Estado de la investigación sobre el crecimiento verde desde la perspectiva de política pública (2011-2021)

Desde los inicios de la apuesta multilateral por el crecimiento verde, se han generado un sinnúmero de políticas locales, de carácter nacional, para dar respuesta a esta demanda mundial. Al mismo tiempo, ha crecido el interés de investigar y profundizar sobre la implementación y evaluación de los pr...

Full description

Autores:
Díaz Ariza, Diana Marcela
Aguilar Galeano, Estíbaliz
García Castiblanco, Claudia Paola
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
Repositorio:
Repositorio UNAB
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/27239
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/27239
https://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4660
Palabra clave:
Bioeconomía
Crecimiento verde
Política pública
Revisión sistemática de literatura
Sostenibilidad
Economía verde
Crecimiento económico
Bioeconomy
Green growth
Public policy
Systematic literature review
Sustainability
Green economy
Economic growth
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id UNAB2_7282fbb43851d12b477bdc7737522c94
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/27239
network_acronym_str UNAB2
network_name_str Repositorio UNAB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Estado de la investigación sobre el crecimiento verde desde la perspectiva de política pública (2011-2021)
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv State of research on green growth from public policy perspectives (2011- 2021)
title Estado de la investigación sobre el crecimiento verde desde la perspectiva de política pública (2011-2021)
spellingShingle Estado de la investigación sobre el crecimiento verde desde la perspectiva de política pública (2011-2021)
Bioeconomía
Crecimiento verde
Política pública
Revisión sistemática de literatura
Sostenibilidad
Economía verde
Crecimiento económico
Bioeconomy
Green growth
Public policy
Systematic literature review
Sustainability
Green economy
Economic growth
title_short Estado de la investigación sobre el crecimiento verde desde la perspectiva de política pública (2011-2021)
title_full Estado de la investigación sobre el crecimiento verde desde la perspectiva de política pública (2011-2021)
title_fullStr Estado de la investigación sobre el crecimiento verde desde la perspectiva de política pública (2011-2021)
title_full_unstemmed Estado de la investigación sobre el crecimiento verde desde la perspectiva de política pública (2011-2021)
title_sort Estado de la investigación sobre el crecimiento verde desde la perspectiva de política pública (2011-2021)
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Díaz Ariza, Diana Marcela
Aguilar Galeano, Estíbaliz
García Castiblanco, Claudia Paola
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Díaz Ariza, Diana Marcela
Aguilar Galeano, Estíbaliz
García Castiblanco, Claudia Paola
dc.contributor.orcid.spa.fl_str_mv Díaz Ariza, Diana Marcela [0000-0002-8606-3234]
Aguilar Galeano, Estíbaliz [0000-0002-8942-1164]
García Castiblanco, Claudia Paola [0000-0002-3882-5556]
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Bioeconomía
Crecimiento verde
Política pública
Revisión sistemática de literatura
Sostenibilidad
Economía verde
Crecimiento económico
topic Bioeconomía
Crecimiento verde
Política pública
Revisión sistemática de literatura
Sostenibilidad
Economía verde
Crecimiento económico
Bioeconomy
Green growth
Public policy
Systematic literature review
Sustainability
Green economy
Economic growth
dc.subject.keywords.eng.fl_str_mv Bioeconomy
Green growth
Public policy
Systematic literature review
Sustainability
Green economy
Economic growth
description Desde los inicios de la apuesta multilateral por el crecimiento verde, se han generado un sinnúmero de políticas locales, de carácter nacional, para dar respuesta a esta demanda mundial. Al mismo tiempo, ha crecido el interés de investigar y profundizar sobre la implementación y evaluación de los programas derivados de los compromisos internacionales. El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar un análisis comprensivo sobre el estado de la investigación respecto al crecimiento verde y la política pública en la última década (2011-2021). Se encuentra que la mayor parte de la producción académica se da en Europa y Asia, y los tópicos con mayor interés son los condicionantes de la efectividad de la política pública, los direccionamientos en tecnología e innovación, la inversión, la evaluación de la política y la discusión conceptual sobre la que se soporta la política. El artículo muestra el debate sobre estos asuntos.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-05
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-10-30T21:30:20Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-10-30T21:30:20Z
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 0124-0781
2590-8669
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/27239
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv repourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4660
identifier_str_mv 0124-0781
2590-8669
instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
repourl:https://repository.unab.edu.co
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/27239
https://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4660
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/4660/3724
