Acomodación fonética durante las interacciones conversacionales: una visión general

Durante las interacciones conversacionales como dar una tutoría, dar instrucciones, las negociaciones verbales, o simplemente hablar con amigos, los comportamientos de las personas experimentan una serie de cambios debido a las características de su interlocutor y a la interacción en sí. Estos cambi...

Full description

Autores:
Barón-Birchenall, Leonardo
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Universidad de San Buenaventura
Repositorio:
Repositorio USB
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/26391
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/10819/26391
https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.6150
Palabra clave:
speech
conversation
convergence
similarity
entrainment
synchronization
phonetics
social interaction
phonetic accommodation
language
conversation
psychology
Acomodación fonética
habla
conversación
convergencia
similitud
arrastre
sincronización
fonética
interacción social
Lenguaje
Conversación
Psicología
Rights
openAccess
License
Leonardo Barón-Birchenall - 2023
id SANBUENAV2_b603d168a01b997a66956ff7a2d85ba9
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/26391
network_acronym_str SANBUENAV2
network_name_str Repositorio USB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Acomodación fonética durante las interacciones conversacionales: una visión general
dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv Acomodación fonética durante las interacciones conversacionales: una visión general
title Acomodación fonética durante las interacciones conversacionales: una visión general
spellingShingle Acomodación fonética durante las interacciones conversacionales: una visión general
speech
conversation
convergence
similarity
entrainment
synchronization
phonetics
social interaction
phonetic accommodation
language
conversation
psychology
Acomodación fonética
habla
conversación
convergencia
similitud
arrastre
sincronización
fonética
interacción social
Lenguaje
Conversación
Psicología
title_short Acomodación fonética durante las interacciones conversacionales: una visión general
title_full Acomodación fonética durante las interacciones conversacionales: una visión general
title_fullStr Acomodación fonética durante las interacciones conversacionales: una visión general
title_full_unstemmed Acomodación fonética durante las interacciones conversacionales: una visión general
title_sort Acomodación fonética durante las interacciones conversacionales: una visión general
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Barón-Birchenall, Leonardo
dc.contributor.author.eng.fl_str_mv Barón-Birchenall, Leonardo
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv speech
conversation
convergence
similarity
entrainment
synchronization
phonetics
social interaction
phonetic accommodation
language
conversation
psychology
topic speech
conversation
convergence
similarity
entrainment
synchronization
phonetics
social interaction
phonetic accommodation
language
conversation
psychology
Acomodación fonética
habla
conversación
convergencia
similitud
arrastre
sincronización
fonética
interacción social
Lenguaje
Conversación
Psicología
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Acomodación fonética
habla
conversación
convergencia
similitud
arrastre
sincronización
fonética
interacción social
Lenguaje
Conversación
Psicología
description Durante las interacciones conversacionales como dar una tutoría, dar instrucciones, las negociaciones verbales, o simplemente hablar con amigos, los comportamientos de las personas experimentan una serie de cambios debido a las características de su interlocutor y a la interacción en sí. Estos cambios están presentes en cada interacción social, y la mayoría de ellos ocurre en los sonidos y ritmos del habla, lo cual se conoce como acomodación acústico-prosódica, o simplemente acomodación fonética. Las consecuencias, las limitaciones lingüísticas y sociales, y los mecanismos cognitivos subyacentes a la acomodación fonética se han estudiado durante al menos 50 años, debido a la importancia del fenómeno para varias disciplinas como la lingüística, la psicología, y la sociología. A partir del análisis y síntesis de la literatura de investigación empírica existente, en este artículo presentamos una revisión estructurada y exhaustiva de las cualidades, funciones, desarrollo onto- y filogenético, y modalidades de la acomodación fonética.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-22T00:00:00Z
2025-07-31T17:14:11Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-22T00:00:00Z
2025-07-31T17:14:11Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-22
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREV
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.21500/22563202.6150
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2256-3202
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10819/26391
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.6150
identifier_str_mv 10.21500/22563202.6150
2256-3202
url https://hdl.handle.net/10819/26391
https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.6150
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/download/6150/5166
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/download/6150/5167
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 517
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv 2
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 493
dc.relation.citationvolume.eng.fl_str_mv 21
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.eng.fl_str_mv Revista Guillermo de Ockham
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv Adank, P., Hagoort, P., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Imitation improves language comprehension. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1903-1909. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610389192 Arriaga, G., Zhou, E. P., & Jarvis, E. D. (2012). Of mice, birds, and men: The mouse ultrasonic song system has some features similar to humans and song-learning birds. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e46610. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046610 Aubanel, V., & Nguyen, N. (2010). Automatic recognition of regional phonological variation in conversational interaction. Speech Communication, 52(6), 577-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.02.008 Babel, M. (2010). Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society, 39(4), 437-456. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404510000400 Babel, M. (2011). Imitation in speech. Acoustics Today, 7(4), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3684224 Babel, M. (2012). Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001 Babel, M., & Bulatov, D. (2011). The role of fundamental frequency in phonetic accommodation. Language and Speech, 55(2), 231-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830911417695 Barón-Birchenall, L. (2016). Animal communication and human language: An overview. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 29, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.46867/ijcp.2016.29.00.07 Barón-Birchenall, L. (2018). Influence of sentence-level rhythmic regularity and phonological phrasing on linguistic accommodation during conversational interactions: The case of Spanish-speaking dyads [Doctoral dissertation, Aix Marseille Université]. HAL. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01993542 Barón-Birchenall, L. (2022). Sentence-level rhythmic regularity and accentual-group phrasing increase linguistic resemblance between Spanish-speaking interlocutors. Manuscript submitted for publication. Beebe, B., Sorter, D., Rustin, J., & Knoblauch, S. (2003). A comparison of Meltzoff, Trevarthen, and Stern. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13(6), 777-804. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481881309348768 Bell, L., Gustafson, J., & Heldner, M. (2003). Prosodic adaptation in human-computer interaction [Conference presentation]. 