Accuracy of an Off-Label Transmitter and Data Manager Paired With an Intermittent Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitor in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

Background: This work evaluates the accuracy and agreement between the FreeStyle Libre sensor (FSL) and an off-label converted real-time continuous glucose monitor (c-rtCGM) device consisting of the MiaoMiao transmitter and the xDrip+ application which can be coupled to the FSL. Methods: Four weeks...

Full description

Autores:
Builes Montaño, Carlos Esteban
Villa Tamayo, María Fernanda
Ramírez Rincón, Alex
Carvajal, Javier
Rivadeneira, Pablo S.
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2024
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/48372
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/48372
Palabra clave:
Monitoreo Continuo de Glucosa
Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Glucemia - análisis
Blood Glucose - analysis
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000095583
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D001786
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D003922
ODS 3: Salud y bienestar. Garantizar una vida sana y promover el bienestar de todos a todas las edades
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Description
Summary:Background: This work evaluates the accuracy and agreement between the FreeStyle Libre sensor (FSL) and an off-label converted real-time continuous glucose monitor (c-rtCGM) device consisting of the MiaoMiao transmitter and the xDrip+ application which can be coupled to the FSL. Methods: Four weeks of glucose data were collected from 21 participants with type 1 diabetes using the c-rtCGM and FSL: two weeks with a single initial calibration (uncalibrated) and two weeks with a daily calibration (calibrated). Accuracy and agreement evaluation included mean absolute relative difference (MARD), the %20/20 rule, Bland-Altman plots, and the Consensus Error Grid analysis. Results: Values reported by the c-rtCGM system compared with the FSL resulted in an overall MARD of 12.06% and 84.71% of the results falling within Consensus Error Grid Zone A when the device is calibrated. For uncalibrated devices, an overall MARD of 17.49% was obtained. Decreased accuracy was shown in the hypoglycemic range and for rates of change greater than 2 mg/dL/min. The between-device bias also incremented with increasing glucose values. Conclusion: Measurements recorded by the c-rtCGM were found to be accurate when compared with FSL data only when performing daily c-rtCGM device calibrations. High drops in accuracy and agreement between devices occurred when the c-rtCGM was not calibrated.