Risk factors for reamputation in patients with diabetic foot: A case-control study

Background: Reamputation as a complication of diabetic foot ulcers presents a high economic burden and represents a therapeutic failure. It is paramount to identify as early as possible patients in whom a minor amputation may not be the best option. The purpose of this investigation was to do a case...

Full description

Autores:
Correa Sánchez, Carlos Alberto
Vargas-Hernández, Juan Sebastián
García, Luisa Fernanda
Jaimes, Julián
Caicedo, Martha
Niño, Manuel Eduardo
Robledo Quijano, Jaime
Tipo de recurso:
https://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Universidad El Bosque
Repositorio:
Repositorio U. El Bosque
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unbosque.edu.co:20.500.12495/11084
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12495/11084
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2023.05.006
Palabra clave:
Reamputación
Úlcera de pie diabético
Pie diabético
Amputación de extremidad inferior
Infección
Análisis de supervivencia
Reamputation
Diabetic foot ulcer
Diabetic foot
Lower extremity amputation
Infection
Survival analysis
Rights
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Description
Summary:Background: Reamputation as a complication of diabetic foot ulcers presents a high economic burden and represents a therapeutic failure. It is paramount to identify as early as possible patients in whom a minor amputation may not be the best option. The purpose of this investigation was to do a case-controlled study to determine risk factors associated with re-amputation in patients with DFU (diabetic foot ulcers) at two University Hospitals. Methods: Multicentric, observational, retrospective, case-control study from clinical records of 2 university hospitals. Our study included 420 patients, with 171 cases (re-amputations), and 249 controls. We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis and time-to-event survival analysis to identify re-amputation risk factors. Results: Statistically significant risk factors were artery history of tobacco use (p = 0.001); male sex (p = 0.048); arterial occlusion in Doppler ultrasound (p = 0.001); percentage of stenosis in arterial ultrasound >50 % (p = 0.053); requirement of vascular intervention (p = 0.01); and microvascular involvement in photoplethysmography (p = 0.033). The most parsimonious regression model suggests that history of tobacco use, male sex, arterial occlusion in ultrasound, and percentage of stenosis in arterial ultrasound >50 % remained statistically significant. The survival analysis identified earlier amputations in patients with larger occlusion in arterial ultrasound, high leukocyte count, and elevated ESR. Conclusion: Direct and surrogate outcomes in patients with diabetic foot ulcers identify vascular involvement as an important risk factor for reamputation.