Cuantificación práctica del bienestar animal en porcinos de pequeños productores del sur de Veracruz, México
- Autores:
-
Hernández-Antonio, Hanssel Iván
Vázquez-Luna, Dinora
Lara-Rodríguez, Daniel Alejandro
Martínez-Martínez, Marina
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad de Córdoba
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional Unicórdoba
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co:ucordoba/6088
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/6088
https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.2055
- Palabra clave:
- Pigs
livestock management
castration
cleaning
humid tropics
Cerdos
manejo del ganado
castración
limpieza
trópico húmedo
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
| id |
UCORDOBA2_f55405992ced83731ac8b5ca4aeb4ede |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co:ucordoba/6088 |
| network_acronym_str |
UCORDOBA2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional Unicórdoba |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cuantificación práctica del bienestar animal en porcinos de pequeños productores del sur de Veracruz, México |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
Practical quantification of animal welfare in pigs of small producers in southern Veracruz, Mexico |
| title |
Cuantificación práctica del bienestar animal en porcinos de pequeños productores del sur de Veracruz, México |
| spellingShingle |
Cuantificación práctica del bienestar animal en porcinos de pequeños productores del sur de Veracruz, México Pigs livestock management castration cleaning humid tropics Cerdos manejo del ganado castración limpieza trópico húmedo |
| title_short |
Cuantificación práctica del bienestar animal en porcinos de pequeños productores del sur de Veracruz, México |
| title_full |
Cuantificación práctica del bienestar animal en porcinos de pequeños productores del sur de Veracruz, México |
| title_fullStr |
Cuantificación práctica del bienestar animal en porcinos de pequeños productores del sur de Veracruz, México |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Cuantificación práctica del bienestar animal en porcinos de pequeños productores del sur de Veracruz, México |
| title_sort |
Cuantificación práctica del bienestar animal en porcinos de pequeños productores del sur de Veracruz, México |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Hernández-Antonio, Hanssel Iván Vázquez-Luna, Dinora Lara-Rodríguez, Daniel Alejandro Martínez-Martínez, Marina |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Hernández-Antonio, Hanssel Iván Vázquez-Luna, Dinora Lara-Rodríguez, Daniel Alejandro Martínez-Martínez, Marina |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Pigs livestock management castration cleaning humid tropics |
| topic |
Pigs livestock management castration cleaning humid tropics Cerdos manejo del ganado castración limpieza trópico húmedo |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cerdos manejo del ganado castración limpieza trópico húmedo |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-02 00:00:00 2022-07-01T21:01:38Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-02 00:00:00 2022-07-01T21:01:38Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-02 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
Journal article |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF |
| dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0122-0268 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/6088 |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.21897/rmvz.2055 |
| dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.2055 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
1909-0544 |
| identifier_str_mv |
0122-0268 10.21897/rmvz.2055 1909-0544 |
| url |
https://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/6088 https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.2055 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Hlongwane NL, Hadebe K, Soma P, Dzomba EF, Muchadeyi FC. Genome Wide Assessment of Genetic Variation and Population Distinctiveness of the Pig Family in South Africa. Front Genet. 2020; 11:344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00344 Martínez-Castañeda FE, Perea-Peña M. Estrategias locales y de gestión para la porcicultura doméstica en localidades periurbanas del Valle de México. Agric Soc Desarro. 2012; 9(4):411-425. https://www.revista-asyd.mx/index.php/asyd/article/view/1180/515 Temple D, Courboulay V, Velarde A, Dalmau A, Manteca X. The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems in France and Spain: assessment of health. Anim Welfare. 2012; 21(2):257-271. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.2.257 Mora QRA. Enfoque eficiente del bienestar animal en el contexto nacional e internacional. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu. 2011; 24(3):327-331. https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/rccp/article/view/324691/20782035 Kittawornrat A, Zimmerman JJ. Toward a better understanding of pig behavior and pig welfare. Anim Health Res Rev. 2011; 12(1):25-32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252310000174 Johnson N, Iorliam B. Minimizing Stress In Pigs In Confinements When Conducting Research-A Review. Int J Adv Res Publ. 2020; 4(3):158-160. http://www.ijarp.org/published-research-papers/mar2020/Minimizing-Stress-In-Pigs-In-Confinements-When-Conducting-Research-A-Review.pdf Gutiérrez-Ruiz E, Aranda-Cirerol F, Rodríguez-Vivas R, Bolio-González M, Ramírez-González S, Estrella-Tec J. Factores sociales de la crianza de animales de traspatio en Yucatán, México. Bioagrociencias. 