Social Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019)

Existen grupos minoritarios y estigmatizados que enfrentan retos particulares para lograr su completa participación en sociedad. El objetivo de este estudio fue conducir una revisión sistemática para determinar los cimientos teóricos y metodológicos en economía del comportamiento que explican cómo s...

Full description

Autores:: Vecchio Camargo, Carolina Mercedes
Rodríguez Acosta, Sandra Milena
Aristizabal Diaz-Granados, Edith Teresa

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2022

Institución:: Universidad de San Buenaventura

Repositorio:: Repositorio USB

Idioma:: eng

id	SANBUENAV2_ee40c04a0b1f9241c9fd5ae6086d1351
oai_identifier_str	oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/28933
network_acronym_str	SANBUENAV2
network_name_str	Repositorio USB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Social Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019)
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv	Social Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019)
title	Social Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019)
spellingShingle	Social Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019) Stigma Stereotypes Discrimination Prejudices Systematic Review Behavioral Economics Estigma Estereotipos Discriminación Prejuicios Revisión Sistemática Economía del Comportamiento
title_short	Social Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019)
title_full	Social Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019)
title_fullStr	Social Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019)
title_full_unstemmed	Social Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019)
title_sort	Social Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019)
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Vecchio Camargo, Carolina Mercedes Rodríguez Acosta, Sandra Milena Aristizabal Diaz-Granados, Edith Teresa
dc.contributor.author.eng.fl_str_mv	Vecchio Camargo, Carolina Mercedes Rodríguez Acosta, Sandra Milena Aristizabal Diaz-Granados, Edith Teresa
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Stigma Stereotypes Discrimination Prejudices Systematic Review Behavioral Economics
topic	Stigma Stereotypes Discrimination Prejudices Systematic Review Behavioral Economics Estigma Estereotipos Discriminación Prejuicios Revisión Sistemática Economía del Comportamiento
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Estigma Estereotipos Discriminación Prejuicios Revisión Sistemática Economía del Comportamiento
description	Existen grupos minoritarios y estigmatizados que enfrentan retos particulares para lograr su completa participación en sociedad. El objetivo de este estudio fue conducir una revisión sistemática para determinar los cimientos teóricos y metodológicos en economía del comportamiento que explican cómo surge la estigmatización dentro de los procesos de relacionamiento y estructuras sociales de los individuos. Los datos abarcan el período de 1940-2019 y, se obtuvieron de 12 bases de datos electrónicas relevantes tales como Scopus y Web of Science. Siguiendo la guía de PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas, 26 estudios de 2459 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. La mayoría de los estudios aplicó economía experimental y fueron publicados entre 2002 y 2018. En general, los artículos enfocan su investigación en experiencias de discriminación basadas en estereotipos y prueban sus hipótesis a través de juegos económicos. La síntesis de los datos parece revelar una débil claridad conceptual, razonamiento circular y un atisbo del problema de regresión infinita. Lo anterior, abre nuevas y emocionantes vías de investigación futura para explorar a través de una variedad de aplicaciones experimentales.
