cordero, Ranniery |
| dc.subject.keywords.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bronchiolitis Clinical practice guideline Health care quality assessment |
| topic |
Bronchiolitis Clinical practice guideline Health care quality assessment |
| description |
Recently, in an attempt to reduce variability in clinical practice and produce better results for patients, several clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the appropriate diagnosis and management of bronchiolitis in infants have been developed. However, the quality of available CPGs for bronchiolitis management has not yet been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of acute viral bronchiolitis CPGs. We performed a systematic and exhaustive search of CPGs on bronchiolitis published from 2000 to 2014. Three independent appraisers assessed the quality of the CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. A standardized score was calculated for each of the six domains, and the CPGS were rated as recommended, recommended with modifications, or not recommended. Six CPGs published between the years 2000 and 2014 were selected from a total of 111 citations. There was substantial agreement among reviewers (ICC: 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61–0.89). The domains that scored the highest were ‘scope and purpose’, with a mean value of 92.1% (range: 77.8–100%), and ‘clarity of presentation’ [83.3% (69.4–91.7%)]. Those that scored the lowest were ‘applicability’ [44.3% (8.3–77.1%)], and ‘stakeholder involvement’ [66.7% (47.2–94.4%)]. Three CPGS were evaluated as being recommended with modifications, and only two were recommended for use in clinical practice. Available bronchiolitis CPGs vary in quality, and the findings of the present study are useful for identifying aspects or domains where there is room for improvement in future CPGs. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-18T13:48:42Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-18T13:48:42Z |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.local.none.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1365-2753 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5366 |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12446 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad El Bosque |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque |
| dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv |
repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co |
| identifier_str_mv |
1365-2753 instname:Universidad El Bosque reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque repourl:https://repositorio.unbosque.edu.co |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/5366 https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12446 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries.spa.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1365-2753, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2017, p. 37-43 |
| dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jep.12446 |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acceso abierto |
| dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Acceso abierto |
| dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-02 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Acceso abierto https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 2017-02 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.journal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice |
| institution |
Universidad El Bosque |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad El Bosque |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bibliotecas@biteca.com |
| _version_ |
1849967237855707136 |
