Validación del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) en población colombiana

La infidelidad es un importante constructo a medir, al ser una problemática que conlleva consecuencias psicológicas y físicas (Buss, 2016; González et al., 2009; Shackelford et al., 2003). Se buscó determinar la validez y la confiabilidad del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) para mu...

Full description

Autores:
Riveros Munévar, Fernando
Prieto Patiño, Luis Enrique
Marroquín Ortegón, Laura
Cardona Rodríguez, Mariana
Delgado Zapata, Camilo
Rodríguez Niño, Yuri
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Universidad de San Buenaventura
Repositorio:
Repositorio USB
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/25846
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10819/25846
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4710
Palabra clave:
Infidelidad
pareja
validez
confiabilidad
Colombia
Infidelity
couple
validity
reliability
Colombia
Rights
openAccess
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id SANBUENAV2_fda0a62a92a929ea7fae10e9e2c57497
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/25846
network_acronym_str SANBUENAV2
network_name_str Repositorio USB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Validación del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) en población colombiana
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv Validación del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) en población colombiana
title Validación del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) en población colombiana
spellingShingle Validación del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) en población colombiana
Infidelidad
pareja
validez
confiabilidad
Colombia
Infidelity
couple
validity
reliability
Colombia
title_short Validación del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) en población colombiana
title_full Validación del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) en población colombiana
title_fullStr Validación del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) en población colombiana
title_full_unstemmed Validación del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) en población colombiana
title_sort Validación del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) en población colombiana
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Riveros Munévar, Fernando
Prieto Patiño, Luis Enrique
Marroquín Ortegón, Laura
Cardona Rodríguez, Mariana
Delgado Zapata, Camilo
Rodríguez Niño, Yuri
dc.contributor.author.eng.fl_str_mv Riveros Munévar, Fernando
Prieto Patiño, Luis Enrique
Marroquín Ortegón, Laura
Cardona Rodríguez, Mariana
Delgado Zapata, Camilo
Rodríguez Niño, Yuri
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Infidelidad
pareja
validez
confiabilidad
Colombia
topic Infidelidad
pareja
validez
confiabilidad
Colombia
Infidelity
couple
validity
reliability
Colombia
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Infidelity
couple
validity
reliability
Colombia
description La infidelidad es un importante constructo a medir, al ser una problemática que conlleva consecuencias psicológicas y físicas (Buss, 2016; González et al., 2009; Shackelford et al., 2003). Se buscó determinar la validez y la confiabilidad del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) para muestras colombianas. Se aplicó el instrumento a 674 participantes colombianos, 224 hombres (33.28%) y 449 mujeres (66.71%), con edades comprendidas entre los 18 y 81 años (M = 25.11;DE = 10.56), llevando a cabo análisis factoriales exploratorios, confirmatorios y de consistencia interna para cada subescala. En la escala de Tendencia a la infidelidad, se identificaron 3 factores que explicaron el 66.74% de la varianza total acumulada; en la escala de Motivos a la infidelidad, se hallaron siete factores, explicando el 65.02% de la varianza total; en la subescala de Creencias a la infidelidad, se obtuvieron cinco factores, explicando el 58.33% de la varianza acumulada; y en la subescala de Consecuencias de la infidelidad se hallaron dos factores claramente constituidos, que explican el 57.58% de la varianza acumulada. Todos los anteriores tenían modelos confirmatorios con adecuados niveles de bondad de ajuste y adecuados indicadores alfas de Cronbach, correlaciones ítem-ítem e ítem-prueba, además de concordancia con la propuesta original del instrumento.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-30T21:34:25Z
2025-07-31T16:12:18Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-30T21:34:25Z
2025-07-31T16:12:18Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-30
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.21500/20112084.4710
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2011-7922
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 2011-2084
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10819/25846
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4710
identifier_str_mv 10.21500/20112084.4710
2011-7922
2011-2084
url https://hdl.handle.net/10819/25846
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4710
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4710/3874
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4710/3922
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 47
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv 1
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 33
dc.relation.citationvolume.eng.fl_str_mv 14
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.eng.fl_str_mv International Journal of Psychological Research
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Afifi, W. A., Falato, W. L., & Weiner, J. L. (2001). Identity Concerns Following a Severe Relational Transgression: The Role of Discovery meted for the Relational outcomes of Infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18 (2), 291–308.
