El sistema de responsabilidad penal para adolescentes: la expansión de la punibilidad en el neopunitivismo colombiano
This article proposes to analyze the main problems evidenced by the Evaluation Commission of the System of Criminal Liability for Adolescents (CRESPA) developed in the light of the constraints of the theories of the Frankfurt School, the Critical School of Criminal Law and the New Punitivity of the...
- Autores:
-
Huertas Díaz, Omar
Morales Chinome, Iván Ricardo
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2013
- Institución:
- Universidad de San Buenaventura
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio USB
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/4930
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10819/4930
- Palabra clave:
- Responsabilidad penal
Adolescentes
Neopunitivismo
Disciplina
Prisión
Hacinamiento
Criminal responsibility
Overcrowding
New punitive
Adolescents
Responsabilidad penal juvenil - Colombia
Doctrinas (derecho)
- Rights
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Summary: | This article proposes to analyze the main problems evidenced by the Evaluation Commission of the System of Criminal Liability for Adolescents (CRESPA) developed in the light of the constraints of the theories of the Frankfurt School, the Critical School of Criminal Law and the New Punitivity of the United States as represented by Loie Wacquant. This qualitative research on the relationship between the social structures and the penal system aims to show that although the SRPA embraces the main classification of international instruments related to the deprivation of liberty of minors that this is based on differentiated treatment and on the paradigm of comprehensive protection and co- responsibility. This system has failed because it carries around the problems that critical studies on criminal and penitentiary law have made evident for a long time, especially the problems and undeclared purposes that arise from the detention, the imposed discipline, the adaptation of the system of production and the victimization in the centers of detention with terrible consequences for fundamental rights of adolescents who are subjected to the system. |
---|