Comparison of Frictional Resistance Among Conventional, Active and Passive Self-Ligating Brackets with Different Combinations of Arch Wires: A Finite Elements Study
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare frictional resistance among conventional, passive and active selfligating brackets using Finite Elements Analysis (FEA). Seventynine (79) slide tests were performed by combining an upper first bicuspid conventional bracket, 0.018” stainless steel wire...
- Autores:
-
Gómez Gómez, Sandra Liliana
Montoya Góez, Yesid de Jesús
García, Nora L.
Virgen, Ana L.
Botero Torres, Javier Enrique
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2016
- Institución:
- Universidad de Antioquia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UdeA
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/37960
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10495/37960
- Palabra clave:
- Análisis de Elementos Finitos
Finite Element Analysis
Diseño de Aparato Ortodóncico
Orthodontic Appliance Design
Soportes Ortodóncicos
Orthodontic Brackets
Fricción Ortodóntica
Orthodontic Friction
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D020342
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D016382
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D016910
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000070297
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/co/
| id |
UDEA2_a1b99ab3cfffa2ae2bce21109c84a331 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/37960 |
| network_acronym_str |
UDEA2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio UdeA |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of Frictional Resistance Among Conventional, Active and Passive Self-Ligating Brackets with Different Combinations of Arch Wires: A Finite Elements Study |
| dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
Comparación de la resistencia friccional entre brackets convencionales, de autoligado activo y pasivo con diferentes combinaciones de arcos: un estudio de elementos finitos |
| title |
Comparison of Frictional Resistance Among Conventional, Active and Passive Self-Ligating Brackets with Different Combinations of Arch Wires: A Finite Elements Study |
| spellingShingle |
Comparison of Frictional Resistance Among Conventional, Active and Passive Self-Ligating Brackets with Different Combinations of Arch Wires: A Finite Elements Study Análisis de Elementos Finitos Finite Element Analysis Diseño de Aparato Ortodóncico Orthodontic Appliance Design Soportes Ortodóncicos Orthodontic Brackets Fricción Ortodóntica Orthodontic Friction https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D020342 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D016382 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D016910 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000070297 |
| title_short |
Comparison of Frictional Resistance Among Conventional, Active and Passive Self-Ligating Brackets with Different Combinations of Arch Wires: A Finite Elements Study |
| title_full |
Comparison of Frictional Resistance Among Conventional, Active and Passive Self-Ligating Brackets with Different Combinations of Arch Wires: A Finite Elements Study |
| title_fullStr |
Comparison of Frictional Resistance Among Conventional, Active and Passive Self-Ligating Brackets with Different Combinations of Arch Wires: A Finite Elements Study |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Frictional Resistance Among Conventional, Active and Passive Self-Ligating Brackets with Different Combinations of Arch Wires: A Finite Elements Study |
| title_sort |
Comparison of Frictional Resistance Among Conventional, Active and Passive Self-Ligating Brackets with Different Combinations of Arch Wires: A Finite Elements Study |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Gómez Gómez, Sandra Liliana Montoya Góez, Yesid de Jesús García, Nora L. Virgen, Ana L. Botero Torres, Javier Enrique |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Gómez Gómez, Sandra Liliana Montoya Góez, Yesid de Jesús García, Nora L. Virgen, Ana L. Botero Torres, Javier Enrique |
| dc.contributor.researchgroup.spa.fl_str_mv |
Periodoncia, Salud y Educación |
| dc.subject.decs.none.fl_str_mv |
Análisis de Elementos Finitos Finite Element Analysis Diseño de Aparato Ortodóncico Orthodontic Appliance Design Soportes Ortodóncicos Orthodontic Brackets Fricción Ortodóntica Orthodontic Friction |
| topic |
Análisis de Elementos Finitos Finite Element Analysis Diseño de Aparato Ortodóncico Orthodontic Appliance Design Soportes Ortodóncicos Orthodontic Brackets Fricción Ortodóntica Orthodontic Friction https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D020342 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D016382 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D016910 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000070297 |
