Las teorías de la guerra justa: implicaciones y limitaciones
In the framework of the so-called history of war theories, this article discusses the scope and limitations of the classic and contemporary theories about a Just War. It identifies the roots of differentiation between just and acceptable wars, and unjust and condemnable wars, using theories from Aug...
- Autores:
-
Jaramillo Marín, Jefferson
Echeverry Enciso, Yesid
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2005
- Institución:
- Universidad de San Buenaventura
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio USB
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/5198
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10819/5198
- Palabra clave:
- Guerra justa
Filosofía política
Guerra y moral
Guerra y política
Guerra y derecho
Just war
Political philosophy
War and morality
War and politics
War and law
Derecho
Filosofía política
Guerra y sociedad
- Rights
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
| Summary: | In the framework of the so-called history of war theories, this article discusses the scope and limitations of the classic and contemporary theories about a Just War. It identifies the roots of differentiation between just and acceptable wars, and unjust and condemnable wars, using theories from Augustine of Hippo, St. Thomas Aquinas, Groccio, Kant, Hegel, Walzer’s, among others. The article concludes with a discussion on the implications of the just war in the terms of the jurist and philosopher, Luigi Ferrajoli, who reflects upon contemporary conflicts in the complex framework of law, war and cosmopolitan democracy. |
|---|