2012; 5:20-28. https://www.ccba.uady.mx/bioagro/V5N1/V5N1.pdf Benítez-Meza A, Gómez-Gurrola A, Hernández-Ballesteros J, Navarrete-Méndez R, Moreno-Flores L. Evaluación de parámetros productivos y económicos en la alimentación de porcinos en engorda. Aban Vet. 2015; 5(3):36-41. https://abanicoacademico.mx/revistasabanico/index.php/abanico-veterinario/article/view/80/63 Sanvicente L, Vargas L, Bustamante G, Jaramillo V. La crianza de cerdos en vida libre y pecaríes silvestres en zonas de transición de áreas protegidas del sureste de México. Arch Zootec. 2020; 69(266):216-224. https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v69i266.5117 González OF, Pérez MA, Ocampo FI, Paredes SJA, de la Rosa PP. Contribuciones de la producción en traspatio a los grupos domésticos campesinos. Estud Soc. 2014; 22(44):146-170. https://www.ciad.mx/estudiosociales/index.php/es/article/view/145/92 Reyna-Ramírez CA, Fuentes-Ponce MH, Rossing WA, López-Ridaura S. Caracterización de unidades de producción familiar agropecuarias mesoamericanas. Agrociencia. 2020; 54(2):259-277. https://agrociencia-colpos.mx/index.php/agrociencia/article/view/1905/1902 Stockemer D. Conducting a Survey. In: Stockemer D, editor. Quantitative Methods for the Social Sciences: A Practical Introduction with Examples in SPSS and Stata. Cham: Springer Inte Publ; 2019.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99118-4_5 Courboulay V, Meunier-Salaün M-C, Stankowiak M, Pol F. BEEP: An advisory pig welfare assessment tool developed by farmers for farmers. Lives Sci. 2020; 240:104107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104107 Hawe SJ, Scollan N, Gordon A, Muns R, Magowan E. Impact of feeding low and average birthweight pigs on a weight basis post-weaning on growth performance and body composition. Livest Sci. 2020;241:104233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104233 Verdon M, Hansen CF, Rault JL, Jongman E, Hansen LU, Plush K, et al. Effects of group housing on sow welfare: A review. J Anim Sci. 2015; 93(5):1999-2017. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8742 Hemsworth P. Key determinants of pig welfare: implications of animal management and housing design on livestock welfare. Anim Prod Sci. 2018; 58(8):1375-1386. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17897 Manteca X, Mainau D, Temple D. Bienestar animal. Manual de Buenas Prácticas de Producción Porcina Lineamientos generales para el pequeño y mediano productor de cerdos Red Porcina Iberoamericana. 2012: 97-111. http://200.23.35.7/archivos/productos/vinculacion/librosdivulgacion/300700005_1.pdf Varón-Álvarez L, Romero M, Sánchez J. Caracterización de las contusiones cutáneas e identificación de factores de riesgo durante el manejo presacrificio de cerdos comerciales. Arch Med Vet. 2014; 46(1):93-101. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2014000100013 Verma J. Data analysis in management with SPSS software: Springer Sci Bus Media; 2012. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9788132207856 García-Contreras A, Ortega YDL, Yagüe A, González JG, Artiga CG. Alimentación práctica del cerdo. Rev Complut Cienc Vet. 2012; 6(1):21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCCV.2012.v6.n1.38718 Hemsworth PH, Rice M, Nash J, Giri K, Butler KL, Tilbrook AJ, et al. Effects of group size and floor space allowance on grouped sows: Aggression, stress, skin injuries, and reproductive performance1. J Anim Sci. 2013 2013; 91(10):4953-4964. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5807 Cadéro A, Aubry A, Dourmad JY, Salaün Y, Garcia-Launay F. Effects of interactions between feeding practices, animal health and farm infrastructure on technical, economic and environmental performances of a pig-fattening unit. animal. 2020: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731120000300 Vitali M, Santacroce E, Correa F, Salvarani C, Maramotti FP, Padalino B, et al. On-Farm Welfare Assessment Protocol for Suckling Piglets: A Pilot Study. Animals. 2020; 10(6):1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10061016 Heid A, Hamm U. Animal welfare versus food quality: Factors influencing organic consumers’ preferences for alternatives to piglet castration without anaesthesia. Meat Sci. 2013; 95(2):203-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.052 Morgan L, Itin-Shwartz B, Koren L, Meyer JS, Matas D, Younis A, et al. Physiological and economic benefits of abandoning invasive surgical procedures and enhancing animal welfare in swine production. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):16093. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52677-6 Van Beirendonck S, Driessen B, Verbeke G, Permentier L, Van de Perre V, Geers R. Improving survival, growth rate, and animal welfare in piglets by avoiding teeth shortening and tail docking. J Vet Behav. 