Grading the strength and certainty of the scientific evidence of the bidirectional association between periodontitis and noncommunicable diseases: an umbrella review

ABSTRACT: Objective: Periodontitis and various noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) have been proposed to have a bidirectional relationship. The purpose of this umbrella review is (1) to synthesize the evidence and (2) to grade the strength and certainty of the scientific evidence regarding the bidirecti...

Full description

Autores:
Rodríguez Medina, Carolina
Amaya Sánchez, Sandra
Contreras Rengifo, Adolfo
Botero Torres, Javier Enrique
Tipo de recurso:
Review article
Fecha de publicación:
2025
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/45538
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/45538
Palabra clave:
Periodontitis
Enfermedades no Transmisibles
Noncommunicable Diseases
Odontología Basada en la Evidencia
Evidence-Based Dentistry
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D010518
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000073296
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D055094
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT: Objective: Periodontitis and various noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) have been proposed to have a bidirectional relationship. The purpose of this umbrella review is (1) to synthesize the evidence and (2) to grade the strength and certainty of the scientific evidence regarding the bidirectional association between periodontitis and NCDs. Data sources: Electronic databases were systematically searched from January 2021 and July 2024; MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and SciELO. Data selection and extraction: Potential epidemiologic systematic reviews with meta-analysis that studied the bidirectional association between periodontitis and NCDs were identified by two independent reviewers and filtered by title and abstract according to the selection criteria. The strength and the quality and certainty of the evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) guide. 561,554 potential results were identified. After removing duplicates and excluding records deemed ineligible by automated filters, 450 results were screened by title and abstract. This process led to 41 records being appraised in full-text. Of these, 17 were further excluded leaving a total of 24 systematic reviews that met the inclusion criteria. Data synthesis: 24 systematic reviews with a total of 32 NCDs were appraised and consolidated. Risk of bias assessment indicated that 21 systematic reviews (87.5%) demonstrated low bias (high quality), 2 had medium bias, and 1 exhibited high bias (low quality). Key issues identified included the formulation of explicit research questions, critical appraisal, data extraction, and publication bias. The association between periodontitis and NCDs was strong in 1 systematic review, moderate in 8, weak in 10 and absent in 7 systematic reviews. The strength of the association between NCDs and periodontitis was moderate in 6 systematic reviews and weak in 3 systematic reviews. The size of the reported effect (odds ratio/risk ratio/hazard ratio) was broader with increasing strength. Although data supports the association between periodontitis and some NCDs, and to a lesser extent between some NCDs and periodontitis, the certainty of the evidence was classified as low to very low. Conclusions: There is some data that, with varying degrees of association and low to very low certainty, provide evidence that periodontitis may be a potential risk factor for some NCDs and vice versa.