| dc.subject.meshuri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D020342 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D016382 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D016910 https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000070297 |
| description |
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare frictional resistance among conventional, passive and active selfligating brackets using Finite Elements Analysis (FEA). Seventynine (79) slide tests were performed by combining an upper first bicuspid conventional bracket, 0.018” stainless steel wires and 0.010” ligature by means of an INSTRON 3345 load system to obtain average maximum static frictional resistance (MSFR). This value was compared to the FR (frictional resistance) obtained by simulation of a slide of the same combination by FEA following conventional bracket modeling by means of Computer Aided Design (CAD). Once the FEA was validated, bracket CADs were designed (upper right first bicuspid conventional, active and passive selfligating bracket) and bracket properties calculated. MSFR was compared among conventional, active and passive selfligating brackets with different alloys and archwire cross sections such as 0.018”, 0.019” x 0.025”and 0.020” x 0.020”. Passive selfligating brackets had the lowest MSFR, followed by conventional brackets and active selfligating brackets. In conventional brackets, a 0.018” archwire produced a linear pattern of stress with maximum concentration at the center. Conversely, stress in 0.020 x 0.020” and 0.019 x 0.025” archwires was distributed across the width of the slot. The highest normal forces were 1.53 N for the 0.018” archwire, 4.85 N for the 0.020 x 0.020” archwire and 8.18 N for the 0.019 x 0.025” archwire. Passive selfligating brackets presented less frictional resistance than conventional and active selfligating brackets. Regardless of bracket type, greater contact area between the slot and the archwire and the spring clip increased frictional resistance. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2016 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-31T22:54:22Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-31T22:54:22Z |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de investigación |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
| dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0326-4815 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/37960 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
1852-4834 |
| identifier_str_mv |
0326-4815 1852-4834 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/37960 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acta Odontol. Latinoam. |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv |
136 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
2 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv |
130 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv |
29 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana |
| dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/co/ |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/co/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
6 |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Argentina de Investigación Odontológica |
| dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Buenos Aires, Argentina |
| institution |
Universidad de Antioquia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/0f0cfa47-d959-475b-8866-16ba0d185f51/download https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/f7eb7ecc-baa9-4393-a078-6cdc73700ceb/download https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/5b66e2fb-9d64-4d1e-94f0-cf78643f8da4/download https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/9e8cdd61-0fda-49fc-95c6-7efdeab58d7a/download https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/0ee5b3d8-fb5e-407f-85f1-f71670f16a29/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e925173e358404a77d11cb4d5d1ad87a c0c92b0ffc8b7d22d9cf56754a416a76 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 75c9b8d8d3c4cd31921b6930386c03c4 8b4e2add56c573ec9e7da585dec18931 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Antioquia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
aplicacionbibliotecadigitalbiblioteca@udea.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1851052350104403968 |
| spelling |