dc.relation.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/issue/view/290
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv Aguilar Galeano, E., & Figueroa Espinel, J. F. (2018). La Política Pública Distrital de Ruralidad de Bogotá D.C., Implementación de una política ambiental en el marco del desarrollo humano. Editorial Uniagustiniana. https://doi. org/10.28970/9789585498167
Bagheri, M., Guevara, Z., Alikarami, M., Kennedy, C. A., & Doluweera, G. (2018). Green growth planning: A multi-factor energy inputoutput analysis of the Canadian economy. Energy Economics, 74, 708-720. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2018.07.015
Banerjee, O., Bagstad, K. J., Cicowiez, M., Dudek, S., Horridge, M., Alavalapati, J. R. R., Masozera, M., Rukundo, E., & Rutebuka, E. (2020). Economic, land use, and ecosystem services impacts of Rwanda’s Green Growth Strategy: An application of the IEEM+ESM platform. Science of the Total Environment, 729, 138779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scitotenv.2020.138779
Baran, B. (2015). Support for renewable energy in Germany as an example of e%ective public policy. Oeconomia Copernicana, 6(2), 143- 158. https://doi.org/10.12775/OEC.2015.017
Bassi, A. (2016). Moving Towards Integrated Policy Formulation and Evaluation: The Green Economy Model. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 16(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1515/ rtuect-2015-0009
Béfort , N. (2020). Going beyond de!nitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested !elds. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119923. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119923
Béfort, N., & Nieddu, M. (2020). Bioéconomie : un retour historique sur deux problématisations de l’usage des ressources renouvelables. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 28(3-4), 216-225. https:// doi.org/10.1051/NSS/2021011
Bentsen, N. S., Larsen, S., & Stupak, I. (2019). Sustainability governance of the Danish bioeconomy - The case of bioenergy and biomaterials from agriculture. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 9(1), 1-14. https:// doi.org/10.1186/S13705-019-0222-3/TABLES/1
Bouzaher, A., Sahin, S., & Yeldan, E. (2015). How to green: a general equilibrium investigation of environmental policies for sustained growth with an application to Turkey’s economy. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 8(1), 49-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12076-014- 0124-0/TABLES/4
Bruckman, V. J., Haruthaithanasan, M., Miller, R. O., Terada, T., Brenner, A. K., Kraxner, F., & Flaspohler, D. (2018). Sustainable Forest Bioenergy Development Strategies in Indochina: Collaborative E%ort to Establish Regional Policies. Forests 2018, 9(4), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/F9040223
Burkolter, P., & Perch, L. (2014). Greening growth in the south: Practice, policies and new frontiers. South African Journal of International A%airs, 21(2), 235-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 0220461.2014.941917
Caplan, A. J., & Go, D. H. (2020). Measuring the bioeconomic impacts of prolonged drought on a lake ecosystem: The case of the Great Salt Lake, Utah. Natural Resource Modeling, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/NRM.12251
Chomkhamsri, K., Mungcharoen, T., & Yuvaniyama, C. (2016). 10-year experience with the Thainational LCI database: case study of ‘re!nery products. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(11), 1760-1770. https:// doi.org/10.1007/S11367-016-1160-3
Costa, J., Kot, S., & Stefko, R. (2021). Carrots or Sticks: Which Policies Matter the Most in Sustainable Resource Management? Resources, 10(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10020012
Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., Salman, M., Boamah, K. B., Ampon-Wireko, S., & Ko! Dogbe, C. S. (2021). Innovation, trade openness and CO2 emissions in selected countries in Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125143
Guo, L. ling, Qu, Y., Wu, C. you, & Wang, X. ling. (2018). “Identifying a pathway towards green growth of Chinese industrial regions based on a system dynamics approach”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2016.09.035
Haberl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Virág, D., Kalt, G., Plank, B., Brockway, P., Fishman, T., Hausknost, D., Krausmann, F., Leon-Gruchalski, B., Mayer, A., Pichler, M., Scha%artzik, A., Sousa, T., Streeck, J., & Creutzig, F. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6), 065003. https://doi. org/10.1088/1748-9326/AB842A
Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2019). Is Green Growth Possible?. New Political Economy , 25(4), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964
Islam, M., & Managi, S. (2019). Green growth and pro-environmental behavior: Sustainable resource management using natural capital accounting in India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 145, 126-138. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.027
Ivanova, Y. (2017). The Green Economy model: A promise or a reality for the Latin-American countries?. International Politics Reviews, 5, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41312-017-0021-9
Jakob, M., & Edenhofer, O. (2014). Green growth, degrowth, and the commons. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 447–468. https://doi. org/10.1093/oxrep/gru026.