publishDate	2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2022-05-24T16:24:53Z 2025-08-22T16:59:00Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2022-05-24T16:24:53Z 2025-08-22T16:59:00Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2022-05-24
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.21500/20112084.5434
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2011-7922
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	2011-2084
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/10819/28933
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5434
identifier_str_mv	10.21500/20112084.5434 2011-7922 2011-2084
url	https://hdl.handle.net/10819/28933 https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5434
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5434/4638
dc.relation.citationedition.eng.fl_str_mv	Núm. 1 , Año 2022 : Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022)
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	125
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv	1
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	98
dc.relation.citationvolume.eng.fl_str_mv	15
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.eng.fl_str_mv	International Journal of Psychological Research
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv	References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the systematic review. Ahmed, A. M. (2007). Group identity, social distance, and intergroup bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28 (3), 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.01.007 Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 715–753. Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2008). Beauty, gender and stereotypes: Evidence from laboratory experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29 (1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.07.008 Armstrong, J. S., & Shapiro, A. C. (1974). Analyzing quantitative models: Help for the user of quantitative models —A simple framework for evaluating their effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 38 (2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297403800212 Arrow, K. J. (1973). The theory of discrimination. In O. Aschenfelter & A. Rees (Eds.), Discrimination in Labor Markets (pp. 3–33). Princeton University Press. Becker, G. S. (1957). The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago Press. Becker, H. (1966). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. The Free Press & Collier Macmillan Limited. Ben-Ner, A., McCall, B. P., Stephane, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Identity and in-group/outgroup differentiation in work and giving behaviors: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72 (1), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.05.007 Bjorvatn, K., & Tungodden, B. (2015). Disabled by stereotype? Experimental evidence from Uganda. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 118, 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.027 Bohnet, I., van Geen, A., & Bazerman, M. (2016). When performance trumps gender bias: Joint vs. separate evaluation. Management Science, 62 (5), 1225–1234. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2186 Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton University Press. Camerer, C. F., & G., L. (2004). Behavioral economics: Past, present and future. In C.F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 3–51). Princeton University Press. Cameron, R. (2018). Infinite regress arguments. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Center for the Study of Language and Information. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/infinite-regress/ Candelo, N., Croson, R. T. A., & Li, S. X. (2017). Identity and social exclusion: An experiment with Hispanic immigrants in the US. Experimental Economics, 20 (2), 460–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-016-9492-1 Carlin, R. E., & Love, G. J. (2013). The Politics of interpersonal trust and reciprocity: An experimental approach. Political Behavior, 35 (1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9181-x Cartwright, E. (2018). Behavioral economics. Routledge. Chapman, K., & Pike, L. (2013). Literature of behavioral economics, part 1: Introduction and books. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 32 (4), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2013.837799 Chen, Y., Li, S. X., Liu, T. X., & Shih, M. (2014). Which hat to wear? Impact of natural identities on coordination and cooperation. Games and Economic Behavior, 84, 58–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2013.12.002 Cooper, H., Hedges, L., & Valentine, J. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and metaanalysis (2nd ed.) Russell Sage Foundation. Copi, I., Cohen, C., & McMahon, K. (2014). Introduction to logic (14th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. Curtin, R. (2017). George Katona: A founder of behavioral economics. In R. Frantz, S.-H. Chen, K. Dopfer, F. Heukelom & S. Mousavi (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Behavioral Economics (pp. 18–35). Routledge. Daniel Kahneman-Facts. (n.d.). NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2022. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2002/kahneman/facts/ Davis, J., Mengersen, K., Bennett, S., & Mazerolle, L. (2014). Viewing systematic reviews and metaanalysis in social research through different lenses. SpringerPlus, 3, 511. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-511 De Donato, X. (2011). Regreso al infinito. In L. Vega & P. Olmos, Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica (pp. 520–521). Editorial Trotta. De Swart, H. (2018). Philosophical and mathematical logic. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03255-5 Dhami, S. (2016). The foundations of behavioral economic analysis. Oxford University Press. Durkheim, E. (1895–1982). The rules of sociological methods (W. D. Halls, Trans.). In S. Lukes (Ed.), The rules of sociological methods and selected texts on sociology and its method (pp. 30–163). The Macmillan Press. Finfgeld-Connet, D. (2018). A guide to qualitative metasynthesis. Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 6 (3), 347–69. Frost, D. M. (2011). Social stigma and its consequences for the socially stigmatized. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5 (11), 824–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00394.x Furuya, K. (2002). A socio-economic model of stigma and related social problems. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48 (3), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00231-1 Gilovich, T., Keltner, D., Chen, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2016). Social psychology (4th ed.) W.W. Norton & Co. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall. Gratton, C. (2010). Infinite regress arguments. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3341-3 Grimm, V., Utikal, V., & Valmasoni, L. (2017). In-group favoritism and discrimination among multiple outgroups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 143, 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.08.015 Grosskopf, B., & Pearce, G. (2017). Discrimination in a deprived neighbourhood: An artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 141, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.05.016 Güth, W., Ploner, M., & Regner, T. (2009). Determinants of in-group bias: Is group affiliation mediated by guilt-aversion? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30 (5), 814–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.07.001 Halevy, N., Weisel, O., & Bornstein, G. (2012). ‘‘ingroup love” and “outgroup hate” in repeated interaction between groups. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25 (2), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.726 Hamilton, W. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 Heinrich, T. (2013). Endogenous negative stereotypes: A similarity-based approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 92, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.016 Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109 Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., & Sterne, J. A. C. (Eds.). (2011). Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In J.P.T. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.1.0). https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_8/8_assessing_risk_of_bias_in_included_studies.htm Hughes, W., & Lavery, J. (2008). Critical thinking: An introduction to the basic skills (5th ed.) Broadview Press. Jenkins, A. C., Karashchuk, P., Zhu, L., & Hsu, M. (2018). Predicting human behavior toward members of different social groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115 (39), 9696–9701. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719452115 Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. SAGE Publications. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93 (5), 1449–1475. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392 Kassin, S., Fein, S., & Markus, H. (2014). Social psychology (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. Koschorke, M., Padmavati, R., Kumar, S., Cohen, A., Weiss, H. A., Chatterjee, S., Pereira, J., Naik, S., John, S., Dabholkar, H., Balaji, M., Chavan, A., Varghese, M., & Thara, R. (2014). Experiences of stigma and discrimination of people with schizophrenia in India. Social Sciences & Medicine, 123, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.035 Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J. Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., P. A. loannidis, J., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. [The PRISMA Group]. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaanalyses of studies that evaluate health-care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339, b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700 Link, B., & Phelan, J. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363 Loewenstein, G. F. (1999). Experimental economics from the vantage-point of behavioural economics. Economic Journal, 109 (453), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00400 Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (1998). Intergroup relations: Insights from a theoretically integrative approach. Psychological Review, 105 (3), 499–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.499 Mason, T., Carlisle, C., Watkins, C., & Whitehead, E. (Eds.). (2001). Stigma and social exclusion in health-care. Routledge – Taylor; Francis. McFadden, D. (2009). The human side of mechanism design: A tribute to Leo Hurwicz and Jean-Jacques Laffont. Review of Economic Design, 13 (1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-009-0075-x McGowan, J., Sampson, M., Salzwedel, D. M., Cogo, E., Foerster, V., & C., L. (2016). PRESS – Peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 Guideline explanation and elaboration (PRESS E&E). CADTH. https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/CP0015_PRESS_Update_Report_2016.pdf Meleady, R., & Seger, C. R. (2017). Imagined contact encourages prosocial behavior towards outgroup members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20 (4), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215612225 Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339 (b2435). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535 Moher, D., Shamseer L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. [The PRISMA-P Group]. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis protocols (PRISMA–P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 Ouazad, A., & Page, L. (2013). Students’ perceptions of teacher biases: Experimental economics in schools. Journal of Public Economics, 105, 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.05.002 Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences. Blackwell Publishing. Phelps, E. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. The American Economic Review, 62 (4), 659–661. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1806107.pdf Pondorfer, A., Barsbai, T., & Schmidt, U. (2017). Gender differences in stereotypes of risk preferences: Experimental evidence from a matrilineal and a patrilineal society. Management Science, 63 (10), 3268–3284. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2505 Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Brittens, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. Economic and Social Research Council [ESRC] Methods Programme. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.178.3100&rep=rep1&type=pdf QSR International Pty Ltda. (2018). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 12) [Computer software]. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home Qualtrics. (n.d.). Qualtrics survey software [online software]. https://www.qualtrics.com Richard H. Thaler – Facts. (n.d.). NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2022. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2017/thaler/facts/ Rodríguez, M., Andreouli, E., & Howarth, C. (2015). From ex-combatants to citizens: connecting everyday citizenship and social reintegration in Colombia. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3 (2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i2.388 Saccardo, S. (2015). Essays in Behavioral Economics and Ethics (Publication No. 3740931) [Doctoral dissertation, University of California]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I database. Saini, M., & Shlonsky, A. (2012). Systematic synthesis of qualitative research. Oxford University Press. Schwartzstein, J. (2014). Selective attention and learning. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12 (6), 1423–1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12104 Sent, E. .-M. (2017). Herbert Simon’s behavioral economics. In R. Frantz, S. -H. Chen, K. Dopfer, F. Heukelom & S. Mousavi (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Behavioral Economics (pp. 55–65). Routledge. Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart L. A. [The PRISMA-P Group]. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349, g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647 Shcherbakov, A. (2016). Stigma of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Cost of a spoiled identity (Publication No. 10297491) [Doctoral dissertation, The State University of New Jersey]. ProQuest Central; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I database. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man, social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. John Wiley; Sons. Simon, H. A. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality. In T. J. Kastelein, S. K. Kuipers, W. A. Nijenhuis, & G. R. Wagenaar (Eds.), 25 Years of Economic Theory: Retrospect and Prospect (pp. 65–86). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4367-7 Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Fogelin, R. (2015). Understanding arguments: An introduction to informal logic (9 ed.) Cengage Learning. Stanley, D. A., Sokol-Hessner, P., Banaji, M. R., & Phelps, E. A. (2011). Implicit race attitudes predict trustworthiness judgments and economic trust decisions. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108 (19), 7710–7715. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014345108 Tajfel, H. (1984). Grupos humanos y categorías sociales. Editorial Herder. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks Cole Pub. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 21–61). Nelson-Hall. Tanaka, T., & Camerer, C. F. (2016). Trait perceptions influence economic outgroup bias: lab and field evidence from Vietnam. Experimental Economics, 19 (3), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9452-1 Thaler, R. H. (2016). Behavioral economics: Past, present and future. American Economic Review, 106 (7), 1577–1600. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.106.7.1577 The Campbell Collaboration. (2019). Campbell systematic reviews: policies and guidelines, Campbell Policies and Guidelines Series No. 1. https://doi.org/10.4073/cpg.2016.1 The Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Review Group. (2014). Data collection form for intervention reviews: RCTs and non-RCTs (Version 3). The Cochrane Collaboration. https://dplp.cochrane.org/data-extraction-forms The Joanna Briggs Institute. (2014). Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual: 2014 edition. The Joanna Briggs Institute. https://nursing.lsuhsc.edu/JBI/docs/ReviewersManuals/ReviewersManual.pdf Torgerson, C. (2003). Systematic reviews. Continuum. Tsutsui, K., & Zizzo, D. J. (2014). Groupstatus, minorities, and trust. Experimental Economics, 17 (2), 215–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-013-9364-x Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185 (4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 van Ewijk, R. (2011). Same work, lower grade? Student ethnicity and teachers’ subjective assessments. Economics of Education Review, 30 (5), 1045–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.05.008 Veritas Health Innovation. (n.d.). Covidence systematic review software [online software]. www.covidence.org Vernon L. Smith – Facts. (n.d.). NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2022. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2002/smith/facts/ Wilder, D., & Simon, A. F. (2001). Affect as a cause of intergroup bias. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 153–172). Blackwell Publishers. Zeitzoff, T. (2018). Anger, legacies of violence, and group conflict: An experiment in post-riot Acre, Israel. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 35 (4), 402–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894216647901
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv	Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/5434
institution	Universidad de San Buenaventura
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/734894f6-0c73-46cd-b23d-dc410d796326/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	368f56f255e0554955dbed3e1e07bdc5
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1851053507700850688
