Pharmacodynamics of nine generic products of amikacin compared with the innovator in the neutropenic mouse thigh infection model
ABSTRACT: Background Previously, we validated the mouse thigh infection model to test the therapeutic equivalence of generic antibiotic products. Here, our aim was to compare the in vivo efficacy of amikacin products in clinical use in Colombia using this animal model. Results All except one generic...
- Autores:
-
Zuluaga Salazar, Andrés Felipe
Rodríguez Jaramillo, Carlos Andrés
Agudelo Pérez, María
Vesga Meneses, Omar
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2015
- Institución:
- Universidad de Antioquia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UdeA
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/25823
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10495/25823
- Palabra clave:
- Amicacina
Amikacin
Modelos Animales
Models, Animal
Medicamentos Genéricos
Drugs, Generic
Equivalencia Terapéutica
Therapeutic Equivalency
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/
| Summary: | ABSTRACT: Background Previously, we validated the mouse thigh infection model to test the therapeutic equivalence of generic antibiotic products. Here, our aim was to compare the in vivo efficacy of amikacin products in clinical use in Colombia using this animal model. Results All except one generic product had the same in vitro potency, judging by the lack of differences on MIC and MBC compared with the innovator. However, eight of nine generic products failed in the neutropenic mouse thigh infection model to achieve the innovator’s maximum effect (E max ≤ 5.65 for the generics vs. 6.58 log10 CFU/g for the innovator) against Escherichia coli SIG-1, after subcutaneous treatment every 6 h with doses ranging from 1.5 to 3072 mg/kg per day. Conclusion As we demonstrated previously with other antibiotics such as vancomycin, gentamicin and oxacillin, the generic products of amikacin failed the in vivo efficacy testing. The therapeutic equivalence should be assessed in vivo before clinical approval of generic products. |
|---|