Jasinevicius, G., Lindner, M., Verkerk, P. J., & Aleinikovas, M. (2017). Assessing Impacts of Wood Utilisation Scenarios for a Lithuanian Bioeconomy: Impacts on Carbon in Forests and Harvested Wood Products and on the Socio-Economic Performance of the Forest- Based Sector. Forests 2017, 8(4), 133. https:// doi.org/10.3390/F8040133
Kang, M. J., & Park, H. (2011). Impact of experience on government policy toward acceptance of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3465-3475. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. ENPOL.2011.03.045
Kelleher, L., Henchion, M., & O’Neill, E. (2019). Policy coherence and the transition to a bioeconomy: The case of Ireland. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/ SU11247247
Kröger, M., & Raitio, K. (2017). Finnish forest policy in the era of bioeconomy: A pathway to sustainability? Forest Policy and Economics, 77, 6-15. https:// doi.org/10.1016/J.FORPOL.2016.12.003
Leitão, J., Pereira, D., & de Brito, S. (2020). Inbound and Outbound Practices of Open Innovation and Eco-Innovation: Contrasting Bioeconomy and Non-Bioeconomy Firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2020, 6(4), 145. https://doi. org/10.3390/JOITMC6040145
Li, W., & Li, D. (2012). Environmental information transparency and implications for green growth in China. Public Administration and Development, 32(3), 324-334. https://doi. org/10.1002/PAD.1626
Marvik, O. J., & Philp, J. (2020). The systemic challenge of the bioeconomy: A policy framework for transitioning towards a sustainable carbon cycle economy. EMBO Reports, 21(10). https:// doi.org/10.15252/EMBR.202051478
Mathews, J. A. (2015). Energizing Industrial Development: The Role of the State in 21st Century Greening Strategies. Revista Do Serviço Público, 66, 29–54. https://doi.org/10.21874/RSP.V66I0.1276
Monasterolo, I., & Raberto, M. (2019). The impact of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies on the lowcarbon transition. Energy Policy, 124, 355- 370. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2018.08.051
Monasterolo, I., Raberto, M., Monasterolo, I., & Raberto, M. (2018). The EIRIN Flow-of-funds Behavioural Model of Green Fiscal Policies and Green Sovereign Bonds. Ecological Economics, 144(C), 228-243. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2017.07.029
Moosmann, D., Majer, S., Ugarte, S., Ladu, L., Wurster, S., & Thrän, D. (2020). Strengths and gaps of the EU frameworks for the sustainability assessment of bio-based products and bioenergy. Energ Sustain Soc, 10(22), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00251-8
Mukhtarov, F., Gerlak, A., & Pierce, R. (2017). Away from fossil-fuels and toward a bioeconomy: Knowledge versatility for public policy? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(6), 1010-1028. https://doi. org/10.1177/0263774X16676273
Muza, O., & Debnath, R. (2021). Disruptive innovation for inclusive renewable policy in sub-Saharan Africa: A social shaping of technology analysis of appliance uptake in Rwanda. Renewable Energy, 168, 896-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. renene.2020.12.091
Özbugday, F. C., Fındık, D., Metin Özcan, K., & Basçı, S. (2020). Resource e%iciency investments and !rm performance: Evidence from European SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119824
Palgan, Y. V., & McCormick, K. (2016). Biore!neries in Sweden: Perspectives on the opportunities, challenges and future. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biore!ning, 10(5), 523-533. https://doi. org/10.1002/BBB.1672
Pandey, P. C. (2020). Circular Designing and Green Growth: Insights on Future of Sustainability. SAGE Journals, 24(1), 113-117. https://doi. org/10.1177/0972262920903904
Pannell, D. J., Tillie, P., Rodríguez-Cerezo, E., Ervin, D., & Frisvold, G. B. (2016). Herbicide resistance : economic and environmental challenges. AgBioForum, 19(2), 136-155. https://mospace. umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/59578
Park, J. (2011). The Evolution of Green Growth Policy: An Unwelcome Intrusion on Global Environmental Governance? Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, 17(2), 207-241. https://dx.doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2013.17.2.264
Petig, E., Choi, H. S., Angenendt, E., Kremer, P., Grethe, H., & Bahrs, E. (2019). Downscaling of agricultural market impacts under bioeconomy development to the regional and the farm level—An example of Baden- Wuerttemberg. GCB Bioenergy, 11(10), 1102- 1124. https://doi.org/10.1111/GCBB.12639
Philippidis, G., Bartelings, H., Helming, J., M’barek, R., Smeets, E., & van Meijl, H. (2019). Levelling the playing !eld for EU biomass usage. Economic Systems Research, 31(2), 158- 177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2018.1564020/ SUPPL_FILE/CESR_A_1564020_SM1227.DOCX
Philippidis, G., M’Barek, R., & Ferrari, E. (2016). Is “biobased” activity a panacea for sustainable competitive growth? Energies, 9(10). https://doi. org/10.3390/en9100806