spelling	Vecchio Camargo, Carolina MercedesRodríguez Acosta, Sandra MilenaAristizabal Diaz-Granados, Edith Teresa2022-05-24T16:24:53Z2025-08-22T16:59:00Z2022-05-24T16:24:53Z2025-08-22T16:59:00Z2022-05-24Existen grupos minoritarios y estigmatizados que enfrentan retos particulares para lograr su completa participación en sociedad. El objetivo de este estudio fue conducir una revisión sistemática para determinar los cimientos teóricos y metodológicos en economía del comportamiento que explican cómo surge la estigmatización dentro de los procesos de relacionamiento y estructuras sociales de los individuos. Los datos abarcan el período de 1940-2019 y, se obtuvieron de 12 bases de datos electrónicas relevantes tales como Scopus y Web of Science. Siguiendo la guía de PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas, 26 estudios de 2459 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. La mayoría de los estudios aplicó economía experimental y fueron publicados entre 2002 y 2018. En general, los artículos enfocan su investigación en experiencias de discriminación basadas en estereotipos y prueban sus hipótesis a través de juegos económicos. La síntesis de los datos parece revelar una débil claridad conceptual, razonamiento circular y un atisbo del problema de regresión infinita. Lo anterior, abre nuevas y emocionantes vías de investigación futura para explorar a través de una variedad de aplicaciones experimentales.There are minority and stigmatized groups who face particular challenges to their full participation in society. This study’s objective was to conduct a systematic review to determine theoretical and methodological underpinnings in behavioral economics that explain how stigmatization emerges within the relationship processes and social structures of individuals. Data from 1940 to 2019 were sourced from 12 relevant electronic databases such as Scopus and Web of Science. Following PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, 26 studies out of 3459 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies applied experimental economics and were published between 2002 and 2018. Overall, the articles focus their research on the experiences of discrimination based on stereotypes and test their hypotheses through economic games. The data synthesis seems to reveal weak conceptual clarity, circular reasoning, and a hint of the problem of infinite regress. Thus, these issues open new and exciting avenues for future research to explore via an array of experimental applications.application/pdf10.21500/20112084.54342011-79222011-2084https://hdl.handle.net/10819/28933https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5434engUniversidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/5434/4638Núm. 1 , Año 2022 : Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022)12519815International Journal of Psychological ResearchReferences marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the systematic review.Ahmed, A. M. (2007). Group identity, social distance, and intergroup bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28 (3), 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.01.007Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 715–753.Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2008). Beauty, gender and stereotypes: Evidence from laboratory experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29 (1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.07.008Armstrong, J. S., & Shapiro, A. C. (1974). Analyzing quantitative models: Help for the user of quantitative models —A simple framework for evaluating their effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 38 (2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297403800212Arrow, K. J. (1973). The theory of discrimination. In O. Aschenfelter & A. Rees (Eds.), Discrimination in Labor Markets (pp. 3–33). Princeton University Press.Becker, G. S. (1957). The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago Press.Becker, H. (1966). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. The Free Press & Collier Macmillan Limited.Ben-Ner, A., McCall, B. P., Stephane, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Identity and in-group/outgroup differentiation in work and giving behaviors: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72 (1), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.05.007Bjorvatn, K., & Tungodden, B. (2015). Disabled by stereotype? Experimental evidence from Uganda. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 118, 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.027Bohnet, I., van Geen, A., & Bazerman, M. (2016). When performance trumps gender bias: Joint vs. separate evaluation. Management Science, 62 (5), 1225–1234. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2186Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton University Press.Camerer, C. F., & G., L. (2004). Behavioral economics: Past, present and future. In C.F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 3–51). Princeton University Press.Cameron, R. (2018). Infinite regress arguments. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Center for the Study of Language and Information. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/infinite-regress/Candelo, N., Croson, R. T. A., & Li, S. X. (2017). Identity and social exclusion: An experiment with Hispanic immigrants in the US. Experimental Economics, 20 (2), 460–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-016-9492-1Carlin, R. E., & Love, G. J. (2013). The Politics of interpersonal trust and reciprocity: An experimental approach. Political Behavior, 35 (1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9181-xCartwright, E. (2018). Behavioral economics. Routledge.Chapman, K., & Pike, L. (2013). Literature of behavioral economics, part 1: Introduction and books. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 32 (4), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2013.837799Chen, Y., Li, S. X., Liu, T. X., & Shih, M. (2014). Which hat to wear? Impact of natural identities on coordination and cooperation. Games and Economic Behavior, 84, 58–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2013.12.002Cooper, H., Hedges, L., & Valentine, J. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and metaanalysis (2nd ed.) Russell Sage Foundation.Copi, I., Cohen, C., & McMahon, K. (2014). Introduction to logic (14th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. Curtin, R. (2017). George Katona: A founder of behavioral economics. In R. Frantz, S.-H. Chen, K. Dopfer, F. Heukelom & S. Mousavi (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Behavioral Economics (pp. 18–35). Routledge.Daniel Kahneman-Facts. (n.d.). NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2022. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2002/kahneman/facts/Davis, J., Mengersen, K., Bennett, S., & Mazerolle, L. (2014). Viewing systematic reviews and metaanalysis in social research through different lenses. SpringerPlus, 3, 511. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-511De Donato, X. (2011). Regreso al infinito. In L. Vega & P. Olmos, Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica (pp. 520–521). Editorial Trotta.De Swart, H. (2018). Philosophical and mathematical logic. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03255-5Dhami, S. (2016). The foundations of behavioral economic analysis. Oxford University Press. Durkheim, E. (1895–1982). The rules of sociological methods (W. D. Halls, Trans.). In S. Lukes (Ed.), The rules of sociological methods and selected texts on sociology and its method (pp. 30–163). The Macmillan Press.Finfgeld-Connet, D. (2018). A guide to qualitative metasynthesis.Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 6 (3), 347–69.Frost, D. M. (2011). Social stigma and its consequences for the socially stigmatized. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5 (11), 824–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00394.xFuruya, K. (2002). A socio-economic model of stigma and related social problems. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48 (3), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00231-1Gilovich, T., Keltner, D., Chen, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2016). Social psychology (4th ed.) W.W. Norton & Co.Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.Gratton, C. (2010). Infinite regress arguments. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3341-3Grimm, V., Utikal, V., & Valmasoni, L. (2017). In-group favoritism and discrimination among multiple outgroups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 143, 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.08.015Grosskopf, B., & Pearce, G. (2017). Discrimination in a deprived neighbourhood: An artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 141, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.05.016Güth, W., Ploner, M., & Regner, T. (2009). Determinants of in-group bias: Is group affiliation mediated by guilt-aversion? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30 (5), 814–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.07.001Halevy, N., Weisel, O., & Bornstein, G. (2012). ‘‘ingroup love” and “outgroup hate” in repeated interaction between groups. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25 (2), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.726Hamilton, W. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4Heinrich, T. (2013). Endogenous negative stereotypes: A similarity-based approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 92, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.016Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., & Sterne, J. A. C. (Eds.). (2011). Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In J.P.T. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.1.0). https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_8/8_assessing_risk_of_bias_in_included_studies.htmHughes, W., & Lavery, J. (2008). Critical thinking: An introduction to the basic skills (5th ed.) Broadview Press.Jenkins, A. C., Karashchuk, P., Zhu, L., & Hsu, M. (2018). Predicting human behavior toward members of different social groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115 (39), 9696–9701. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719452115Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. SAGE Publications.Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93 (5), 1449–1475. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392Kassin, S., Fein, S., & Markus, H. (2014). Social psychology (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.Koschorke, M., Padmavati, R., Kumar, S., Cohen, A., Weiss, H. A., Chatterjee, S., Pereira, J., Naik, S., John, S., Dabholkar, H., Balaji, M., Chavan, A., Varghese, M., & Thara, R. (2014). Experiences of stigma and discrimination of people with schizophrenia in India. Social Sciences & Medicine, 123, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.035Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J. Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., P. A. loannidis, J., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. [The PRISMA Group]. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaanalyses of studies that evaluate health-care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339, b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700Link, B., & Phelan, J. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363Loewenstein, G. F. (1999). Experimental economics from the vantage-point of behavioural economics. Economic Journal, 109 (453), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00400Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (1998). Intergroup relations: Insights from a theoretically integrative approach. Psychological Review, 105 (3), 499–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.499Mason, T., Carlisle, C., Watkins, C., & Whitehead, E. (Eds.). (2001). Stigma and social exclusion in health-care. Routledge – Taylor; Francis.McFadden, D. (2009). The human side of mechanism design: A tribute to Leo Hurwicz and Jean-Jacques Laffont. Review of Economic Design, 13 (1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-009-0075-xMcGowan, J., Sampson, M., Salzwedel, D. M., Cogo, E., Foerster, V., & C., L. (2016). PRESS – Peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 Guideline explanation and elaboration (PRESS E&E). CADTH. https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/CP0015_PRESS_Update_Report_2016.pdfMeleady, R., & Seger, C. R. (2017). Imagined contact encourages prosocial behavior towards outgroup members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20 (4), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215612225Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339 (b2435). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535Moher, D., Shamseer L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. [The PRISMA-P Group]. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis protocols (PRISMA–P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1Ouazad, A., & Page, L. (2013). Students’ perceptions of teacher biases: Experimental economics in schools. Journal of Public Economics, 105, 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.05.002Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences. Blackwell Publishing.Phelps, E. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. The American Economic Review, 62 (4), 659–661. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1806107.pdfPondorfer, A., Barsbai, T., & Schmidt, U. (2017). Gender differences in stereotypes of risk preferences: Experimental evidence from a matrilineal and a patrilineal society. Management Science, 63 (10), 3268–3284. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2505Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Brittens, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. Economic and Social Research Council [ESRC] Methods Programme. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.178.3100&rep=rep1&type=pdfQSR International Pty Ltda. (2018). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 12) [Computer software]. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/homeQualtrics. (n.d.). Qualtrics survey software [online software]. https://www.qualtrics.comRichard H. Thaler – Facts. (n.d.). NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2022. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2017/thaler/facts/Rodríguez, M., Andreouli, E., & Howarth, C. (2015). From ex-combatants to citizens: connecting everyday citizenship and social reintegration in Colombia. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3 (2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i2.388Saccardo, S. (2015). Essays in Behavioral Economics and Ethics (Publication No. 3740931) [Doctoral dissertation, University of California]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I database.Saini, M., & Shlonsky, A. (2012). Systematic synthesis of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.Schwartzstein, J. (2014). Selective attention and learning. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12 (6), 1423–1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12104Sent, E. .-M. (2017). Herbert Simon’s behavioral economics. In R. Frantz, S. -H. Chen, K. Dopfer, F. Heukelom & S. Mousavi (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Behavioral Economics (pp. 55–65). Routledge.Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart L. A. [The PRISMA-P Group]. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349, g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647Shcherbakov, A. (2016). Stigma of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Cost of a spoiled identity (Publication No. 10297491) [Doctoral dissertation, The State University of New Jersey]. ProQuest Central; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I database.Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man, social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. John Wiley; Sons.Simon, H. A. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality. In T. J. Kastelein, S. K. Kuipers, W. A. Nijenhuis, & G. R. Wagenaar (Eds.), 25 Years of Economic Theory: Retrospect and Prospect (pp. 65–86). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4367-7Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Fogelin, R. (2015). Understanding arguments: An introduction to informal logic (9 ed.) Cengage Learning.Stanley, D. A., Sokol-Hessner, P., Banaji, M. R., & Phelps, E. A. (2011). Implicit race attitudes predict trustworthiness judgments and economic trust decisions. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108 (19), 7710–7715. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014345108Tajfel, H. (1984). Grupos humanos y categorías sociales. Editorial Herder.Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W.G.Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks Cole Pub.Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 21–61). Nelson-Hall.Tanaka, T., & Camerer, C. F. (2016). Trait perceptions influence economic outgroup bias: lab and field evidence from Vietnam. Experimental Economics, 19 (3), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9452-1Thaler, R. H. (2016). Behavioral economics: Past, present and future. American Economic Review, 106 (7), 1577–1600. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.106.7.1577The Campbell Collaboration. (2019). Campbell systematic reviews: policies and guidelines, Campbell Policies and Guidelines Series No. 1. https://doi.org/10.4073/cpg.2016.1The Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Review Group. (2014). Data collection form for intervention reviews: RCTs and non-RCTs (Version 3). The Cochrane Collaboration. https://dplp.cochrane.org/data-extraction-formsThe Joanna Briggs Institute. (2014). Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual: 2014 edition. The Joanna Briggs Institute. https://nursing.lsuhsc.edu/JBI/docs/ReviewersManuals/ReviewersManual.pdfTorgerson, C. (2003). Systematic reviews. Continuum.Tsutsui, K., & Zizzo, D. J. (2014). Groupstatus, minorities, and trust. Experimental Economics, 17 (2), 215–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-013-9364-xTversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185 (4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124van Ewijk, R. (2011). Same work, lower grade? Student ethnicity and teachers’ subjective assessments. Economics of Education Review, 30 (5), 1045–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.05.008Veritas Health Innovation. (n.d.). Covidence systematic review software [online software]. www.covidence.orgVernon L. Smith – Facts. (n.d.). NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2022. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2002/smith/facts/Wilder, D., & Simon, A. F. (2001). Affect as a cause of intergroup bias. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 153–172). Blackwell Publishers.Zeitzoff, T. (2018). Anger, legacies of violence, and group conflict: An experiment in post-riot Acre, Israel. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 35 (4), 402–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894216647901info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/5434StigmaStereotypesDiscriminationPrejudicesSystematic ReviewBehavioral EconomicsEstigmaEstereotiposDiscriminaciónPrejuiciosRevisión SistemáticaEconomía del ComportamientoSocial Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019)Social Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019)Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2716https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/734894f6-0c73-46cd-b23d-dc410d796326/download368f56f255e0554955dbed3e1e07bdc5MD5110819/28933oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/289332025-08-22 11:59:00.634http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Social Stigma: A Systematic Review of Cognitive Insights from Behavioral Economics (1940–2019)

Publicaciones similares