Gómez Gómez, Sandra LilianaMontoya Góez, Yesid de JesúsGarcía, Nora L.Virgen, Ana L.Botero Torres, Javier EnriquePeriodoncia, Salud y Educación2024-01-31T22:54:22Z2024-01-31T22:54:22Z20160326-4815https://hdl.handle.net/10495/379601852-4834ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare frictional resistance among conventional, passive and active selfligating brackets using Finite Elements Analysis (FEA). Seventynine (79) slide tests were performed by combining an upper first bicuspid conventional bracket, 0.018” stainless steel wires and 0.010” ligature by means of an INSTRON 3345 load system to obtain average maximum static frictional resistance (MSFR). This value was compared to the FR (frictional resistance) obtained by simulation of a slide of the same combination by FEA following conventional bracket modeling by means of Computer Aided Design (CAD). Once the FEA was validated, bracket CADs were designed (upper right first bicuspid conventional, active and passive selfligating bracket) and bracket properties calculated. MSFR was compared among conventional, active and passive selfligating brackets with different alloys and archwire cross sections such as 0.018”, 0.019” x 0.025”and 0.020” x 0.020”. Passive selfligating brackets had the lowest MSFR, followed by conventional brackets and active selfligating brackets. In conventional brackets, a 0.018” archwire produced a linear pattern of stress with maximum concentration at the center. Conversely, stress in 0.020 x 0.020” and 0.019 x 0.025” archwires was distributed across the width of the slot. The highest normal forces were 1.53 N for the 0.018” archwire, 4.85 N for the 0.020 x 0.020” archwire and 8.18 N for the 0.019 x 0.025” archwire. Passive selfligating brackets presented less frictional resistance than conventional and active selfligating brackets. Regardless of bracket type, greater contact area between the slot and the archwire and the spring clip increased frictional resistance.RESUMEN: El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la resistencia friccional entre brackets convencionales, de autoligado pasivo y activo por medio del método de elementos finitos (MEF). Se realizaron setenta y nueve (79) deslizamientos combinando brackets convencionales de primer bicúspide superior con arcos de acero de 0,018” y ligadura metálica de 0,010” en una máquina INSTRON 3345, obteniendo el promedio de la resistencia estática máxima (REM). Este valor fue comparado con la resistencia friccional obtenida por simulación de un deslizamiento de la misma combinación por medio de MEF previo diseño asistido por computador (CAD) del bracket convencional. Una vez se validó MEF, se realizaron diseños CAD de los brackets (convencional, autoligado activo y pasivo de primer bicúspide superior derecho) y cálculos de sus propiedades. Se realizó una comparación entre brackets convencionales, brackets de autoligado activo y pasivo con diferentes aleaciones y secciones cruzadas de alambre 0.018”, 0.019” x 0.025” y 0.020” x 0.020”. Los brackets de autoligado pasivo mostraron la menor REM, seguidos de los brackets convencionales y finalmente los brackets de autoligado activo. En los brackets convencionales, el arco de 0,018” produjo un patrón lineal de stress en el fondo de la ranura, con su máxima concentración en el centro. Por el contrario, los arcos de 0.020” x 0.020” y 0.019 x 0.025” tuvieron una distribución de esfuerzos a través del ancho de la ranura. La mayor fuerza normal en los brackets convencionales fue para el arco 0.019”x 0.025” (8.18N), seguido por el arco 0.020 x 0.020” (4.85N) y finalmente el arco 0.018” (1.53N). Los brackets de autoligado pasivo presentaron menos resistencia friccional que los brackets convencionales y autoligado activo respectivamente. Independiente del tipo de bracket, una mayor área de contacto entre la ranura del bracket y el arco, y el spring clip aumentaron la resistencia friccional.COL00828976application/pdfengSociedad Argentina de Investigación OdontológicaBuenos Aires, Argentinahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/co/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Comparison of Frictional Resistance Among Conventional, Active and Passive Self-Ligating Brackets with Different Combinations of Arch Wires: A Finite Elements StudyComparación de la resistencia friccional entre brackets convencionales, de autoligado activo y pasivo con diferentes combinaciones de arcos: un estudio de elementos finitosArtículo de investigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARThttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAnálisis de Elementos FinitosFinite Element AnalysisDiseño de Aparato OrtodóncicoOrthodontic Appliance DesignSoportes OrtodóncicosOrthodontic BracketsFricción OrtodónticaOrthodontic Frictionhttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D020342https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D016382https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D016910https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000070297Acta Odontol. Latinoam.136213029Acta Odontológica LatinoamericanaPublicationORIGINALGomezSandra_2016_Comparison_Frictional_Resistance.pdfGomezSandra_2016_Comparison_Frictional_Resistance.