Barriers that limit the implementation of thermal fogging for the control of dengue in Colombia: a study of mixed methods

ABSTRACT: Background: Thermal fogging of Insecticides is a vector control strategy used by the Medellin Secretary of Health to combat dengue. This method is employed during outbreaks to curb populations of potentially infectious adult mosquitoes and interrupt transmission cycles. While this strategy has been used in Medellin since 2007, in some years it has not reduced dengue cases as expected. Difficulties in the implementation of fumigation strategies, such as lack of opportunity for treatment and public perception may be factors that limit its utility. The objective of this study was to identify barriers that hinder the implementation of thermal fogging, as well as attitudes and beliefs that prevent its acceptance. Methods: We used a cross-sectional observational study of mixed methods carried out in neighborhoods prioritized for fumigation treatment in Medellin, Colombia. First, we assessed the timeliness of treatment by determining the latency period between reported dengue cases and the implementation of fumigation in response to those cases. Next, we administered structured questionnaires to residents in the area of fumigation treatments (n = 4455 homes) to quantify acceptance and rejection, as well as factors associated with rejection. Results: The median time between notification and treatment was 25 days (IQR 20.0-36.5). Fumigators were only able to treat 53.7% of total households scheduled for treatment; 9.6% rejected treatment, and treatment teams were unable to fumigate the remaining 36.7% of homes due to absent residents, no adults being present, and other reasons. The most frequent causes for rejection were residents being busy at the time of treatment (33.1%) and no interest in the treatment (24.5%). Other reasons for rejection include the perceptions that fumigation does not control pests other than mosquitoes (4.3%), that no mosquitoes were present in the home (3.3%), and that fumigation affects human health (3.1%). Conclusions: The high percentage of houses where it was not possible to perform fumigation limits control of the vector. Future strategies should consider more flexible treatment schedules and incorporate informational messages to educate residents about the safety and importance of treatment.

• Autores: Úsuga Rodríguez, Andrés Felipe; Zuluaga Idárraga, Lina Marcela; Álvarez Echavarría, Olga Natalia; Rojo Ospina, Raúl Alberto; Henao Correa, Enrique Antonio; Rúa Uribe, Guillermo León
• Tipo de recurso: Article of investigation
• Fecha de publicación: 2019
• Institución: Universidad de Antioquia
• Repositorio: Repositorio UdeA
• Idioma: eng
• OAI Identifier: oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/45064
• Acceso en línea: https://hdl.handle.net/10495/45064
• Palabra clave: Estudios Transversales; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dengue; Composición Familiar; Family Characteristics; Fumigación; Fumigation; Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Insecticidas; Insecticides; Control de Mosquitos; Mosquito Control; Mosquitos Vectores; Mosquito Vectors; Características de la Residencia; Residence Characteristics; Encuestas y Cuestionarios; Surveys and Questionnaires; https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D003430; https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D003715; https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D005191; https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D005651; https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D007722; https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D007306; https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D009032; https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000072138; https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D012111; https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D011795
• Rights: openAccess
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/