Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo
El primer debate teórico en las relaciones Internacionales fue el realismo y el liberalismo. Este debate resultó de la oposición con la escuela realista que defendió el interés nacional y los liberales que rechazaron la política internacional de la inevitabilidad guerra. los enfoques sistemáticos de...
- Autores:
-
Caro Álvarez, Laura Daniela
Lagos Duarte, Yuneisy
- Tipo de recurso:
- Trabajo de grado de pregrado
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad Santo Tomás
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional USTA
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/34060
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/11634/34060
- Palabra clave:
- Internationals relations
History
European geography
Relaciones Internacionales
Historia
Geografía
Europa
Guerra Mundial II - Análisis
Tesis y disertaciones académicas
Liberalismo
Realismo
Segunda Guerra Mundial
Relaciones Internacionales
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia
| id |
SANTTOMAS2_07a114c389903001f13e09d6fda18122 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/34060 |
| network_acronym_str |
SANTTOMAS2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio Institucional USTA |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo |
| title |
Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo |
| spellingShingle |
Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo Internationals relations History European geography Relaciones Internacionales Historia Geografía Europa Guerra Mundial II - Análisis Tesis y disertaciones académicas Liberalismo Realismo Segunda Guerra Mundial Relaciones Internacionales |
| title_short |
Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo |
| title_full |
Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo |
| title_fullStr |
Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo |
| title_sort |
Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Caro Álvarez, Laura Daniela Lagos Duarte, Yuneisy |
| dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv |
Jairo Camilo, Zamora Escobar |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Caro Álvarez, Laura Daniela Lagos Duarte, Yuneisy |
| dc.contributor.orcid.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9817-8311 |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ZDw_wlIAAAAJ&hl=es |
| dc.contributor.cvlac.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001526877 |
| dc.contributor.corporatename.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Santo Tomas |
| dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Internationals relations History European geography |
| topic |
Internationals relations History European geography Relaciones Internacionales Historia Geografía Europa Guerra Mundial II - Análisis Tesis y disertaciones académicas Liberalismo Realismo Segunda Guerra Mundial Relaciones Internacionales |
| dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv |
Relaciones Internacionales Historia Geografía Europa Guerra Mundial II - Análisis Tesis y disertaciones académicas |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Liberalismo Realismo Segunda Guerra Mundial Relaciones Internacionales |
| description |
El primer debate teórico en las relaciones Internacionales fue el realismo y el liberalismo. Este debate resultó de la oposición con la escuela realista que defendió el interés nacional y los liberales que rechazaron la política internacional de la inevitabilidad guerra. los enfoques sistemáticos de las relaciones internacionales relacionaron distintos rasgos para explicar eventos históricos. A lo largo de la historia de las relaciones internacionales han ocurrido eventualidades trascendentales en la reconstitución del poder político y territorial; por ente la investigación pretende analizar la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante de las relaciones internacionales desde dos teorías: liberalismo y realismo, siguiendo una metodología de la investigación tipo cualitativa, ya que estudia, describe y explica un suceso histórico considerando este fenómeno y sus componentes, mediante la medición de conceptos y definición de variables. La investigación es basada en fuentes secundarias como; documentos, artículos, revistas, libros, publicaciones, etc... |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-13T15:58:46Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-13T15:58:46Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-22 |
| dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado |
| dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| dc.type.category.spa.fl_str_mv |
Formación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Pregrado |
| dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
| dc.type.drive.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Caro Álvarez, L. & Lagos Duarte Y. (2021). Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo. [Trabajo de grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/34060 |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad Santo Tomás |
| identifier_str_mv |