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf234613https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/0f0cfa47-d959-475b-8866-16ba0d185f51/downloade925173e358404a77d11cb4d5d1ad87aMD52trueAnonymousREADCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8933https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/f7eb7ecc-baa9-4393-a078-6cdc73700ceb/downloadc0c92b0ffc8b7d22d9cf56754a416a76MD53falseAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/5b66e2fb-9d64-4d1e-94f0-cf78643f8da4/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD54falseAnonymousREADTEXTGomezSandra_2016_Comparison_Frictional_Resistance.pdf.txtGomezSandra_2016_Comparison_Frictional_Resistance.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain30114https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/9e8cdd61-0fda-49fc-95c6-7efdeab58d7a/download75c9b8d8d3c4cd31921b6930386c03c4MD55falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILGomezSandra_2016_Comparison_Frictional_Resistance.pdf.jpgGomezSandra_2016_Comparison_Frictional_Resistance.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg15394https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/0ee5b3d8-fb5e-407f-85f1-f71670f16a29/download8b4e2add56c573ec9e7da585dec18931MD56falseAnonymousREAD10495/37960oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/379602025-03-26 20:58:09.445http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/co/open.accesshttps://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.coRepositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Antioquiaaplicacionbibliotecadigitalbiblioteca@udea.edu.coTk9URTogUExBQ0UgWU9VUiBPV04gTElDRU5TRSBIRVJFClRoaXMgc2FtcGxlIGxpY2Vuc2UgaXMgcHJvdmlkZWQgZm9yIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgcHVycG9zZXMgb25seS4KCk5PTi1FWENMVVNJVkUgRElTVFJJQlVUSU9OIExJQ0VOU0UKCkJ5IHNpZ25pbmcgYW5kIHN1Ym1pdHRpbmcgdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLCB5b3UgKHRoZSBhdXRob3Iocykgb3IgY29weXJpZ2h0Cm93bmVyKSBncmFudHMgdG8gRFNwYWNlIFVuaXZlcnNpdHkgKERTVSkgdGhlIG5vbi1leGNsdXNpdmUgcmlnaHQgdG8gcmVwcm9kdWNlLAp0cmFuc2xhdGUgKGFzIGRlZmluZWQgYmVsb3cpLCBhbmQvb3IgZGlzdHJpYnV0ZSB5b3VyIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gKGluY2x1ZGluZwp0aGUgYWJzdHJhY3QpIHdvcmxkd2lkZSBpbiBwcmludCBhbmQgZWxlY3Ryb25pYyBmb3JtYXQgYW5kIGluIGFueSBtZWRpdW0sCmluY2x1ZGluZyBidXQgbm90IGxpbWl0ZWQgdG8gYXVkaW8gb3IgdmlkZW8uCgpZb3UgYWdyZWUgdGhhdCBEU1UgbWF5LCB3aXRob3V0IGNoYW5naW5nIHRoZSBjb250ZW50LCB0cmFuc2xhdGUgdGhlCnN1Ym1pc3Npb24gdG8gYW55IG1lZGl1bSBvciBmb3JtYXQgZm9yIHRoZSBwdXJwb3NlIG9mIHByZXNlcnZhdGlvbi4KCllvdSBhbHNvIGFncmVlIHRoYXQgRFNVIG1heSBrZWVwIG1vcmUgdGhhbiBvbmUgY29weSBvZiB0aGlzIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gZm9yCnB1cnBvc2VzIG9mIHNlY3VyaXR5LCBiYWNrLXVwIGFuZCBwcmVzZXJ2YXRpb24uCgpZb3UgcmVwcmVzZW50IHRoYXQgdGhlIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gaXMgeW91ciBvcmlnaW5hbCB3b3JrLCBhbmQgdGhhdCB5b3UgaGF2ZQp0aGUgcmlnaHQgdG8gZ3JhbnQgdGhlIHJpZ2h0cyBjb250YWluZWQgaW4gdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLiBZb3UgYWxzbyByZXByZXNlbnQKdGhhdCB5b3VyIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gZG9lcyBub3QsIHRvIHRoZSBiZXN0IG9mIHlvdXIga25vd2xlZGdlLCBpbmZyaW5nZSB1cG9uCmFueW9uZSdzIGNvcHlyaWdodC4KCklmIHRoZSBzdWJtaXNzaW9uIGNvbnRhaW5zIG1hdGVyaWFsIGZvciB3aGljaCB5b3UgZG8gbm90IGhvbGQgY29weXJpZ2h0LAp5b3UgcmVwcmVzZW50IHRoYXQgeW91IGhhdmUgb2J0YWluZWQgdGhlIHVucmVzdHJpY3RlZCBwZXJtaXNzaW9uIG9mIHRoZQpjb3B5cmlnaHQgb3duZXIgdG8gZ3JhbnQgRFNVIHRoZSByaWdodHMgcmVxdWlyZWQgYnkgdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLCBhbmQgdGhhdApzdWNoIHRoaXJkLXBhcnR5IG93bmVkIG1hdGVyaWFsIGlzIGNsZWFybHkgaWRlbnRpZmllZCBhbmQgYWNrbm93bGVkZ2VkCndpdGhpbiB0aGUgdGV4dCBvciBjb250ZW50IG9mIHRoZSBzdWJtaXNzaW9uLgoKSUYgVEhFIFNVQk1JU1NJT04gSVMgQkFTRUQgVVBPTiBXT1JLIFRIQVQgSEFTIEJFRU4gU1BPTlNPUkVEIE9SIFNVUFBPUlRFRApCWSBBTiBBR0VOQ1kgT1IgT1JHQU5JWkFUSU9OIE9USEVSIFRIQU4gRFNVLCBZT1UgUkVQUkVTRU5UIFRIQVQgWU9VIEhBVkUKRlVMRklMTEVEIEFOWSBSSUdIVCBPRiBSRVZJRVcgT1IgT1RIRVIgT0JMSUdBVElPTlMgUkVRVUlSRUQgQlkgU1VDSApDT05UUkFDVCBPUiBBR1JFRU1FTlQuCgpEU1Ugd2lsbCBjbGVhcmx5IGlkZW50aWZ5IHlvdXIgbmFtZShzKSBhcyB0aGUgYXV0aG9yKHMpIG9yIG93bmVyKHMpIG9mIHRoZQpzdWJtaXNzaW9uLCBhbmQgd2lsbCBub3QgbWFrZSBhbnkgYWx0ZXJhdGlvbiwgb3RoZXIgdGhhbiBhcyBhbGxvd2VkIGJ5IHRoaXMKbGljZW5zZSwgdG8geW91ciBzdWJtaXNzaW9uLgo= |
