Pet avoidance in allergy cases: Is it possible to implement it?

ABSTRACT:Introduction: Among allergic patients, pet avoidance is commonly recommended. It is difficult for patients to accomplish this because of their emotional attachment to the pets, and its effectiveness is controversial. Objective: To explore the applicability and effectiveness of pet avoidance...

Full description

Autores:
Cardona Villa, Ricardo
Sánchez Caraballo, Jorge Mario
Diez Zuluaga, Libia Susana
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2015
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/38647
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/38647
Palabra clave:
Alérgenos - immunología
Allergens - immunology
Asma
Asthma
Perros
Dogs
Aves
Birds
Gatos
Cats
Caballos
Horses
Mascotas
Pets
Dermatitis Atópica
Dermatitis, Atopic
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000485
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D001249
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D004285
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D001717
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002415
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D006736
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D057805
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D003876
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
id UDEA2_d16806ee14cde7f15d9a6ead715a7609
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/38647
network_acronym_str UDEA2
network_name_str Repositorio UdeA
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Pet avoidance in allergy cases: Is it possible to implement it?
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv Evitación de mascotas en casos de alergia. ¿Es factible lograrla?
title Pet avoidance in allergy cases: Is it possible to implement it?
spellingShingle Pet avoidance in allergy cases: Is it possible to implement it?
Alérgenos - immunología
Allergens - immunology
Asma
Asthma
Perros
Dogs
Aves
Birds
Gatos
Cats
Caballos
Horses
Mascotas
Pets
Dermatitis Atópica
Dermatitis, Atopic
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000485
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D001249
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D004285
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D001717
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002415
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D006736
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D057805
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D003876
title_short Pet avoidance in allergy cases: Is it possible to implement it?
title_full Pet avoidance in allergy cases: Is it possible to implement it?
title_fullStr Pet avoidance in allergy cases: Is it possible to implement it?
title_full_unstemmed Pet avoidance in allergy cases: Is it possible to implement it?
title_sort Pet avoidance in allergy cases: Is it possible to implement it?
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Cardona Villa, Ricardo
Sánchez Caraballo, Jorge Mario
Diez Zuluaga, Libia Susana
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Cardona Villa, Ricardo
Sánchez Caraballo, Jorge Mario
Diez Zuluaga, Libia Susana
dc.contributor.researchgroup.spa.fl_str_mv Grupo de Alergología Clínica y Experimental (GACE)
dc.subject.decs.none.fl_str_mv Alérgenos - immunología
Allergens - immunology
Asma
Asthma
Perros
Dogs
Aves
Birds
Gatos
Cats
Caballos
Horses
Mascotas
Pets
Dermatitis Atópica
Dermatitis, Atopic
topic Alérgenos - immunología
Allergens - immunology
Asma
Asthma
Perros
Dogs
Aves
Birds
Gatos
Cats
Caballos
Horses
Mascotas
Pets
Dermatitis Atópica
Dermatitis, Atopic
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000485
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D001249
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D004285
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D001717
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002415
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D006736
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D057805
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D003876
dc.subject.meshuri.none.fl_str_mv https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000485
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D001249
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D004285
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D001717
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002415
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D006736
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D057805
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D003876
