Retórica en el pensamiento biológico moderno: un estudio de caso de la genética clásica

Este artículo se centra en el libro The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity (1915) de T. H. Morgan (1866-1945), Alfred H. Sturtevant (1891-1970), Herman J. Muller (1890-1967) y Calvin B. Bridges (1889-1938). Considerado por algunos como un hito en genética, convenció a personas especializadas y no espec...

Full description

Autores:: Pereira Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2025

Institución:: Universidad de San Buenaventura

Repositorio:: Repositorio USB

Idioma:: eng

id	SANBUENAV2_c19156eee87f9c0639a21a490563b3ed
oai_identifier_str	oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/26444
network_acronym_str	SANBUENAV2
network_name_str	Repositorio USB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Retórica en el pensamiento biológico moderno: un estudio de caso de la genética clásica
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv	Retórica en el pensamiento biológico moderno: un estudio de caso de la genética clásica
title	Retórica en el pensamiento biológico moderno: un estudio de caso de la genética clásica
spellingShingle	Retórica en el pensamiento biológico moderno: un estudio de caso de la genética clásica historia de la genética retórica teoría mendeliana-cromosómica The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity history of genetics rhetoric mendelian chromosome theory The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity
title_short	Retórica en el pensamiento biológico moderno: un estudio de caso de la genética clásica
title_full	Retórica en el pensamiento biológico moderno: un estudio de caso de la genética clásica
title_fullStr	Retórica en el pensamiento biológico moderno: un estudio de caso de la genética clásica
title_full_unstemmed	Retórica en el pensamiento biológico moderno: un estudio de caso de la genética clásica
title_sort	Retórica en el pensamiento biológico moderno: un estudio de caso de la genética clásica
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Pereira Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr
dc.contributor.author.eng.fl_str_mv	Pereira Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	historia de la genética retórica teoría mendeliana-cromosómica The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity
topic	historia de la genética retórica teoría mendeliana-cromosómica The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity history of genetics rhetoric mendelian chromosome theory The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	history of genetics rhetoric mendelian chromosome theory The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity
description	Este artículo se centra en el libro The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity (1915) de T. H. Morgan (1866-1945), Alfred H. Sturtevant (1891-1970), Herman J. Muller (1890-1967) y Calvin B. Bridges (1889-1938). Considerado por algunos como un hito en genética, convenció a personas especializadas y no especializadas, en su momento, de que la teoría estaba establecida a pesar de sus problemas cruciales. Su objetivo es discutir los recursos retóricos que los autores utilizaron para persuadir a esas personas. La metodología comprende el análisis de fuentes primarias, además del texto de Morgan et al. (1915), y fuentes secundarias que tratan el tema, incluyendo algunos trabajos de la autora de este artículo relacionados con la temática y su representación en la ciencia. El estudio concluyó que Morgan et al. (1915) utilizaron su discurso, dibujos y diagramas, sin acompañarlos de fotografías, principalmente en aspectos de la teoría donde la evidencia era escasa, dando una falsa impresión de que todo estaba claro. Es posible encontrar una simplificación histórica de los hechos para reforzar los argumentos de los autores, falta de discusión de explicaciones alternativas, diagramas que representan objetos ideales que no observaron y ejemplos teóricos que entran en conflicto con los datos numéricos de sus artículos anteriores. Además, no presentaron problemas o dificultades en relación con su teoría. Todo esto contribuyó para que algunas características problemáticas de la teoría no se evidenciaran y se aceptaran.
