The components of cognitive vulnerability to generalized anxiety disorder
The components of cognitive vulnerability to generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) were identified. We performed a comparative analysis between the cognitive profile of patients diagnosed with GAD (69 adults) and a control group with no diagnosis (69 adults). They were completed the MINI International...
- Autores:
-
Londoño, Nora H.
Jiménez, Erika B.
Juárez, Fernando
Marín, Carlos A.
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2010
- Institución:
- Universidad de San Buenaventura
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio USB
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/6548
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10819/6548
- Palabra clave:
- Anxiety
Cognitive
Vulnerability
Profile
Copying strategies
Ansiedad
Cognitivo
Vulnerabilidad
Perfil
Afrontamiento
Desordenes de conducta
Perfil cognoscitivo
- Rights
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
Summary: | The components of cognitive vulnerability to generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) were identified. We performed a comparative analysis between the cognitive profile of patients diagnosed with GAD (69 adults) and a control group with no diagnosis (69 adults). They were completed the MINI International Neuropsyquiatric Interview, the Young Schemes Questionnaire -YSQ-, the Core Beliefs Questionnaire for Personality Disorders -CCE-TP-, the Inventory of Automatic Thoughts -IPA-, and the Coping Strategies Questionnaire -EEC-M-. The cognitive profile of GAD comprised patterns of abandonment, mistrust/abuse, uncompromising standards and insufficient self-control/self-discipline. Associated personality disorders were dependent, paranoid, avoidant, schizotypal, borderline and antisocial. Cognitive distortions were filtering or selective abstraction (low scores), and significantly higher scores in polarized thinking, overgeneralization, interpretation of thought, catastrophic vision, fallacy of control, emotional reasonin g and fallacy of change. Coping strategies were high aggressive reaction, expression of coping difficulty, denial, and low positive reappraisal. |
---|