Biliary complications in transplant patients: A comparison of two ERCP diagnostic methods

ABSTRACT:Background: Biliary complications after liver transplantation are a serious cause of morbidity and mortality. Direct invasive cholangiography techniques, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) all have procedure-related complications...

Full description

Autores:
García, Vanesa
Acosta, Federico
Cano, Julián
Montoya, Claudia
Correa Arango, Gonzalo
Restrepo Gutiérrez, Juan Carlos
Castaño Llano, Rodrigo
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2013
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/38739
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10495/38739
Palabra clave:
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
Ultrasonido
Ultrasonics
Resonancia magnética
Magnetic resonance
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002760
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D014465
Rights
openAccess
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
id UDEA2_2d675f8d478374c0571d71a93ae850ec
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/38739
network_acronym_str UDEA2
network_name_str Repositorio UdeA
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Biliary complications in transplant patients: A comparison of two ERCP diagnostic methods
title Biliary complications in transplant patients: A comparison of two ERCP diagnostic methods
spellingShingle Biliary complications in transplant patients: A comparison of two ERCP diagnostic methods
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
Ultrasonido
Ultrasonics
Resonancia magnética
Magnetic resonance
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002760
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D014465
title_short Biliary complications in transplant patients: A comparison of two ERCP diagnostic methods
title_full Biliary complications in transplant patients: A comparison of two ERCP diagnostic methods
title_fullStr Biliary complications in transplant patients: A comparison of two ERCP diagnostic methods
title_full_unstemmed Biliary complications in transplant patients: A comparison of two ERCP diagnostic methods
title_sort Biliary complications in transplant patients: A comparison of two ERCP diagnostic methods
dc.creator.fl_str_mv García, Vanesa
Acosta, Federico
Cano, Julián
Montoya, Claudia
Correa Arango, Gonzalo
Restrepo Gutiérrez, Juan Carlos
Castaño Llano, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv García, Vanesa
Acosta, Federico
Cano, Julián
Montoya, Claudia
Correa Arango, Gonzalo
Restrepo Gutiérrez, Juan Carlos
Castaño Llano, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.researchgroup.spa.fl_str_mv Grupo de Gastrohepatología
dc.subject.decs.none.fl_str_mv Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
Ultrasonido
Ultrasonics
topic Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
Ultrasonido
Ultrasonics
Resonancia magnética
Magnetic resonance
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002760
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D014465
dc.subject.lemb.none.fl_str_mv Resonancia magnética
Magnetic resonance
dc.subject.meshuri.none.fl_str_mv https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002760
https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D014465
description ABSTRACT:Background: Biliary complications after liver transplantation are a serious cause of morbidity and mortality. Direct invasive cholangiography techniques, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) all have procedure-related complications. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) are non-invasive, safe, and accurate. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of US and MRCP for detecting biliary complications following liver transplantation and compare these findings with those from the gold standard, ERCP. Methods: Between march 2006 and January 2009, twenty-seven consecutive liver transplant recipients at the Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe in Medellín-Colombia who presented clinical and biochemical evidence of biliary complications were evaluated with US, MRCP and ERCP. Results: The presence of a biliary anastomotic complications was confirmed in 26 patients (92.6%), anastomotic biliary strictures in 24 (88.9%), ischemic or diffuse intrahepatic biliary strictures in two (7.4%), and choledocholithiasis in one (3.7%). All patients underwent ERCP, 25 underwent US (92, 5%) and 13 underwent MRCP (48, 1%). There was a statistically significant correlation for MRCP and ERCP findings, but not for US findings. The sensitivity of MRCP was 80% and its specificity was 50%. The sensitivity of US was 55.6% with 50% specificity. Positive and negative predictive values for MRCP were 92.3% and 25%, but for US were 93.7% and 7.8% respectively. Conclusions: MRCP is an accurate imaging tool for assessment of biliary complications after liver transplantation. We recommend that MRCP be the diagnostic imaging modality of choice in this setting, reserving direct cholangiography for therapeutic procedures.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2013
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-25T22:22:03Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-25T22:22:03Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de investigación
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv García Vanesa, Acosta Federico, Cano Julián, Montoya Claudia, Correa Arango Gonzalo, Restrepo G Juan Carlos et al . Biliary complications in transplant patients: A comparison of two ERCP diagnostic methods. Rev Col Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2013 Mar [cited 2024 Mar 21] ; 28( 1 ): 2-9. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-99572013000100002&lng=en.