publishDate	2025
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2025-01-20T00:00:00Z 2025-07-31T17:14:32Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2025-01-20T00:00:00Z 2025-07-31T17:14:32Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2025-01-20
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.21500/22563202.7128
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2256-3202
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/10819/26444
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.7128
identifier_str_mv	10.21500/22563202.7128 2256-3202
url	https://hdl.handle.net/10819/26444 https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.7128
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/download/7128/5532
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	187
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv	1
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	175
dc.relation.citationvolume.eng.fl_str_mv	23
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.eng.fl_str_mv	Revista Guillermo de Ockham
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv	Aczél, P. (2016). Rediscovering the visual in rhetorical tradition: Persuasion as visionary in suasory discourse. In A. Benedek and A. Veszelszki (Eds.), In the beginning was the image. The omnipresence of pictures: Time, truth, tradition (pp. 69–82). Peter Lang AG. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv2t4cns.9 Allen, G. E. (1972). Introduction. In T. H. Morgan, A. H. Sturtevant, H. J. Muller and C. B. Bridges, The mechanism of Mendelian heredity (pp. v–xxv). Johnson Reprint. (Original work published 1915) Allen, G. E. (1978). Thomas Hunt Morgan: The man and his science. Princeton University Press. Bateson, W. (1916). The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity. By T. H. Morgan, A. H. Sturtevant, H. J. Muller, and C. B. Bridges. Henry Holt and Company, New York. 1915. Science, 44(1137), 536–543. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.44.1137.536 Bateson, W., & Punnett, R. C. (1905). A suggestion as to the nature of the “walnut” comb in fowls. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 13, 165–168. Bateson, W., & Punnett, R. C. (1911). On gametic series involving reduplication of certain terms. Journal of Genetics, 1, 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981554 Baxter, A. L., & Farley, J. (1979). Mendel and meiosis. Journal of the History of Biology, 12(1), 137–171. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4330729 Bonnevie, K. (1907). “Heterotypical” mitosis in Nereis limbata (Ehlers). Biological Bulletin, 13, 57–83. Brunelli, A. (2017). O desenvolvimento do conceito de linkage (1902-1915): uma contribuição histórica para o Ensino de genética [Master’s thesis, Universidade de São Paulo]. Biblioteca Digital USP. https://doi.org/10.11606/D.81.2015.tde-20072015-102850 Brush, S. G. (2002). How theories became knowledge: Morgan’s chromosome theory of heredity in America and Britain. Journal of the History of Biology, 35(3), 471–535. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021175231599 Cannon, W. A. (1902). A cytological basis for Mendelian laws. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 29(12), 657–661. Coleman, W. (1963). Cell, nucleus, and inheritance: An historical study. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 109, 124–158. Correns, C. (1902). Über den Modus und den Zeitpunket der Spaltung der Anlagen bei Bastarden der Erbsen-Typus. Bot. Zeit., 60(2), 65–68. Creighton, H. B., & McClintock, B. (1931). A correlation of cytological and genetical crossingover in Zea mays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 17(8), 492–497. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.17.8.49 Doncaster, L. (1915). Chromosomes, heredity, and sex, a review of the present state of the evidence with regard to the material basis of hereditary transmission and sex determination. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 59, 487–521. Durbano, J. P. D. M. (2015) As pesquisas de Barbara McClintock sobre o crossing-over em Zea mays: 1925-1932. Filosofia e História da Biologia, 10(1), 49–65. https://www.abfhib.org/FHB/FHB-10-1/FHB-10-1-04-Joao-Durbano.pdf Durbano, J. P. D. M. (2017). O desenvolvimento do conceito de crossing-over 1915-1935: uma introdução histórica para o ensino de genética [Doctoral thesis, Universidade de São Paulo]. Biblioteca Digital USP. https://doi.org/10.11606/T.59.2017.tde-09112020-101836 Gilbert, S. F. (1991). Epigenetic landscaping: Waddington’s use of cell fate bifurcation diagrams. Biology and Philosophy, 6(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426835 Ibarra, A., & Mormann, T. (2005). Interactive representations. Revista de Estudios sobre Representaciones en Arte, Ciencia y Filosofía, 1(1), 1–20. Janssens, F. A. (1909). Spermatogénèse dans les batraciens, V. La théorie de la chiasmatypie, nouvelle interprétation des cinèses de maturation. La Cellule, 25, 389–406. Lynch, M. (1991). Science in the age of mechanical reproduction: Moral and epistemic relations between diagrams and photographs. Biology and Philosophy, 6, 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426838 Maienschein, J. (1991). From presentation to representation in E. B. Wilson’s The Cell. Biology and Philosophy, 6, 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426839 Martins, L. A-C. P. (1997). A teoria cromossômica da herança, proposta, fundamentação, crítica e aceitação [Doctoral thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas]. Sophia. https://doi.org/10.47749/T/UNICAMP.1997.781732 Martins, L. A-C. P. (1998). Thomas Hunt Morgan e a teoria cromossômica: de crítico a defensor. Episteme: Filosofia e História das Ciências em Revista, 3(6), 100–126. Martins, L. A-C. P. (1999). Did Sutton and Boveri propose the so-called Sutton-Boveri chromosome hypothesis? Genetics and Molecular Biology, 22(2), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47571999000200022 Martins, L. A-C. P. (2002). Bateson e o programa de pesquisa mendeliano. Episteme: Filosofia e História da Ciência em Revista, (14), 27–55. Martins, L. A-C. P. (2005). História da ciência, objetos, métodos e problemas. Ciência & Educação, 11(2), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-73132005000200011 Martins, L. A-C. P. (2007). El papel de las representaciones pictóricas en la ciencia: Wilson, Morgan y la teoría cromosómica. Representaciones: Revista de Estudios sobre Representaciones en Arte, Ciencia y Filosofía, 3(2), 77–96. Martins, L. A-C. P. (2010). The dissemination of the chromosome theory of Mendelian heredity by Morgan and his collaborators around 1916: A case study on the distortion of science by scientists. Filosofia e História da Biologia, 5(2), 327–367. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Harvard University Press. Mendel, G. (1966). Experiments in plant hybridization. In C. Stern and E. Sherwood (Eds.), The origins of genetics: A Mendel source book (pp. 1–48). W. Frieman and Company. (Original work published 1866) Moore, J. A. (1986). Science as a way of knowing-genetics. American Zoologist, 26(3), 583–747. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/26.3.583 Morgan, T. H. (1909). What are “factors” in Mendelian explanations? American Breeders Association Report, 5, 365–368. Morgan, T. H. (1910). Chromosomes and heredity. The American Naturalist, 44(524), 449–496. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2455783 Morgan, T. H. (1914). No crossing over in the male of Drosophila of genes in the second and third pairs of chromosomes. Biological Bulletin, 26(4), 195–204. Morgan, T. H., Sturtevant, A. H., Muller, H. J., & Bridges, C. B. (1915). The mechanism of Mendelian heredity. H. Holt and Company. Portugal, F. H., & Cohen, J. S. (1977). A century of DNA: A history of the discovery of the structure and function of genetic substance. The MIT Press. Stern, C. J. (1931). Zytologisch-genetische Untersuchungenals Beweise fur die Morganschetheorie des Faktorenaustausches. Biologisches Zentralblatt, 51, 547–587. Sturtevant, A. H. (2011). A history of genetics. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press. (Original work published 1965) Sutton, W. S. (1902). On the morphology of the chromosome group in Brachystola magna. Biological Bulletin, 4, 24–39. Sutton, W. S. (1903). The chromosomes in heredity. Biological Bulletin, 4, 231–251. Swinburne, R. G. (1962). The presence-and-absence theory. Annals of Science, 18(3), 131–145. http://doi.org/10.1080/00033796200202762 Taylor, P. J., & Blum, A. S. (1991). Pictorial representation in biology. Biology and Philosophy, 6, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426834 The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity. (1916). Nature, 97(2423), 117–118. https://doi.org/10.1038/097117a0 Trow, A. H. (1916). A criticism of the hypothesis of linkage and crossing-over. Journal of Genetics, 5(4), 281–297. Wilson, E. B. (1909). Studies on chromosomes V. The “accessory” chromosome of Metapodius. A contribution to the hypothesis of the genetic continuity of chromosomes. The Journal of Experimental Zoology, 6(2), 147–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1400060202 Wilson, E. B. (1912). Studies on chromosomes VIII. Observations on the maturation phenomena in certain hemipter and other forms, with considerations on synapsis and reduction. The Journal of Experimental Zoology, 13(3), 345–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1400130302