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain. http://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2003/papers/p15_2453.pdf Bloom, K. (1998). The missing link’s missing link: Syllabic vocalizations at 3 months of age. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(4), 514-515. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x98251260 Bonin, F., De Looze, C., Ghosh, S., Gilmartin, E., Vogel, C., Polychroniou, A., Salamin, H., Vinciarelli, A., & Campbell, N. (2013). Investigating fine temporal dynamics of prosodic and lexical accommodation. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2013 (pp. 539-543). ISCA. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/93668/1/93668.pdf Borrie, S. A., & Liss, J. M. (2014). Rhythm as a coordinating device: Entrainment with disordered speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(3), 815-824. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_jslhr-s-13-0149 Borrie, S. A., Lubold, N., & Pon-Barry, H. (2015). Disordered speech disrupts conversational entrainment: A study of acoustic-prosodic entrainment and communicative success in populations with communication challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01187 Casasanto, L. S., Jasmin, K., & Casasanto, D. (2010). Virtually accommodating: Speech rate accommodation to a virtual interlocutor [Conference presentation]. 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, United States. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_458220/component/file_529234/content Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893-910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 Clopper, C. G., & Dossey, E. (2020). Phonetic convergence to Southern American English: Acoustics and perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(1), 671-683. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000555 Cohen, U., Edelist, L., & Gleason, E. (2017). Converging to the baseline: Corpus evidence for convergence in speech rate to interlocutor’s baseline. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(5), 2989-2996. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4982199 Collins, B. (1998). Convergence of fundamental frequencies in conversation: If it happens, does it matter? [Conference presentation]. 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Sydney, Australia. https://doi.org/10.21437/icslp.1998-111 Condon, W. S., & Sander, L. W. (1974). Synchrony demonstrated between movements of the neonate and adult speech. Child Development, 45(2), 456-462. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127968 Coulston, R., Oviatt, S., & Darves, C. (2002). Amplitude convergence in children’s conversational speech with animated personas [Conference presentation]. 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Denver, United States. https://doi.org/10.21437/icslp.2002-671 De Looze, C., & Rauzy, S. (2011). Measuring speakers’ similarity in speech by means of prosodic cues: Methods and potential. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2011 (pp. 1393-1396). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2011-457 De Looze, C., Oertel, C., Rauzy, S., & Campbell, N. (2011). Measuring dynamics of mimicry by means of prosodic cues in conversational speech [Conference presentation]. 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01705525/document De Looze, C., Scherer, S., Vaughan, B., & Campbell, N. (2014). Investigating automatic measurements of prosodic accommodation and its dynamics in social interaction. Speech Communication, 58, 11-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2013.10.002 Delaherche, E., Chetouani, M., Mahdhaoui, A., Saint-Georges, C., Viaux, S., & Cohen, D. (2012). Interpersonal synchrony: A survey of evaluation methods across disciplines. EEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(3), 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.12 Delvaux, V., & Soquet, A. (2007). The influence of ambient speech on adult speech productions through unintentional imitation. Phonetica, 64(2-3), 145-173. https://doi.org/10.1159/000107914 Doupe, A. J., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999). Birdsong and human speech: Common themes and mechanisms. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 567-631. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567 Duran, N. D., & Fusaroli, R. (2017). Conversing with a devil’s advocate: Interpersonal coordination in deception and disagreement. PLoS ONE, 12(6), e0178140. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178140 Duranton, C., & Gaunet, F. (2016). Behavioural synchronization from an ethological perspective: Overview of its adaptive value. Adaptive Behavior, 24(3), 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712316644966 Edlund, J., Heldner, M., & Hirschberg, J. (2009). Pause and gap length in face-to-face interaction. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2009 (pp. 2779-2782). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2009-710 Evans, B. G., & Iverson, P. (2007). Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent change in young adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(6), 3814-3826. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2722209 Fehér, O., Ritt, N., & Smith, K. (2019). Asymmetric accommodation during interaction leads to the regularisation of linguistic variants. Journal of Memory and Language, 109, 104036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104036 Feldman, R., Mayes, L. C., & Swain, J. E. (2005). Interaction synchrony and neural circuits contribute to shared intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 697-698. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0529012x Fitch, W. T. (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817779 Freud, D., Ezrati-Vinacour, R., & Amir, O. (2018). Speech rate adjustment of adults during conversation. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 57, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.06.002 Fusaroli, R., Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Tylén, K. (2014). Dialog as interpersonal synergy. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.005 Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 8-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016 Gentilucci, M., & Bernardis, P. (2007). Imitation during phoneme production. Neuropsychologia, 45(3), 608-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.004 Gessinger, I., Schweitzer, A., Andreeva, B., Raveh, E., Möbius, B., & Steiner, I. (2018). Convergence of pitch accents in a shadowing task. In 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2018 (pp. 225-229). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2018-46 Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1-68). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511663673.001 Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105(2), 251-279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.251 Goldinger, S. D., & Azuma, T. (2004). Episodic memory reflected in printed word naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(4), 716-722. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196625 Gregory, S. W., & Hoyt, B. R. (1982). Conversation partner mutual adaptation as demonstrated by Fourier series analysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01067500 Gregory, S. W., & Webster, S. (1996). A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1231-1240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1231 Gregory, S. W., Webster, S., & Huang, G. (1993). Voice pitch and amplitude convergence as a metric of quality in dyadic interviews. Language & Communication, 13(3), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(93)90026-j Hay, J., Jannedy, S., & Mendoza-Denton, N. (1999). Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design and style [Conference presentation]. 