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0120-9957
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10495/38739
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2500-7440
identifier_str_mv García Vanesa, Acosta Federico, Cano Julián, Montoya Claudia, Correa Arango Gonzalo, Restrepo G Juan Carlos et al . Biliary complications in transplant patients: A comparison of two ERCP diagnostic methods. Rev Col Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2013 Mar [cited 2024 Mar 21] ; 28( 1 ): 2-9. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-99572013000100002&lng=en.
0120-9957
2500-7440
url https://hdl.handle.net/10495/38739
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv Rev. Colomb. Gastroenterol.
dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv 9
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 1
dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv 2
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 28
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Gastroenterología
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 8 páginas
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Asociación Colombiana de Gastroenterología
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Bogotá, Colombia
institution Universidad de Antioquia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/d44f6eb1-c016-43b1-a43b-138dd69bb8fc/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/09889195-52cc-44ed-a024-24e0593f9b51/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/56f3d301-fa28-466e-bb13-a64d513be750/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/7acb85b7-2e58-4a12-b515-920dcf86b079/download
https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/822cd957-f36d-4230-a2bb-e6951f799615/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv fdcd8263d845825aefd85e368626e4ab
b88b088d9957e670ce3b3fbe2eedbc13
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bd43927317f3b8ea7c2dfabb0a101b2f
108091ae92388c42e8dabc28fd52eb09
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Antioquia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv aplicacionbibliotecadigitalbiblioteca@udea.edu.co
_version_ 1851052321500299264
spelling García, VanesaAcosta, FedericoCano, JuliánMontoya, ClaudiaCorrea Arango, GonzaloRestrepo Gutiérrez, Juan CarlosCastaño Llano, RodrigoGrupo de Gastrohepatología2024-03-25T22:22:03Z2024-03-25T22:22:03Z2013García Vanesa, Acosta Federico, Cano Julián, Montoya Claudia, Correa Arango Gonzalo, Restrepo G Juan Carlos et al . Biliary complications in transplant patients: A comparison of two ERCP diagnostic methods. Rev Col Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2013 Mar [cited 2024 Mar 21] ; 28( 1 ): 2-9. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-99572013000100002&lng=en.0120-9957https://hdl.handle.net/10495/387392500-7440ABSTRACT:Background: Biliary complications after liver transplantation are a serious cause of morbidity and mortality. Direct invasive cholangiography techniques, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) all have procedure-related complications. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) are non-invasive, safe, and accurate. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of US and MRCP for detecting biliary complications following liver transplantation and compare these findings with those from the gold standard, ERCP. Methods: Between march 2006 and January 2009, twenty-seven consecutive liver transplant recipients at the Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe in Medellín-Colombia who presented clinical and biochemical evidence of biliary complications were evaluated with US, MRCP and ERCP. Results: The presence of a biliary anastomotic complications was confirmed in 26 patients (92.6%), anastomotic biliary strictures in 24 (88.9%), ischemic or diffuse intrahepatic biliary strictures in two (7.4%), and choledocholithiasis in one (3.7%). All patients underwent ERCP, 25 underwent US (92, 5%) and 13 underwent MRCP (48, 1%). There was a statistically significant correlation for MRCP and ERCP findings, but not for US findings. The sensitivity of MRCP was 80% and its specificity was 50%. The sensitivity of US was 55.6% with 50% specificity. Positive and negative predictive values for MRCP were 92.3% and 25%, but for US were 93.7% and 7.8% respectively. Conclusions: MRCP is an accurate imaging tool for assessment of biliary complications after liver transplantation. We recommend that MRCP be the diagnostic imaging modality of choice in this setting, reserving direct cholangiography for therapeutic procedures.COL00241598 páginasapplication/pdfengAsociación Colombiana de GastroenterologíaBogotá, Colombiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Biliary complications in transplant patients: A comparison of two ERCP diagnostic methodsArtículo de investigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARThttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionColangiopancreatografia Retrógrada EndoscópicaCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeUltrasonidoUltrasonicsResonancia magnéticaMagnetic resonancehttps://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D002760https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/D014465Rev. Colomb. Gastroenterol.91228Revista Colombiana de GastroenterologíaPublicationORIGINALCorreaGonzalo_2013_BiliaryTransplantERCP.pdfCorreaGonzalo_2013_BiliaryTransplantERCP.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf266916https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/d44f6eb1-c016-43b1-a43b-138dd69bb8fc/downloadfdcd8263d845825aefd85e368626e4abMD51trueAnonymousREADCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8823https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/09889195-52cc-44ed-a024-24e0593f9b51/downloadb88b088d9957e670ce3b3fbe2eedbc13MD52falseAnonymousREADLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/56f3d301-fa28-466e-bb13-a64d513be750/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53falseAnonymousREADTEXTCorreaGonzalo_2013_BiliaryTransplantERCP.pdf.txtCorreaGonzalo_2013_BiliaryTransplantERCP.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain34142https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/7acb85b7-2e58-4a12-b515-920dcf86b079/downloadbd43927317f3b8ea7c2dfabb0a101b2fMD54falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILCorreaGonzalo_2013_BiliaryTransplantERCP.pdf.jpgCorreaGonzalo_2013_BiliaryTransplantERCP.