description ABSTRACT:Introduction: Among allergic patients, pet avoidance is commonly recommended. It is difficult for patients to accomplish this because of their emotional attachment to the pets, and its effectiveness is controversial. Objective: To explore the applicability and effectiveness of pet avoidance measures among sensitized patients. Materials and methods: We evaluated 288 patients with asthma, rhinitis, conjunctivitis and/or dermatitis using skin prick test to measure their sensitization to cats, dogs and other animals to which they were exposed. Exposure to animals was evaluated in each patient (pets at home, frequent indirect exposure or no exposure). In those patients sensitized to animals some avoidance measures, such as removing pets from home and preventing indirect exposure, were recommended. On the following two appointments, we evaluated patients’ fulfillment of these recommendations. Results: Sensitization to cats, dogs and birds was high (9%, 48%, 14%, respectively), as well as direct and indirect exposure (30%, 46%, 24%, respectively). Most patients denied contact with other animals (horses, hamsters, rabbits or cows), and sensitization to them was low. During the follow-up of patients sensitized to their pets at home (n=50), most of them refused to remove them from their house due to emotional attachment, and only two followed this recommendation. Conclusions: High exposure to animals could explain the frequency of sensitization to pets in this population. However, emotional attachment and prevalent indirect exposure to animals among sensitized patients make avoidance recommendations impractical or impossible to achieve.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2015
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-21T22:19:35Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-21T22:19:35Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de investigación
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv "Sánchez J, Diez S, Cardona R. Evitación de mascotas en casos de alergia. ¿Es factible lograrla?. biomedica [Internet]. 1 de septiembre de 2015 [citado 20 de noviembre de 2023];35(3):357-62. Disponible en: https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/2634 "
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0120-4157
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10495/38647
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.7705/biomedica.v35i3.2634
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2590-7379
identifier_str_mv "Sánchez J, Diez S, Cardona R. Evitación de mascotas en casos de alergia. ¿Es factible lograrla?. biomedica [Internet]. 1 de septiembre de 2015 [citado 20 de noviembre de 2023];35(3):357-62. Disponible en: https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/2634 "
0120-4157
10.7705/biomedica.v35i3.2634
2590-7379
url https://hdl.handle.net/10495/38647
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv Biomédica
dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv 362
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 3
dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv 357
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 35
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Biomédica
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 6 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Salud
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Bogotá, Colombia
institution Universidad de Antioquia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/d4b385ac-5012-42ad-b09b-83e71f9e6d45/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/4707d3c5-7508-4943-ae0c-68d6eec77363/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/c1a9a8a2-8526-4cf7-8a7c-5d1970bb1727/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/60109397-3d41-4927-8489-cf4c96727d3d/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/8180de77-071e-4425-a9bf-0dd4b8c84966/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv b88b088d9957e670ce3b3fbe2eedbc13
a70e37eb0bbbb89a8064e0ae6802ec00
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bc5663bb03d4ce128a91d69213a4404f
109d592671d5640b8e95140f599c7484
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Antioquia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv aplicacionbibliotecadigitalbiblioteca@udea.edu.co
_version_ 1851052364982648832
spelling Cardona Villa, RicardoSánchez Caraballo, Jorge MarioDiez Zuluaga, Libia SusanaGrupo de Alergología Clínica y Experimental (GACE)2024-03-21T22:19:35Z2024-03-21T22:19:35Z2015"Sánchez J, Diez S, Cardona R. Evitación de mascotas en casos de alergia. ¿Es factible lograrla?. biomedica [Internet]. 1 de septiembre de 2015 [citado 20 de noviembre de 2023];35(3):357-62. Disponible en: https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/2634 "0120-4157https://hdl.handle.net/10495/3864710.7705/biomedica.v35i3.26342590-7379ABSTRACT:Introduction: Among allergic patients, pet avoidance is commonly recommended. It is difficult for patients to accomplish this because of their emotional attachment to the pets, and its effectiveness is controversial. Objective: To explore the applicability and effectiveness of pet avoidance measures among sensitized patients. Materials and methods: We evaluated 288 patients with asthma, rhinitis, conjunctivitis and/or dermatitis using skin prick test to measure their sensitization to cats, dogs and other animals to which they were exposed. Exposure to animals was evaluated in each patient (pets at home, frequent indirect exposure or no exposure). In those patients sensitized to animals some avoidance measures, such as removing pets from home and preventing indirect exposure, were recommended. On the following two appointments, we evaluated patients’ fulfillment of these recommendations. Results: Sensitization to