La investigación éticamente reflexionada

ABSTRACT: Today, the practice of research ethics is grounded on the four principles theory of Beauchamp & Childress. They proposed that ethical research be conducted on the basis of four prima facie principles: autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice The instrumentalization of this th...

Full description

Autores:
Arias Valencia, Samuel Andrés
Peñaranda Correa, Fernando
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2015
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/4379
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/10495/4379
Palabra clave:
Investigación
Etica en investigación
Justicia social
Bioética
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
id UDEA2_26dda996370cbefea3d8ee488276c1b5
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/4379
network_acronym_str UDEA2
network_name_str Repositorio UdeA
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv La investigación éticamente reflexionada
dc.title.alternative.spa.fl_str_mv Ethically pondered research
title La investigación éticamente reflexionada
spellingShingle La investigación éticamente reflexionada
Investigación
Etica en investigación
Justicia social
Bioética
title_short La investigación éticamente reflexionada
title_full La investigación éticamente reflexionada
title_fullStr La investigación éticamente reflexionada
title_full_unstemmed La investigación éticamente reflexionada
title_sort La investigación éticamente reflexionada
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Arias Valencia, Samuel Andrés
Peñaranda Correa, Fernando
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Arias Valencia, Samuel Andrés
Peñaranda Correa, Fernando
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Investigación
Etica en investigación
Justicia social
Bioética
topic Investigación
Etica en investigación
Justicia social
Bioética
description ABSTRACT: Today, the practice of research ethics is grounded on the four principles theory of Beauchamp & Childress. They proposed that ethical research be conducted on the basis of four prima facie principles: autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice The instrumentalization of this theory has made ethics discussion and argumentation easier for the biomedical sciences and health research. However, the ethical assessment and monitoring of research has been bureaucratized. For both researchers and ethical review boards, this is a process in which compliance with a requirements checklist is verified. This checklist is what is left of the codes of ethics research provided by the four principles approach after being synthesized in practice. Moreover, this checklist generally disregards the discussion of social justice as a priority for health research. For this reason, the authors consider it necessary to propose other frameworks for addressing the ethics of research that are not limited to applying regulations but rather invite ethical reflection in the processes of health research. Likewise, the authors believe that conceiving ethics as a reflection on justice creates a broader framework for understanding the ethics of research. This makes it possible to avoid assuming a position that is limited to external rules and regulations and instead recognizes it as a vital issue that involves the researcher as a moral subject.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2015
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-09T20:59:03Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-09T20:59:03Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.hasversion.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de reflexión
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Arias-Valencia S, Peñaranda F. La investigación éticamente reflexionada. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública 2015;33(3): 444-451. DOI: 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v33n3a15.
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0120-386X
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10495/4379
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v33n3a15
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2256-3334
identifier_str_mv Arias-Valencia S, Peñaranda F. La investigación éticamente reflexionada. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública 2015;33(3): 444-451. DOI: 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v33n3a15.
0120-386X
10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v33n3a15
2256-3334
url http://hdl.handle.net/10495/4379
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv 7
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública
dc.publisher.group.spa.fl_str_mv Salud y Sociedad
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Medellín, Colombia
institution Universidad de Antioquia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/4379/2/license_url
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/4379/3/license_text
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/4379/4/license_rdf
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/4379/5/license.txt
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/4379/1/AriasSamuel_2015_InvestigacionEticamenteReflexionada.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
eec755f13d6125baaf9cbb2f5ab21658
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv andres.perez@udea.edu.co
_version_ 1812173091068968960
spelling Arias Valencia, Samuel AndrésPeñaranda Correa, Fernando2016-09-09T20:59:03Z2016-09-09T20:59:03Z2015Arias-Valencia S, Peñaranda F. La investigación éticamente reflexionada. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública 2015;33(3): 444-451. DOI: 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v33n3a15.0120-386Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10495/437910.17533/udea.rfnsp.v33n3a152256-3334ABSTRACT: Today, the practice of research ethics is grounded on the four principles theory of Beauchamp & Childress. They proposed that ethical research be conducted on the basis of four prima facie principles: autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice The instrumentalization of this theory has made ethics discussion and argumentation easier for the biomedical sciences and health research. However, the ethical assessment and monitoring of research has been bureaucratized. For both researchers and ethical review boards, this is a process in which compliance with a requirements checklist is verified. This checklist is what is left of the codes of ethics research provided by the four principles approach after being synthesized in practice. Moreover, this checklist generally disregards the discussion of social justice as a priority for health research. For this reason, the authors consider it necessary to propose other frameworks for addressing the ethics of research that are not limited to applying regulations but rather invite ethical reflection in the processes of health research. Likewise, the authors believe that conceiving ethics as a reflection on justice creates a broader framework for understanding the ethics of research. This makes it possible to avoid assuming a position that is limited to external rules and regulations and instead recognizes it as a vital issue that involves the researcher as a moral subject.RESUMEN: Hoy día, el ejercicio de la ética de la investigación se soporta en la teoría principialista de Beauchamp & Childres. Ellos propusieron el análisis de la reflexión ética a partir de cuatro principios Prima facie: autonomía, no maleficencia, beneficencia y justicia. Su instrumentalización ha facilitado la discusión y la argumentación ética en las ciencias biomédicas y la investigación en salud. Sin embargo, la valoración y el seguimiento ético de la investigación se ha burocratizado. Tanto para el investigador como para los comités de ética el ejercicio consiste en un trámite donde se debe verificar el cumplimiento de requisitos establecidos por unas listas de chequeo, que es a lo que han quedado reducidos en la práctica los códigos de ética de la investigación basados en la propuesta principialista; donde se excluye generalmente la discusión de la justicia social como prioridad de la investigación en salud. Por tal razón, los autores consideran necesario proponer otros marcos para el abordaje de la ética de la investigación que no se restrinjan a la aplicación de normas sino que inviten a una reflexión ética en los procesos de investigación en salud. Consideran que asumir la ética como reflexión sobre la justicia genera un marco más amplio para comprender la ética de investigación. Se supera así, una perspectiva limitada a reglas y normas externas para reconocerla como un asunto vital que compromete al investigador en su calidad de sujeto moral.COL00274567application/pdfspaUniversidad de Antioquia, Facultad Nacional de Salud PúblicaSalud y SociedadMedellín, Colombiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFArtículo de reflexiónhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/InvestigaciónEtica en investigaciónJusticia socialBioéticaLa investigación éticamente reflexionadaEthically pondered researchRev. Fac. Nac. Salud PúblicaRevista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública130141333CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/4379/2/license_url4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/4379/3/license_textd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/4379/4/license_rdfd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/4379/5/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD55ORIGINALAriasSamuel_2015_InvestigacionEticamenteReflexionada.pdfAriasSamuel_2015_InvestigacionEticamenteReflexionada.pdfArtículo de reflexiónapplication/pdf288990http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/4379/1/AriasSamuel_2015_InvestigacionEticamenteReflexionada.pdfeec755f13d6125baaf9cbb2f5ab21658MD5110495/4379oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/43792021-09-01 12:25:48.529Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquiaandres.perez@udea.edu.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