Cuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego para la edad de latencia: Propiedades psicométricas en una muestra argentina
El propósito de este artículo fue realizar un estudio psicométrico del Cuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego en idioma español. Este trabajo incluyó tres estudios. Los objetivos del estudio 1 fueron analizar el poder discriminativo de los ítems, realizar un AFE para determinar la estructu...
- Autores:
-
Richaud, María Cristina
Mesurado, Belén
Minzi, María Paula
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad de San Buenaventura
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio USB
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/25824
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10819/25824
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4058
- Palabra clave:
- attachment questionnaire
latency age
psychometric properties
factor structure
validity
reliability
cuestionario de apego
edad de latencia
propiedades psicométricas
estructura factorial
validez
confiabilidad
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- International Journal of Psychological Research - 2019
| id |
SANBUENAV2_6b97a2873598a712c8667a54a0563afe |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/25824 |
| network_acronym_str |
SANBUENAV2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio USB |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego para la edad de latencia: Propiedades psicométricas en una muestra argentina |
| dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
Cuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego para la edad de latencia: Propiedades psicométricas en una muestra argentina |
| title |
Cuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego para la edad de latencia: Propiedades psicométricas en una muestra argentina |
| spellingShingle |
Cuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego para la edad de latencia: Propiedades psicométricas en una muestra argentina attachment questionnaire latency age psychometric properties factor structure validity reliability cuestionario de apego edad de latencia propiedades psicométricas estructura factorial validez confiabilidad |
| title_short |
Cuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego para la edad de latencia: Propiedades psicométricas en una muestra argentina |
| title_full |
Cuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego para la edad de latencia: Propiedades psicométricas en una muestra argentina |
| title_fullStr |
Cuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego para la edad de latencia: Propiedades psicométricas en una muestra argentina |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Cuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego para la edad de latencia: Propiedades psicométricas en una muestra argentina |
| title_sort |
Cuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego para la edad de latencia: Propiedades psicométricas en una muestra argentina |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Richaud, María Cristina Mesurado, Belén Minzi, María Paula |
| dc.contributor.author.eng.fl_str_mv |
Richaud, María Cristina Mesurado, Belén Minzi, María Paula |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
attachment questionnaire latency age psychometric properties factor structure validity reliability |
| topic |
attachment questionnaire latency age psychometric properties factor structure validity reliability cuestionario de apego edad de latencia propiedades psicométricas estructura factorial validez confiabilidad |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
cuestionario de apego edad de latencia propiedades psicométricas estructura factorial validez confiabilidad |
| description |
El propósito de este artículo fue realizar un estudio psicométrico del Cuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego en idioma español. Este trabajo incluyó tres estudios. Los objetivos del estudio 1 fueron analizar el poder discriminativo de los ítems, realizar un AFE para determinar la estructura del cuestionario y calcular la consistencia interna de los factores. Los objetivos del estudio 2 fueron probar la estructura del cuestionario a través de un AFC y determinar si el modelo obtenido era invariante a través del sexo y la edad. El objetivo del estudio 3 fue estudiar la validez convergente. Los tres estudios se llevaron a cabo con tres muestras diferentes de 180, 200 y 425 niños argentinos de 9 a 12 años, respectivamente. Los resultados confirman la estructura de tres factores del cuestionario adaptado, mostrando buenas propiedades psicométricas (consistencia interna satisfactoria y validez adecuada). |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-05T22:27:21Z 2025-07-31T16:12:08Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-05T22:27:21Z 2025-07-31T16:12:08Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-05 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv |
Journal article |
| dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.21500/20112084.4058 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-7922 |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-2084 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10819/25824 |
| dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4058 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.21500/20112084.4058 2011-7922 2011-2084 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10819/25824 https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4058 |
| dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4058/3431 https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4058/3668 |
| dc.relation.citationedition.eng.fl_str_mv |
Núm. 2 , Año 2019 : Volume 12(2) |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
70 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv |
2 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv |
59 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.eng.fl_str_mv |
12 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.eng.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Psychological Research |
| dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv |
Arbuckle, J. R. (2007). AMOS 18 user’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: AMOS Development Corporation. Belsky, J., & Cassidy, J. (1994). Attachment: Theory and evidence. In M. Rutter, & D. F. Hay (Eds.), Development through life: A handbook for clinicians (pp. 373–402). Oxford: Blackwell. Borelli, J. L., Somers, J., West, J. L., Coffey, J. K., De Los Reyes, A., & Shmueli-Goetz, Y. (2016). Associations between attachment narratives and self-report measures of attachment in middle childhood: Extending evidence for the validity of the Child Attachment Interview. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(4), 1235-1246. doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0310-8 Bosmans, G., & Kerns, K. A. (2015). Attachment in middle childhood: Progress and prospects. New directions for child and adolescent development, 148, 1-14. doi:10.1002/cad.20100 Burnette, J. L., Davis, D. E., Green, J. D., Worthington, E. L., & Bradfield, E. (2009). Insecure attachment and depressive symptoms: The mediating role of rumination, empathy, and forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(3), 276–280. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.016 Byrne, B. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Basic Concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge Cassidy, J. (2003). Continuity and change in the measurement of infant attachment: Comment on Fraley and Spieker. Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 409-412. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.409 Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245-276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2012). Social location and value priorities. A European-wide comparison of the relation between socio-demographic variables and human values. In S. I. Keil, O. W. Gabriel (Eds.), Society and Democracy in Europe. London: Routledge. Davis, M. H. (2018). Empathy: A Social-Psychological Approach. London: Routledge. Decety, J., & Svetlova, M. (2011). Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy. Developmental Cognitive Neurocience. 2(1), 1-24. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.003 Dwyer, K. (2005). The meaning and measurement of attachment in middle and late childhood. Human development, 48 (3), 155–182. Eisenberg, N., & Eggum, N. D. (2009). Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress. In Decety, J., Ickes, W. (Eds.), The Social Neuro-science of Empathy (pp. 71–83). MIT Press, MA: Cambridge. Finzi, R., Cohen, O., Iwaniec, D., Sapir, Y. & Weizman, A. (2003). Attachment styles in the families of the drug-using father. Substance Use and Misuse, 38, 271-292. doi:10.1081/JA-120017249 Finzi, R., Cohen, O., Sapir, Y., & Weizman, A. (2000) Attachment styles in maltreated children: a comparative study. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 31(2), 113-128. doi:10.1023/A:1001944509409 Finzi, R., Har-Even, D., Weizman, A., Tyano, S., & Shnit, D. (1996). The adaptation of the attachment style questionnaire for latency-aged children [Hebrew]. Psychology, 5, 167–177. Finzi, R., Shnit, D., & Weizman, A. (2002). Psychosocial characterization of physically abused children from low socioeconomic households in comparison to neglected and non maltreated children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11(4), 441–453. doi:10.1023/A:1020983308496 Finzi-Dottan, R., Manor, I. & Tyano, S. (2006). ADHD, temperament, and parental style as predictors of the child’s attachment patterns. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 37(2), 103-114. doi:10.1007/s10578-006-0024-7 Fonagy, P. (2018). Attachment Theory and Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge Frías-Navarro, D. (2014). Apuntes de SPSS. Universidad de Valencia. Retrieved from http://www.uv.es/friasnav/ApuntesSPSS.pdf. Gillath, O., Shaver, P. R., Mikulincer, M., Nitzberg, R. E., Erez, A., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2005). Attachment, caregiving, and volunteering: Placing volunteerism in an Attachment-theoretical framework. Personal Relationships, 12(4), 425-446. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00124.x Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(3), 511-524. Katz, M. H. (2006). Multivariable analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kerns, K. A., Klepac, L., & Cole, A. K. (1996). Peer relationships and preadolescents´ perceptions of security in the mother-child relationships. Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 457-466. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.3.457 Kerns, K. A., Mathews, B. L., Koehn, A. J., Williams, C. T., & Siener-Ciesla, S. (2015). Assessing both safe haven and secure base support in parent–child relationships. Attachment & human development, 17(4), 337-353. doi:10.1080/14616734.2015.1042487 Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press Lieberman, A. (2004). Traumatic stress and quality of attachment: Reality and internalization in disorders of infant mental health. Infant Mental Health, 25(4), 336-351. doi:10.1002/imhj.20009 Lieberman, M., Doyle, A., & Markiewicz, D. (1999). Developmental patterns in security of attachment to mother and father in late childhood and early adolescence: Associations with peer relations. Child Development, 70(1), 202–213. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00015 Lorenzo-Seva, U., Timmerman, M. E., & Kiers, H. A. (2011). The Hull method for selecting the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 340-364. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.564527 Marvin, R. S., & Britner, P. A. (1999). Normative development: The ontogeny of attachment. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 44-67). New York, NY: Guilford Press. McDonald, R. P. (2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group. doi:10.4324/9781410601087 Mesurado, B. Guerra, P., De Sanctis, F., & Rodriguez, L. M. (2019) Validation of the Spanish Version of the Prosocial Behavior Toward Different Targets Scale. International Social Work. doi:10.1177/2F0020872819858738 Mesurado, B., & Richaud, M. C. (2017). The relationship between parental variables, empathy and prosocial-flow with prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(3), 843-860. doi:10.1007/s10902-016-9748-7 Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., & Tolmacz, R. (1990). Attachment styles and fear of personal death: A case study of affect regulation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58(2), 273-280 Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2005). Attachment Security, Compassion, and Altruism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(1), 34-38. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00330.x Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Gillath, O., & Nitzberg, R. A. (2005). Attachment, caregiving, and altruism: boosting attachment security increases compassion and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 817-839. Méndez-Castellano, H., & de Méndez, M. C. (1999). Sociedad y estratificación. método graffar-méndez castellano [society and stratification. graffar–méndez castellano method]. Caracas, Venezuela: Fundacredesa. Otto, H., & Keller, H. (Eds.) (2014). Different faces of attachment: Cultural variations on a universal human need. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Christensen, J. C. (2011). Empathy and Self-Regulation as Mediators Between Parenting and Adolescents' Prosocial Behavior Toward Strangers, Friends, and Family. Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 545-551. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00695.x Pallini, S., Chirumbolo, A., Morelli, M., Baiocco, R., Laghi, F., & Eisenberg, N. (2018). The relation of attachment security status to effortful self-regulation: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 144(5), 501-531. doi:10.1037/bul0000134 Peterson, Ch., & Seligman, M. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues. A handbook and classification. New York; NY: APA, Oxford University Press. Reebye, P. N., Ross, S. E., Jamieson, K. (2019) A literature review of child-parent/caregiver attachment theory and cross-cultural practices influencing attachment. Retrieved from https://www.attachmentacrosscultures.org/research Richaud, M. C., Lemos, V., Mesurado, B., & Oros, L. (2017). Construct validity and reliability of a new Empathy Questionnaire for children aged 9 to12 years. Frontiers in Psychology Method, 8, 1-10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00979 Richaud, M. C., Mesurado, B., & Lemos, V. (2018). Prosociality: types, targets, and related and contextual variables in childhood and adolescence. In C. García (Ed.), Research on Hispanic Psychology, Volume 1 (Chapter 9). Nova Science Publishers. Richaud de Minzi, M. C. (2006). Loneliness and depression in middle and late childhood: the relationship to attachment and parental styles. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167(2), 189-210. doi:10.3200/GNTP.167.2.189-210 Rodríguez Ayán, M. & Ruiz, M. (2008). Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: Incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. [Attenuation of the asymmetry and kurtosis of the observed scores through transformations of variables: Incidence on the factorial structure]. Psicológica, 29(2), 205-227. Román, M. (2011). Metodologías para la evaluación del apego infantil:de la observación de conductas a la exploración de las representaciones mentales [Methods of assessing attachment in infancy and childhood: from observation of behaviours to exploration of mental representations]. Acción Psicológica, 8(2), 27-38. Román, M., & Palacios, J. (2010). Los modelos internos de apego en niños y niñas adoptados: Relevancia y evaluación.[The internal models of attachment in adopted children: Relevance and evaluation]. In F. Loizaga (Ed.), Adopción hoy. Nuevos desafíos, nuevas estrategias [Adoption today. New challenges, new strategies] (pp. 203-228). Bilbao: Editorial Mensajero. Ruckstaetter, J., Sells, J., Newmeyer, M. D., & Zink, D. (2017). Parental apologies, empathy, shame, guilt, and attachment: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling & Development, 95(4), 389-400. doi:10.1002/jcad.12154 Sharif, Z. M., Yadegari, N., Bahrami, H., & Khorsandi, T. (2018). Representation of children attachment styles in corman’s instruction of family drawing. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 57, 34-42. doi:10.1016/j.aip.2017.10.004 Siegel, D. J., & Hartzell, M. (2005). Ser padres conscientes. Ediciones La Llave Sommerville, J., & Decety, J. (Eds.) (2016). Social cognition: Development across the life span. New York, NY: Psychology Press. Spinrad, T., & Eisenberg, N. (2014). Empathy, prosocial behavior, and positive development in schools. In Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 90-106). London: Routledge. Sroufe, L.A. (2003). Attachment categories as reflections of multiple dimensions: Comment on Fraley and Spieker. Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 413–416. Sroufe, L. A. (2016). The Place of Attachment in Development. In J. Cassidy, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications (pp. 997–1011). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Weinfield, N.S., Srouffe, L.A., Egeland, B., & Carlson, E. (2010). Individual differences in infant-caregiver attachment. In Cassidy, J., Shaver, P.R. (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment (pp. 78–101). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Wellisch, M., Brown, J., Taylor, A., Knight, R., Berresford, L., Campbell, L., & Cohen, A. (2011). Secure attachment and high IQ: Are gifted children better adjusted? Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 20(2), 23-33. |
| dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Psychological Research - 2019 |
| dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
International Journal of Psychological Research - 2019 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
| dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv |
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia) |
| dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/4058 |
| institution |
Universidad de San Buenaventura |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/4637179d-4c69-41c8-bf9f-71d6219ac0fb/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
790131aa3cc01744ddc3b0ce2f23b9a3 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
| _version_ |
1851053635910238208 |
| spelling |