Caro Álvarez, L. & Lagos Duarte Y. (2021). Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo. [Trabajo de grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositorio reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomás instname:Universidad Santo Tomás |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11634/34060 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Addams, J. (2002). Democracy and social ethics. University of Illinois Press. Alexander Bird. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions and its significance: An essay review of the fiftieth anniversary edition. Oxford Publishing Limited(England). https://doi.org/10.2307/23356448 Bashota, B. (2016). The role of theory of international relations in explicating global political events. ILIRIA International Review, 1, 37. https://doi.org/10.21113/iir.v1i1.198 Berlin, I. (2017). Two concepts of liberty. Liberty reader (pp. 33-57). Routledge. Beveridge, William Henry Beveridge Baron. (1942). Social insurance and allied services: Beveridge report. HM Stationery Office. Boesche, R. (2019a). The strange liberalism of alexis de tocqueville. Cornell University Press. Boesche, R. (2019b). The strange liberalism of alexis de tocqueville. Cornell University Press. Buchan, B. (2002). Explicando la guerra y la paz: Kant y la teoría liberal del IR. Alternatives, 27(4), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540202700401 Burchill, S. (2013). Theories of international relations (5. ed. ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. Buzan, B., & Lawson, G. (2018). Explanation, geopolitics, and liberalism: A reply to luke cooper. Journal of Historical Sociology, 31(1), E92-E97. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12160 Cowling, M. (1990). Mill and liberalism. Cambridge Core, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558412 De Gouges, O. (1791). Declaration of the rights of woman and the female citizen. The French Revolution and Human Rights: A Brief Documentary History, , 124-129. DEUDNEY, D., & IKENBERRY, G. J. (1999). The nature and sources of liberal international order. Review of International Studies, 25(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210599001795 Donnelly, J. (2012). The differentiation of international societies: An approach to structural international theory. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111411208 Donnelly, J. (2019). Systems, levels, and structural theory: Waltz's theory is not a systemic theory (and why that matters for international relations today). European Journal of International Relations, 25(3), 904-930. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066118820929 Drezner, D. W. (2019). Technological change and international relations. International Relations, 33(2), 286-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117819834629 Eadeh, F. R., & Chang, K. K. (2020). Can threat increase support for liberalism? new insights into the relationship between threat and political attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(1), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618815919 Elman, C., & Elman, M. F. (2008). The role of history in international relations. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 37(2), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808097644 Eriksson, J., & Giacomello, G. (2006). The information revolution, security, and international relations: (IR)relevant theory? International Political Science Review, 27(3), 221-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512106064462 Frieden, J. A., & Lake, D. A. (2005). International relations as a social science: Rigor and relevance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 600, 136-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205276732 Gibbons, M. (1999). Science's new social contract with society. Nature, 402(6761), C81-C84. https://doi.org/10.1038/35011576 Gilbert, A. N. (1968). International relations and the relevance of history. International Studies Quarterly, 12(4), 351-359. https://doi.org/10.2307/3013522 Grancay, M., & Szikorova, N. (2014). Liberalism in foreign trade versus liberalism in air transportation is there a link? Panoeconomicus, 61(6), 709-721. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN1406709G Harrison, K., & Boyd, T. (2018). Liberalism.https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137951.00014 Hasson, Y., Tamir, M., Brahms, K. S., Cohrs, J. C., & Halperin, E. (2018). Are liberals and conservatives equally motivated to feel empathy toward others?: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218769867 Hayek Friedrich, A. v. (1960). The constitution of liberty. South Bend, IN: Gateway, Hayek, F. A. (1944). A.(1944) the road to serfdom. Dymock’s Book Arcade, Hobson, J. M., & Lawson, G. (2008). What is history in international relations? Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 37(2), 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808097648 Hodgskin, T. (1900). Labour defended against the claims of capital. BEIJING BOOK CO. INC. Ikenberry, G. J. (2009). Liberalism in a realist world. International Studies, 46(1-2), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088171004600213 Kant, I. (1781). Critique of pure reason, norman kemp smith. New York: St.Martins, Kant, I. (1983). Perpetual peace and other essays. Hackett Publishing. Keohane, R. O. (2012). Twenty years of institutional liberalism. International Relations, 26(2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117812438451 Lebow, R. N. (2011). Philosophy and international relations. International Affairs, 87(5), 1216-+. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01030.x Lees, N. (2016). International society is to international system as world society is to...? systemic and societal processes in english school theory. Journal of International Relations and Development, 19(3), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2014.20 Lijphart, A. (1974). The structure of the theoretical revolution in international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 18(1), 41-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600260 Locke, J. (1689b). The second treatise of government (an essay concerning the true original extent and end of civil government) and A letter concerning toleration Mengistie, S. (2013). The structure of scientific revolutions (thomas S. kuhn, 1970, 2nd ed. chicago, london: University of chicago press ltd. 210 pages). Philosophical Papers and Review, 4, 41-48. https://doi.org/10.5897/PPR2013.0102 Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat de, & Cohler, A. M. (1989). The spirit of the laws (1. publ. ed.). Cambridge Univ. Press. Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513-553. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447 Owen, J. M. (2018). Liberalism and its alternatives, again. International Studies Review, 20(2), 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy026 Paine, T. (2011). Rights of man. Broadview Press. Rand, A. (1993). The fountainhead (1943). New York: Signet, Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism. Columbia University Press. Rawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice. Harvard university press. Scholte, J. A. (2019). After liberal global democracy: New methodology for new praxis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-019-00265-3 Segrillo, A. (2012). Liberalism, marxism and democratic theory revisited: Proposal of a joint index of political and economic democracy. Brazilian Political Science Review, 6(2), 8-27. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1981-38212012000200001 Shimko, K. I. (1992). Realism, neorealism, and american liberalism. The Review of Politics, 54(2), 281-301. Shiping, T. (2014). International system, not international structure: Against the agent-structure problematique in IR. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 7(4), 483-506. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pou046 Shklar, J., & Rosenblum, N. L. (1989). The liberalism of fear. Political Liberalism: Variations on a Theme, , 149-166. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen. Spencer, H. (1969). The man versus the state (1884). Herbert Spencer: Political Writings, Spinoza, B., & de Spinoza, B. (2007). Spinoza: Theological-political treatise. Cambridge University Press. Stephen M. Walt. (1998). International relations: One world, many theories. Foreign Policy, (110), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149275 T.E., A. H. B. AND J. L. (2018, Ago 29,). The literature of liberalism. The Economist, https://www.economist.com/open-future/2018/08/29/the-literature-of-liberalism Taylor Mill, H. (1868). The enfranchisement of women. 1851. London, Trübner and Co, Tocqueville, A. d. (1992). De la démocratie en amérique (1840). Paris: Les Editions Gallimard, 2, 506-1193. Tocqueville, A. d. (2000). Democracy in america. 1835. Trans.Harvey C.Mansfield and Delba Winthrop.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Waltz, K. N. (2007). Theory of international politics (1. ed., [Nachdr.] ed.). McGraw-Hill. Williams, M. C. (2013). In the beginning: The international relations enlightenment and the ends of international relations theory.European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 647-665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495477 Wilson, P. (2011). Gilbert murray and international relations: Hellenism, liberalism, and international intellectual cooperation as a path to peace. Review of International Studies, 37(2), 881-909. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000744 Witt, M. A. (2019). De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(7), 1053-1077. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00219-7 Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A vindication of the rights of woman. 1792. The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, 5, 79-266. Xidias, J., & Jackson, I. (2017). The end of history and the last man (1ª ed.). Macat Library. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912282135 Bastiat, F. (1850). Membre correspondant de l'Institut. Représentant du peuple à l'Assemblée Nationale, (The Law) (Paris: Guillaumin, 1850). 