Laringoespasmo en anestesia pediátrica con el uso de la máscara laríngea vs tubo endotraqueal: Ensayo clínico de no inferioridad

ABSTRACT: Introduction: Airway-related problems are the most common perioperative complications in pediatric anesthesia and, among them, the most significant is laryngospasm. The type of device used to secure the airway has been found to be among the factors responsible for this outcome. Objective:...

Full description

Autores:
Casas Arroyave, Fabián David
Giraldo Salazar, Olga Lucía
Medina Ramírez, Santiago
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/34983
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/34983
Palabra clave:
Laryngismus
Laringismo
Child
Niño
Laryngeal Masks
Máscaras Laríngeas
Intubation
Intubación
Intubation, Intratracheal
Intubación Intratraqueal
Anestesia
Anesthesia
Rights
openAccess
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
id UDEA2_eff21fd77425fa8b2dd5c8231940d71a
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/34983
network_acronym_str UDEA2
network_name_str Repositorio UdeA
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Laringoespasmo en anestesia pediátrica con el uso de la máscara laríngea vs tubo endotraqueal: Ensayo clínico de no inferioridad
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv Laryngospasm in Pediatric Anesthesia with Laryngeal mask vs. Endotracheal Tube: non-inferiority Clinical Trial
title Laringoespasmo en anestesia pediátrica con el uso de la máscara laríngea vs tubo endotraqueal: Ensayo clínico de no inferioridad
spellingShingle Laringoespasmo en anestesia pediátrica con el uso de la máscara laríngea vs tubo endotraqueal: Ensayo clínico de no inferioridad
Laryngismus
Laringismo
Child
Niño
Laryngeal Masks
Máscaras Laríngeas
Intubation
Intubación
Intubation, Intratracheal
Intubación Intratraqueal
Anestesia
Anesthesia
title_short Laringoespasmo en anestesia pediátrica con el uso de la máscara laríngea vs tubo endotraqueal: Ensayo clínico de no inferioridad
title_full Laringoespasmo en anestesia pediátrica con el uso de la máscara laríngea vs tubo endotraqueal: Ensayo clínico de no inferioridad
title_fullStr Laringoespasmo en anestesia pediátrica con el uso de la máscara laríngea vs tubo endotraqueal: Ensayo clínico de no inferioridad
title_full_unstemmed Laringoespasmo en anestesia pediátrica con el uso de la máscara laríngea vs tubo endotraqueal: Ensayo clínico de no inferioridad
title_sort Laringoespasmo en anestesia pediátrica con el uso de la máscara laríngea vs tubo endotraqueal: Ensayo clínico de no inferioridad
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Casas Arroyave, Fabián David
Giraldo Salazar, Olga Lucía
Medina Ramírez, Santiago
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Casas Arroyave, Fabián David
Giraldo Salazar, Olga Lucía
Medina Ramírez, Santiago
dc.contributor.researchgroup.spa.fl_str_mv Grupo de Investigación en Medicina Perioperatoria (GRIMPA)
dc.subject.decs.none.fl_str_mv Laryngismus
Laringismo
Child
Niño
Laryngeal Masks
Máscaras Laríngeas
Intubation
Intubación
Intubation, Intratracheal
Intubación Intratraqueal
Anestesia
Anesthesia
topic Laryngismus
Laringismo
Child
Niño
Laryngeal Masks
Máscaras Laríngeas
Intubation
Intubación
Intubation, Intratracheal
Intubación Intratraqueal
Anestesia
Anesthesia
description ABSTRACT: Introduction: Airway-related problems are the most common perioperative complications in pediatric anesthesia and, among them, the most significant is laryngospasm. The type of device used to secure the airway has been found to be among the factors responsible for this outcome. Objective: To determine whether the use of the classic laryngeal mask (LM) creates a non-inferior risk of laryngospasm compared with the use of the endotracheal tube (ET) in children. Method: Non-inferiority, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with random assignment that included 260 children ages 2 to 14 years, American Society of Anaesthesiology I to III, taken to surgical procedures under general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the development of laryngospasm, and the need to exchange devices, airway trauma, and other respiratory complications were assessed as secondary outcomes. A 10% non-inferiority margin was selected for the difference between the 2 devices. Results: A total of 270 patients were recruited, and 135 were assigned to each group. Laryngospasm occurred in 3.3% of the patients, with an incidence of 5.2% in the LM group versus 1.5% for the ET group, for a difference of 3.7% and a 95% confidence interval (-0.7%, 7.9%). No differences were found among bradycardia, cardiac arrest, and death outcomes. Conclusion: The use of LM in children 2 to 14 years of age taken to various surgical procedures is not inferior or superior to ET in terms of the development of laryngospasm.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-11T21:33:12Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-11T21:33:12Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de investigación
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Casas-Arroyave FD, Giraldo-Salazar OL, Medina-Ramírez S. Laryngospasm in pediatric anaesthesia with laryngeal mask vs.endotracheal tube: non-inferiority clinical trial. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2018;46:292–299.
