Peer review of research projects showed to a Health Research Local Committee. Tabasco, Mexico, 2009

Introduction: Frequently they found fails in research projects and reports, and your study show continuing education needs. Objective: to identify errors in projects presented to Health Research Local Committee of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social from Tabasco, Mexico, during 2009. Material a...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2015
Institución:
Universidad Industrial de Santander
Repositorio:
Repositorio UIS
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/5826
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistamedicasuis/article/view/5208
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/5826
Palabra clave:
Rights
openAccess
License
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
id UISANTADR2_a98940f7148ae342e0b48ca0111ef5ef
oai_identifier_str oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/5826
network_acronym_str UISANTADR2
network_name_str Repositorio UIS
repository_id_str
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv Peer review of research projects showed to a Health Research Local Committee. Tabasco, Mexico, 2009
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Revisiones por pares de protocolos presentados a un Comité Local de Investigación en Salud. Tabasco, México, 2009
title Peer review of research projects showed to a Health Research Local Committee. Tabasco, Mexico, 2009
spellingShingle Peer review of research projects showed to a Health Research Local Committee. Tabasco, Mexico, 2009
title_short Peer review of research projects showed to a Health Research Local Committee. Tabasco, Mexico, 2009
title_full Peer review of research projects showed to a Health Research Local Committee. Tabasco, Mexico, 2009
title_fullStr Peer review of research projects showed to a Health Research Local Committee. Tabasco, Mexico, 2009
title_full_unstemmed Peer review of research projects showed to a Health Research Local Committee. Tabasco, Mexico, 2009
title_sort Peer review of research projects showed to a Health Research Local Committee. Tabasco, Mexico, 2009
description Introduction: Frequently they found fails in research projects and reports, and your study show continuing education needs. Objective: to identify errors in projects presented to Health Research Local Committee of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social from Tabasco, Mexico, during 2009. Material and methods: Cross-sectional and descriptive design. Universe: 62 projects presented in 2009. Sample: no randomized for convenience. Inclusion criteria: projects presented and ruled in 2009 that and counted with peer review files. Variables: verdicts, reviewers, presentation errors, introduction errors, method errors, ethic methods. Information source: peer review files based on “Research projects evaluation guide” of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Procedures: systematization of peer review information. Analysis: descriptive statistic. Software: Epi Info© version 3.3.2 for WindowsTM environment. Results: 50 research projects were ruled: 32 authorized (64%), 10 non-authorized (20%), 8 with modification and sending back to peer-review (16%). As the most frecuent errors, were found: incorrect syntax and spelling 62%, inadequate informed consent letter 45%, lack of appropriate foundation 36%, insufficient description of procedures 36%. Conclusions: The most frequents errors in the research projects presented to the Health Research Local Committee of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social were about the ethical considerations and the redaction. For this reason to qualify in these aspects to health personnel of institution that carry out and advice on research works is required. MÉD UIS. 2015;28(3):317-25. Keywords: Research. Manuscripts, Medical. Ethics Committees. Research. Peer Review. Protocols
publishDate 2015
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-14T20:12:15Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-14T20:12:15Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistamedicasuis/article/view/5208
10.18273/revmed.v28n3-2015006
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/5826
url https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistamedicasuis/article/view/5208
https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/5826
identifier_str_mv 10.18273/revmed.v28n3-2015006
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistamedicasuis/article/view/5208/5517
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Universidad Industrial de Santander
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Revista Médicas UIS; v. 28 n. 3 (2015): Médicas UIS; 317-325
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Médicas UIS; Vol. 28 No. 3 (2015): Médicas UIS; 317-325
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Médicas UIS; Vol. 28 Núm. 3 (2015): Médicas UIS; 317-325
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 1794-5240