Allen, E. S., & Atkins, D. C. (2012). The association of divorce and extramarital sex in a representative US sample. Journal of Family Issues, 33 (11), 1477–1493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12439692.
Amato, P. R., & Previti, D. (2003). People’s reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of family issues, 24 (5), 602–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X03024005002.
Banfield, S., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Extra relationship involvement among women: Are they different from men? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30 (2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002773100507.
Barrera, L., Bautista, E., & Trujillo, A. (2017). Prevalencia de problemas psicológicos detectados en un centro de educación y desarrollo humano. Enseñanza e investigación en Psicología, 17 (1), 13–27. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/292/29223246002.pdf.
Britos, M., Estigarribia, R., Ferreira, J., & Valenzuela, J. (2019). Relación entre conducta infiel y los datos sociodemográficos en personas que resident en paraguay, período 2018. Revista Científica de la UCSA, 6 (2), 39–66. https://dx.doi.org/10.18004/ucsa/2409-8752/2019.006.02.039-066.
Busby, D. M., Carroll, J. S., & Willoughby, B. J. (2010). Compatibility or Restraint? The Effects of Sexual Timing on Marriage Relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 24 (6), 766–774. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021690.
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Susceptibility of infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 31 (2), 193–221. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2175.
Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Choe, J., Buunk, B. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2000). Distress about mating rivals. Personal Relationships, 7 (3), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00014.x.
Buss, D. M. (2016). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. Basic books.
Buunk, A. P., Massar, K., & Dijkstra, P. (2007). A social cognitive evolutionary approach to jealousy: The automatic evaluation of one’s romantic rivals. In J. P. Forgas, M. G. Haselton, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Sydney symposium of social psychology. Evolution and the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and social cognition (pp. 213228). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Buss, D. M. (2016). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. Basic Books.
Calderón-Pérez, Y., Flores-Galaz, M., & Rivera-Aragón, S. (2018). Celos e infidelidad en personas heterosexuales y homosexuales: Estudio intercultural. Acta de investigación psicológica, 8 (1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.22201/fpsi.20074719e.2018.1.02.
Cano, A., & O’Leary, K. D. (2000). Infidelity and separations precipitate major depressive episodes and symptoms of nonspecific depression and anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68 (5), 774–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.774.
Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Ziegler, A., & Karathanasis, C. (2012). Unfaithful individuals are less likely to practice safer sex than openly nonmonogamous individuals. The journal of sexual medicine, 9 (6), 1559–1565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02712.x.
Eslami, M., Yazdanpanah, M., Andalib, P., Rahimi, A., Safizadeh, M., Dadvar, A., & Nakhaee, N. (2018). Development of a questionnaire to measure perceived reasons for divorce seeking: An instrument development study. Electronic physician, 10 (7), 7071–7077. https://doi.org/10.19082%2F7071.
Fincham, F. D., & May, R. W. (2016). Infidelity in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.008. Geney, E. R., Tezón, M. I., Fortich Pérez, D. J., & Baeza, S. (2018). Análisis psicométrico del inventario multidimensional de infidelidad, en estudiantes de educación superior en cartagena, Colombia. Summa Psicológica UST, 15 (1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.18774/448x.2018.15.374.
Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L. (1992). Justifications for extramarital relationships: The association between attitudes, behaviors, and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 29 (3), 361–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499209551654.
González, J., Martínez-Taboas, A., & Martínez, D. (2009). Factores psicológicos asociados a la infidelidad sexual y/o emocional y su relación a la búsqueda de sensaciones en parejas puertorriqueñas. Revista Puertorriqueña de Psicología, 20 (1), 59–81. http://www.ojs.repsasppr.net/index.php/reps/article/view/175.
