From Insult to Injury : How Disputes Begin and Escalate among Adolescents and Young Adults in Medellin, Colombia

ABSTRACT: This article aims to contribute to the understanding of circumstances, causes of initiation, and process of escalation of physical disputes or fights resulting in physical injury. We analyzed data from a case-control study of perpetrators of violence between the ages of 15 to 24 (n=373) in...

Full description

Autores:
Montoya Gómez, Nilton Edu
Duque Ramírez, Luis Fernando
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2013
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/39656
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/39656
Palabra clave:
Violencia
Violence
Disentimientos y Disputas
Dissent and Disputes
Exposición a la Violencia
Exposure to Violence
Colombia
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D014754
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D034462
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D000069581
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D003105
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT: This article aims to contribute to the understanding of circumstances, causes of initiation, and process of escalation of physical disputes or fights resulting in physical injury. We analyzed data from a case-control study of perpetrators of violence between the ages of 15 to 24 (n=373) in the city of Medellín, Colombia. The findings show that 89% of conflicts resulting in injury took place in public places and most often involved males (78%). Six percent involved the consumption of alcohol, 20% reported having used illicit drugs before the initiation of the confrontation. Circa 50% of disputes began because of verbal aggression. Alcohol consumption was found to be associated with verbal aggression towards a friend or companion but not to other circumstances that start disputes. Drug use was not associated with the initiation of disputes. In 18.5% of the cases, a weapon was used while 5% of these disputes ended in a homicide. In none of the cases in which homicide was the outcome was there bystander intervention. In contrast, homicide did not result in the cases in which bystanders intervened.