cats, dogs and birds was high (9%, 48%, 14%, respectively), as well as direct and indirect exposure (30%, 46%, 24%, respectively). Most patients denied contact with other animals (horses, hamsters, rabbits or cows), and sensitization to them was low. During the follow-up of patients sensitized to their pets at home (n=50), most of them refused to remove them from their house due to emotional attachment, and only two followed this recommendation. Conclusions: High exposure to animals could explain the frequency of sensitization to pets in this population. However, emotional attachment and prevalent indirect exposure to animals among sensitized patients make avoidance recommendations impractical or impossible to achieve.RESUMEN:Introducción. Entre los pacientes alérgicos se recomienda comúnmente la evitación de mascotas; sin embargo, es difícil que los pacientes cumplan con esta recomendación debido al apego emocional y, además, su efecto clínico no es claro. Objetivo. Explorar la aplicabilidad de las medidas de evitación entre pacientes sensibilizados a mascotas. Materiales y métodos. En 284 pacientes con asma, rinitis, conjuntivitis y dermatitis, se evaluó la sensibilización a gatos, perros y otros animales mediante pruebas de punción epidérmica. Se evaluó, igualmente, el nivel de exposición a animales (mascotas en la casa y exposición indirecta frecuente). A aquellos pacientes sensibilizados a los animales, se les recomendaron medidas de evitación como retirar la mascota de la casa y evitar la exposición indirecta. En las dos citas médicas siguientes se evaluó el cumplimiento de estas recomendaciones. Resultados. La sensibilización a gatos, perros y aves fue alta (9, 48, y 14 %, respectivamente), al igual que la exposición directa o indirecta a estos animales (30, 46, 24 %, respectivamente). La mayoría de los pacientes negó el contacto frecuente con otros animales (caballos, hámsteres, conejos, vacas) y la sensibilización a estos fue baja. La mayoría de los pacientes sensibilizados a su propia mascota (n= 50) se rehusó a retirar la mascota de la casa y solo dos de ellos siguieron la recomendación de hacerlo. Conclusiones. La exposición frecuente a los animales podría explicar la gran frecuencia de sensibilización a las mascotas en esta población. Sin embargo, el apego emocional y la exposición indirecta frecuente, hacen que las recomendaciones de evitación sean imprácticas o casi imposibles de lograr.Universidad de Antioquia. Grupo de Alergología Clínica y ExperimentalCOL00595676 páginasapplication/pdfengInstituto Nacional de SaludBogotá, Colombiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Pet avoidance in allergy cases: Is it possible to implement it?Evitación de mascotas en casos de alergia. ¿Es factible lograrla?Artículo de investigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARThttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAlérgenos - immunologíaAllergens - immunologyAsmaAsthmaPerrosDogsAvesBirdsGatosCatsCaballosHorsesMascotasPetsDermatitis AtópicaDermatitis, Atopichttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000485https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D001249https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D004285https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D001717https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002415https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D006736https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D057805https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D003876Biomédica362335735BiomédicaRoR:03bp5hc83PublicationCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8823https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/d4b385ac-5012-42ad-b09b-83e71f9e6d45/downloadb88b088d9957e670ce3b3fbe2eedbc13MD52falseAnonymousREADORIGINALDiezSusana_2015_Pet_Allergy.pdfDiezSusana_2015_Pet_Allergy.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf178413https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/4707d3c5-7508-4943-ae0c-68d6eec77363/downloada70e37eb0bbbb89a8064e0ae6802ec00MD51trueAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/c1a9a8a2-8526-4cf7-8a7c-5d1970bb1727/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53falseAnonymousREADTEXTDiezSusana_2015_Pet_Allergy.pdf.txtDiezSusana_2015_Pet_Allergy.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain28363https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/60109397-3d41-4927-8489-cf4c96727d3d/downloadbc5663bb03d4ce128a91d69213a4404fMD54falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILDiezSusana_2015_Pet_Allergy.pdf.jpgDiezSusana_2015_Pet_Allergy.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg14277https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/8180de77-071e-4425-a9bf-0dd4b8c84966/download109d592671d5640b8e95140f599c7484MD55falseAnonymousREAD10495/38647oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/386472025-03-26 21:10:20.032http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/open.accesshttps://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.coRepositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Antioquiaaplicacionbibliotecadigitalbiblioteca@udea.edu.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