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Berkeley, United States. http://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS1999/papers/p14_1389.pdf Heath, J. (2014). Accommodation can lead to innovated variation. University of California, Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report, 10, 119-145. https://doi.org/10.5070/p78f86j4k3 Heath, J. (2015). Convergence through divergence: Compensatory changes in phonetic accommodation. LSA 2015 Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts, 6, 1-4. http://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/ExtendedAbs/article/view/3002 Heldner, M., Edlund, J., & Hirschberg, J. (2010). Pitch similarity in the vicinity of backchannels. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2010 (pp. 3054-3057). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2010-58 Himberg, T., Hirvenkari, L., Mandel, A., & Hari, R. (2015). Word-by-word entrainment of speech rhythm during joint story building. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 797. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00797 Kawasaki, M., Yamada, Y., Ushiku, Y., Miyauchi, E., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2013). Inter-brain synchronization during coordination of speech rhythm in human-to-human social interaction. Scientific Reports, 3, 1692. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01692 Kim, M., Horton, W. S., & Bradlow, A. R. (2011). Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Laboratory Phonology, 2(1), 125-156. https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.004 King, S. L., Harley, H. E., & Janik, V. M. (2014). The role of signature whistle matching in bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus. Animal Behaviour, 96, 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.07.019 Koban, L., Ramamoorthy, A., & Konvalinka, I. (2017). Why do we fall into sync with others? Interpersonal synchronization and the brain’s optimization principle. Social Neuroscience, 14, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2017.1400463 Kousidis, S., Dorran, D., McDonnell, C., & Coyle, E. (2009). Convergence in human dialogues: Times series analysis of acoustic feature [Conference presentation]. SPECOM 2009, St. Petersburg, Russia. https://arrow.tudublin.ie/dmccon/2/ Kousidis, S., Dorran, D., Wang, Y., Vaughan, B., Cullen, C., Campbell, D., McDonnell, C., & Coyle, E. (2008). Towards measuring continuous acoustic feature convergence in unconstrained spoken dialogues. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2008 (pp. 22-26). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2008-369 Lee, C. C., Black, M., Katsamanis, A., Lammert, A. C., Baucom, B. R., Christensen, A., Georgiou, P. G., & Narayanan, S. S. (2010). Quantification of prosodic entrainment in affective spontaneous spoken interactions of married couples. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2010 (pp. 793-796). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2010-287 Lee, Y., Danner, S. G., Parrell, B., Lee, S., Goldstein, L., & Byrd, D. (2018). Articulatory, acoustic, and prosodic accommodation in a cooperative maze navigation task. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0201444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201444 Lelong, A., & Bailly, G. (2011). Study of the phenomenon of phonetic convergence thanks to speech dominoes. In A. Esposito, A. Vinciarelli, K. Vicsi, C. Pelachaud & A. Nihjolt (Eds.), Analysis of verbal and nonverbal communication and enactment: The processing issue (pp. 273-285). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25775-9_26 Levitan, R., Gravano, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2011). Entrainment in speech preceding backchannels. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8DN4DFM/download Levitan, R., Gravano, A., Wilson, L., Beňuš, Š., Hirschberg, J., & Nenkova, A. (2012). Acoustic-prosodic entrainment and social behavior [Conference presentation]. Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Montréal, Canada. https://aclanthology.org/N12-1002.pdf Levitan, R., & Hirschberg, J. (2011). Measuring acoustic-prosodic entrainment with respect to multiple levels and dimensions. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2011 (pp. 3081-3084). ISCA. https://www.isca- speech.org/archive/interspeech_2011/levitan11_interspeech.html Lewandowski, E. M., & Nygaard, L. C. (2018). Vocal alignment to native and non-native speakers of English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(2), 620-633. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5038567 Lewandowski, N., & Jilka, M. (2019). Phonetic convergence, language talent, personality and attention. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00018 Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1404-1426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01269.x Lubold, N., & Pon-Barry, H. (2014). A comparison of acoustic-prosodic entrainment in face-to-face and remote collaborative learning dialogues. In 2014 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) (pp. 288-293). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7078589 MacNeilage, P. F. (1998). The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(4), 499-511. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x98001265 Mampe, B., Friederici, A. D., Christophe, A., & Wermke, K. (2009). Newborns’ cry melody is shaped by their native language. Current Biology, 19(23), 1994-1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.064 Manson, J. H., Bryant, G. A., Gervais, M. M., & Kline, M. A. (2013). Convergence of speech rate in conversation predicts cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 419-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.001 McGarva, A. R., & Warner, R. M. (2003). Attraction and social coordination: Mutual entrainment of vocal activity rhythms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(3), 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023547703110 Merker, B. J., Madison, G. S., & Eckerdal, P. (2009). On the role and origin of isochrony in human rhythmic entrainment. Cortex, 45(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.06.011 Mitterer, H., & Ernestus, M. (2008). The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: Evidence from the shadowing task. Cognition, 109(1), 168-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.002 Mooney, S., & Sullivan, G. C. (2015). Investigating an acoustic measure of perceived isochrony in conversation: Preliminary notes on the role of rhythm in turn transitions. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 21(2), 128-135. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol21/iss2/15 Muir, K., Joinson, A., Cotterill, R., & Dewdney, N. (2017). Linguistic style accommodation shapes impression formation and rapport in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(5), 525-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x17701327 Namy, L. L., Nygaard, L. C., & Sauerteig, D. (2002). Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(4), 422-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/026192702237958 Natale, M. (1975). Convergence of mean vocal intensity in dyadic communication as a function of social desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 790-804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.790 Nguyen, N., & Delvaux, V. (2015). Role of imitation in the emergence of phonological systems. Journal of Phonetics, 53, 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.08.004 Nielsen, K. (2011). Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 39(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.007 Oben, B., & Brône, G. (2015). What you see is what you do: On the relationship between gaze and gesture in multimodal alignment. Language and Cognition, 7(4), 546-562. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.22 Pardo, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(4), 2382-2393. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2178720 Pardo, J. S. (2013a). Reconciling diverse findings in studies of phonetic convergence. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 19(1), 060140. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4798479 Pardo, J. S. (2013b). Measuring phonetic convergence in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 559. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00559 Pardo, J. S., Gibbons, R., Suppes, A., & Krauss, R. M. (2012). Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.001 Pardo, J. S., Jay, I. C., & Krauss, R. M. (2010). Conversational role influences speech imitation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2254-2264. https://doi.org/10.3758/app.72.8.2254 Pardo, J. S., Jordan, K., Mallari, R., Scanlon, C., & Lewandowski, E. (2013). Phonetic convergence in shadowed speech: The relation between acoustic and perceptual measures. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(3), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.06.002 Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056 Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2021). Understanding dialogue: Language use and social interaction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610728 Polyanskaya, L., Samuel, A. G., & Ordin, M. (2019). Speech rhythm convergence as a social coalition signal. Evolutionary Psychology, 17(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919879335 Prat, Y., Taub, M., & Yovel, Y. (2015). Vocal learning in a social mammal: Demonstrated by isolation and playback experiments in bats. Science Advances, 1(2), e1500019. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500019 Putman, W. B., & Street, R. L. (1984). The conception and perception of noncontent speech performance: Implications for speech-accommodation theory. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1984.46.97 Rao, G., & Smiljanic, R. (2011). Effects of language, speaking style and age on prosodic rhythm [Conference presentation]. 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2011/OnlineProceedings/RegularSession/Rao/Rao.pdf Rao, G., Smiljanic, R., & Diehl, R. (2013). Individual variability in phonetic convergence of vowels and rhythm. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 19(1), 060084. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4800750 Reitter, D., & Moore, J. (2007). Predicting success in dialogue [Conference presentation]. 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic. https://era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/4165/MooreJ_Predicting%20Success%20in%20Dialogue.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Reverdy, J., Koutsombogera, M., & Vogel, C. (2020). Linguistic repetition in three-party conversations. In A. Esposito, M. Faundez-Zanuy, F. Morabito & E. Pasero (Eds.), Neural approaches to dynamics of signal exchanges (vol. 151, pp. 359-370). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8950-4_32 Ruch, H., Zürcher, Y., & Burkart, J. M. (2017). The function and mechanism of vocal accommodation in humans and other primates. Biological Reviews, 93(2), 996-1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12382 Sanchez, K., Miller, R. M., & Rosenblum, L. D. (2010). Visual influences on alignment to voice onset time. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(2), 262-272. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0247) Sancier, M. L., & Fowler, C. A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0051 Schoot, L., Heyselaar, E., Hagoort, P., & Segaert, K. (2016). Does syntactic alignment effectively influence how speakers are perceived by their conversation partner? PLoS ONE, 11(4), e0153521. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153521 Schultz, B. G., O’Brien, I., Phillips, N., McFarland, D. H., Titone, D., & Palmer, C. (2015). Speech rates converge in scripted turn-taking conversations. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1201-1220. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716415000545 Schweitzer, A., & Lewandowski, N. (2013). Convergence of articulation rate in spontaneous speech. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2013 (pp. 525-529). ISCA. https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/interspeech_2013/schweitzer13_interspeech.html Shockley, K., Sabadini, L., & Fowler, C. A. (2004). Imitation in shadowing words. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(3), 422-429. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194890 Späth, M., Aichert, I., Ceballos-Baumann, A. O., Wagner-Sonntag, E. W., Miller, N., & Ziegler, W. (2016). Entraining with another person’s speech rhythm: Evidence from healthy speakers and individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 30(1), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2015.1115129 Street, R. L. (1984). Speech convergence and speech evaluation in fact-finding interviews. Human Communication Research, 11(2), 139-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00043.x Ten Bosch, L., Oostdijk, N., & Boves, L. (2005). On temporal aspects of turn taking in conversational dialogues. Speech Communication, 47(1-2), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.05.009 Thomason, J., Nguyen, H. V., & Litman, D. (2013). Prosodic entrainment and tutoring dialogue success. In H. C. Lane, K. Yacef, J. Mostow & P. Pavlik (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 750-753). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_104 Thomson, R., Murachver, T., & Green, J. (2001). Where is the gender in gendered language? Psychological Science, 12(2), 171-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00329 Trevarthen, C. (1998). The concept and foundations of infant intersubjectivity. In S. Braten (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 15-46). Cambridge University Press. Turk, A., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2013). What is speech rhythm? A commentary on Arvaniti and Rodriquez, Krivokapić, and Goswami and Leong. Laboratory Phonology, 4(1), 93-118. https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2013-0005 Van Puyvelde, M., Loots, G., Gillisjans, L., Pattyn, N., & Quintana, C. (2015). A cross-cultural comparison of tonal synchrony and pitch imitation in the vocal dialogs of Belgian Flemish-speaking and Mexican Spanish-speaking mother–infant dyads. Infant Behavior and Development, 40, 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.03.001 Vaughan, B. (2011). Prosodic synchrony in co-operative task-based dialogues: A measure of agreement and disagreement. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2011 (pp. 1865-1868). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2011-507 Ward, A., & Litman, D. (2007). Automatically measuring lexical and acoustic/prosodic convergence in tutorial dialog corpora. In Proceedings of the SLaTE Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education 2007 (pp. 57-60). http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/23210/1/cpSlate.pdf Weise, A., & Levitan, R. (2018). Looking for structure in lexical and acoustic-prosodic entrainment behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (vol. 2, pp. 297-302). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n18-2048 Wretling, P., & Eriksson, A. (1998). Is articulatory timing speaker specific? – Evidence from imitated voices. In P. Branderud & H. Traunmüller, Proceedings of Fonetik 98 (pp. 48-51). Stockholm University. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.39.6122&rep=rep1&type=pdf Wynn, C. J., & Borrie, S. A. (2020). Methodology matters: The impact of research design on conversational entrainment outcomes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(5), 1352-1360. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00243 Wynn, C. J., Borrie, S. A., & Pope, K. A. (2019). Going with the flow: An examination of entrainment in typically developing children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(10), 3706-3713. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-19-0116 Wynn, C. J., Borrie, S. A., & Sellers, T. P. (2018). Speech rate entrainment in children and adults with and without autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_ajslp-17-0134 Xu, Y., & Reitter, D. (2016). Convergence of syntactic complexity in conversation. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (vol. 2, pp. 443-448). ACL. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/p16-2072 Yu, A. C. L., Abrego-Collier, C., & Sonderegger, M. (2013). Phonetic imitation from an individual-difference perspective: Subjective attitude, personality and “autistic” traits. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e74746. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074746 Yu, L., Hattori, Y., Yamamoto, S., & Tomonaga, M. (2018). Understanding empathy from interactional synchrony in humans and non-human primates. In L. D. Di Paolo, F. Di Vincenzo & F. De Petrillo (Eds.), Evolution of primate social cognition (vol. 5, pp. 47-58). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93776-2_4