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg13220https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstreams/822cd957-f36d-4230-a2bb-e6951f799615/download108091ae92388c42e8dabc28fd52eb09MD55falseAnonymousREAD10495/38739oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/387392025-03-26 20:32:12.235http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/open.accesshttps://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.coRepositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Antioquiaaplicacionbibliotecadigitalbiblioteca@udea.edu.coTk9URTogUExBQ0UgWU9VUiBPV04gTElDRU5TRSBIRVJFClRoaXMgc2FtcGxlIGxpY2Vuc2UgaXMgcHJvdmlkZWQgZm9yIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgcHVycG9zZXMgb25seS4KCk5PTi1FWENMVVNJVkUgRElTVFJJQlVUSU9OIExJQ0VOU0UKCkJ5IHNpZ25pbmcgYW5kIHN1Ym1pdHRpbmcgdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLCB5b3UgKHRoZSBhdXRob3Iocykgb3IgY29weXJpZ2h0Cm93bmVyKSBncmFudHMgdG8gRFNwYWNlIFVuaXZlcnNpdHkgKERTVSkgdGhlIG5vbi1leGNsdXNpdmUgcmlnaHQgdG8gcmVwcm9kdWNlLAp0cmFuc2xhdGUgKGFzIGRlZmluZWQgYmVsb3cpLCBhbmQvb3IgZGlzdHJpYnV0ZSB5b3VyIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gKGluY2x1ZGluZwp0aGUgYWJzdHJhY3QpIHdvcmxkd2lkZSBpbiBwcmludCBhbmQgZWxlY3Ryb25pYyBmb3JtYXQgYW5kIGluIGFueSBtZWRpdW0sCmluY2x1ZGluZyBidXQgbm90IGxpbWl0ZWQgdG8gYXVkaW8gb3IgdmlkZW8uCgpZb3UgYWdyZWUgdGhhdCBEU1UgbWF5LCB3aXRob3V0IGNoYW5naW5nIHRoZSBjb250ZW50LCB0cmFuc2xhdGUgdGhlCnN1Ym1pc3Npb24gdG8gYW55IG1lZGl1bSBvciBmb3JtYXQgZm9yIHRoZSBwdXJwb3NlIG9mIHByZXNlcnZhdGlvbi4KCllvdSBhbHNvIGFncmVlIHRoYXQgRFNVIG1heSBrZWVwIG1vcmUgdGhhbiBvbmUgY29weSBvZiB0aGlzIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gZm9yCnB1cnBvc2VzIG9mIHNlY3VyaXR5LCBiYWNrLXVwIGFuZCBwcmVzZXJ2YXRpb24uCgpZb3UgcmVwcmVzZW50IHRoYXQgdGhlIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gaXMgeW91ciBvcmlnaW5hbCB3b3JrLCBhbmQgdGhhdCB5b3UgaGF2ZQp0aGUgcmlnaHQgdG8gZ3JhbnQgdGhlIHJpZ2h0cyBjb250YWluZWQgaW4gdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLiBZb3UgYWxzbyByZXByZXNlbnQKdGhhdCB5b3VyIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gZG9lcyBub3QsIHRvIHRoZSBiZXN0IG9mIHlvdXIga25vd2xlZGdlLCBpbmZyaW5nZSB1cG9uCmFueW9uZSdzIGNvcHlyaWdodC4KCklmIHRoZSBzdWJtaXNzaW9uIGNvbnRhaW5zIG1hdGVyaWFsIGZvciB3aGljaCB5b3UgZG8gbm90IGhvbGQgY29weXJpZ2h0LAp5b3UgcmVwcmVzZW50IHRoYXQgeW91IGhhdmUgb2J0YWluZWQgdGhlIHVucmVzdHJpY3RlZCBwZXJtaXNzaW9uIG9mIHRoZQpjb3B5cmlnaHQgb3duZXIgdG8gZ3JhbnQgRFNVIHRoZSByaWdodHMgcmVxdWlyZWQgYnkgdGhpcyBsaWNlbnNlLCBhbmQgdGhhdApzdWNoIHRoaXJkLXBhcnR5IG93bmVkIG1hdGVyaWFsIGlzIGNsZWFybHkgaWRlbnRpZmllZCBhbmQgYWNrbm93bGVkZ2VkCndpdGhpbiB0aGUgdGV4dCBvciBjb250ZW50IG9mIHRoZSBzdWJtaXNzaW9uLgoKSUYgVEhFIFNVQk1JU1NJT04gSVMgQkFTRUQgVVBPTiBXT1JLIFRIQVQgSEFTIEJFRU4gU1BPTlNPUkVEIE9SIFNVUFBPUlRFRApCWSBBTiBBR0VOQ1kgT1IgT1JHQU5JWkFUSU9OIE9USEVSIFRIQU4gRFNVLCBZT1UgUkVQUkVTRU5UIFRIQVQgWU9VIEhBVkUKRlVMRklMTEVEIEFOWSBSSUdIVCBPRiBSRVZJRVcgT1IgT1RIRVIgT0JMSUdBVElPTlMgUkVRVUlSRUQgQlkgU1VDSApDT05UUkFDVCBPUiBBR1JFRU1FTlQuCgpEU1Ugd2lsbCBjbGVhcmx5IGlkZW50aWZ5IHlvdXIgbmFtZShzKSBhcyB0aGUgYXV0aG9yKHMpIG9yIG93bmVyKHMpIG9mIHRoZQpzdWJtaXNzaW9uLCBhbmQgd2lsbCBub3QgbWFrZSBhbnkgYWx0ZXJhdGlvbiwgb3RoZXIgdGhhbiBhcyBhbGxvd2VkIGJ5IHRoaXMKbGljZW5zZSwgdG8geW91ciBzdWJtaXNzaW9uLgo=