0121-0319
institution Universidad Industrial de Santander
repository.name.fl_str_mv DSpace at UIS
repository.mail.fl_str_mv noesis@uis.edu.co
_version_ 1831929699109961728
spelling Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)2015-12-032022-03-14T20:12:15Z2022-03-14T20:12:15Zhttps://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistamedicasuis/article/view/520810.18273/revmed.v28n3-2015006https://noesis.uis.edu.co/handle/20.500.14071/5826Introduction: Frequently they found fails in research projects and reports, and your study show continuing education needs. Objective: to identify errors in projects presented to Health Research Local Committee of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social from Tabasco, Mexico, during 2009. Material and methods: Cross-sectional and descriptive design. Universe: 62 projects presented in 2009. Sample: no randomized for convenience. Inclusion criteria: projects presented and ruled in 2009 that and counted with peer review files. Variables: verdicts, reviewers, presentation errors, introduction errors, method errors, ethic methods. Information source: peer review files based on “Research projects evaluation guide” of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Procedures: systematization of peer review information. Analysis: descriptive statistic. Software: Epi Info© version 3.3.2 for WindowsTM environment. Results: 50 research projects were ruled: 32 authorized (64%), 10 non-authorized (20%), 8 with modification and sending back to peer-review (16%). As the most frecuent errors, were found: incorrect syntax and spelling 62%, inadequate informed consent letter 45%, lack of appropriate foundation 36%, insufficient description of procedures 36%. Conclusions: The most frequents errors in the research projects presented to the Health Research Local Committee of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social were about the ethical considerations and the redaction. For this reason to qualify in these aspects to health personnel of institution that carry out and advice on research works is required. MÉD UIS. 2015;28(3):317-25. Keywords: Research. Manuscripts, Medical. Ethics Committees. Research. Peer Review. ProtocolsIntroducción: Frecuentemente se encuentran errores en protocolos y reportes de investigación, su estudio permite detectar necesidades de educación continua. Objetivo: Identificar los errores en los protocolos presentados al Comité Local de Investigación en Salud del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, en Tabasco, México, durante el año 2009. Materiales y métodos: Diseño transversal descriptivo. Universo: 62 protocolos presentados en el año 2009. Muestra: no probabilística por conveniencia. Criterios de inclusión: protocolos presentados y dictaminados durante el período de estudio, que cuenten con registros de su revisión por pares. Variables: dictámenes, revisores y errores: de presentación, introducción, método y éticos. Fuente de información: archivos de revisiones por pares con base en la “Guía para la evaluación de protocolos de investigación” del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Procedimientos: sistematización de información de revisiones por pares. Análisis: estadística descriptiva. Software: Epi Info® versión 3.3.2 para entorno WindowsTM. Resultados: Se dictaminaron 50 protocolos de investigación: 32 autorizados (64%), 10 no autorizados (20%) y 8 con dictamen de modificarlo y volverlo a presentar (16%). Errores más frecuentes: sintaxis y ortografía incorrectas, (62%;), carta de consentimiento informado inadecuada, 45%; fundamentación inadecuada del problema, 36%; descripción insuficiente de procedimientos, 36%. Conclusiones: Los errores en las consideraciones éticas y de redacción son los más frecuentes en los protocolos de investigación presentados al Comité Local de Investigación en Salud del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social en Tabasco. Se requiere capacitar en estos aspectos al personal de salud de la institución que realiza o asesora trabajos de investigación. MÉD UIS. 2015;28(3):317 25.Palabras clave: Investigación. Manuscritos Médicos. Comités de Ética en Investigación. Revisión por Expertos. Protocolos. application/pdfspaUniversidad Industrial de Santanderhttps://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistamedicasuis/article/view/5208/5517Revista Médicas UIS; v. 28 n. 3 (2015): Médicas UIS; 317-325Médicas UIS; Vol. 28 No. 3 (2015): Médicas UIS; 317-325Médicas UIS; Vol. 28 Núm. 3 (2015): Médicas UIS; 317-3251794-52400121-0319Peer review of research projects showed to a Health Research Local Committee. Tabasco, Mexico, 2009Revisiones por pares de protocolos presentados a un Comité Local de Investigación en Salud. Tabasco, México, 2009info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Zavala-González, Marco Antonio20.500.14071/5826oai:noesis.uis.edu.co:20.500.14071/58262022-03-16 12:39:39.659metadata.onlyhttps://noesis.uis.edu.coDSpace at UISnoesis@uis.edu.co