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv	Lilian Al-Chueyr Pereira Martins - 2024
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv	Lilian Al-Chueyr Pereira Martins - 2024 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv	Universidad de San Buenaventura Cali
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/view/7128
institution	Universidad de San Buenaventura
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/0bd50ccb-4c65-4ffa-af70-8e5eaf2a20e6/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	0ebfdb1dcd20a283a5726f57503c223a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1851053494082994176
spelling	Pereira Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr2025-01-20T00:00:00Z2025-07-31T17:14:32Z2025-01-20T00:00:00Z2025-07-31T17:14:32Z2025-01-20Este artículo se centra en el libro The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity (1915) de T. H. Morgan (1866-1945), Alfred H. Sturtevant (1891-1970), Herman J. Muller (1890-1967) y Calvin B. Bridges (1889-1938). Considerado por algunos como un hito en genética, convenció a personas especializadas y no especializadas, en su momento, de que la teoría estaba establecida a pesar de sus problemas cruciales. Su objetivo es discutir los recursos retóricos que los autores utilizaron para persuadir a esas personas. La metodología comprende el análisis de fuentes primarias, además del texto de Morgan et al. (1915), y fuentes secundarias que tratan el tema, incluyendo algunos trabajos de la autora de este artículo relacionados con la temática y su representación en la ciencia. El estudio concluyó que Morgan et al. (1915) utilizaron su discurso, dibujos y diagramas, sin acompañarlos de fotografías, principalmente en aspectos de la teoría donde la evidencia era escasa, dando una falsa impresión de que todo estaba claro. Es posible encontrar una simplificación histórica de los hechos para reforzar los argumentos de los autores, falta de discusión de explicaciones alternativas, diagramas que representan objetos ideales que no observaron y ejemplos teóricos que entran en conflicto con los datos numéricos de sus artículos anteriores. Además, no presentaron problemas o dificultades en relación con su teoría. Todo esto contribuyó para que algunas características problemáticas de la teoría no se evidenciaran y se aceptaran.This paper mainly focuses on the book The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity (1915) by T. H. Morgan (1866-1945), Alfred H. Sturtevant (1891-1970), Herman J. Muller (1890-1967), and Calvin B. Bridges (1889-1938). Considered by some as a landmark in genetics, it convinced specialized and not specialized at the time that the theory was established despite its crucial problems. It aims to discuss the rhetorical devices the authors used to persuade these people. The methodology comprises the analysis of primary sources, in addition to the text by Morgan et al. (1915), and secondary sources dealing with the topic, including some works by the author of this article related to the subject and its representation in science. The study concluded that Morgan et al. (1915) used their discourse, some drawings, and diagrams, unaccompanied by photographs, mainly in aspects of the theory where evidence was scarce, giving a false impression that all was clear. It is possible to find historical simplification of the facts to reinforce the authors’ arguments, lack of discussion of alternative explanations, diagrams representing ideal objects they did not observe, and theoretical examples that conflicted with the numerical data in their previous papers. In addition, they did not present problems or difficulties related to their theory. All this contributed to some problematic features of the theory not being evident and being accepted.application/pdf10.21500/22563202.71282256-3202https://hdl.handle.net/10819/26444https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.7128engUniversidad de San Buenaventura Calihttps://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/download/7128/5532187117523Revista Guillermo de OckhamAczél, P. (2016). Rediscovering the visual in rhetorical tradition: Persuasion as visionary in suasory discourse. In A. Benedek and A. Veszelszki (Eds.), In the beginning was the image. The omnipresence of pictures: Time, truth, tradition (pp. 69–82). Peter Lang AG. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv2t4cns.9 Allen, G. E. (1972). Introduction. In T. H. Morgan, A. H. Sturtevant, H. J. Muller and C. B. Bridges, The mechanism of Mendelian heredity (pp. v–xxv). Johnson Reprint. (Original work published 1915) Allen, G. E. (1978). Thomas Hunt Morgan: The man and his science. Princeton University Press. Bateson, W. (1916). The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity. By T. H. Morgan, A. H. Sturtevant, H. J. Muller, and C. B. Bridges. Henry Holt and Company, New York. 1915. Science, 44(1137), 536–543. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.44.1137.536 Bateson, W., & Punnett, R. C. (1905). A suggestion as to the nature of the “walnut” comb in fowls. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 13, 165–168. Bateson, W., & Punnett, R. C. (1911). On gametic series involving reduplication of certain terms. Journal of Genetics, 1, 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981554 Baxter, A. L., & Farley, J. (1979). Mendel and meiosis. Journal of the History of Biology, 12(1), 137–171. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4330729 Bonnevie, K. (1907). “Heterotypical” mitosis in Nereis limbata (Ehlers). Biological Bulletin, 13, 57–83. Brunelli, A. (2017). O desenvolvimento do conceito de linkage (1902-1915): uma contribuição histórica para o Ensino de genética [Master’s thesis, Universidade de São Paulo]. Biblioteca Digital USP. https://doi.org/10.11606/D.81.2015.tde-20072015-102850 Brush, S. G. (2002). How theories became knowledge: Morgan’s chromosome theory of heredity in America and Britain. Journal of the History of Biology, 35(3), 471–535. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021175231599 Cannon, W. A. (1902). A cytological basis for Mendelian laws. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 29(12), 657–661. Coleman, W. (1963). Cell, nucleus, and inheritance: An historical study. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 109, 124–158. Correns, C. (1902). Über den Modus und den Zeitpunket der Spaltung der Anlagen bei Bastarden der Erbsen-Typus. Bot. Zeit., 60(2), 65–68. Creighton, H. B., & McClintock, B. (1931). A correlation of cytological and genetical crossingover in Zea mays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 17(8), 492–497. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.17.8.49 Doncaster, L. (1915). Chromosomes, heredity, and sex, a review of the present state of the evidence with regard to the material basis of hereditary transmission and sex determination. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 59, 487–521. Durbano, J. P. D. M. (2015) As pesquisas de Barbara McClintock sobre o crossing-over em Zea mays: 1925-1932. Filosofia e História da Biologia, 10(1), 49–65. https://www.abfhib.org/FHB/FHB-10-1/FHB-10-1-04-Joao-Durbano.pdf Durbano, J. P. D. M. (2017). O desenvolvimento do conceito de crossing-over 1915-1935: uma introdução histórica para o ensino de genética [Doctoral thesis, Universidade de São Paulo]. Biblioteca Digital USP. https://doi.org/10.11606/T.59.2017.tde-09112020-101836 Gilbert, S. F. (1991). Epigenetic landscaping: Waddington’s use of cell fate bifurcation diagrams. Biology and Philosophy, 6(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426835 Ibarra, A., & Mormann, T. (2005). Interactive representations. Revista de Estudios sobre Representaciones en Arte, Ciencia y Filosofía, 1(1), 1–20. Janssens, F. A. (1909). Spermatogénèse dans les batraciens, V. La théorie de la chiasmatypie, nouvelle interprétation des cinèses de maturation. La Cellule, 25, 389–406. Lynch, M. (1991). Science in the age of mechanical reproduction: Moral and epistemic relations between diagrams and photographs. Biology and Philosophy, 6, 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426838 Maienschein, J. (1991). From presentation to representation in E. B. Wilson’s The Cell. Biology and Philosophy, 6, 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426839 Martins, L. A-C. P. (1997). A teoria cromossômica da herança, proposta, fundamentação, crítica e aceitação [Doctoral thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas]. Sophia. https://doi.org/10.47749/T/UNICAMP.1997.781732 Martins, L. A-C. P. (1998). Thomas Hunt Morgan e a teoria cromossômica: de crítico a defensor. Episteme: Filosofia e História das Ciências em Revista, 3(6), 100–126. Martins, L. A-C. P. (1999). Did Sutton and Boveri propose the so-called Sutton-Boveri