Richaud, María CristinaMesurado, BelénMinzi, María Paula2019-09-05T22:27:21Z2025-07-31T16:12:08Z2019-09-05T22:27:21Z2025-07-31T16:12:08Z2019-09-05El propósito de este artículo fue realizar un estudio psicométrico del Cuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego en idioma español. Este trabajo incluyó tres estudios. Los objetivos del estudio 1 fueron analizar el poder discriminativo de los ítems, realizar un AFE para determinar la estructura del cuestionario y calcular la consistencia interna de los factores. Los objetivos del estudio 2 fueron probar la estructura del cuestionario a través de un AFC y determinar si el modelo obtenido era invariante a través del sexo y la edad. El objetivo del estudio 3 fue estudiar la validez convergente. Los tres estudios se llevaron a cabo con tres muestras diferentes de 180, 200 y 425 niños argentinos de 9 a 12 años, respectivamente. Los resultados confirman la estructura de tres factores del cuestionario adaptado, mostrando buenas propiedades psicométricas (consistencia interna satisfactoria y validez adecuada).The purpose of this article was to perform a psychometric study of the Attachment Style Classification Questionnaire (ASCQ) in Spanish language. This paper included three studies. The objectives of study 1 were to analyze the discriminative power of items, to carry out an EFA to determine the structure of the questionnaire, and to calculate the internal consistency of factors. The objectives of study 2 were to test the questionnaire structure through a CFA, and to determine if the model obtained was invariant between sex and age. The objective of Study 3 was to study the convergent validity. The three studies were carried out with three different samples of 180, 200, and 425 Argentinian children, aged 9 to 12 years, respectively. The results confirm the three factor structure of the adapted questionnaire, showing good psychometric properties (satisfactory internal consistency and adequate validity).application/pdftext/xml10.21500/20112084.40582011-79222011-2084https://hdl.handle.net/10819/25824https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4058engUniversidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4058/3431https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/4058/3668Núm. 2 , Año 2019 : Volume 12(2)7025912International Journal of Psychological ResearchArbuckle, J. R. (2007). AMOS 18 user’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: AMOS Development Corporation. Belsky, J., & Cassidy, J. (1994). Attachment: Theory and evidence. In M. Rutter, & D. F. Hay (Eds.), Development through life: A handbook for clinicians (pp. 373–402). Oxford: Blackwell. Borelli, J. L., Somers, J., West, J. L., Coffey, J. K., De Los Reyes, A., & Shmueli-Goetz, Y. (2016). Associations between attachment narratives and self-report measures of attachment in middle childhood: Extending evidence for the validity of the Child Attachment Interview. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(4), 1235-1246. doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0310-8 Bosmans, G., & Kerns, K. A. (2015). Attachment in middle childhood: Progress and prospects. New directions for child and adolescent development, 148, 1-14. doi:10.1002/cad.20100 Burnette, J. L., Davis, D. E., Green, J. D., Worthington, E. L., & Bradfield, E. (2009). Insecure attachment and depressive symptoms: The mediating role of rumination, empathy, and forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(3), 276–280. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.016 Byrne, B. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Basic Concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge Cassidy, J. (2003). Continuity and change in the measurement of infant attachment: Comment on Fraley and Spieker. Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 409-412. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.409 Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245-276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2012). Social location and value priorities. A European-wide comparison of the relation between socio-demographic variables and human values. In S. I. Keil, O. W. Gabriel (Eds.), Society and Democracy in Europe. London: Routledge. Davis, M. H. (2018). Empathy: A Social-Psychological Approach. London: Routledge. Decety, J., & Svetlova, M. (2011). Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy. Developmental Cognitive Neurocience. 2(1), 1-24. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.003 Dwyer, K. (2005). The meaning and measurement of attachment in middle and late childhood. Human development, 48 (3), 155–182. Eisenberg, N., & Eggum, N. D. (2009). Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress. In Decety, J., Ickes, W. (Eds.), The Social Neuro-science of Empathy (pp. 71–83). MIT Press, MA: Cambridge. Finzi, R., Cohen, O., Iwaniec, D., Sapir, Y. & Weizman, A. (2003). Attachment styles in the families of the drug-using father. Substance Use and Misuse, 38, 271-292. doi:10.1081/JA-120017249 Finzi, R., Cohen, O., Sapir, Y., & Weizman, A. (2000) Attachment styles in maltreated children: a comparative study. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 31(2), 113-128. doi:10.1023/A:1001944509409 Finzi, R., Har-Even, D., Weizman, A., Tyano, S., & Shnit, D. (1996). The adaptation of the attachment style questionnaire for latency-aged children [Hebrew]. Psychology, 5, 167–177. Finzi, R., Shnit, D., & Weizman, A. (2002). Psychosocial characterization of physically abused children from low socioeconomic households in comparison to neglected and non maltreated children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11(4), 441–453. doi:10.1023/A:1020983308496 Finzi-Dottan, R., Manor, I. & Tyano, S. (2006). ADHD, temperament, and parental style as predictors of the child’s attachment patterns. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 37(2), 103-114. doi:10.1007/s10578-006-0024-7 Fonagy, P. (2018). Attachment Theory and Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge Frías-Navarro, D. (2014). Apuntes de SPSS. Universidad de Valencia. Retrieved from http://www.uv.es/friasnav/ApuntesSPSS.pdf. Gillath, O., Shaver, P. R., Mikulincer, M., Nitzberg, R. E., Erez, A., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2005). Attachment, caregiving, and volunteering: Placing volunteerism in an Attachment-theoretical framework. Personal Relationships, 12(4), 425-446. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00124.x Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(3), 511-524. Katz, M. H. (2006). Multivariable analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kerns, K. A., Klepac, L., & Cole, A. K. (1996). Peer relationships and preadolescents´ perceptions of security in the mother-child relationships. Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 457-466. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.3.457 Kerns, K. A., Mathews, B. L., Koehn, A. J., Williams, C. T., & Siener-Ciesla, S. (2015). Assessing both safe haven and secure base support in parent–child relationships. Attachment & human development, 17(4), 337-353. doi:10.1080/14616734.2015.1042487 Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press Lieberman, A. (2004). Traumatic stress and quality of attachment: Reality and internalization in disorders of infant mental health. Infant Mental Health, 25(4), 336-351. doi:10.1002/imhj.20009 Lieberman, M., Doyle, A., & Markiewicz, D. (1999). Developmental patterns in security of attachment to mother and father in late childhood and early adolescence: Associations with peer relations. Child Development, 70(1), 202–213. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00015 Lorenzo-Seva, U., Timmerman, M. E., & Kiers, H. A. (2011). The Hull method for selecting the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 340-364. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.564527 Marvin, R. S., & Britner, P. A. (1999). Normative development: The ontogeny of attachment. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 44-67). New York, NY: Guilford Press. McDonald, R. P. (2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group. doi:10.4324/9781410601087 Mesurado, B. Guerra, P., De Sanctis, F., & Rodriguez, L. M. (2019) Validation of the Spanish Version of the Prosocial Behavior Toward Different Targets Scale. International Social Work. doi:10.1177/2F0020872819858738 Mesurado, B., & Richaud, M. C. (2017). The relationship between parental variables, empathy and prosocial-flow with prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(3), 843-860. doi:10.1007/s10902-016-9748-7 Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., & Tolmacz, R. (1990). Attachment styles and fear of personal death: A case study of affect regulation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58(2), 273-280 Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2005). Attachment Security, Compassion, and Altruism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(1), 34-38. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00330.x Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Gillath, O., & Nitzberg, R. A. (2005). Attachment, caregiving, and altruism: boosting attachment security increases compassion and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 817-839. Méndez-Castellano, H., & de Méndez, M. C. (1999). Sociedad y estratificación. método graffar-méndez castellano [society and stratification. graffar–méndez castellano method]. Caracas, Venezuela: Fundacredesa. Otto, H., & Keller, H. (Eds.) (2014). Different faces of attachment: Cultural variations on a universal human need. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Christensen, J. C. (2011). Empathy and Self-Regulation as Mediators Between Parenting and Adolescents' Prosocial Behavior Toward Strangers, Friends, and Family. Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 545-551. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00695.x Pallini, S., Chirumbolo, A., Morelli, M., Baiocco, R., Laghi, F., & Eisenberg, N. (2018). The relation of attachment security status to effortful self-regulation: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 144(5), 501-531. doi:10.1037/bul0000134 Peterson, Ch., & Seligman, M. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues. A handbook and classification. New York; NY: APA, Oxford University Press. Reebye, P. N., Ross, S. E., Jamieson, K. (2019) A literature review of child-parent/caregiver attachment theory and cross-cultural practices influencing attachment. Retrieved from https://www.attachmentacrosscultures.org/research Richaud, M. C., Lemos, V., Mesurado, B., & Oros, L. (2017). Construct validity and reliability of a new Empathy Questionnaire for children aged 9 to12 years. Frontiers in Psychology Method, 8, 1-10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00979 Richaud, M. C., Mesurado, B., & Lemos, V. (2018). Prosociality: types, targets, and related and contextual variables in childhood and adolescence. In C. García (Ed.), Research on Hispanic Psychology, Volume 1 (Chapter 9). Nova Science Publishers. Richaud de Minzi, M. C. (2006). Loneliness and depression in middle and late childhood: the relationship to attachment and parental styles. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167(2), 189-210. doi:10.3200/GNTP.167.2.189-210 Rodríguez Ayán, M. & Ruiz, M. (2008). Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: Incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. [Attenuation of the asymmetry and kurtosis of the observed scores through transformations of variables: Incidence on the factorial structure]. Psicológica, 29(2), 205-227. Román, M. (2011). Metodologías para la evaluación del apego infantil:de la observación de conductas a la exploración de las representaciones mentales [Methods of assessing attachment in infancy and childhood: from observation of behaviours to exploration of mental representations]. Acción Psicológica, 8(2), 27-38. Román, M., & Palacios, J. (2010). Los modelos internos de apego en niños y niñas adoptados: Relevancia y evaluación.[The internal models of attachment in adopted children: Relevance and evaluation]. In F. Loizaga (Ed.), Adopción hoy. Nuevos desafíos, nuevas estrategias [Adoption today. New challenges, new strategies] (pp. 203-228). Bilbao: Editorial Mensajero. Ruckstaetter, J., Sells, J., Newmeyer, M. D., & Zink, D. (2017). Parental apologies, empathy, shame, guilt, and attachment: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling & Development, 95(4), 389-400. doi:10.1002/jcad.12154 Sharif, Z. M., Yadegari, N., Bahrami, H., & Khorsandi, T. (2018). Representation of children attachment styles in corman’s instruction of family drawing. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 57, 34-42. doi:10.1016/j.aip.2017.10.004 Siegel, D. J., & Hartzell, M. (2005). Ser padres conscientes. Ediciones La Llave Sommerville, J., & Decety, J. (Eds.) (2016). Social cognition: Development across the life span. New York, NY: Psychology Press. Spinrad, T., & Eisenberg, N. (2014). Empathy, prosocial behavior, and positive development in schools. In Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 90-106). London: Routledge. Sroufe, L.A. (2003). Attachment categories as reflections of multiple dimensions: Comment on Fraley and Spieker. Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 413–416. Sroufe, L. A. (2016). The Place of Attachment in Development. In J. Cassidy, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications (pp. 997–1011). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Weinfield, N.S., Srouffe, L.A., Egeland, B., & Carlson, E. (2010). Individual differences in infant-caregiver attachment. In Cassidy, J., Shaver, P.R. (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment (pp. 78–101). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Wellisch, M., Brown, J., Taylor, A., Knight, R., Berresford, L., Campbell, L., & Cohen, A. (2011). Secure attachment and high IQ: Are gifted children better adjusted? Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 20(2), 23-33.International Journal of Psychological Research - 2019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/4058attachment questionnairelatency agepsychometric propertiesfactor structurevalidityreliabilitycuestionario de apegoedad de latenciapropiedades psicométricasestructura factorialvalidezconfiabilidadCuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego para la edad de latencia: Propiedades psicométricas en una muestra argentinaCuestionario de Clasificación de Estilo de Apego para la edad de latencia: Propiedades psicométricas en una muestra argentinaArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2701https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/4637179d-4c69-41c8-bf9f-71d6219ac0fb/download790131aa3cc01744ddc3b0ce2f23b9a3MD5110819/25824oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/258242025-07-31 11:12:08.541https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com |