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0120-3347
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10495/34983
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1097/CJ9.0000000000000073
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2422-0248
identifier_str_mv Casas-Arroyave FD, Giraldo-Salazar OL, Medina-Ramírez S. Laryngospasm in pediatric anaesthesia with laryngeal mask vs.endotracheal tube: non-inferiority clinical trial. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2018;46:292–299.
0120-3347
10.1097/CJ9.0000000000000073
2422-0248
url https://hdl.handle.net/10495/34983
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
spa
language eng
spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv Rev. Colomb. Anestesiol.
dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv 299
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 4
dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv 292
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 46
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 8 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Sociedad Colombiana de Anestesiología y Reanimación
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Bogotá, Colombia
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv sin facultad - programa
institution Universidad de Antioquia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/8918d3e9-d4cd-4d71-b62f-4c636c279f1c/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/1f0286fd-15d8-4aa7-8abb-b4fba2564204/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/5417168f-08b4-4434-b0f5-6e82c1d26269/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/bb0599b9-1e5f-43d1-9367-ff059ac4428a/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/29bd38fa-851c-4982-a300-ddfa702bbee9/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/fb43f50d-fd8f-4730-8df2-b084acfc19e7/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/2f350597-fc93-4c35-b107-b4ccaf9bd0f9/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/0ddb8903-fe25-46d5-b849-388912f76de6/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 99f92d30cb98efac5559a0aa62a08663
59aee7ca9e9d8643d1cf199c8feda1a8
b88b088d9957e670ce3b3fbe2eedbc13
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
950e4640f83352651e02c76ad5d48b4f
08d7b69b61a96386e6a21ef47439226f
feae6d533ef55e5434f49c9a9ad4a784
c990f42bdc474bc7a8345c3220428614
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Antioquia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv aplicacionbibliotecadigitalbiblioteca@udea.edu.co
_version_ 1851052645946490880
spelling Casas Arroyave, Fabián DavidGiraldo Salazar, Olga LucíaMedina Ramírez, SantiagoGrupo de Investigación en Medicina Perioperatoria (GRIMPA)2023-05-11T21:33:12Z2023-05-11T21:33:12Z2018Casas-Arroyave FD, Giraldo-Salazar OL, Medina-Ramírez S. Laryngospasm in pediatric anaesthesia with laryngeal mask vs.endotracheal tube: non-inferiority clinical trial. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2018;46:292–299.0120-3347https://hdl.handle.net/10495/3498310.1097/CJ9.00000000000000732422-0248ABSTRACT: Introduction: Airway-related problems are the most common perioperative complications in pediatric anesthesia and, among them, the most significant is laryngospasm. The type of device used to secure the airway has been found to be among the factors responsible for this outcome. Objective: To determine whether the use of the classic laryngeal mask (LM) creates a non-inferior risk of laryngospasm compared with the use of the endotracheal tube (ET) in children. Method: Non-inferiority, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with random assignment that included 260 children ages 2 to 14 years, American Society of Anaesthesiology I to III, taken to surgical procedures under general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the development of laryngospasm, and the need to exchange devices, airway trauma, and other respiratory complications were assessed as secondary outcomes. A 10% non-inferiority margin was selected for the difference between the 2 devices. Results: A total of 270 patients were recruited, and 135 were assigned to each group. Laryngospasm occurred in 3.3% of the patients, with an incidence of 5.2% in the LM group versus 1.5% for the ET group, for a difference of 3.7% and a 95% confidence interval (-0.7%, 7.9%). No differences were found among bradycardia, cardiac arrest, and death outcomes. Conclusion: The use of LM in children 2 to 14 years of age taken to various surgical procedures is not inferior or superior to ET in terms of the development of laryngospasm.RESUMEN: Introducción:Los problemas relacionados con el manejo de la vía aérea son las complicaciones perioperatorias más comunes en la anestesia pediátrica; de ellos, el laringoespasmoes el principal. Dentro de los