80 pp. [OC4, pp. 342-93] [CW2.9, pp. 107-46]Berlin, I. (2017). Two concepts of liberty. Liberty reader (pp. 33-57). Routledge. Fukuyama, F. (1992). History and Theory, 32(2), 188-196. doi:10.2307/2505352 Hayek, F. A., & Pryor, F. L. (1989). The Collected Works of FA Hayek. Vol. 1: The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, 1651. Menston: Scolar P, 1969. Print. Keynes, J. M. (2018). The General Theory. In The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (pp. 3-3). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Kuhn, T. S. (1997). The structure of scientific revolutions. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 33(5), 129-129. Locke, J., & Popple, W. (1955). A letter concerning toleration (p. 18). New York: Bobbs-Merrill. Martineau, H. (1832). Illustrations of Political Economy (3rd ed) in 9 vols. (London: Charles Fox, 1832). Vol. 1. Martineau, H. (1837). Society in America: In Two Volumes (Vol. 191). Saunders and Otley McGlinchey, S., Walters, R., & Scheinpflug, C. (Eds.) (2017). International Relations Theory. E-International Relations. http://www.e-ir.info/2017/11/30/beginners-textbook-international-relations-theory/ Mill, J. S. (1981). JOHN STUART MILL ON LIBERTY, UTILITY, AND RIGHTS. Nomos, 23, 80-116. Retrieved May 11, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24219089 Paine, Thomas, 1737-1809. (1975). Thomas Paine's Common sense : the call to independence. Woodbury, N.Y. :Barron's Educational Series, inc. |
| dc.rights.*.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia |
| dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/ |
| dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
| dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/ Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.campus.spa.fl_str_mv |
CRAI-USTA Villavicencio |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
| dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Pregrado Negocios Internacionales |
| dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Negocios Internacionales |
| institution |
Universidad Santo Tomás |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/14/2021yuneisylagos.pdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/2/2021yuneisylagos1.pdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/8/2021yuneisylagos2.pdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/12/license_rdf https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/13/license.txt https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/15/2021yuneisylagos.pdf.jpg https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/16/2021yuneisylagos1.pdf.jpg https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/17/2021yuneisylagos2.pdf.jpg |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
2d3b8b9efe7b2b8f84cc81bd980a04ba 06cb6eec1705c44cd9c25f9814f3f3f3 8c7e42cda3e6db528afa2de6478425d0 1487462a1490a8fc01f5999ce7b3b9cc aedeaf396fcd827b537c73d23464fc27 c313cf3495cb39f76282c0bd301e9b31 ac27f01a2204bccb2f1ed405aac97a7f 84e87711bc867087c0d5120c93199d64 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Universidad Santo Tomás |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@usantotomas.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1782026116759814144 |
| spelling |
Jairo Camilo, Zamora EscobarCaro Álvarez, Laura DanielaLagos Duarte, Yuneisyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9817-8311http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ZDw_wlIAAAAJ&hl=eshttp://scienti.colciencias.gov.co:8081/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001526877Universidad Santo Tomas2021-05-13T15:58:46Z2021-05-13T15:58:46Z2021-04-22Caro Álvarez, L. & Lagos Duarte Y. (2021). Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismo. [Trabajo de grado, Universidad Santo Tomás]. Repositoriohttp://hdl.handle.net/11634/34060reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Santo Tomásinstname:Universidad Santo TomásEl primer debate teórico en las relaciones Internacionales fue el realismo y el liberalismo. Este debate resultó de la oposición con la escuela realista que defendió el interés nacional y los liberales que rechazaron la política internacional de la inevitabilidad guerra. los enfoques sistemáticos de las relaciones internacionales relacionaron distintos rasgos para explicar eventos históricos. A lo largo de la historia de las relaciones internacionales han ocurrido eventualidades trascendentales en la reconstitución del poder político y territorial; por ente la investigación pretende analizar la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante de las relaciones internacionales desde dos teorías: liberalismo y realismo, siguiendo una metodología de la investigación tipo cualitativa, ya que estudia, describe y explica un suceso histórico considerando este fenómeno y sus componentes, mediante la medición de conceptos y definición de variables. La investigación es basada en fuentes secundarias como; documentos, artículos, revistas, libros, publicaciones, etc...The first theoretical debate in international relations was realism and liberalism. This debate resulted from opposition to the realistic school that