Philp, J. (2015). Balancing the bioeconomy: Supporting biofuels and bio-based materials in public policy. Energy and Environmental Science, 8(11), 3063-3068. https://doi.org/10.1039/ c5ee01864a
Pitkänen, K., Antikainen, R., Droste, N., Loiseau, E., Saikku, L., Aissani, L., Hansjürgens, B., Kuikman, P. J., Leskinen, P., & Thomsen, M. (2016). What can be learned from practical cases of green economy? –studies from !ve European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 666-676. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.08.071
Purkus, A., & Lüdtke, J. (2020). A systemic evaluation framework for a multi-actor, forest-based bioeconomy governance process: The German Charter for Wood 2.0 as a case study. Forest Policy and Economics, 113, 102113. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.FORPOL.2020.102113
Quenault, B. (2020). Energy transition and the sustainability of development trajectories: Are we headed toward a mere marginal adjustment or a disruptive transformation? Mondes En Developpement, 192(4), 45-70. https://doi.org/10.3917/MED.192.0045
Rampasso, I. S., Quelhas, O. L. G., Anholon, R., Silva, D. A. L., Pontes, A. T., Miranda, J. D. A., & Dias, J. O. (2021). The Bioeconomy in emerging economies: a study of the critical success factors based on Life Cycle Assessment and Delphi and Fuzzy-Delphi methods. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2021, 26(6), 1254-1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/ S11367-021-01913-1
Sampaio Neto, O. Z., Batista, E. A. C., & Meirelles, A. J. de A. (2020). Potencial de oleaginosas nativas no desenvolvimento de cadeias produtivas da biodiversidade brasileira. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 54(0), 537-559. https://doi. org/10.5380/DMA.V54I0.71934
Seidl, I., & Zahrnt, A. (2015). Social welfare politics cannot ignore growthmania. Unde!ned, 24(4), 232-235. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.24.4.6
Smith, E., & Diggans, J. (2020). Next Steps to Grow the Bioeconomy. Health Security, 18(4), 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1089/HS.2020.0012
Söderholm, K., Bergquist, A. K., & Söderholm, P. (2017). The transition to chlorine free pulp revisited: Nordic heterogeneity in environmental regulation and R&D collaboration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 1328-1339. https:// doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.07.190
Stahel, W. R. (2017). Analysis of the structure and values of the European Commission’s Circular Economy Package. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Waste and Resource Management, 170(1), 41-44. https:// doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.17.00009
Teigiserova, D. A., Hamelin, L., & Thomsen, M. (2020). Towards transparent valorization of food surplus, waste and loss: Clarifying de!nitions, food waste hierarchy, and role in the circular economy. Science of The Total Environment, 706, 136033. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.136033
Toivonen, R., Vihemäki, H., & Toppinen, A. (2021). Policy narratives on wooden multi-storey construction and implications for technology innovation system governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 125, 102409. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.FORPOL.2021.102409
Tong, C., Ding, S., Wang, B., & Yang, S. (2020). Assessing the target-availability of China’s investments for green growth using time series prediction. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 537, 122724. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122724
Vazquez-Brust, D. A., & Sarkis, J. (2012). Green growth: Managing the transition to a sustainable economy: Learning by doing in East Asia and Europe. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94- 007-4417-2
Venkata Mohan, S., Dahiya, S., Amulya, K., Katakojwala, R., & Vanitha, T. K. (2019). Can circular bioeconomy be fueled by waste biore!neries - A closer look. Bioresource Technology Reports, 7, 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. BITEB.2019.100277
Wang, X., & Shao, Q. (2019). Non-linear e%ects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on green growth in G20 countries: Evidence from panel threshold regression. Science of the Total Environment, 660, 1346-1354. https:// doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.01.094
Wang, Y., Hu, H., Dai, W., & Burns, K. (2021). Evaluation of industrial green development and industrial green competitiveness: Evidence from Chinese urban agglomerations. Ecological Indicators, 124, 107371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolind.2021.107371
Zhou, Z., Wu, H., & Song, P. (2019). Measuring the resource and environmental e%iciency of industrial water consumption in China: A non-radial directional distance function. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118169
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNAB
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Vol. 25 Núm. 51 (2023): Reflexión Política (enero - junio); 31-44