factores de riesgo se ha encontrado que el tipo de dispositivo empleado para el aseguramiento de la vía aérea puede ser responsable de este desenlace. Objetivo:Determinar si el uso de Máscara Laríngea Clásica (ML) genera un riesgo no inferior al uso de Tubo Endotraqueal (TET) para desarrollar laringoespasmo en niños. Metodología:Ensayo clínico controlado de no inferioridad,ciego Único, con asignación aleatoria, que incluyó 260 niños de 2 a 14 años, ASA I-III, sometidos a procedimientos quir urgicos bajo anestesia general. El desenlace primario fue el desarrollo de laringoespasmo y como desenlaces secundarios se evaluaron la necesidad de cambio de dispositivo, trauma de vía aérea y otras complicaciones respiratorias. Se estableció un margen de no inferioridad del 10% para la diferencia entre ambos dispositivos. Resultados:Se reclutaron 270 pacientes, 135 en cada grupo. El laringoespasmo se presentó en el 3,3% de los pacientes, con una incidencia en el grupo de ML de 5,2% vs 1,5% para TET, con una diferencia de 3,7% un IC del 95%: (-0,7%, 7,9%). No se encontraron diferencias entre los desenlacesde bradicardia, paro cardiaco y muerte. Conclusión:El uso de ML en niños de 2–14 años de edad sometidos a diversos procedimientos quirúrgicos no es inferior ni superior al TET para desarrollo de laringoespasmo.COL00943148 páginasapplication/pdfengspaSociedad Colombiana de Anestesiología y ReanimaciónBogotá, Colombiasin facultad - programahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Laringoespasmo en anestesia pediátrica con el uso de la máscara laríngea vs tubo endotraqueal: Ensayo clínico de no inferioridadLaryngospasm in Pediatric Anesthesia with Laryngeal mask vs. Endotracheal Tube: non-inferiority Clinical TrialArtículo de investigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARThttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionLaryngismusLaringismoChildNiñoLaryngeal MasksMáscaras LaríngeasIntubationIntubaciónIntubation, IntratrachealIntubación IntratraquealAnestesiaAnesthesiaRev. Colomb. Anestesiol.299429246Revista Colombiana de AnestesiologíaPublicationORIGINALCasasFabian_2018_LaryngospasmPediatricAnesthesia.pdfCasasFabian_2018_LaryngospasmPediatricAnesthesia.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf488115https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/8918d3e9-d4cd-4d71-b62f-4c636c279f1c/download99f92d30cb98efac5559a0aa62a08663MD51trueAnonymousREADCasasFabian_2018_LaringoespasmoAnestesiaPediatrica.pdfCasasFabian_2018_LaringoespasmoAnestesiaPediatrica.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf465711https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/1f0286fd-15d8-4aa7-8abb-b4fba2564204/download59aee7ca9e9d8643d1cf199c8feda1a8MD52falseAnonymousREADCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8823https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/5417168f-08b4-4434-b0f5-6e82c1d26269/downloadb88b088d9957e670ce3b3fbe2eedbc13MD53falseAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/bb0599b9-1e5f-43d1-9367-ff059ac4428a/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD54falseAnonymousREADTEXTCasasFabian_2018_LaryngospasmPediatricAnesthesia.pdf.txtCasasFabian_2018_LaryngospasmPediatricAnesthesia.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain29270https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/29bd38fa-851c-4982-a300-ddfa702bbee9/download950e4640f83352651e02c76ad5d48b4fMD55falseAnonymousREADCasasFabian_2018_LaringoespasmoAnestesiaPediatrica.pdf.txtCasasFabian_2018_LaringoespasmoAnestesiaPediatrica.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain31266https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/fb43f50d-fd8f-4730-8df2-b084acfc19e7/download08d7b69b61a96386e6a21ef47439226fMD57falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILCasasFabian_2018_LaryngospasmPediatricAnesthesia.pdf.jpgCasasFabian_2018_LaryngospasmPediatricAnesthesia.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg13784https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/2f350597-fc93-4c35-b107-b4ccaf9bd0f9/downloadfeae6d533ef55e5434f49c9a9ad4a784MD56falseAnonymousREADCasasFabian_2018_LaringoespasmoAnestesiaPediatrica.pdf.jpgCasasFabian_2018_LaringoespasmoAnestesiaPediatrica.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg13852https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/0ddb8903-fe25-46d5-b849-388912f76de6/downloadc990f42bdc474bc7a8345c3220428614MD58falseAnonymousREAD10495/34983oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/349832025-03-27 01:35:30.51https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/open.accesshttps://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.coRepositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Antioquiaaplicacionbibliotecadigitalbiblioteca@udea.edu.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