Hall, J. H., Fals-Stewart, W., & Fincham, F. D. (2008). Risky sexual behavior among married alcoholic men. Journal of Family Psychology, 22 (2), 287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.2.287.
Hughes, M. E., & Waite, L. J. (2009). Marital biography and health at mid-life. Journal of health and social behavior, 50 (3), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650905000307.
Kato, T. (2019). Gender differences in response to infidelity types and rival attractiveness.Sexual and Relationship Therapy. Advance online publication.
Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). Exploratory Item Factor Analysis: A practical guide revised and up-dated. Annals of Psychology, 30 (3), 1151–1169. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361.
Mark, K. P., Janssen, E., & Milhausen, R. R. (2011). Infidelity in heterosexual couples: Demographic, interpersonal, and personality-related predictors of extradyadic sex. Archives of sexual behavior, 40 (5), 971–982. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9771-z.
McIlhaney Jr, J. S., & Bush, F. M. (2018). Hooked: The brain science on how casual sex is affecting human development. Northfield Publishing.
Medina, J. L. V., Colín, B. G., Martínez, M. U. M., de Oca, Y. P. A. M., Fuentes, N. I. G. A. L., & Muñoz, M. A. T. (2013). Las causas que llevan a la infidelidad: Un análisis por sexo. Acta de investigación psicológica, 3 (3), 1271–1279. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3589/358933345007.pdf.
Montero, I., & León, O. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 3 (7), 847–862. http://www.aepc.es/ijchp/GNEIP07_es.pdf.
Negash, S., Cui, M., Fincham, F. D., & Pasley, K. (2014). Extradyadic involvement and relationship dissolution in heterosexual women university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43 (3), 531–539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0213-y.
Quesada, S. (2004). Estudio sobre los motivos de consulta psicológica en una población universitaria. Universitas Psychologica, 3 (1), 7–16. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/647/64730102.pdf.
Rada, C. (2012). The prevalence of sexual infidelity, opinions on its causes for a population in romania. Rev Psih, 58 (3), 211–224. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275657080_The_prevalence_of_sexual_infidelity_opinions_on_its_causes_for_a_population_in_Romania.
Redacción El Tiempo. (2010, October 2). Colombianos son los más infieles de América Latina según encuesta. El Tiempo.
Reyes Osejo, J. (2018). Motivos para la Infidelidad en una relación conyugal en miembros del Comando de la Policía Nacional de la Sub-zona Napo Nř 15, periodo 2017-2018 [Thesis, Universidad Central del Ecuador]. Repositorio de la Universidad Central del Ecuador.
Reynolds, J., & Houlston, C. (2014). Parental conflict: Outcomes and interventions for children and families. Policy Press.
Romero-Palencia, A., del Castillo-Arreola, A., Solano-Solano, G., Rivera-Aragón, S., & Cruz-del Castillo, C. (2014). Predictores del deseo sexual en una muestra de mujeres mexicanas. Psicología Iberoamericana, 22 (2), 36–45. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1339/133938134005.pdf.
Romero-Palencia, A., Rivera-Aragón, S., & Díaz-Loving, R. (2007). Desarrollo del inventario multidimensional de infidelidad (IMIN). RIDEP, 23 (1), 121–148. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4596/459645446008.pdf.
Rosenberg, K. P. (2018). Infidelity: Why men and women cheat. Da Capo Press.
Ruiz, M., Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31 (1), 34–45. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=77812441004.
Sandin, B., Valiente, R. M., Chorot, P., & Santed, M. A. (2007). ASI-3: Nueva escala para la evaluación de la sensibilidad a la ansiedad. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 12 (2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.12.num.2.2007.4036.
Scott, S. B., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., Allen, E. S., & Markman, H. J. (2013). Reasons for divorce and recollections of premarital intervention: Implications for improving relationship education. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 2 (2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032025.
