Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn
Mi objetivo en este artículo es comparar la filosofía de la ciencia de Heidegger con la de Thomas Kuhn. Con esta comparación quiero perseguir dos objetivos: 1) usar el arsenal conceptual de Kuhn para hacer más clara la posición de Heidegger; y 2) mostrar que las posiciones de Heidegger y Kuhn no son...
- Autores:
-
Belgrano, Mateo
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad de San Buenaventura
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio USB
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/27979
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10819/27979
https://doi.org/10.21500/01201468.4716
- Palabra clave:
- Science
Paradigm
World
Being
Thinking
Ciencia
Paradigma
Mundo
Ser
Pensamiento
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Franciscanum - 2021
| id |
SANBUENAV2_741cde985b1429ea8b24486f1c9c0880 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/27979 |
| network_acronym_str |
SANBUENAV2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio USB |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
World and Paradigm in Heidegger and Kuhn |
| title |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn |
| spellingShingle |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn Science Paradigm World Being Thinking Ciencia Paradigma Mundo Ser Pensamiento |
| title_short |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn |
| title_full |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn |
| title_fullStr |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn |
| title_sort |
Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Belgrano, Mateo |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Belgrano, Mateo |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Science Paradigm World Being Thinking |
| topic |
Science Paradigm World Being Thinking Ciencia Paradigma Mundo Ser Pensamiento |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Ciencia Paradigma Mundo Ser Pensamiento |
| description |
Mi objetivo en este artículo es comparar la filosofía de la ciencia de Heidegger con la de Thomas Kuhn. Con esta comparación quiero perseguir dos objetivos: 1) usar el arsenal conceptual de Kuhn para hacer más clara la posición de Heidegger; y 2) mostrar que las posiciones de Heidegger y Kuhn no son tan diferentes como cabría esperar. Por lo tanto, sugeriré que estas filosofías pueden ser compatibles. Mostraré que si bien hay diferencias, también hay muchas continuidades. Abordaré tres cuestiones: 1) las diferencias y similitudes entre la noción de paradigma de Kuhn y la noción de mundo de Heidegger; 2) los conceptos análogos de "ciencia normal" y "pensamiento calculador"; y 3) la fuente de inteligibilidad en ambos autores. Aquí, creo, es donde radica la principal diferencia entre ambos pensadores. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-15T00:00:00Z 2025-08-22T13:32:53Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-15T00:00:00Z 2025-08-22T13:32:53Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-15 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv |
Journal article |
| dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.21500/01201468.4716 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
2665-3834 |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0120-1468 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10819/27979 |
| dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.21500/01201468.4716 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.21500/01201468.4716 2665-3834 0120-1468 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10819/27979 https://doi.org/10.21500/01201468.4716 |
| dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Franciscanum/article/download/4716/3847 |
| dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv |
Núm. 175 , Año 2021 : Franciscanum 175 |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
16 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
175 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv |
1 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv |
63 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Franciscanum |
| dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv |
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005. Carnap, Rudolf. «The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis on language». In Logical positivism, ed. Alfred Ayer, 60-81. London: Allen & Unwin, 1959. Dreyfus, Hubert. «How Heidegger defends the possibility of a correspondence theory of truth with respect to the entities of natural science». In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. Theodore R. Schatzki, 159-171. London: Routledge, 2005. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796220.003.0006 Emad, Parvis and Maly, Kenneth. «Translators' Foreword». In Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowing), auth. Martin Heidegger, XX–XXI. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999. Glazebrook, Trish. Heidegger’s philosophy of science. New York: Fordham University Press, 2000. Haugeland, John. Dasein Disclosed. Cambdridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2013. Heidegger, Martin. Basic Questions of Philosophy. Selected «Problems» of «Logic». Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994. Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. New York: SUNY Press, 1996. Heidegger, Martin. Contributions to Philosophy (Of the Event). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012. Heidegger, Martin. Discourse on thinking. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1966. Heidegger, Martin. Identity and Difference. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1969. Heidegger, Martin. Logic as the Question Concerning the Essence of Language. New York: SUNY Press, 2009. Heidegger, Martin. Nietzsche. 2. The Eternal Recurrence of the Same. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco, 1991. Heidegger, Martin. Off the Beaten Track. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Heidegger, Martin. Pathmarks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Heidegger, Martin. The Question Concerning Technology. New York/London: Garland Publishing, 1977. Heidegger, Martin. Towards the Definition of Philosophy. New York: Continuum, 2008. Heidegger, Martin. What is Called Thinking? New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1968. Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. «Kuhn's conception of incommensurability». Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21.3 (1990): 481-492. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(90)90006-t Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970. Lafont, Cristina. Heidegger, Language, and World- Disclosure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Lattis, James M. Between Copernicus and Galileo: Christoph Clavius and the Collapse of Ptolemaic Cosmology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/221058785x01065 Loscerbo, John. Being and Technology: A Study in the Philosophy of Martin Heidegger. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1981. Masterman, Margaret. «The Nature of a Paradigm». In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. Imre Lakatos, Alan Musgrave, 59-90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Philipse, Herman. Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being. A Critical Interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998. Polt, Richard. The Emergency of Being. On Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy. New York: Cornell University Press, 2006. Pöggeler, Otto. The Paths of Heidegger’s Life and Thought. New York: Humanity Books, 1998. Robbins, Breat Dean. «A reading of Kuhn in light of Heidegger as a response to Hoeller's critique of Giorgi». Janus Head 1, Vol. 1 (1998): 2-35. Rouse, Joseph. «Kuhn, Heidegger, and scientific realism». Man and World 3, Vol. 14 (1981): 269-290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01248749 Sankey, Howard. «Kuhn's changing concept of incommensurability». The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4, Vol 44 (1993): 759-774 Sheehan, Thomas. Making Sense of Heidegger: A Paradigm Shift. London: Rowman et Littlefield, 2015. Vidal-Folch, Ignacio. «Entrevista a Mario Bunge: Las frases de Heidegger son las propias de un esquizofrénico». Revista de Pedagogía 84, Vol. 29 (2008): 187-190. Welch, Cyril. «Review of The Anatomy of Disillusion: Martin Heidegger’s Notion of Truth by W. B. Macomber». Man and World 3 (1970): 135-146. Wisser, Richard. Heidegger in Conversation. New Delhi: Arnold-Heinemann Publishers, 1977. |
| dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv |
Franciscanum - 2021 |
| dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Franciscanum - 2021 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad San Buenaventura |
| dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Franciscanum/article/view/4716 |
| institution |
Universidad de San Buenaventura |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/db5f4b76-66e9-4e22-9db5-74d0bd79820f/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
71eeaecf260dd3a6f1cf215b14bce5ae |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
| _version_ |
1851053635591471104 |
| spelling |
Belgrano, Mateo2021-01-15T00:00:00Z2025-08-22T13:32:53Z2021-01-15T00:00:00Z2025-08-22T13:32:53Z2021-01-15Mi objetivo en este artículo es comparar la filosofía de la ciencia de Heidegger con la de Thomas Kuhn. Con esta comparación quiero perseguir dos objetivos: 1) usar el arsenal conceptual de Kuhn para hacer más clara la posición de Heidegger; y 2) mostrar que las posiciones de Heidegger y Kuhn no son tan diferentes como cabría esperar. Por lo tanto, sugeriré que estas filosofías pueden ser compatibles. Mostraré que si bien hay diferencias, también hay muchas continuidades. Abordaré tres cuestiones: 1) las diferencias y similitudes entre la noción de paradigma de Kuhn y la noción de mundo de Heidegger; 2) los conceptos análogos de "ciencia normal" y "pensamiento calculador"; y 3) la fuente de inteligibilidad en ambos autores. Aquí, creo, es donde radica la principal diferencia entre ambos pensadores.My goal in this paper is to compare Heidegger’s philosophy of science with Thomas Kuhn’s. With this comparison I want to pursue two goals: 1) using Kuhn’s arsenal of conceptual tools, to make Heidegger’s position appear in a clearer fashion; and 2) to show that Heidegger’s and Kuhn’s positions are not so different as one might expect. I will, thus, suggest that these philosophies can be compatible. I will show that, even if there are differences, there are many similarities as well. I will address three issues: 1) the differences and similarities between Kuhn’s notion of paradigm and Heidegger’s notion of world; 2) the analogous concepts of “normal science” and “calculating thinking”; and 3) the