Using mixed models to describe growth in buffaloes

ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to evaluate growth between 12 months and slaughter in 123 castrated male buffaloes. Body weight data, ultrasound, and bovimetric measurements were used. Linear mixed models of first and second order were used. The model included “lot” as a fixed effect. “Ind...

Full description

Autores:
Ramírez Toro, Edison Julián
Mesa Restrepo, Jaime Alberto
Agudelo Gómez, Divier Antonio
Bolivar Vergara, Diana María
Cerón Muñoz, Mario Fernando
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2011
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/41341
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/41341
Palabra clave:
Ultrasonido
ultrasound
Ganado de carne
Beef cattle
Bovimetric
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_27098
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_862
Rights
openAccess
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to evaluate growth between 12 months and slaughter in 123 castrated male buffaloes. Body weight data, ultrasound, and bovimetric measurements were used. Linear mixed models of first and second order were used. The model included “lot” as a fixed effect. “Individual” and the three parameters of the model were included as random effects. The second order model had the best fit. “Lot” had a highly significant effect (p <0.01) for most of the traits. The βo values, estimated for body weight (BW), Ribeye area (REA), and rump fat thickness (RFT), were 184, 20.3, and 0.65, respectively. Monthly increments (β1) corresponded to 28, 44, 3.72, 1.25; and deceleration (β2) was -0.61, -0.116, -0.011, respectively. Measurements of height at the sacrum (HS) and height at the withers (HC) agreed with literature reports for this species. Chest circumference measurements (CC), body length (BL), separation between the ilia (II), and distance between ilium-ischium (IIS) were lower than those reported in the literature. Buffalo growth was well described by the quadratic model. This model fits better the growth curve for buffaloes when random parameters are included. During the study, animals maintained the normal physiological behavior described for cattle growth.