chromosome hypothesis? Genetics and Molecular Biology, 22(2), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47571999000200022 Martins, L. A-C. P. (2002). Bateson e o programa de pesquisa mendeliano. Episteme: Filosofia e História da Ciência em Revista, (14), 27–55. Martins, L. A-C. P. (2005). História da ciência, objetos, métodos e problemas. Ciência & Educação, 11(2), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-73132005000200011 Martins, L. A-C. P. (2007). El papel de las representaciones pictóricas en la ciencia: Wilson, Morgan y la teoría cromosómica. Representaciones: Revista de Estudios sobre Representaciones en Arte, Ciencia y Filosofía, 3(2), 77–96. Martins, L. A-C. P. (2010). The dissemination of the chromosome theory of Mendelian heredity by Morgan and his collaborators around 1916: A case study on the distortion of science by scientists. Filosofia e História da Biologia, 5(2), 327–367. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Harvard University Press. Mendel, G. (1966). Experiments in plant hybridization. In C. Stern and E. Sherwood (Eds.), The origins of genetics: A Mendel source book (pp. 1–48). W. Frieman and Company. (Original work published 1866) Moore, J. A. (1986). Science as a way of knowing-genetics. American Zoologist, 26(3), 583–747. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/26.3.583 Morgan, T. H. (1909). What are “factors” in Mendelian explanations? American Breeders Association Report, 5, 365–368. Morgan, T. H. (1910). Chromosomes and heredity. The American Naturalist, 44(524), 449–496. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2455783 Morgan, T. H. (1914). No crossing over in the male of Drosophila of genes in the second and third pairs of chromosomes. Biological Bulletin, 26(4), 195–204. Morgan, T. H., Sturtevant, A. H., Muller, H. J., & Bridges, C. B. (1915). The mechanism of Mendelian heredity. H. Holt and Company. Portugal, F. H., & Cohen, J. S. (1977). A century of DNA: A history of the discovery of the structure and function of genetic substance. The MIT Press. Stern, C. J. (1931). Zytologisch-genetische Untersuchungenals Beweise fur die Morganschetheorie des Faktorenaustausches. Biologisches Zentralblatt, 51, 547–587. Sturtevant, A. H. (2011). A history of genetics. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press. (Original work published 1965) Sutton, W. S. (1902). On the morphology of the chromosome group in Brachystola magna. Biological Bulletin, 4, 24–39. Sutton, W. S. (1903). The chromosomes in heredity. Biological Bulletin, 4, 231–251. Swinburne, R. G. (1962). The presence-and-absence theory. Annals of Science, 18(3), 131–145. http://doi.org/10.1080/00033796200202762 Taylor, P. J., & Blum, A. S. (1991). Pictorial representation in biology. Biology and Philosophy, 6, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426834 The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity. (1916). Nature, 97(2423), 117–118. https://doi.org/10.1038/097117a0 Trow, A. H. (1916). A criticism of the hypothesis of linkage and crossing-over. Journal of Genetics, 5(4), 281–297. Wilson, E. B. (1909). Studies on chromosomes V. The “accessory” chromosome of Metapodius. A contribution to the hypothesis of the genetic continuity of chromosomes. The Journal of Experimental Zoology, 6(2), 147–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1400060202 Wilson, E. B. (1912). Studies on chromosomes VIII. Observations on the maturation phenomena in certain hemipter and other forms, with considerations on synapsis and reduction. The Journal of Experimental Zoology, 13(3), 345–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1400130302Lilian Al-Chueyr Pereira Martins - 2024info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/view/7128historia de la genéticaretóricateoría mendeliana-cromosómicaThe Mechanism of Mendelian Heredityhistory of geneticsrhetoricmendelian chromosome theoryThe Mechanism of Mendelian HeredityRetórica en el pensamiento biológico moderno: un estudio de caso de la genética clásicaRetórica en el pensamiento biológico moderno: un estudio de caso de la genética clásicaArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2546https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/0bd50ccb-4c65-4ffa-af70-8e5eaf2a20e6/download0ebfdb1dcd20a283a5726f57503c223aMD5110819/26444oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/264442025-07-31 12:14:32.735https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Retórica en el pensamiento biológico moderno: un estudio de caso de la genética clásica

Publicaciones similares