source of intelligibility in both authors. Here, I believe, is where the main difference between both thinkers lays.application/pdf10.21500/01201468.47162665-38340120-1468https://hdl.handle.net/10819/27979https://doi.org/10.21500/01201468.4716engUniversidad San Buenaventurahttps://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Franciscanum/article/download/4716/3847Núm. 175 , Año 2021 : Franciscanum 17516175163FranciscanumBourdieu, Pierre. The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005. Carnap, Rudolf. «The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis on language». In Logical positivism, ed. Alfred Ayer, 60-81. London: Allen & Unwin, 1959. Dreyfus, Hubert. «How Heidegger defends the possibility of a correspondence theory of truth with respect to the entities of natural science». In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. Theodore R. Schatzki, 159-171. London: Routledge, 2005. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796220.003.0006 Emad, Parvis and Maly, Kenneth. «Translators' Foreword». In Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowing), auth. Martin Heidegger, XX–XXI. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999. Glazebrook, Trish. Heidegger’s philosophy of science. New York: Fordham University Press, 2000. Haugeland, John. Dasein Disclosed. Cambdridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2013. Heidegger, Martin. Basic Questions of Philosophy. Selected «Problems» of «Logic». Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994. Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. New York: SUNY Press, 1996. Heidegger, Martin. Contributions to Philosophy (Of the Event). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012. Heidegger, Martin. Discourse on thinking. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1966. Heidegger, Martin. Identity and Difference. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1969. Heidegger, Martin. Logic as the Question Concerning the Essence of Language. New York: SUNY Press, 2009. Heidegger, Martin. Nietzsche. 2. The Eternal Recurrence of the Same. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco, 1991. Heidegger, Martin. Off the Beaten Track. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Heidegger, Martin. Pathmarks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Heidegger, Martin. The Question Concerning Technology. New York/London: Garland Publishing, 1977. Heidegger, Martin. Towards the Definition of Philosophy. New York: Continuum, 2008. Heidegger, Martin. What is Called Thinking? New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1968. Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. «Kuhn's conception of incommensurability». Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21.3 (1990): 481-492. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(90)90006-t Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970. Lafont, Cristina. Heidegger, Language, and World- Disclosure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Lattis, James M. Between Copernicus and Galileo: Christoph Clavius and the Collapse of Ptolemaic Cosmology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/221058785x01065 Loscerbo, John. Being and Technology: A Study in the Philosophy of Martin Heidegger. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1981. Masterman, Margaret. «The Nature of a Paradigm». In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. Imre Lakatos, Alan Musgrave, 59-90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Philipse, Herman. Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being. A Critical Interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998. Polt, Richard. The Emergency of Being. On Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy. New York: Cornell University Press, 2006. Pöggeler, Otto. The Paths of Heidegger’s Life and Thought. New York: Humanity Books, 1998. Robbins, Breat Dean. «A reading of Kuhn in light of Heidegger as a response to Hoeller's critique of Giorgi». Janus Head 1, Vol. 1 (1998): 2-35. Rouse, Joseph. «Kuhn, Heidegger, and scientific realism». Man and World 3, Vol. 14 (1981): 269-290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01248749 Sankey, Howard. «Kuhn's changing concept of incommensurability». The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4, Vol 44 (1993): 759-774 Sheehan, Thomas. Making Sense of Heidegger: A Paradigm Shift. London: Rowman et Littlefield, 2015. Vidal-Folch, Ignacio. «Entrevista a Mario Bunge: Las frases de Heidegger son las propias de un esquizofrénico». Revista de Pedagogía 84, Vol. 29 (2008): 187-190. Welch, Cyril. «Review of The Anatomy of Disillusion: Martin Heidegger’s Notion of Truth by W. B. Macomber». Man and World 3 (1970): 135-146. Wisser, Richard. Heidegger in Conversation. New Delhi: Arnold-Heinemann Publishers, 1977.Franciscanum - 2021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Franciscanum/article/view/4716ScienceParadigmWorldBeingThinkingCienciaParadigmaMundoSerPensamientoMundo y paradigma en Heidegger y KuhnWorld and Paradigm in Heidegger and KuhnArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2433https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/db5f4b76-66e9-4e22-9db5-74d0bd79820f/download71eeaecf260dd3a6f1cf215b14bce5aeMD5110819/27979oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/279792025-08-22 08:32:53.128https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com |