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv Leonardo Barón-Birchenall - 2023
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv Leonardo Barón-Birchenall - 2023
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv Universidad de San Buenaventura Cali
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/view/6150
institution Universidad de San Buenaventura
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/eb3f186e-8d18-4c3c-8574-baf29edc109c/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv c736f63753934bfece8bedef6c45709a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1851053592920719360
spelling Barón-Birchenall, Leonardo2023-03-22T00:00:00Z2025-07-31T17:14:11Z2023-03-22T00:00:00Z2025-07-31T17:14:11Z2023-03-22Durante las interacciones conversacionales como dar una tutoría, dar instrucciones, las negociaciones verbales, o simplemente hablar con amigos, los comportamientos de las personas experimentan una serie de cambios debido a las características de su interlocutor y a la interacción en sí. Estos cambios están presentes en cada interacción social, y la mayoría de ellos ocurre en los sonidos y ritmos del habla, lo cual se conoce como acomodación acústico-prosódica, o simplemente acomodación fonética. Las consecuencias, las limitaciones lingüísticas y sociales, y los mecanismos cognitivos subyacentes a la acomodación fonética se han estudiado durante al menos 50 años, debido a la importancia del fenómeno para varias disciplinas como la lingüística, la psicología, y la sociología. A partir del análisis y síntesis de la literatura de investigación empírica existente, en este artículo presentamos una revisión estructurada y exhaustiva de las cualidades, funciones, desarrollo onto- y filogenético, y modalidades de la acomodación fonética.During conversational interactions such as tutoring, instruction-giving tasks, verbal negotiations, or just talking with friends, interlocutors’ behaviors experience a series of changes due to the characteristics of their counterpart and to the interaction itself. These changes are pervasively present in every social interaction, and most of them occur in the sounds and rhythms of our speech, which is known as acoustic-prosodic accommodation, or simply phonetic accommodation. The consequences, linguistic and social constraints, and underlying cognitive mechanisms of phonetic accommodation have been studied for at least 50 years, due to the importance of the phenomenon to several disciplines such as linguistics, psychology, and sociology. Based on the analysis and synthesis of the existing empirical research literature, in this paper we present a structured and comprehensive review of the qualities, functions, onto- and phylogenetic development, and modalities of phonetic accommodation.application/pdftext/xml10.21500/22563202.61502256-3202https://hdl.handle.net/10819/26391https://doi.org/10.21500/22563202.6150engUniversidad de San Buenaventura Calihttps://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/download/6150/5166https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/download/6150/5167517249321Revista Guillermo de OckhamAdank, P., Hagoort, P., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Imitation improves language comprehension. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1903-1909. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610389192 Arriaga, G., Zhou, E. P., & Jarvis, E. D. (2012). Of mice, birds, and men: The mouse ultrasonic song system has some features similar to humans and song-learning birds. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e46610. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046610 Aubanel, V., & Nguyen, N. (2010). Automatic recognition of regional phonological variation in conversational interaction. Speech Communication, 52(6), 577-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.02.008 Babel, M. (2010). Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society, 39(4), 437-456. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404510000400 Babel, M. (2011). Imitation in speech. Acoustics Today, 7(4), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3684224 Babel, M. (2012). Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001 Babel, M., & Bulatov, D. (2011). The role of fundamental frequency in phonetic accommodation. Language and Speech, 55(2), 231-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830911417695 Barón-Birchenall, L. (2016). Animal communication and human language: An overview. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 29, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.46867/ijcp.2016.29.00.07 Barón-Birchenall, L. (2018). Influence of sentence-level rhythmic regularity and phonological phrasing on linguistic accommodation during conversational interactions: The case of Spanish-speaking dyads [Doctoral dissertation, Aix Marseille Université]. HAL. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01993542 Barón-Birchenall, L. (2022). Sentence-level rhythmic regularity and accentual-group phrasing increase linguistic resemblance between Spanish-speaking interlocutors. Manuscript submitted for publication. Beebe, B., Sorter, D., Rustin, J., & Knoblauch, S. (2003). A comparison of Meltzoff, Trevarthen, and Stern. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13(6), 777-804. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481881309348768 Bell, L., Gustafson, J., & Heldner, M. (2003). Prosodic adaptation in human-computer interaction [Conference presentation]. 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain. http://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2003/papers/p15_2453.pdf Bloom, K. (1998). The missing link’s missing link: Syllabic vocalizations at 3 months of age. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(4), 514-515. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x98251260 Bonin, F., De Looze, C., Ghosh, S., Gilmartin, E., Vogel, C., Polychroniou, A., Salamin, H., Vinciarelli, A., & Campbell, N. (2013). Investigating fine temporal dynamics of prosodic and lexical accommodation. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2013 (pp. 539-543). ISCA. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/93668/1/93668.pdf Borrie, S. A., & Liss, J. M. (2014). Rhythm as a coordinating device: Entrainment with disordered speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(3), 815-824. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_jslhr-s-13-0149 Borrie, S. A., Lubold, N., & Pon-Barry, H. (2015). Disordered speech disrupts conversational entrainment: A study of acoustic-prosodic entrainment and communicative success in populations with communication challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01187 Casasanto, L. S., Jasmin, K., & Casasanto, D. (2010). Virtually accommodating: Speech rate accommodation to a virtual interlocutor [Conference presentation]. 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, United States. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_458220/component/file_529234/content Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893-910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 Clopper, C. G., & Dossey, E. (2020). Phonetic convergence to Southern American English: Acoustics and perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(1), 671-683. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000555 Cohen, U., Edelist, L., & Gleason, E. (2017). Converging to the baseline: Corpus evidence for convergence in speech rate to interlocutor’s baseline. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(5), 2989-2996. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4982199 Collins, B. (1998). Convergence of fundamental frequencies in conversation: If it happens, does it matter? [Conference presentation]. 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Sydney, Australia. https://doi.org/10.21437/icslp.1998-111 Condon, W. S., & Sander, L. W. (1974). Synchrony demonstrated between movements of the neonate and adult speech. Child Development, 45(2), 456-462. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127968 Coulston, R., Oviatt, S., & Darves, C. (2002). Amplitude convergence in children’s conversational speech with animated personas [Conference presentation]. 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Denver, United States. https://doi.org/10.21437/icslp.2002-671 De Looze, C., & Rauzy, S. (2011). Measuring speakers’ similarity in speech by means of prosodic cues: Methods and potential. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2011 (pp. 1393-1396). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2011-457 De Looze, C., Oertel, C., Rauzy, S., & Campbell, N. (2011). Measuring dynamics of mimicry by means of prosodic cues in conversational speech [Conference presentation]. 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01705525/document De Looze, C., Scherer, S., Vaughan, B., & Campbell, N. (2014). Investigating automatic measurements of prosodic accommodation and its dynamics in social interaction. Speech Communication, 58, 11-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2013.10.002 Delaherche, E., Chetouani, M., Mahdhaoui, A., Saint-Georges, C., Viaux, S., & Cohen, D. (2012). Interpersonal synchrony: A survey of evaluation methods across disciplines. EEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(3), 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.12 Delvaux, V., & Soquet, A. (2007). The influence of ambient speech on adult speech productions through unintentional imitation. Phonetica, 64(2-3), 145-173. https://doi.org/10.1159/000107914 Doupe, A. J., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999). Birdsong and human speech: Common themes and mechanisms. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 567-631. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567 Duran, N. D., & Fusaroli, R. (2017). Conversing with a devil’s advocate: Interpersonal coordination in deception and disagreement. PLoS ONE, 12(6), e0178140. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178140 Duranton, C., & Gaunet, F. (2016). Behavioural synchronization from an ethological perspective: Overview of its adaptive value. Adaptive Behavior, 24(3), 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712316644966 Edlund, J., Heldner, M., & Hirschberg, J. (2009). Pause and gap length in face-to-face interaction. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2009 (pp. 2779-2782). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2009-710 Evans, B. G., & Iverson, P. (2007). Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent change in young adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(6), 3814-3826. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2722209 Fehér, O., Ritt, N., & Smith, K. (2019). Asymmetric accommodation during interaction leads to the regularisation of linguistic variants. Journal of Memory and Language, 109, 104036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104036 Feldman, R., Mayes, L. C., & Swain, J. E. (2005). Interaction synchrony and neural circuits contribute to shared intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 697-698. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0529012x Fitch, W. T. (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817779 Freud, D., Ezrati-Vinacour, R., & Amir, O. (2018). Speech rate adjustment of adults during conversation. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 57, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.06.002 Fusaroli, R., Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Tylén, K. (2014). Dialog as interpersonal synergy. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.005 Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 8-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016 Gentilucci, M., & Bernardis, P. (2007). Imitation during phoneme production. Neuropsychologia, 45(3), 608-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.004 Gessinger, I., Schweitzer, A., Andreeva, B., Raveh, E., Möbius, B., & Steiner, I. (2018). Convergence of pitch accents in a shadowing task. In 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2018 (pp. 225-229). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2018-46 Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1-68). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511663673.001 Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105(2), 251-279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.251 Goldinger, S. D., & Azuma, T. (2004). Episodic memory reflected in printed word naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(4), 716-722. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196625 Gregory, S. W., & Hoyt, B. R. (1982). Conversation partner mutual adaptation as demonstrated by Fourier series analysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01067500 Gregory, S. W., & Webster, S. (1996). A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1231-1240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1231 Gregory, S. W., Webster, S., & Huang, G. (1993). Voice pitch and amplitude convergence as a metric of quality in dyadic interviews. Language & Communication, 13(3), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(93)90026-j Hay, J., Jannedy, S., & Mendoza-Denton, N. (1999). Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design and style [Conference presentation]. 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Berkeley, United States. http://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS1999/papers/p14_1389.pdf Heath, J. (2014). Accommodation can lead to innovated variation. University of California, Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report, 10, 119-145. https://doi.org/10.5070/p78f86j4k3 Heath, J. (2015). Convergence through divergence: Compensatory changes in phonetic accommodation. LSA 2015 Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts, 6, 1-4. http://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/ExtendedAbs/article/view/3002 Heldner, M., Edlund, J., & Hirschberg, J. (2010). Pitch similarity in the vicinity of backchannels. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2010 (pp. 3054-3057). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2010-58 Himberg, T., Hirvenkari, L., Mandel, A., & Hari, R. (2015). Word-by-word entrainment of speech rhythm during joint story building. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 797. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00797 Kawasaki, M., Yamada, Y., Ushiku, Y., Miyauchi, E., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2013). Inter-brain synchronization during coordination of speech rhythm in human-to-human social interaction. Scientific Reports, 3, 1692. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01692 Kim, M., Horton, W. S., & Bradlow, A. R. (2011). Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Laboratory Phonology, 2(1), 125-156. https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.004 King, S. L., Harley, H. E., & Janik, V. M. (2014). The role of signature whistle matching in bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus. Animal Behaviour, 96, 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.07.019 Koban, L., Ramamoorthy, A., & Konvalinka, I. (2017). Why do we fall into sync with others? Interpersonal synchronization and the brain’s optimization principle. Social Neuroscience, 14, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2017.1400463 Kousidis, S., Dorran, D., McDonnell, C., & Coyle, E. (2009). Convergence in human dialogues: Times series analysis of acoustic feature [Conference presentation]. SPECOM 2009, St. Petersburg, Russia. https://arrow.tudublin.ie/dmccon/2/ Kousidis, S., Dorran, D., Wang, Y., Vaughan, B., Cullen, C., Campbell, D., McDonnell, C., & Coyle, E. (2008). Towards measuring continuous acoustic feature convergence in unconstrained spoken dialogues. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2008 (pp. 22-26). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2008-369 Lee, C. C., Black, M., Katsamanis, A., Lammert, A. C., Baucom, B. R., Christensen, A., Georgiou, P. G., & Narayanan, S. S. (2010). Quantification of prosodic entrainment in affective spontaneous spoken interactions of married couples. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2010 (pp. 793-796). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2010-287 Lee, Y., Danner, S. G., Parrell, B., Lee, S., Goldstein, L., & Byrd, D. (2018). Articulatory, acoustic, and prosodic accommodation in a cooperative maze navigation task. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0201444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201444 Lelong, A., & Bailly, G. (2011). Study of the phenomenon of phonetic convergence thanks to speech dominoes. In A. Esposito, A. Vinciarelli, K. Vicsi, C. Pelachaud & A. Nihjolt (Eds.), Analysis of verbal and nonverbal communication and enactment: The processing issue (pp. 273-285). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25775-9_26 Levitan, R., Gravano, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2011). Entrainment in speech preceding backchannels. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8DN4DFM/download Levitan, R., Gravano, A., Wilson, L., Beňuš, Š., Hirschberg, J., & Nenkova, A. (2012). Acoustic-prosodic entrainment and social behavior [Conference presentation]. Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Montréal, Canada. https://aclanthology.org/N12-1002.pdf Levitan, R., & Hirschberg, J. (2011). Measuring acoustic-prosodic entrainment with respect to multiple levels and dimensions. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2011 (pp. 3081-3084). ISCA. https://www.isca- speech.org/archive/interspeech_2011/levitan11_interspeech.html Lewandowski, E. M., & Nygaard, L. C. (2018). Vocal alignment to native and non-native speakers of English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(2), 620-633. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5038567 Lewandowski, N., & Jilka, M. (2019). Phonetic convergence, language talent, personality and attention. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00018 Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1404-1426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01269.x Lubold, N., & Pon-Barry, H. (2014). A comparison of acoustic-prosodic entrainment in face-to-face and remote collaborative learning dialogues. In 2014 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) (pp. 288-293). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7078589 MacNeilage, P. F. (1998). The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(4), 499-511. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x98001265 Mampe, B., Friederici, A. D., Christophe, A., & Wermke, K. (2009). Newborns’ cry melody is shaped by their native language. Current Biology, 19(23), 1994-1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.064 Manson, J. H., Bryant, G. A., Gervais, M. M., & Kline, M. A. (2013). Convergence of speech rate in conversation predicts cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 419-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.001 McGarva, A. R., & Warner, R. M. (2003). Attraction and social coordination: Mutual entrainment of vocal activity rhythms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(3), 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023547703110 Merker, B. J., Madison, G. S., & Eckerdal, P. (2009). On the role and origin of isochrony in human rhythmic entrainment. Cortex, 45(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.06.011 Mitterer, H., & Ernestus, M. (2008). The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: Evidence from the shadowing task. Cognition, 109(1), 168-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.002 Mooney, S., & Sullivan, G. C. (2015). Investigating an acoustic measure of perceived isochrony in conversation: Preliminary notes on the role of rhythm in turn transitions. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 21(2), 128-135. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol21/iss2/15 Muir, K., Joinson, A., Cotterill, R., & Dewdney, N. (2017). Linguistic style accommodation shapes impression formation and rapport in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(5), 525-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x17701327 Namy, L. L., Nygaard, L. C., & Sauerteig, D. (2002). Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(4), 422-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/026192702237958 Natale, M. (1975). Convergence of mean vocal intensity in dyadic communication as a function of social desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 790-804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.790 Nguyen, N., & Delvaux, V. (2015). Role of imitation in the emergence of phonological systems. Journal of Phonetics, 53, 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.08.004 Nielsen, K. (2011). Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 39(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.007 Oben, B., & Brône, G. (2015). What you see is what you do: On the relationship between gaze and gesture in multimodal alignment. Language and Cognition, 7(4), 546-562. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.22 Pardo, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(4), 2382-2393. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2178720 Pardo, J. S. (2013a). Reconciling diverse findings in studies of phonetic convergence. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 19(1), 060140. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4798479 Pardo, J. S. (2013b). Measuring phonetic convergence in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 559. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00559 Pardo, J. S., Gibbons, R., Suppes, A., & Krauss, R. M. (2012). Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.001 Pardo, J. S., Jay, I. C., & Krauss, R. M. (2010). Conversational role influences speech imitation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2254-2264. https://doi.org/10.3758/app.72.8.2254 Pardo, J. S., Jordan, K., Mallari, R., Scanlon, C., & Lewandowski, E. (2013). Phonetic convergence in shadowed speech: The relation between acoustic and perceptual measures. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(3), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.06.002 Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056 Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2021). Understanding dialogue: Language use and social interaction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610728 Polyanskaya, L., Samuel, A. G., & Ordin, M. (2019). Speech rhythm convergence as a social coalition signal. Evolutionary Psychology, 17(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919879335 Prat, Y., Taub, M., & Yovel, Y. (2015). Vocal learning in a social mammal: Demonstrated by isolation and playback experiments in bats. Science Advances, 1(2), e1500019. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500019 Putman, W. B., & Street, R. L. (1984). The conception and perception of noncontent speech performance: Implications for speech-accommodation theory. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1984.46.97 Rao, G., & Smiljanic, R. (2011). Effects of language, speaking style and age on prosodic rhythm [Conference presentation]. 