Shackelford, T. K., Buss, D. M., & Bennett, K. (2002). Forgiveness or breakup: Sex differences in responses to a partners infidelity. Cognition and Emotion, 16 (2), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000202.
Shackelford, T. K., Buss, D. M., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2003). Wife killings committed in the context of a lovers triangle. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25 (2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2502_4.
Stosny, S. (2013). Living and Loving After Betrayal: How to Heal from Emotional Abuse, Deceit, Infidelity, and Chronic Resentment. New Harbinger Publications.
Thompson, A. E., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2016). Drawing the line: The development of a comprehensive assessment of infidelity judgments. The Journal of Sex Research, 53 (8), 910–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1062840.
Torres, A., Torres, L., & Riveros, F. (2016). Relación entre tendencia a la infidelidad emocional y/o sexual e inteligencia emocional, en estudiantes universitarios. Cuadernos hispanoamericanos de Psicología, 16 (1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.18270/chps.v16i1.1969.
Wang, W. (2018, January 10). Who cheats more? the demographics of infidelity in America. Institute for family studies. https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-cheats-more-thedemographics-of-cheating-in-america.
Whisman, M. A., Gordon, K. C., & Chatav, Y. (2007). Predicting sexual infidelity in a population-based sample of married individuals. Journal of Family Psychology, 21 (2), 320–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.320.
Wike, R. (2014). French More Accepting of Infidelity than People in Other Countries. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/01/14/french-more-accepting-of-infidelitythan-people-in-other-countries/.
Wilcox, W. B., Doherty, W. J., Fisher, H., Galston, W., Glenn, N. D., Gottman, J., Lerman, R., Mahoney, A., Markey, B., Markman, H. J., Nock, S., Popenoe, D., Rodriguez, G. G., Stanley, S. M., Waite, L. J., &Wallerstein, J. (2011). Why marriage matters: Thirty conclusions from the social sciences: A report from family scholars institute for american values. Institute for American Values.
Yeniceri, Z., & Kökdemir, D. (2006). University Studentsť perceptions of, and explanations for, infidelity: The development of the infidelity questionnaire (INFQ). Social Behavior and Personality, 34 (6), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.6.639.
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/4710
institution Universidad de San Buenaventura
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/c45e460f-7b03-45e1-aa54-f0bd961ce5a5/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 7bccfc3608c1cdd731df94fdf3b400f5
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1851053537834827776
spelling Riveros Munévar, FernandoPrieto Patiño, Luis EnriqueMarroquín Ortegón, LauraCardona Rodríguez, MarianaDelgado Zapata, CamiloRodríguez Niño, Yuri2021-04-30T21:34:25Z2025-07-31T16:12:18Z2021-04-30T21:34:25Z2025-07-31T16:12:18Z2021-04-30La infidelidad es un importante constructo a medir, al ser una problemática que conlleva consecuencias psicológicas y físicas (Buss, 2016; González et al., 2009; Shackelford et al., 2003). Se buscó determinar la validez y la confiabilidad del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) para muestras colombianas. Se aplicó el instrumento a 674 participantes colombianos, 224 hombres (33.28%) y 449 mujeres (66.71%), con edades comprendidas entre los 18 y 81 años (M = 25.11;DE = 10.56), llevando a cabo análisis factoriales exploratorios, confirmatorios y de consistencia interna para cada subescala. En la escala de Tendencia a la infidelidad, se identificaron 3 factores que explicaron el 66.74% de la varianza total acumulada; en la escala de Motivos a la infidelidad, se hallaron siete factores, explicando el 65.02% de la varianza total; en la subescala de Creencias a la infidelidad, se obtuvieron cinco factores, explicando el 58.33% de la varianza acumulada; y en la subescala de Consecuencias de la infidelidad se hallaron dos factores claramente constituidos, que explican el 57.58% de la varianza acumulada. Todos los anteriores tenían modelos confirmatorios con adecuados niveles de bondad de ajuste y adecuados indicadores alfas de Cronbach, correlaciones ítem-ítem e ítem-prueba, además de concordancia con la propuesta original del instrumento.Infidelity is a problem that entails psychological and physical consequences in humankind (Buss, 2016; González et al., 2009; Shackelford et al., 2003); thus, indicating