Effect of toe-clipping on the survival of several lizard species
ABSTRACT: Toe-clipping is an extensively used technique for individual identification of amphibians and reptiles. However, this method might result in negative effects including reduced survival. In this study, we used capture-mark-recapture data obtained from ten different lizard species, including...
- Autores:
-
Rubio Rocha, Laura Carolina
Bock Garnier, Brian Carl
Alzate Basto, Luis Esteban
Olivera Tlahuel, Claudia
Pérez Mendoza, Hibraim Adán
Zúñiga Vega, J. Jaime
Rojas González, Ramón Isaac
Zamora Abrego, Joan Gastón
Ortega León, Angela M.
Maceda Cruz, R. Jonathan
Méndez de la Cruz, Fausto R.
Siliceo Cantero, Héctor H.
Serna Lagunes, Ricardo
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Universidad de Antioquia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UdeA
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/33430
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10495/33430
- Palabra clave:
- Supervivencia
Survival
Dactyloidae
Marking methods
Phrynosomatidae
Toe-clipping
Xenosauridae
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7538
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
| Summary: | ABSTRACT: Toe-clipping is an extensively used technique for individual identification of amphibians and reptiles. However, this method might result in negative effects including reduced survival. In this study, we used capture-mark-recapture data obtained from ten different lizard species, including more than one population for two species, to examine whether survival rates varied as a function of the number of toes that were clipped. We used likelihood methods and multi-state models to estimate survival probabilities. Specifically, we tested if the number of clipped toes had an effect on annual survival, comparing survival among groups of individuals that shared the same number of toes that were clipped. We found clear reductions in survival associated with the removal of several toes in seven study sites that correspond to five different species. These represent 37% of all the species and populations that we examined. Therefore, we conclude that this marking method potentially causes severe damage and may lead to biased parameter estimates in ecological studies of lizard species. Whenever possible, toe-clipping should be avoided and replaced by less invasive methods for individual identification. |
|---|