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2011/OnlineProceedings/RegularSession/Rao/Rao.pdf Rao, G., Smiljanic, R., & Diehl, R. (2013). Individual variability in phonetic convergence of vowels and rhythm. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 19(1), 060084. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4800750 Reitter, D., & Moore, J. (2007). Predicting success in dialogue [Conference presentation]. 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic. https://era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/4165/MooreJ_Predicting%20Success%20in%20Dialogue.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Reverdy, J., Koutsombogera, M., & Vogel, C. (2020). Linguistic repetition in three-party conversations. In A. Esposito, M. Faundez-Zanuy, F. Morabito & E. Pasero (Eds.), Neural approaches to dynamics of signal exchanges (vol. 151, pp. 359-370). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8950-4_32 Ruch, H., Zürcher, Y., & Burkart, J. M. (2017). The function and mechanism of vocal accommodation in humans and other primates. Biological Reviews, 93(2), 996-1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12382 Sanchez, K., Miller, R. M., & Rosenblum, L. D. (2010). Visual influences on alignment to voice onset time. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(2), 262-272. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0247) Sancier, M. L., & Fowler, C. A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0051 Schoot, L., Heyselaar, E., Hagoort, P., & Segaert, K. (2016). Does syntactic alignment effectively influence how speakers are perceived by their conversation partner? PLoS ONE, 11(4), e0153521. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153521 Schultz, B. G., O’Brien, I., Phillips, N., McFarland, D. H., Titone, D., & Palmer, C. (2015). Speech rates converge in scripted turn-taking conversations. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1201-1220. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716415000545 Schweitzer, A., & Lewandowski, N. (2013). Convergence of articulation rate in spontaneous speech. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2013 (pp. 525-529). ISCA. https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/interspeech_2013/schweitzer13_interspeech.html Shockley, K., Sabadini, L., & Fowler, C. A. (2004). Imitation in shadowing words. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(3), 422-429. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194890 Späth, M., Aichert, I., Ceballos-Baumann, A. O., Wagner-Sonntag, E. W., Miller, N., & Ziegler, W. (2016). Entraining with another person’s speech rhythm: Evidence from healthy speakers and individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 30(1), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2015.1115129 Street, R. L. (1984). Speech convergence and speech evaluation in fact-finding interviews. Human Communication Research, 11(2), 139-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00043.x Ten Bosch, L., Oostdijk, N., & Boves, L. (2005). On temporal aspects of turn taking in conversational dialogues. Speech Communication, 47(1-2), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.05.009 Thomason, J., Nguyen, H. V., & Litman, D. (2013). Prosodic entrainment and tutoring dialogue success. In H. C. Lane, K. Yacef, J. Mostow & P. Pavlik (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 750-753). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_104 Thomson, R., Murachver, T., & Green, J. (2001). Where is the gender in gendered language? Psychological Science, 12(2), 171-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00329 Trevarthen, C. (1998). The concept and foundations of infant intersubjectivity. In S. Braten (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 15-46). Cambridge University Press. Turk, A., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2013). What is speech rhythm? A commentary on Arvaniti and Rodriquez, Krivokapić, and Goswami and Leong. Laboratory Phonology, 4(1), 93-118. https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2013-0005 Van Puyvelde, M., Loots, G., Gillisjans, L., Pattyn, N., & Quintana, C. (2015). A cross-cultural comparison of tonal synchrony and pitch imitation in the vocal dialogs of Belgian Flemish-speaking and Mexican Spanish-speaking mother–infant dyads. Infant Behavior and Development, 40, 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.03.001 Vaughan, B. (2011). Prosodic synchrony in co-operative task-based dialogues: A measure of agreement and disagreement. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2011 (pp. 1865-1868). ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2011-507 Ward, A., & Litman, D. (2007). Automatically measuring lexical and acoustic/prosodic convergence in tutorial dialog corpora. In Proceedings of the SLaTE Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education 2007 (pp. 57-60). http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/23210/1/cpSlate.pdf Weise, A., & Levitan, R. (2018). Looking for structure in lexical and acoustic-prosodic entrainment behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (vol. 2, pp. 297-302). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n18-2048 Wretling, P., & Eriksson, A. (1998). Is articulatory timing speaker specific? – Evidence from imitated voices. In P. Branderud & H. Traunmüller, Proceedings of Fonetik 98 (pp. 48-51). Stockholm University. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.39.6122&rep=rep1&type=pdf Wynn, C. J., & Borrie, S. A. (2020). Methodology matters: The impact of research design on conversational entrainment outcomes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(5), 1352-1360. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00243 Wynn, C. J., Borrie, S. A., & Pope, K. A. (2019). Going with the flow: An examination of entrainment in typically developing children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(10), 3706-3713. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-19-0116 Wynn, C. J., Borrie, S. A., & Sellers, T. P. (2018). Speech rate entrainment in children and adults with and without autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_ajslp-17-0134 Xu, Y., & Reitter, D. (2016). Convergence of syntactic complexity in conversation. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (vol. 2, pp. 443-448). ACL. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/p16-2072 Yu, A. C. L., Abrego-Collier, C., & Sonderegger, M. (2013). Phonetic imitation from an individual-difference perspective: Subjective attitude, personality and “autistic” traits. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e74746. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074746 Yu, L., Hattori, Y., Yamamoto, S., & Tomonaga, M. (2018). Understanding empathy from interactional synchrony in humans and non-human primates. In L. D. Di Paolo, F. Di Vincenzo & F. De Petrillo (Eds.), Evolution of primate social cognition (vol. 5, pp. 47-58). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93776-2_4Leonardo Barón-Birchenall - 2023info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/view/6150speechconversationconvergencesimilarityentrainmentsynchronizationphoneticssocial interactionphonetic accommodationlanguageconversationpsychologyAcomodación fonéticahablaconversaciónconvergenciasimilitudarrastresincronizaciónfonéticainteracción socialLenguajeConversaciónPsicologíaAcomodación fonética durante las interacciones conversacionales: una visión generalAcomodación fonética durante las interacciones conversacionales: una visión generalArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bchttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2545https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/eb3f186e-8d18-4c3c-8574-baf29edc109c/downloadc736f63753934bfece8bedef6c45709aMD5110819/26391oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/263912025-07-31 12:14:11.719http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Publicaciones similares