the importance of measuring infidelity construct. The objective of the study was to determine the validity and reliability of the Multidimensional Infidelity Inventory (IMIN) for Colombian samples. For this, the instrument was applied to 674 Colombian participants, 224 men (33.28%) and 449 women (66.71%), with ages between 18 and 81 years (M = 25.11;SD = 10.56), carrying out exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory, and internal consistency for each subscale. In general, in the Motives to infidelity scale, three factors were found that explained 66.74% of the total accumulated variance; three factors were found in the Trend to Infidelity scale, explaining 65.02% of the total variance; in the sub-scale of Beliefs to infidelity, five factors were obtained, explaining 58.33% of the accumulated variance; and in the sub-scale of Consequences of infidelity, two clearly constituted factors were found, which explain 57.58% of the accumulated variance. All of them had confirmatory models with adequate levels of goodness of fit, adequate Cronbach alpha indicators, item-item, and item-test correlations, in addition to concordance with the original proposal of the instrument.application/pdfapplication/pdf10.21500/20112084.47102011-79222011-2084https://hdl.handle.net/10819/25846https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4710spaUniversidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4710/3874https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4710/39224713314International Journal of Psychological ResearchAfifi, W. A., Falato, W. L., & Weiner, J. L. (2001). Identity Concerns Following a Severe Relational Transgression: The Role of Discovery meted for the Relational outcomes of Infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18 (2), 291–308.Allen, E. S., & Atkins, D. C. (2012). The association of divorce and extramarital sex in a representative US sample. Journal of Family Issues, 33 (11), 1477–1493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12439692.Amato, P. R., & Previti, D. (2003). People’s reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of family issues, 24 (5), 602–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X03024005002.Banfield, S., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Extra relationship involvement among women: Are they different from men? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30 (2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002773100507.Barrera, L., Bautista, E., & Trujillo, A. (2017). Prevalencia de problemas psicológicos detectados en un centro de educación y desarrollo humano. Enseñanza e investigación en Psicología, 17 (1), 13–27. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/292/29223246002.pdf.Britos, M., Estigarribia, R., Ferreira, J., & Valenzuela, J. (2019). Relación entre conducta infiel y los datos sociodemográficos en personas que resident en paraguay, período 2018. Revista Científica de la UCSA, 6 (2), 39–66. https://dx.doi.org/10.18004/ucsa/2409-8752/2019.006.02.039-066.Busby, D. M., Carroll, J. S., & Willoughby, B. J. (2010). Compatibility or Restraint? The Effects of Sexual Timing on Marriage Relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 24 (6), 766–774. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021690.Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Susceptibility of infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 31 (2), 193–221. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2175.Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Choe, J., Buunk, B. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2000). Distress about mating rivals. Personal Relationships, 7 (3), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00014.x.Buss, D. M. (2016). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. Basic books.Buunk, A. P., Massar, K., & Dijkstra, P. (2007). A social cognitive evolutionary approach to jealousy: The automatic evaluation of one’s romantic rivals. In J. P. Forgas, M. G. Haselton, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Sydney symposium of social psychology. Evolution and the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and social cognition (pp. 213228). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Buss, D. M. (2016). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. Basic Books.Calderón-Pérez, Y., Flores-Galaz, M., & Rivera-Aragón, S. (2018). Celos e infidelidad en personas heterosexuales y homosexuales: Estudio intercultural. Acta de investigación psicológica, 8 (1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.22201/fpsi.20074719e.2018.1.02.Cano, A., & O’Leary, K. D. (2000). Infidelity and separations precipitate major depressive episodes and symptoms of nonspecific depression and anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68 (5), 774–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.774.Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Ziegler, A., & Karathanasis, C. (2012). Unfaithful individuals are less likely to practice safer sex than openly nonmonogamous individuals. The journal of sexual medicine, 9 (6), 1559–1565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02712.x.Eslami, M., Yazdanpanah, M., Andalib, P., Rahimi, A., Safizadeh, M., Dadvar, A., & Nakhaee, N. (2018). Development of a questionnaire to measure perceived reasons for divorce seeking: An instrument development study. Electronic physician, 10 (7), 7071–7077. https://doi.org/10.19082%2F7071.Fincham, F. D., & May, R. W. (2016). Infidelity in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.008. Geney, E. R., Tezón, M. I., Fortich Pérez, D. J., & Baeza, S. (2018). Análisis psicométrico del inventario multidimensional de infidelidad, en estudiantes de educación superior en cartagena, Colombia. Summa Psicológica UST, 15 (1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.18774/448x.2018.15.374.Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L. (1992). Justifications for extramarital relationships: The association between attitudes, behaviors, and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 29 (3), 361–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499209551654.González, J., Martínez-Taboas, A., & Martínez, D. (2009). Factores psicológicos asociados a la infidelidad sexual y/o emocional y su relación a la búsqueda de sensaciones en parejas puertorriqueñas. Revista Puertorriqueña de Psicología, 20 (1), 59–81. http://www.ojs.repsasppr.net/index.php/reps/article/view/175.Hall, J. H., Fals-Stewart, W., & Fincham, F. D. (2008). Risky sexual behavior among married alcoholic men. Journal of Family Psychology, 22 (2), 287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.2.287.Hughes, M. E., & Waite, L. J. (2009). Marital biography and health at mid-life. Journal of health and social behavior, 50 (3), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650905000307.Kato, T. (2019). Gender differences in response to infidelity types and rival attractiveness.Sexual and Relationship Therapy. Advance online publication.Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). Exploratory Item Factor Analysis: A practical guide revised and up-dated. Annals of Psychology, 30 (3), 1151–1169. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361.Mark, K. P., Janssen, E., & Milhausen, R. R. (2011). Infidelity in heterosexual couples: Demographic, interpersonal, and personality-related predictors of extradyadic sex. Archives of sexual behavior, 40 (5), 971–982. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9771-z.McIlhaney Jr, J. S., & Bush, F. M. (2018). Hooked: The brain science on how casual sex is affecting human development. Northfield Publishing.Medina, J. L. V., Colín, B. G., Martínez, M. U. M., de Oca, Y. P. A. M., Fuentes, N. I. G. A. L., & Muñoz, M. A. T. (2013). Las causas que llevan a la infidelidad: Un análisis por sexo. Acta de investigación psicológica, 3 (3), 1271–1279. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3589/358933345007.pdf.Montero, I., & León, O. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 3 (7), 847–862. http://www.aepc.es/ijchp/GNEIP07_es.pdf.Negash, S., Cui, M., Fincham, F. D., & Pasley, K. (2014). Extradyadic involvement and relationship dissolution in heterosexual women university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43 (3), 531–539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0213-y.Quesada, S. (2004). Estudio sobre los motivos de consulta psicológica en una población universitaria. Universitas Psychologica, 3 (1), 7–16. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/647/64730102.pdf.Rada, C. (2012). The prevalence of sexual infidelity, opinions on its causes for a population in romania. Rev Psih, 58 (3), 211–224. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275657080_The_prevalence_of_sexual_infidelity_opinions_on_its_causes_for_a_population_in_Romania.Redacción El Tiempo. (2010, October 2). Colombianos son los más infieles de América Latina según encuesta. El Tiempo.Reyes Osejo, J. (2018). Motivos para la Infidelidad en una relación conyugal en miembros del Comando de la Policía Nacional de la Sub-zona Napo Nř 15, periodo 2017-2018 [Thesis, Universidad Central del Ecuador]. Repositorio de la Universidad Central del Ecuador.Reynolds, J., & Houlston, C. (2014). Parental conflict: Outcomes and interventions for children and families. Policy Press.Romero-Palencia, A., del Castillo-Arreola, A., Solano-Solano, G., Rivera-Aragón, S., & Cruz-del Castillo, C. (2014). Predictores del deseo sexual en una muestra de mujeres mexicanas. Psicología Iberoamericana, 22 (2), 36–45. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1339/133938134005.pdf.Romero-Palencia, A., Rivera-Aragón, S., & Díaz-Loving, R. (2007). Desarrollo del inventario multidimensional de infidelidad (IMIN). RIDEP, 23 (1), 121–148. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4596/459645446008.pdf.Rosenberg, K. P. (2018). Infidelity: Why men and women cheat. Da Capo Press.Ruiz, M., Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31 (1), 34–45. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=77812441004.Sandin, B., Valiente, R. M., Chorot, P., & Santed, M. A. (2007). ASI-3: Nueva escala para la evaluación de la sensibilidad a la ansiedad. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 12 (2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.12.num.2.2007.4036.Scott, S. B., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., Allen, E. S., & Markman, H. J. (2013). Reasons for divorce and recollections of premarital intervention: Implications for improving relationship education. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 2 (2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032025.Shackelford, T. K., Buss, D. M., & Bennett, K. (2002). Forgiveness or breakup: Sex differences in responses to a partners infidelity. Cognition and Emotion, 16 (2), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000202.Shackelford, T. K., Buss, D. M., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2003). Wife killings committed in the context of a lovers triangle. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25 (2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2502_4.Stosny, S. (2013). Living and Loving After Betrayal: How to Heal from Emotional Abuse, Deceit, Infidelity, and Chronic Resentment. New Harbinger Publications.Thompson, A. E., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2016). Drawing the line: The development of a comprehensive assessment of infidelity judgments. The Journal of Sex Research, 53 (8), 910–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1062840.Torres, A., Torres, L., & Riveros, F. (2016). Relación entre tendencia a la infidelidad emocional y/o sexual e inteligencia emocional, en estudiantes universitarios. Cuadernos hispanoamericanos de Psicología, 16 (1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.18270/chps.v16i1.1969.Wang, W. (2018, January 10). Who cheats more? the demographics of infidelity in America. Institute for family studies. https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-cheats-more-thedemographics-of-cheating-in-america.Whisman, M. A., Gordon, K. C., & Chatav, Y. (2007). Predicting sexual infidelity in a population-based sample of married individuals. Journal of Family Psychology, 21 (2), 320–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.320.Wike, R. (2014). French More Accepting of Infidelity than People in Other Countries. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/01/14/french-more-accepting-of-infidelitythan-people-in-other-countries/.Wilcox, W. B., Doherty, W. J., Fisher, H., Galston, W., Glenn, N. D., Gottman, J., Lerman, R., Mahoney, A., Markey, B., Markman, H. J., Nock, S., Popenoe, D., Rodriguez, G. G., Stanley, S. M., Waite, L. J., &Wallerstein, J. (2011). Why marriage matters: Thirty conclusions from the social sciences: A report from family scholars institute for american values. Institute for American Values.Yeniceri, Z., & Kökdemir, D. (2006). University Studentsť perceptions of, and explanations for, infidelity: The development of the infidelity questionnaire (INFQ). Social Behavior and Personality, 34 (6), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.6.639.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/4710InfidelidadparejavalidezconfiabilidadColombiaInfidelitycouplevalidityreliabilityColombiaValidación del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) en población colombianaValidación del Inventario Multidimensional de Infidelidad (IMIN) en población colombianaArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml3410https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/c45e460f-7b03-45e1-aa54-f0bd961ce5a5/download7bccfc3608c1cdd731df94fdf3b400f5MD5110819/25846oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/258462025-07-31 11:12:18.448http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Publicaciones similares