2012; 7(2):88-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2011.08.005 Kauppinen T, Vesala KM, Valros A. Farmer attitude toward improvement of animal welfare is correlated with piglet production parameters. Livest Sci. 2012; 143(2):142-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.011 Garcia ADM. Tipificación del maltrato animal en el Estado de Hidalgo, México: Derecho Animal Forum of Animal Law Studies; 2016. Vargas-Bello-Pérez E, Miranda-de la Lama GC, Teixeira DL, Enríquez-Hidalgo D, Tadich T, Lensink J. Farm Animal Welfare Influences on Markets and Consumer Attitudes in Latin America: The Cases of Mexico, Chile and Brazil. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2017; 30(5):697-713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9695-2 Nowland TL, van Wettere WHEJ, Plush KJ. Allowing sows to farrow unconfined has positive implications for sow and piglet welfare. Applied Anim Behav Sci. 2019; 221:104872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104872 Yang CH, Ko HL, Salazar LC, Llonch L, Manteca X, Camerlink I, et al. Pre-weaning environmental enrichment increases piglets’ object play behaviour on a large scale commercial pig farm. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2018; 202:7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.02.004 Bensoussan S, Tigeot R, Meunier-Salaün M-C, Tallet C. Broadcasting human voice to piglets (Sus scrofa domestica) modifies their behavioural reaction to human presence in the home pen and in arena tests. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2020; 225:104965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104965 de Oliveira D, Paranhos da Costa MJR, Zupan M, Rehn T, Keeling LJ. Early human handling in non-weaned piglets: Effects on behaviour and body weight. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2015; 164:56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.01.002 Fraser D, Duncan IJH, Edwards SA, Grandin T, Gregory NG, Guyonnet V, et al. General Principles for the welfare of animals in production systems: The underlying science and its application. Vet J. 2013; 198(1):19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.06.028 Nowak B, Mucha A, Kruszyński W, Moska M. Phenotypic correlations between reproductive charac-teristics related to litter and reproductive cycle length in sows. Czech J Anim Sci. 2020; 65(6):205-212. https://doi.org/10.17221/108/2020-CJAS Manteca X. Bienestar animal en explotaciones de porcino. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2011; 24(3):303-305. https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/rccp/article/view/324687/20782025 |
| dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3087 https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3088 https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3547 https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3549 https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3548 https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3550 https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3089 https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3090 |
| dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv |
Núm. 3 , Año 2021 : Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 26(3) Septiembre-Diciembre 2021 |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
e2055 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
3 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv |
e2055 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv |
26 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revista MVZ Córdoba |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/zip application/zip application/xml application/xml audio/mpeg audio/mpeg |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Córdoba |
| dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e2055 |
| institution |
Universidad de Córdoba |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/bitstreams/b78b8e3f-6b54-4e1f-a12f-2d7ae50b23f5/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
10f6d45c2ec18eb9dca62a18b4aa53ee |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad de Córdoba |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
| _version_ |
1839636135974797312 |
| spelling |
Hernández-Antonio, Hanssel Ivánc27fef05-a830-4de5-a8c7-24b4957a0a33-1Vázquez-Luna, Dinora3a4b0e76-70ee-4a34-bf4a-19b83d85e5c4-1Lara-Rodríguez, Daniel Alejandro98cf81f4-b474-4159-86d7-244be0964566-1Martínez-Martínez, Marina3ba76f06-da44-4a9a-b9c1-6a2cb5399bac-12021-05-02 00:00:002022-07-01T21:01:38Z2021-05-02 00:00:002022-07-01T21:01:38Z2021-05-020122-0268https://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/handle/ucordoba/608810.21897/rmvz.2055https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.20551909-0544application/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/zipapplication/zipapplication/xmlapplication/xmlaudio/mpegaudio/mpegspaUniversidad de CórdobaHanssel Iván Hernández-Antonio, Dinora Vázquez-Luna, Daniel Alejandro Lara-Rodríguez, Marina Martínez-Martínez - 2021https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e2055Pigslivestock managementcastrationcleaninghumid tropicsCerdosmanejo del ganadocastraciónlimpiezatrópico húmedoCuantificación práctica del bienestar animal en porcinos de pequeños productores del sur de Veracruz, MéxicoPractical quantification of animal welfare in pigs of small producers in southern Veracruz, MexicoArtículo de revistaJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Hlongwane NL, Hadebe K, Soma P, Dzomba EF, Muchadeyi FC. Genome Wide Assessment of Genetic Variation and Population Distinctiveness of the Pig Family in South Africa. Front Genet. 