defended the national interest and the liberals who rejected the international policy of war inevitability. systematic approaches to international relations related different features to explain historical events. Throughout the history of international relations, transcendental eventualities have occurred in the reconstitution of political and territorial power; The research therefore intends to analyze the Second World War as a relevant event in international relations from two theories: liberalism and realism, following a qualitative research methodology, since it studies, describes and explains a historical event considering this phenomenon and its components, by measuring concepts and defining variables. The research is based on secondary sources such as; documents, articles, magazines, books, publications, etc ...Profesional en Negocios Internacionaleshttp://www.ustavillavicencio.edu.co/home/index.php/unidades/extension-y-proyeccion/investigacionapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Santo TomásPregrado Negocios InternacionalesFacultad de Negocios InternacionalesAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 ColombiaAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 ColombiaAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 ColombiaAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Colombiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/co/Abierto (Texto Completo)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Análisis de la segunda guerra mundial como suceso relevante para las relaciones internacionales desde dos perspectivas; liberalismos y realismoInternationals relationsHistoryEuropean geographyRelaciones InternacionalesHistoriaGeografíaEuropaGuerra Mundial II - AnálisisTesis y disertaciones académicasLiberalismoRealismoSegunda Guerra MundialRelaciones InternacionalesTrabajo de gradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionFormación de Recurso Humano para la Ctel: Trabajo de grado de Pregradohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1finfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisCRAI-USTA VillavicencioAddams, J. (2002). Democracy and social ethics. University of Illinois Press.Alexander Bird. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions and its significance: An essay review of the fiftieth anniversary edition. Oxford Publishing Limited(England). https://doi.org/10.2307/23356448Bashota, B. (2016). The role of theory of international relations in explicating global political events. ILIRIA International Review, 1, 37. https://doi.org/10.21113/iir.v1i1.198Berlin, I. (2017). Two concepts of liberty. Liberty reader (pp. 33-57). Routledge.Beveridge, William Henry Beveridge Baron. (1942). Social insurance and allied services: Beveridge report. HM Stationery Office.Boesche, R. (2019a). The strange liberalism of alexis de tocqueville. Cornell University Press.Boesche, R. (2019b). The strange liberalism of alexis de tocqueville. Cornell University Press.Buchan, B. (2002). Explicando la guerra y la paz: Kant y la teoría liberal del IR. Alternatives, 27(4), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540202700401Burchill, S. (2013). Theories of international relations (5. ed. ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.Buzan, B., & Lawson, G. (2018). Explanation, geopolitics, and liberalism: A reply to luke cooper. Journal of Historical Sociology, 31(1), E92-E97. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12160Cowling, M. (1990). Mill and liberalism. Cambridge Core, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558412De Gouges, O. (1791). Declaration of the rights of woman and the female citizen. The French Revolution and Human Rights: A Brief Documentary History, , 124-129.DEUDNEY, D., & IKENBERRY, G. J. (1999). The nature and sources of liberal international order. Review of International Studies, 25(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210599001795Donnelly, J. (2012). The differentiation of international societies: An approach to structural international theory. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111411208Donnelly, J. (2019). Systems, levels, and structural theory: Waltz's theory is not a systemic theory (and why that matters for international relations today). European Journal of International Relations, 25(3), 904-930. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066118820929Drezner, D. W. (2019). Technological change and international relations. International Relations, 33(2), 286-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117819834629Eadeh, F. R., & Chang, K. K. (2020). Can threat increase support for liberalism? new insights into the relationship between threat and political attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(1), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618815919Elman, C., & Elman, M. F. (2008). The role of history in international relations. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 37(2), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808097644Eriksson, J., & Giacomello, G. (2006). The information revolution, security, and international relations: (IR)relevant theory? International Political Science Review, 27(3), 221-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512106064462Frieden, J. A., & Lake, D. A. (2005). International relations as a social science: Rigor and relevance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 600, 136-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205276732Gibbons, M. (1999). Science's new social contract with society. Nature, 402(6761), C81-C84. https://doi.org/10.1038/35011576Gilbert, A. N. (1968). International relations and the relevance of history. International Studies Quarterly, 12(4), 351-359. https://doi.org/10.2307/3013522Grancay, M., & Szikorova, N. (2014). Liberalism in foreign trade versus liberalism in air transportation is there a link? Panoeconomicus, 61(6), 709-721. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN1406709GHarrison, K., & Boyd, T. (2018). Liberalism.https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137951.00014Hasson, Y., Tamir, M., Brahms, K. S., Cohrs, J. C., & Halperin, E. (2018). Are liberals and conservatives equally motivated to feel empathy toward others?: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218769867Hayek Friedrich, A. v. (1960). The constitution of liberty. South Bend, IN: Gateway,Hayek, F. A. (1944). A.(1944) the road to serfdom. Dymock’s Book Arcade,Hobson, J. M., & Lawson, G. (2008). What is history in international relations? Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 37(2), 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808097648Hodgskin, T. (1900). Labour defended against the claims of capital. BEIJING BOOK CO. INC.Ikenberry, G. J. (2009). Liberalism in a realist world. International Studies, 46(1-2), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088171004600213Kant, I. (1781). Critique of pure reason, norman kemp smith. New York: St.Martins,Kant, I. (1983). Perpetual peace and other essays. Hackett Publishing.Keohane, R. O. (2012). Twenty years of institutional liberalism. International Relations, 26(2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117812438451Lebow, R. N. (2011). Philosophy and international relations. International Affairs, 87(5), 1216-+. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01030.xLees, N. (2016). International society is to international system as world society is to...? systemic and societal processes in english school theory. Journal of International Relations and Development, 19(3), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2014.20Lijphart, A. (1974). The structure of the theoretical revolution in international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 18(1), 41-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600260Locke, J. (1689b). The second treatise of government (an essay concerning the true original extent and end of civil government) and A letter concerning tolerationMengistie, S. (2013). The structure of scientific revolutions (thomas S. kuhn, 1970, 2nd ed. chicago, london: University of chicago press ltd. 210 pages). Philosophical Papers and Review, 4, 41-48. https://doi.org/10.5897/PPR2013.0102Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat de, & Cohler, A. M. (1989). The spirit of the laws (1. publ. ed.). Cambridge Univ. Press.Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513-553. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447Owen, J. M. (2018). Liberalism and its alternatives, again. International Studies Review, 20(2), 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy026Paine, T. (2011). Rights of man. Broadview Press.Rand, A. (1993). The fountainhead (1943). New York: Signet,Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism. Columbia University Press.Rawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice. Harvard university press.Scholte, J. A. (2019). After liberal global democracy: New methodology for new praxis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-019-00265-3Segrillo, A. (2012). Liberalism, marxism and democratic theory revisited: Proposal of a joint index of political and economic democracy. Brazilian Political Science Review, 6(2), 8-27. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1981-38212012000200001Shimko, K. I. (1992). Realism, neorealism, and american liberalism. The Review of Politics, 54(2), 281-301.Shiping, T. (2014). International system, not international structure: Against the agent-structure problematique in IR. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 7(4), 483-506. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pou046Shklar, J., & Rosenblum, N. L. (1989). The liberalism of fear. Political Liberalism: Variations on a Theme, , 149-166.Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen.Spencer, H. (1969). The man versus the state (1884). Herbert Spencer: Political Writings,Spinoza, B., & de Spinoza, B. (2007). Spinoza: Theological-political treatise. Cambridge University Press.Stephen M. Walt. (1998). International relations: One world, many theories. Foreign Policy, (110), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149275T.E., A. H. B. AND J. L. (2018, Ago 29,). The literature of liberalism. The Economist, https://www.economist.com/open-future/2018/08/29/the-literature-of-liberalismTaylor Mill, H. (1868). The enfranchisement of women. 