institution Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27239/1/Art%c3%adculo.pdf
https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27239/3/Art%c3%adculo.pdf.jpg
https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27239/2/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 1099c473301b129ae7ad76e9270ca66a
b4803f81a1891474cb1c1104d4f57aae
3755c0cfdb77e29f2b9125d7a45dd316
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional | Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNAB
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@unab.edu.co
_version_ 1828219761302962176
spelling Díaz Ariza, Diana Marcela717bcbd6-7a89-44c2-83ad-fefd1ce2ea4fAguilar Galeano, Estíbaliz9511a744-1ce2-4728-8ef9-bee78b097651García Castiblanco, Claudia Paola6f0d98fb-b844-4f25-bf46-7feb679c0443Díaz Ariza, Diana Marcela [0000-0002-8606-3234]Aguilar Galeano, Estíbaliz [0000-0002-8942-1164]García Castiblanco, Claudia Paola [0000-0002-3882-5556]2024-10-30T21:30:20Z2024-10-30T21:30:20Z2023-05-050124-07812590-8669http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/27239instname:Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABrepourl:https://repository.unab.edu.cohttps://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4660Desde los inicios de la apuesta multilateral por el crecimiento verde, se han generado un sinnúmero de políticas locales, de carácter nacional, para dar respuesta a esta demanda mundial. Al mismo tiempo, ha crecido el interés de investigar y profundizar sobre la implementación y evaluación de los programas derivados de los compromisos internacionales. El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar un análisis comprensivo sobre el estado de la investigación respecto al crecimiento verde y la política pública en la última década (2011-2021). Se encuentra que la mayor parte de la producción académica se da en Europa y Asia, y los tópicos con mayor interés son los condicionantes de la efectividad de la política pública, los direccionamientos en tecnología e innovación, la inversión, la evaluación de la política y la discusión conceptual sobre la que se soporta la política. El artículo muestra el debate sobre estos asuntos.Since the beginning of the multilateral commitment to green growth, many local policies have been generated. At the same time, there has been a growing interest in researching and deepening the implementation and evaluation of programs derived from international commitments. The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive analysis on the state of research regarding green growth and public policy in the last decade (2011 - 2021). For this purpose, a systematic review of the literature was made, identifying the relevant publications with the keywords: “green growth” and “public policy”, and “bioeconomy” and “public policy” in the search engines of the Scopus and Web of Science databases. It is found that most of the academic production takes place in Europe and Asia, and the topics with greater interest are the determinants of the e!ectiveness of public policy, the directions in technology and innovation, investment, policy evaluation and conceptual discussion on which policy is supported.application/pdfspaUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga UNABhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/article/view/4660/3724https://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/reflexion/issue/view/290Aguilar Galeano, E., & Figueroa Espinel, J. F. (2018). La Política Pública Distrital de Ruralidad de Bogotá D.C., Implementación de una política ambiental en el marco del desarrollo humano. Editorial Uniagustiniana. https://doi. org/10.28970/9789585498167Bagheri, M., Guevara, Z., Alikarami, M., Kennedy, C. A., & Doluweera, G. (2018). Green growth planning: A multi-factor energy inputoutput analysis of the Canadian economy. Energy Economics, 74, 708-720. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2018.07.015Banerjee, O., Bagstad, K. J., Cicowiez, M., Dudek, S., Horridge, M., Alavalapati, J. R. R., Masozera, M., Rukundo, E., & Rutebuka, E. (2020). Economic, land use, and ecosystem services impacts of Rwanda’s Green Growth Strategy: An application of the IEEM+ESM platform. Science of the Total Environment, 729, 138779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scitotenv.2020.138779Baran, B. (2015). Support for renewable energy in Germany as an example of e%ective public policy. Oeconomia Copernicana, 6(2), 143- 158. https://doi.org/10.12775/OEC.2015.017Bassi, A. (2016). Moving Towards Integrated Policy Formulation and Evaluation: The Green Economy Model. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 16(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1515/ rtuect-2015-0009Béfort , N. (2020). Going beyond de!nitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested !elds. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119923. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119923Béfort, N., & Nieddu, M. (2020). Bioéconomie : un retour historique sur deux problématisations de l’usage des ressources renouvelables. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 28(3-4), 216-225. https:// doi.org/10.1051/NSS/2021011Bentsen, N. S., Larsen, S., & Stupak, I. (2019). Sustainability governance of the Danish bioeconomy - The case of bioenergy and biomaterials from agriculture. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 9(1), 1-14. https:// doi.org/10.1186/S13705-019-0222-3/TABLES/1Bouzaher, A., Sahin, S., & Yeldan, E. (2015). How to green: a general equilibrium investigation of environmental policies for sustained growth with an application to Turkey’s economy. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 8(1), 49-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12076-014- 0124-0/TABLES/4Bruckman, V. J., Haruthaithanasan, M., Miller, R. O., Terada, T., Brenner, A. K., Kraxner, F., & Flaspohler, D. (2018). Sustainable Forest Bioenergy Development Strategies in Indochina: Collaborative E%ort to Establish Regional Policies. Forests 2018, 9(4), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/F9040223Burkolter, P., & Perch, L. (2014). Greening growth in the south: Practice, policies and new frontiers. South African Journal of International A%airs, 21(2), 235-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 0220461.2014.941917Caplan, A. J., & Go, D. H. (2020). Measuring the bioeconomic impacts of prolonged drought on a lake ecosystem: The case of the Great Salt Lake, Utah. Natural Resource Modeling, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/NRM.12251Chomkhamsri, K., Mungcharoen, T., & Yuvaniyama, C. (2016). 10-year experience with the Thainational LCI database: case study of ‘re!nery products. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(11), 1760-1770. https:// doi.org/10.1007/S11367-016-1160-3Costa, J., Kot, S., & Stefko, R. (2021). Carrots or Sticks: Which Policies Matter the Most in Sustainable Resource Management? Resources, 10(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10020012Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., Salman, M., Boamah, K. B., Ampon-Wireko, S., & Ko! Dogbe, C. S. (2021). Innovation, trade openness and CO2 emissions in selected countries in Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125143Guo, L. ling, Qu, Y., Wu, C. you, & Wang, X. ling. (2018). “Identifying a pathway towards green growth of Chinese industrial regions based on a system dynamics approach”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2016.09.035Haberl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Virág, D., Kalt, G., Plank, B., Brockway, P., Fishman, T., Hausknost, D., Krausmann, F., Leon-Gruchalski, B., Mayer, A., Pichler, M., Scha%artzik, A., Sousa, T., Streeck, J., & Creutzig, F. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6), 065003. https://doi. org/10.1088/1748-9326/AB842AHickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2019). Is Green Growth Possible?. New Political Economy , 25(4), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964Islam, M., & Managi, S. (2019). Green growth and pro-environmental behavior: Sustainable resource management using natural capital accounting in India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 145, 126-138. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.027Ivanova, Y. (2017). The Green Economy model: A promise or a reality for the Latin-American countries?. International Politics Reviews, 5, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41312-017-0021-9Jakob, M., & Edenhofer, O. (2014). Green growth, degrowth, and the commons. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 447–468. https://doi. org/10.1093/oxrep/gru026.Jasinevicius, G., Lindner, M., Verkerk, P. J., & Aleinikovas, M. (2017). Assessing Impacts of Wood Utilisation Scenarios for a Lithuanian Bioeconomy: Impacts on Carbon in Forests and Harvested Wood Products and on the Socio-Economic Performance of the Forest- Based Sector. Forests 2017, 8(4), 133. https:// doi.org/10.3390/F8040133Kang, M. J., & Park, H. (2011). Impact of experience on government policy toward acceptance of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3465-3475. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. ENPOL.2011.03.045Kelleher, L., Henchion, M., & O’Neill, E. (2019). Policy coherence and the transition to a bioeconomy: The case of Ireland. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/ SU11247247Kröger, M., & Raitio, K. (2017). Finnish forest policy in the era of bioeconomy: A pathway to sustainability? Forest Policy and Economics, 77, 6-15. https:// doi.org/10.1016/J.FORPOL.2016.12.003Leitão, J., Pereira, D., & de Brito, S. (2020). Inbound and Outbound Practices of Open Innovation and Eco-Innovation: Contrasting Bioeconomy and Non-Bioeconomy Firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2020, 6(4), 145. https://doi. org/10.3390/JOITMC6040145Li, W., & Li, D. (2012). Environmental information transparency and implications for green growth in China. Public Administration and Development, 32(3), 324-334. https://doi. org/10.1002/PAD.1626Marvik, O. J., & Philp, J. (2020). The systemic challenge of the bioeconomy: A policy framework for transitioning towards a sustainable carbon cycle economy. EMBO Reports, 21(10). https:// doi.org/10.15252/EMBR.202051478Mathews, J. A. (2015). Energizing Industrial Development: The Role of the State in 21st Century Greening Strategies. Revista Do Serviço Público, 66, 29–54. https://doi.org/10.21874/RSP.V66I0.1276Monasterolo, I., & Raberto, M. (2019). The impact of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies on the lowcarbon transition. Energy Policy, 124, 355- 370. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2018.08.051Monasterolo, I., Raberto, M., Monasterolo, I., & Raberto, M. (2018). The EIRIN Flow-of-funds Behavioural Model of Green Fiscal Policies and Green Sovereign Bonds. Ecological Economics, 144(C), 228-243. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2017.07.029Moosmann, D., Majer, S., Ugarte, S., Ladu, L., Wurster, S., & Thrän, D. (2020). Strengths and gaps of the EU frameworks for the sustainability assessment of bio-based products and bioenergy. Energ Sustain Soc, 10(22), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00251-8Mukhtarov, F., Gerlak, A., & Pierce, R. (2017). Away from fossil-fuels and toward a bioeconomy: Knowledge versatility for public policy? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(6), 1010-1028. https://doi. org/10.1177/0263774X16676273Muza, O., & Debnath, R. (2021). Disruptive innovation for inclusive renewable policy in sub-Saharan Africa: A social shaping of technology analysis of appliance uptake in Rwanda. Renewable Energy, 168, 896-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. renene.2020.12.091Özbugday, F. C., Fındık, D., Metin Özcan, K., & Basçı, S. (2020). Resource e%iciency investments and !rm performance: Evidence from European SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119824Palgan, Y. V., & McCormick, K. (2016). Biore!neries in Sweden: Perspectives on the opportunities, challenges and future. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biore!ning, 10(5), 523-533. https://doi. org/10.1002/BBB.1672Pandey, P. C. (2020). Circular Designing and Green Growth: Insights on Future of Sustainability. SAGE Journals, 24(1), 113-117. https://doi. org/10.1177/0972262920903904Pannell, D. J., Tillie, P., Rodríguez-Cerezo, E., Ervin, D., & Frisvold, G. B. (2016). Herbicide resistance : economic and environmental challenges. AgBioForum, 19(2), 136-155. https://mospace. umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/59578Park, J. (2011). The Evolution of Green Growth Policy: An Unwelcome Intrusion on Global Environmental Governance? Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, 17(2), 207-241. https://dx.doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2013.17.2.264Petig, E., Choi, H. S., Angenendt, E., Kremer, P., Grethe, H., & Bahrs, E. (2019). Downscaling of agricultural market impacts under bioeconomy development to the regional and the farm level—An example of Baden- Wuerttemberg. GCB Bioenergy, 11(10), 1102- 1124. https://doi.org/10.1111/GCBB.12639Philippidis, G., Bartelings, H., Helming, J., M’barek, R., Smeets, E., & van Meijl, H. (2019). Levelling the playing !eld for EU biomass usage. Economic Systems Research, 31(2), 158- 177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2018.1564020/ SUPPL_FILE/CESR_A_1564020_SM1227.DOCXPhilippidis, G., M’Barek, R., & Ferrari, E. (2016). Is “biobased” activity a panacea for sustainable competitive growth? Energies, 9(10). https://doi. org/10.3390/en9100806Philp, J. (2015). Balancing the bioeconomy: Supporting biofuels and bio-based materials in public policy. Energy and Environmental Science, 8(11), 3063-3068. https://doi.org/10.1039/ c5ee01864aPitkänen, K., Antikainen, R., Droste, N., Loiseau, E., Saikku, L., Aissani, L., Hansjürgens, B., Kuikman, P. J., Leskinen, P., & Thomsen, M. (2016). What can be learned from practical cases of green economy? –studies from !ve European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 666-676. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.08.071Purkus, A., & Lüdtke, J. (2020). A systemic evaluation framework for a multi-actor, forest-based bioeconomy governance process: The German Charter for Wood 2.0 as a case study. Forest Policy and Economics, 113, 102113. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.FORPOL.2020.102113Quenault, B. (2020). Energy transition and the sustainability of development trajectories: Are we headed toward a mere marginal adjustment or a disruptive transformation? Mondes En Developpement, 192(4), 45-70. https://doi.org/10.3917/MED.192.0045Rampasso, I. S., Quelhas, O. L. G., Anholon, R., Silva, D. A. L., Pontes, A. T., Miranda, J. D. A., & Dias, J. O. (2021). The Bioeconomy in emerging economies: a study of the critical success factors based on Life Cycle Assessment and Delphi and Fuzzy-Delphi methods. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2021, 26(6), 1254-1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/ S11367-021-01913-1Sampaio Neto, O. Z., Batista, E. A. C., & Meirelles, A. J. de A. (2020). Potencial de oleaginosas nativas no desenvolvimento de cadeias produtivas da biodiversidade brasileira. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 54(0), 537-559. https://doi. org/10.5380/DMA.V54I0.71934Seidl, I., & Zahrnt, A. (2015). Social welfare politics cannot ignore growthmania. Unde!ned, 24(4), 232-235. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.24.4.6Smith, E., & Diggans, J. (2020). Next Steps to Grow the Bioeconomy. Health Security, 18(4), 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1089/HS.2020.0012Söderholm, K., Bergquist, A. K., & Söderholm, P. (2017). The transition to chlorine free pulp revisited: Nordic heterogeneity in environmental regulation and R&D collaboration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 1328-1339. https:// doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.07.190Stahel, W. R. (2017). Analysis of the structure and values of the European Commission’s Circular Economy Package. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Waste and Resource Management, 170(1), 41-44. https:// doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.17.00009Teigiserova, D. A., Hamelin, L., & Thomsen, M. (2020). Towards transparent valorization of food surplus, waste and loss: Clarifying de!nitions, food waste hierarchy, and role in the circular economy. Science of The Total Environment, 706, 136033. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.136033Toivonen, R., Vihemäki, H., & Toppinen, A. (2021). Policy narratives on wooden multi-storey construction and implications for technology innovation system governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 125, 102409. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.FORPOL.2021.102409Tong, C., Ding, S., Wang, B., & Yang, S. (2020). Assessing the target-availability of China’s investments for green growth using time series prediction. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 537, 122724. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122724Vazquez-Brust, D. A., & Sarkis, J. (2012). Green growth: Managing the transition to a sustainable economy: Learning by doing in East Asia and Europe. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94- 007-4417-2Venkata Mohan, S., Dahiya, S., Amulya, K., Katakojwala, R., & Vanitha, T. K. (2019). Can circular bioeconomy be fueled by waste biore!neries - A closer look. Bioresource Technology Reports, 7, 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. BITEB.2019.100277Wang, X., & Shao, Q. (2019). Non-linear e%ects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on green growth in G20 countries: Evidence from panel threshold regression. Science of the Total Environment, 660, 1346-1354. https:// doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.01.094Wang, Y., Hu, H., Dai, W., & Burns, K. (2021). Evaluation of industrial green development and industrial green competitiveness: Evidence from Chinese urban agglomerations. Ecological Indicators, 124, 107371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolind.2021.107371Zhou, Z., Wu, H., & Song, P. (2019). Measuring the resource and environmental e%iciency of industrial water consumption in China: A non-radial directional distance function. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118169Vol. 25 Núm. 51 (2023): Reflexión Política (enero - junio); 31-44BioeconomíaCrecimiento verdePolítica públicaRevisión sistemática de literaturaSostenibilidadEconomía verdeCrecimiento económicoBioeconomyGreen growthPublic policySystematic literature reviewSustainabilityGreen economyEconomic growthEstado de la investigación sobre el crecimiento verde desde la perspectiva de política pública (2011-2021)State of research on green growth from public policy perspectives (2011- 2021)info:eu-repo/semantics/articleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARThttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2ORIGINALArtículo.pdfArtículo.pdfArtículoapplication/pdf573100https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27239/1/Art%c3%adculo.pdf1099c473301b129ae7ad76e9270ca66aMD51open accessTHUMBNAILArtículo.pdf.jpgArtículo.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg10607https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27239/3/Art%c3%adculo.pdf.jpgb4803f81a1891474cb1c1104d4f57aaeMD53open accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8829https://repository.unab.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12749/27239/2/license.txt3755c0cfdb77e29f2b9125d7a45dd316MD52open access20.500.12749/27239oai:repository.unab.edu.co:20.500.12749/272392024-10-30 22:00:19.72open accessRepositorio Institucional | Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga - UNABrepositorio@unab.edu.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