Comparación de cuatro protocolos anestésicos para ovariohisterectomia canina en jornadas de esterilización masiva

ABSTRACT: Four anesthetic protocols were evaluated for ovariohysterectomy in twenty female dogs. The bitches were randomly divided in four groups of five animals each and were assigned to one of four different anesthetic protocols. In all the protocols xylazine, acepromacine and atropine were includ...

Full description

Autores:
Peña Guerra, Jairo Alonso
Sánchez Nodarse, Raúl A.
Restrepo Betancur, Luis Fernando
Ruiz Buitrago, Jhon Didier
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2007
Institución:
Universidad de Antioquia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UdeA
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/7663
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/10495/7663
Palabra clave:
Anestesia veterinaria
Procedimientos anestésicos
Ovariectomia
Caninos
Esterilizacion canina
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
id UDEA2_114a0b5e54d0276f4445ceed3e4f4949
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/7663
network_acronym_str UDEA2
network_name_str Repositorio UdeA
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Comparación de cuatro protocolos anestésicos para ovariohisterectomia canina en jornadas de esterilización masiva
title Comparación de cuatro protocolos anestésicos para ovariohisterectomia canina en jornadas de esterilización masiva
spellingShingle Comparación de cuatro protocolos anestésicos para ovariohisterectomia canina en jornadas de esterilización masiva
Anestesia veterinaria
Procedimientos anestésicos
Ovariectomia
Caninos
Esterilizacion canina
title_short Comparación de cuatro protocolos anestésicos para ovariohisterectomia canina en jornadas de esterilización masiva
title_full Comparación de cuatro protocolos anestésicos para ovariohisterectomia canina en jornadas de esterilización masiva
title_fullStr Comparación de cuatro protocolos anestésicos para ovariohisterectomia canina en jornadas de esterilización masiva
title_full_unstemmed Comparación de cuatro protocolos anestésicos para ovariohisterectomia canina en jornadas de esterilización masiva
title_sort Comparación de cuatro protocolos anestésicos para ovariohisterectomia canina en jornadas de esterilización masiva
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Peña Guerra, Jairo Alonso
Sánchez Nodarse, Raúl A.
Restrepo Betancur, Luis Fernando
Ruiz Buitrago, Jhon Didier
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Peña Guerra, Jairo Alonso
Sánchez Nodarse, Raúl A.
Restrepo Betancur, Luis Fernando
Ruiz Buitrago, Jhon Didier
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Anestesia veterinaria
Procedimientos anestésicos
Ovariectomia
Caninos
Esterilizacion canina
topic Anestesia veterinaria
Procedimientos anestésicos
Ovariectomia
Caninos
Esterilizacion canina
description ABSTRACT: Four anesthetic protocols were evaluated for ovariohysterectomy in twenty female dogs. The bitches were randomly divided in four groups of five animals each and were assigned to one of four different anesthetic protocols. In all the protocols xylazine, acepromacine and atropine were included in preanesthesia; ketamine was added to groups 3 and 4 in premedication. Induction was made with ketamine in groups 1 and 4, or propofol in groups 2 and 3. Three anesthesiological variables (latency period, length of the anesthesia and recovery from anesthesia) and six physiological variables (body temperature, cardiac frequency, respiratory frequency, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation in blood, carbon dioxide in exhaled air) were evaluated. For analysis of data a fully random - balanced fix effect - experimental design, with five replications for treatment was used. The Tukey test with 95% confidence intervals was used for analysis of quantitative variables. A unidirectional descriptive analysis was also used. Body temperature decreased up to 37 ºC in all animals in group 1. The respiratory frequency showed a great variation, especially in groups 1 and 2 (without ketamine in premedication), being more stable in protocol 3 (propofol without ketamine) (p<0.05). Cardiac frequency was slightly increased in group 1. Oxygen saturation in blood and carbon dioxide in exhaled air were stable and similar in all groups (within physiological limits). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were stable with propofol, higher with ketamine in preanesthesia and induction, and unstable when ketamine was used in induction only. The anesthesiological variables evaluated did not show statistically significant differences among the four protocols. Based on the clinical behavior and on the physiological variables, it was concluded that, the use of ketamine and propofol (protocol 3) for preanesthesia and induction, respectively, is the best anesthetic combination for massive neutering of bitches.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2007
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-14T20:53:29Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-14T20:53:29Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.hasversion.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de investigación
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv Pena JA, Sanchez RA, Restrepo LF, Ruiz JD. Comparación de cuatro protocolos anestésicos para ovariohisterectomía canina en jornadas de esterilización masiva. Rev. colomb. cienc. pecu. 2007;20(3):260-268
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0120-0690
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10495/7663
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2256-2958
identifier_str_mv Pena JA, Sanchez RA, Restrepo LF, Ruiz JD. Comparación de cuatro protocolos anestésicos para ovariohisterectomía canina en jornadas de esterilización masiva. Rev. colomb. cienc. pecu. 2007;20(3):260-268
0120-0690
2256-2958
url http://hdl.handle.net/10495/7663
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrev.spa.fl_str_mv Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Pecu.
dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias
dc.publisher.group.spa.fl_str_mv CENTAURO
dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv Medellín, Colombia
institution Universidad de Antioquia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/7663/1/Restrepo_L_2007_Comparacion_protocolos_anestesicos.pdf
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/7663/2/license_url