1851. London, Trübner and Co,Tocqueville, A. d. (1992). De la démocratie en amérique (1840). Paris: Les Editions Gallimard, 2, 506-1193.Tocqueville, A. d. (2000). Democracy in america. 1835. Trans.Harvey C.Mansfield and Delba Winthrop.Chicago: University of Chicago Press,Waltz, K. N. (2007). Theory of international politics (1. ed., [Nachdr.] ed.). McGraw-Hill.Williams, M. C. (2013). In the beginning: The international relations enlightenment and the ends of international relations theory.European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 647-665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495477Wilson, P. (2011). Gilbert murray and international relations: Hellenism, liberalism, and international intellectual cooperation as a path to peace. Review of International Studies, 37(2), 881-909. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000744Witt, M. A. (2019). De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(7), 1053-1077. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00219-7Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A vindication of the rights of woman. 1792. The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, 5, 79-266.Xidias, J., & Jackson, I. (2017). The end of history and the last man (1ª ed.). Macat Library. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912282135Bastiat, F. (1850). Membre correspondant de l'Institut. Représentant du peuple à l'Assemblée Nationale, (The Law) (Paris: Guillaumin, 1850). 80 pp. [OC4, pp. 342-93] [CW2.9, pp. 107-46]Berlin, I. (2017). Two concepts of liberty. Liberty reader (pp. 33-57). Routledge.Fukuyama, F. (1992). History and Theory, 32(2), 188-196. doi:10.2307/2505352Hayek, F. A., & Pryor, F. L. (1989). The Collected Works of FA Hayek. Vol. 1: The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism.Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, 1651. Menston: Scolar P, 1969. Print.Keynes, J. M. (2018). The General Theory. In The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (pp. 3-3). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.Kuhn, T. S. (1997). The structure of scientific revolutions. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 33(5), 129-129.Locke, J., & Popple, W. (1955). A letter concerning toleration (p. 18). New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Martineau, H. (1832). Illustrations of Political Economy (3rd ed) in 9 vols. (London: Charles Fox, 1832). Vol. 1.Martineau, H. (1837). Society in America: In Two Volumes (Vol. 191). Saunders and OtleyMcGlinchey, S., Walters, R., & Scheinpflug, C. (Eds.) (2017). International Relations Theory. E-International Relations. http://www.e-ir.info/2017/11/30/beginners-textbook-international-relations-theory/Mill, J. S. (1981). JOHN STUART MILL ON LIBERTY, UTILITY, AND RIGHTS. Nomos, 23, 80-116. Retrieved May 11, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24219089Paine, Thomas, 1737-1809. (1975). Thomas Paine's Common sense : the call to independence. Woodbury, N.Y. :Barron's Educational Series, inc.ORIGINAL2021yuneisylagos.pdf2021yuneisylagos.pdfTrabajo de Gradoapplication/pdf908447https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/14/2021yuneisylagos.pdf2d3b8b9efe7b2b8f84cc81bd980a04baMD514open access2021yuneisylagos1.pdf2021yuneisylagos1.pdfAutorización Facultadapplication/pdf620168https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/2/2021yuneisylagos1.pdf06cb6eec1705c44cd9c25f9814f3f3f3MD52metadata only access2021yuneisylagos2.pdf2021yuneisylagos2.pdfDerechos de autorapplication/pdf619797https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/8/2021yuneisylagos2.pdf8c7e42cda3e6db528afa2de6478425d0MD58metadata only accessCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-81037https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/12/license_rdf1487462a1490a8fc01f5999ce7b3b9ccMD512open accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8807https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/13/license.txtaedeaf396fcd827b537c73d23464fc27MD513open accessTHUMBNAIL2021yuneisylagos.pdf.jpg2021yuneisylagos.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6450https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/15/2021yuneisylagos.pdf.jpgc313cf3495cb39f76282c0bd301e9b31MD515open access2021yuneisylagos1.pdf.jpg2021yuneisylagos1.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg9971https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/16/2021yuneisylagos1.pdf.jpgac27f01a2204bccb2f1ed405aac97a7fMD516open access2021yuneisylagos2.pdf.jpg2021yuneisylagos2.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg8890https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/11634/34060/17/2021yuneisylagos2.pdf.jpg84e87711bc867087c0d5120c93199d64MD517open access11634/34060oai:repository.usta.edu.co:11634/340602022-10-10 14:39:43.74metadata only accessRepositorio Universidad Santo Tomásrepositorio@usantotomas.edu.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 |