2020; 11:344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00344Martínez-Castañeda FE, Perea-Peña M. Estrategias locales y de gestión para la porcicultura doméstica en localidades periurbanas del Valle de México. Agric Soc Desarro. 2012; 9(4):411-425. https://www.revista-asyd.mx/index.php/asyd/article/view/1180/515Temple D, Courboulay V, Velarde A, Dalmau A, Manteca X. The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems in France and Spain: assessment of health. Anim Welfare. 2012; 21(2):257-271. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.2.257Mora QRA. Enfoque eficiente del bienestar animal en el contexto nacional e internacional. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu. 2011; 24(3):327-331. https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/rccp/article/view/324691/20782035Kittawornrat A, Zimmerman JJ. Toward a better understanding of pig behavior and pig welfare. Anim Health Res Rev. 2011; 12(1):25-32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252310000174Johnson N, Iorliam B. Minimizing Stress In Pigs In Confinements When Conducting Research-A Review. Int J Adv Res Publ. 2020; 4(3):158-160. http://www.ijarp.org/published-research-papers/mar2020/Minimizing-Stress-In-Pigs-In-Confinements-When-Conducting-Research-A-Review.pdfGutiérrez-Ruiz E, Aranda-Cirerol F, Rodríguez-Vivas R, Bolio-González M, Ramírez-González S, Estrella-Tec J. Factores sociales de la crianza de animales de traspatio en Yucatán, México. Bioagrociencias. 2012; 5:20-28. https://www.ccba.uady.mx/bioagro/V5N1/V5N1.pdfBenítez-Meza A, Gómez-Gurrola A, Hernández-Ballesteros J, Navarrete-Méndez R, Moreno-Flores L. Evaluación de parámetros productivos y económicos en la alimentación de porcinos en engorda. Aban Vet. 2015; 5(3):36-41. https://abanicoacademico.mx/revistasabanico/index.php/abanico-veterinario/article/view/80/63Sanvicente L, Vargas L, Bustamante G, Jaramillo V. La crianza de cerdos en vida libre y pecaríes silvestres en zonas de transición de áreas protegidas del sureste de México. Arch Zootec. 2020; 69(266):216-224. https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v69i266.5117González OF, Pérez MA, Ocampo FI, Paredes SJA, de la Rosa PP. Contribuciones de la producción en traspatio a los grupos domésticos campesinos. Estud Soc. 2014; 22(44):146-170. https://www.ciad.mx/estudiosociales/index.php/es/article/view/145/92Reyna-Ramírez CA, Fuentes-Ponce MH, Rossing WA, López-Ridaura S. Caracterización de unidades de producción familiar agropecuarias mesoamericanas. Agrociencia. 2020; 54(2):259-277. https://agrociencia-colpos.mx/index.php/agrociencia/article/view/1905/1902Stockemer D. Conducting a Survey. In: Stockemer D, editor. Quantitative Methods for the Social Sciences: A Practical Introduction with Examples in SPSS and Stata. Cham: Springer Inte Publ; 2019.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99118-4_5Courboulay V, Meunier-Salaün M-C, Stankowiak M, Pol F. BEEP: An advisory pig welfare assessment tool developed by farmers for farmers. Lives Sci. 2020; 240:104107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104107Hawe SJ, Scollan N, Gordon A, Muns R, Magowan E. Impact of feeding low and average birthweight pigs on a weight basis post-weaning on growth performance and body composition. Livest Sci. 2020;241:104233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104233Verdon M, Hansen CF, Rault JL, Jongman E, Hansen LU, Plush K, et al. Effects of group housing on sow welfare: A review. J Anim Sci. 2015; 93(5):1999-2017. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8742Hemsworth P. Key determinants of pig welfare: implications of animal management and housing design on livestock welfare. Anim Prod Sci. 2018; 58(8):1375-1386. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17897Manteca X, Mainau D, Temple D. Bienestar animal. Manual de Buenas Prácticas de Producción Porcina Lineamientos generales para el pequeño y mediano productor de cerdos Red Porcina Iberoamericana. 2012: 97-111. http://200.23.35.7/archivos/productos/vinculacion/librosdivulgacion/300700005_1.pdfVarón-Álvarez L, Romero M, Sánchez J. Caracterización de las contusiones cutáneas e identificación de factores de riesgo durante el manejo presacrificio de cerdos comerciales. Arch Med Vet. 2014; 46(1):93-101. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2014000100013Verma J. Data analysis in management with SPSS software: Springer Sci Bus Media; 2012. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9788132207856García-Contreras A, Ortega YDL, Yagüe A, González JG, Artiga CG. Alimentación práctica del cerdo. Rev Complut Cienc Vet. 2012; 6(1):21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCCV.2012.v6.n1.38718Hemsworth PH, Rice M, Nash J, Giri K, Butler KL, Tilbrook AJ, et al. Effects of group size and floor space allowance on grouped sows: Aggression, stress, skin injuries, and reproductive performance1. J Anim Sci. 2013 2013; 91(10):4953-4964. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5807Cadéro A, Aubry A, Dourmad JY, Salaün Y, Garcia-Launay F. Effects of interactions between feeding practices, animal health and farm infrastructure on technical, economic and environmental performances of a pig-fattening unit. animal. 2020: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731120000300Vitali M, Santacroce E, Correa F, Salvarani C, Maramotti FP, Padalino B, et al. On-Farm Welfare Assessment Protocol for Suckling Piglets: A Pilot Study. Animals. 2020; 10(6):1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10061016Heid A, Hamm U. Animal welfare versus food quality: Factors influencing organic consumers’ preferences for alternatives to piglet castration without anaesthesia. Meat Sci. 2013; 95(2):203-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.052Morgan L, Itin-Shwartz B, Koren L, Meyer JS, Matas D, Younis A, et al. Physiological and economic benefits of abandoning invasive surgical procedures and enhancing animal welfare in swine production. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):16093. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52677-6Van Beirendonck S, Driessen B, Verbeke G, Permentier L, Van de Perre V, Geers R. Improving survival, growth rate, and animal welfare in piglets by avoiding teeth shortening and tail docking. J Vet Behav. 2012; 7(2):88-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2011.08.005Kauppinen T, Vesala KM, Valros A. Farmer attitude toward improvement of animal welfare is correlated with piglet production parameters. Livest Sci. 2012; 143(2):142-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.011Garcia ADM. Tipificación del maltrato animal en el Estado de Hidalgo, México: Derecho Animal Forum of Animal Law Studies; 2016.Vargas-Bello-Pérez E, Miranda-de la Lama GC, Teixeira DL, Enríquez-Hidalgo D, Tadich T, Lensink J. Farm Animal Welfare Influences on Markets and Consumer Attitudes in Latin America: The Cases of Mexico, Chile and Brazil. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2017; 30(5):697-713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9695-2Nowland TL, van Wettere WHEJ, Plush KJ. Allowing sows to farrow unconfined has positive implications for sow and piglet welfare. Applied Anim Behav Sci. 2019; 221:104872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104872Yang CH, Ko HL, Salazar LC, Llonch L, Manteca X, Camerlink I, et al. Pre-weaning environmental enrichment increases piglets’ object play behaviour on a large scale commercial pig farm. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2018; 202:7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.02.004Bensoussan S, Tigeot R, Meunier-Salaün M-C, Tallet C. Broadcasting human voice to piglets (Sus scrofa domestica) modifies their behavioural reaction to human presence in the home pen and in arena tests. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2020; 225:104965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104965de Oliveira D, Paranhos da Costa MJR, Zupan M, Rehn T, Keeling LJ. Early human handling in non-weaned piglets: Effects on behaviour and body weight. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2015; 164:56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.01.002Fraser D, Duncan IJH, Edwards SA, Grandin T, Gregory NG, Guyonnet V, et al. General Principles for the welfare of animals in production systems: The underlying science and its application. Vet J. 2013; 198(1):19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.06.028Nowak B, Mucha A, Kruszyński W, Moska M. Phenotypic correlations between reproductive charac-teristics related to litter and reproductive cycle length in sows. Czech J Anim Sci. 2020; 65(6):205-212. https://doi.org/10.17221/108/2020-CJASManteca X. Bienestar animal en explotaciones de porcino. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2011; 24(3):303-305. https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/rccp/article/view/324687/20782025https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3087https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3088https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3547https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3549https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3548https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3550https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3089https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/download/e2055/3090Núm. 3 , Año 2021 : Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 26(3) Septiembre-Diciembre 2021e20553e205526Revista MVZ CórdobaPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml3353https://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co/bitstreams/b78b8e3f-6b54-4e1f-a12f-2d7ae50b23f5/download10f6d45c2ec18eb9dca62a18b4aa53eeMD51ucordoba/6088oai:repositorio.unicordoba.edu.co:ucordoba/60882023-10-06 00:46:33.489https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Hanssel Iván Hernández-Antonio, Dinora Vázquez-Luna, Daniel Alejandro Lara-Rodríguez, Marina Martínez-Martínez - 2021metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.unicordoba.edu.coRepositorio Universidad de Córdobabdigital@metabiblioteca.com |