Whoever wants better healthcare simply pays more: citizens' perception about voluntary private health insurance in Colombia
ABSTRACT: Objectives: To explore the perceptions that Colombians have about voluntary private health insurance plans (VPHI) in the health system to identify the tensions that exist between the public and private systems. Methods: A qualitative case study approach with 46 semi structured interviews o...
- Autores:
-
Patiño Lugo, Daniel Felipe
Vélez, Claudia Marcela
Díaz Hernández, Diana Patricia
Salazar Blanco, Olga Francisca
González Arango, Juan Esteban
Velásquez Correa, Juan Carlos
Rodríguez Corredor, Leydi Camila
Vélez Marín, Viviana María
Velásquez Salazar, Pamela
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2024
- Institución:
- Universidad de Antioquia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UdeA
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/44206
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10495/44206
- Palabra clave:
- Atención a la Salud
Delivery of Health Care
Seguro de Salud
Insurance, Health
Pueblos Sudamericanos
South American People
Colombia
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D003695
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D007348
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000094860
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D003105
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/
| Summary: | ABSTRACT: Objectives: To explore the perceptions that Colombians have about voluntary private health insurance plans (VPHI) in the health system to identify the tensions that exist between the public and private systems. Methods: A qualitative case study approach with 46 semi structured interviews of patients, healthcare workers, healthcare administrators, decision-makers, and citizens. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, anonymized, digitally stored, and analyzed following grounded theory guidelines. Results: We developed a paradigmatic matrix that explores how, in a context mediated by both the commodification of health and social stratification, perceptions about the failures in the public health system related to lack of timely care, extensive administrative procedures, and the search for privileged care led to positioning VPHI as a solution to these failures. The interviewees identified three consequences of using VPHI: first, the worsening of problems of timely access to care in the public system; second, higher costs for citizens translated into double payment for technologies and services to which they are entitled; third, the widening of inequity gaps in access to health services between people with similar needs but different payment capacities. Conclusions: These findings can help decision makers to understand citizens´ perceptions about the implications that VPHI may have in worsening equity gaps in the Colombian health system. It also shows, how VPHI is perceived as a double payment for services covered within social security plans and suggests that the perceived lack of timely access to care in the public systems and the fear that citizens have for themselves or their family members when using suboptimal healthcare are important drivers to purchase these private insurances. Keywords: Accessibility to health services; Employer-sponsored health insurance; Equity in access to health services; For-profit insurance plans; Private practice; Social security. |
|---|