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/7663/3/license_text
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/7663/4/license_rdf
http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/7663/5/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8343c189f8dc0e54cd949540ca07ea31
4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv andres.perez@udea.edu.co
_version_ 1812173246949228544
spelling Peña Guerra, Jairo AlonsoSánchez Nodarse, Raúl A.Restrepo Betancur, Luis FernandoRuiz Buitrago, Jhon Didier2017-07-14T20:53:29Z2017-07-14T20:53:29Z2007Pena JA, Sanchez RA, Restrepo LF, Ruiz JD. Comparación de cuatro protocolos anestésicos para ovariohisterectomía canina en jornadas de esterilización masiva. Rev. colomb. cienc. pecu. 2007;20(3):260-2680120-0690http://hdl.handle.net/10495/76632256-2958ABSTRACT: Four anesthetic protocols were evaluated for ovariohysterectomy in twenty female dogs. The bitches were randomly divided in four groups of five animals each and were assigned to one of four different anesthetic protocols. In all the protocols xylazine, acepromacine and atropine were included in preanesthesia; ketamine was added to groups 3 and 4 in premedication. Induction was made with ketamine in groups 1 and 4, or propofol in groups 2 and 3. Three anesthesiological variables (latency period, length of the anesthesia and recovery from anesthesia) and six physiological variables (body temperature, cardiac frequency, respiratory frequency, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation in blood, carbon dioxide in exhaled air) were evaluated. For analysis of data a fully random - balanced fix effect - experimental design, with five replications for treatment was used. The Tukey test with 95% confidence intervals was used for analysis of quantitative variables. A unidirectional descriptive analysis was also used. Body temperature decreased up to 37 ºC in all animals in group 1. The respiratory frequency showed a great variation, especially in groups 1 and 2 (without ketamine in premedication), being more stable in protocol 3 (propofol without ketamine) (p<0.05). Cardiac frequency was slightly increased in group 1. Oxygen saturation in blood and carbon dioxide in exhaled air were stable and similar in all groups (within physiological limits). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were stable with propofol, higher with ketamine in preanesthesia and induction, and unstable when ketamine was used in induction only. The anesthesiological variables evaluated did not show statistically significant differences among the four protocols. Based on the clinical behavior and on the physiological variables, it was concluded that, the use of ketamine and propofol (protocol 3) for preanesthesia and induction, respectively, is the best anesthetic combination for massive neutering of bitches.RESUMEN: En el presente estudio se evaluaron cuatro protocolos anestésicos para ovariohisterectomía en veinte hembras caninas distribuidas al azar en cuatro grupos de cinco animales cada uno, y se asignó, al azar, un protocolo diferente a cada grupo. Todos los grupos evaluados recibieron xilacina, acepromacina y atropina en la preanestesia; adicionalmente, los grupos 3 y 4 recibieron ketamina. La inducción se llevó a cabo con ketamina en los grupos 1 y 4, o con propofol en los grupos 2 y 3. En cada caso se evaluaron tres variables anestesiológicas (periodo de latencia, duración de la anestesia y recuperación de la anestesia) y seis variables fisiológicas (temperatura corporal, frecuencia cardíaca, frecuencia respiratoria, presión arterial diastólica y sistólica, saturación de oxígeno en sangre y bióxido de carbono en aire expirado). En todos los protocolos, la temperatura corporal estuvo en descenso, hasta un mínimo de 37 ºC registrados en el protocolo 1. La frecuencia respiratoria tuvo grandes variaciones en los grupos 1 y 2 (sin ketamina en la premedicación) y fue más estable en el grupo 3 (propofol, sin ketamina) (p<0.05). La frecuencia cardiaca estuvo ligeramente aumentada en los grupos 1 y 4 (ketamina sólo en inducción) y fue más estable en los demás grupos. La saturación de oxígeno en la sangre y la concentración de bióxido de carbono en aire expirado, presentaron un comportamiento estable, siempre dentro de los rangos fisiológicos. La presión arterial, tanto diastólica como sistólica, tuvo un comportamiento estable con el propofol, fue más alta con el uso de ketamina en preanestesia e inducción, y más inestable cuando se usó ketamina sólo en la inducción (p<0.05). Las variables anestesiológicas no presentaron diferencias significativas. Con base en el juicio clínico y en los resultados de las variables fisiológicas, se concluye que el uso de ketamina en preanestesia, e inducción con propofol (protocolo 3), es la combinación anestésica más recomendable para este tipo de intervenciones.COL0001262application/pdfspaUniversidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Ciencias AgrariasCENTAUROMedellín, Colombiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1https://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTArtículo de investigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CO)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Anestesia veterinariaProcedimientos anestésicosOvariectomiaCaninosEsterilizacion caninaComparación de cuatro protocolos anestésicos para ovariohisterectomia canina en jornadas de esterilización masivaRev. Colomb. Cienc. Pecu.Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias260268203ORIGINALRestrepo_L_2007_Comparacion_protocolos_anestesicos.pdfRestrepo_L_2007_Comparacion_protocolos_anestesicos.pdfArtículo de investigaciónapplication/pdf391795http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/7663/1/Restrepo_L_2007_Comparacion_protocolos_anestesicos.pdf8343c189f8dc0e54cd949540ca07ea31MD51CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/7663/2/license_url4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/7663/3/license_textd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/7663/4/license_rdfd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/7663/5/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD5510495/7663oai:bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co:10495/76632021-05-21 20:32:05.014Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Antioquiaandres.perez@udea.edu.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