Comparative evaluation of sonicated shrimp waste hydrolysates as potential fertilizers for legumes
ABSTRACT: The global annual production of shrimp is nearly 4.8 million metric tons, generating almost half this weight in waste. The aim of this study was to assess the development and crop production of legumes fertilized with alkaline sonicated shrimp waste under greenhouse conditions. Plants were...
- Autores:
-
Rojas Camargo, John Jairo
Quintero Quiroz, Julián
Ciro Monsalve, Yhors Alexander
Silva Agredo, Javier
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad de Antioquia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UdeA
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/38217
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10495/38217
- Palabra clave:
- Legumbres
Legumes
Nutrición de las plantas
Plant nutrition
Abonos orgánicos
Organic fertilizers
Hidrólisis
Hydrolysis
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16379
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4592
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24940
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
| id |
UDEA2_e6f96ece7a76aaf0f32b96a4c59a5d34 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/38217 |
| network_acronym_str |
UDEA2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio UdeA |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Comparative evaluation of sonicated shrimp waste hydrolysates as potential fertilizers for legumes |
| title |
Comparative evaluation of sonicated shrimp waste hydrolysates as potential fertilizers for legumes |
| spellingShingle |
Comparative evaluation of sonicated shrimp waste hydrolysates as potential fertilizers for legumes Legumbres Legumes Nutrición de las plantas Plant nutrition Abonos orgánicos Organic fertilizers Hidrólisis Hydrolysis http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16379 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4592 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24940 |
| title_short |
Comparative evaluation of sonicated shrimp waste hydrolysates as potential fertilizers for legumes |
| title_full |
Comparative evaluation of sonicated shrimp waste hydrolysates as potential fertilizers for legumes |
| title_fullStr |
Comparative evaluation of sonicated shrimp waste hydrolysates as potential fertilizers for legumes |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative evaluation of sonicated shrimp waste hydrolysates as potential fertilizers for legumes |
| title_sort |
Comparative evaluation of sonicated shrimp waste hydrolysates as potential fertilizers for legumes |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Rojas Camargo, John Jairo Quintero Quiroz, Julián Ciro Monsalve, Yhors Alexander Silva Agredo, Javier |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Rojas Camargo, John Jairo Quintero Quiroz, Julián Ciro Monsalve, Yhors Alexander Silva Agredo, Javier |
| dc.contributor.researchgroup.spa.fl_str_mv |
Diseño y Formulación de Medicamentos Cosméticos y Afines |
| dc.subject.lemb.none.fl_str_mv |
Legumbres Legumes |
| topic |
Legumbres Legumes Nutrición de las plantas Plant nutrition Abonos orgánicos Organic fertilizers Hidrólisis Hydrolysis http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16379 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4592 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24940 |
| dc.subject.agrovoc.none.fl_str_mv |
Nutrición de las plantas Plant nutrition Abonos orgánicos Organic fertilizers Hidrólisis Hydrolysis |
| dc.subject.agrovocuri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16379 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4592 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24940 |
| description |
ABSTRACT: The global annual production of shrimp is nearly 4.8 million metric tons, generating almost half this weight in waste. The aim of this study was to assess the development and crop production of legumes fertilized with alkaline sonicated shrimp waste under greenhouse conditions. Plants were grown separately under the following fertilization regimes: untreated soil, untreated cotton substrate, two commercial fertilizers [commercial organic fertilizer (COF) and commercial synthetic fertilizer (CSF)], and shrimp waste having hydrolysis degrees of 0%, 15%, 18%, and 25%. Electrical conductivity of shrimp-based fertilizers (SBFs) decreased with hydrolysis degree. However, pH (6.7–6.9), densification (0.2–0.3 g·cm–3) and conductivity (10–21 mS·cm–1) of soil was unaffected by fertilization. Furthermore, CSF had the greatest ionic exchange capability. Sonolysis resulted in an assimilable source of C, N, and O, mainly derived from carbohydrates and proteins, and increased the availability of minerals such as Ca and phosphate. The greatest plant growth in both legumes was achieved when treated with CSF, whereas the raw shrimp waste caused a beneficial plant growth and crop yield mainly for Phaseolus vulgaris. All fertilizers showed typical type II isotherms, and soil substrate per se exhibited the largest water uptake. The soil microbiota increased during the growing cycle and then decreased as the reproductive phase started. In fact, soil planted with Phaseolus vulgaris showed a greater microbial population than Pisium sativum. These shrimp waste hydrolysates can be used as alternative organic soil fertilizers and are suggested as substitutes for synthetic fertilizers. |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2019 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-02-19T16:28:22Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-02-19T16:28:22Z |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de investigación |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
| dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0018-5345 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/38217 |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.21273/HORTSCI14103-19 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
2327-9834 |
| identifier_str_mv |
0018-5345 10.21273/HORTSCI14103-19 2327-9834 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/38217 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv |
HortScience |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv |
1592 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
9 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv |
1585 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv |
54 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
HortScience |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
8 páginas |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
American Society for Horticultural Science |
| dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Alexandria, Estados Unidos |
| institution |
Universidad de Antioquia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/a226431e-f51e-4250-b1b7-566829f5d849/download https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/74a61f70-917a-4388-8ba6-ef1cebc50c87/download https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/3824e24c-c729-4727-a8db-7c5ba993553b/download https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/949abf64-c6eb-430e-8b6e-890de3ae2b76/download https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/4083e9d0-8603-4987-854c-7b4c71b3f38e/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
06e29238d0bdc60185c949e8f9b55a68 b88b088d9957e670ce3b3fbe2eedbc13 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 282aca2641813c3f772066495304225d 1ff7a0ca982ee908409f94d42feb962a |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Antioquia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
aplicacionbibliotecadigitalbiblioteca@udea.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1851052366080507904 |
| spelling |
Rojas Camargo, John JairoQuintero Quiroz, JuliánCiro Monsalve, Yhors AlexanderSilva Agredo, JavierDiseño y Formulación de Medicamentos Cosméticos y Afines2024-02-19T16:28:22Z2024-02-19T16:28:22Z20190018-5345https://hdl.handle.net/10495/3821710.21273/HORTSCI14103-192327-9834ABSTRACT: The global annual production of shrimp is nearly 4.8 million metric tons, generating almost half this weight in waste. The aim of this study was to assess the development and crop production of legumes fertilized with alkaline sonicated shrimp waste under greenhouse conditions. Plants were grown separately under the following fertilization regimes: untreated soil, untreated cotton substrate, two commercial fertilizers [commercial organic fertilizer (COF) and commercial synthetic fertilizer (CSF)], and shrimp waste having hydrolysis degrees of 0%, 15%, 18%, and 25%. Electrical conductivity of shrimp-based fertilizers (SBFs) decreased with hydrolysis degree. However, pH (6.7–6.9), densification (0.2–0.3 g·cm–3) and conductivity (10–21 mS·cm–1) of soil was unaffected by fertilization. Furthermore, CSF had the greatest ionic exchange capability. Sonolysis resulted in an assimilable source of C, N, and O, mainly derived from carbohydrates and proteins, and increased the availability of minerals such as Ca and phosphate. The greatest plant growth in both legumes was achieved when treated with CSF, whereas the raw shrimp waste caused a beneficial plant growth and crop yield mainly for Phaseolus vulgaris. All fertilizers showed typical type II isotherms, and soil substrate per se exhibited the largest water uptake. The soil microbiota increased during the growing cycle and then decreased as the reproductive phase started. In fact, soil planted with Phaseolus vulgaris showed a greater microbial population than Pisium sativum. These shrimp waste hydrolysates can be used as alternative organic soil fertilizers and are suggested as substitutes for synthetic fertilizers.Universidad de Antioquia. Vicerrectoría de investigación. Comité para el Desarrollo de la Investigación - CODIColombia. Ministerio de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación - MinicienciasCOL00036238 páginasapplication/pdfengAmerican Society for Horticultural ScienceAlexandria, Estados Unidoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Comparative evaluation of sonicated shrimp waste hydrolysates as potential fertilizers for legumesArtículo de investigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARThttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionLegumbresLegumesNutrición de las plantasPlant nutritionAbonos orgánicosOrganic fertilizersHidrólisisHydrolysishttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16379http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4592http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24940HortScience15929158554HortScience036-2016111571551545RoR:03bp5hc83RoR:03fd5ne08PublicationORIGINALRojasJohn_2019_SonicatedShrimpWaste.pdfRojasJohn_2019_SonicatedShrimpWaste.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf393935https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/a226431e-f51e-4250-b1b7-566829f5d849/download06e29238d0bdc60185c949e8f9b55a68MD51trueAnonymousREADCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8823https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/74a61f70-917a-4388-8ba6-ef1cebc50c87/downloadb88b088d9957e670ce3b3fbe2eedbc13MD52falseAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/3824e24c-c729-4727-a8db-7c5ba993553b/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53falseAnonymousREADTEXTRojasJohn_2019_SonicatedShrimpWaste.pdf.txtRojasJohn_2019_SonicatedShrimpWaste.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain57754https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/949abf64-c6eb-430e-8b6e-890de3ae2b76/download282aca2641813c3f772066495304225dMD54falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILRojasJohn_2019_SonicatedShrimpWaste.pdf.jpgRojasJohn_2019_SonicatedShrimpWaste.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg20996https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/4083e9d0-8603-4987-854c-7b4c71b3f38e/download1ff7a0ca982ee908409f94d42feb962aMD55falseAnonymousREAD10495/38217oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/382172025-03-26 21:10:57.837https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/open.accesshttps://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.coRepositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Antioquiaaplicacionbibliotecadigitalbiblioteca@udea.edu.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 |
