Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político*

El presente artículo expone dos contribuciones teóricas del institucionalismohistórico a la ciencia política que, a diferencia de losestudios más representativos que ha orientado esta corriente de pensamiento en la disciplina, se centran en el ámbito del análisis político antes que en la reconstrucc...

Full description

Autores:: Martínez Coral, Patricia

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2015

Institución:: Universidad de San Buenaventura

Repositorio:: Repositorio USB

Idioma:: spa

id	SANBUENAV2_6a550df53cb03bb460d32a47e888ba7e
oai_identifier_str	oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/28447
network_acronym_str	SANBUENAV2
network_name_str	Repositorio USB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político*
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político*
title	Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político*
spellingShingle	Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político*
title_short	Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político*
title_full	Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político*
title_fullStr	Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político*
title_full_unstemmed	Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político*
title_sort	Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político*
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Martínez Coral, Patricia
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Martínez Coral, Patricia
description	El presente artículo expone dos contribuciones teóricas del institucionalismohistórico a la ciencia política que, a diferencia de losestudios más representativos que ha orientado esta corriente de pensamiento en la disciplina, se centran en el ámbito del análisis político antes que en la reconstrucción de macrodinámicas de cambio institucional.La primera de ellas corresponde al esclarecimiento conceptualde la capacidad que tienen los instrumentos de acción pública para estructurar el contenido sustancial de la política, la incidencia que tienen en la representación de los problemas públicos, y el rol que ejercen sobre la formación y/o transmisión de preferencias. La segunda se refiere a las implicaciones de la dimensión temporal de las políticas, con base en la cual es posible controvertir gran parte de las aproximaciones convencionales de la disciplina en torno a los procesos de aprendizaje.
publishDate	2015
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2015-11-30T00:00:00Z 2025-08-22T13:56:44Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2015-11-30T00:00:00Z 2025-08-22T13:56:44Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2015-11-30
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.21500/20115733.2207
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	2011-5733
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/10819/28447
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.21500/20115733.2207
identifier_str_mv	10.21500/20115733.2207 2011-5733
url	https://hdl.handle.net/10819/28447 https://doi.org/10.21500/20115733.2207
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/criterios/article/download/2207/1931
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 2 , Año 2015 : (Julio-Diciembre)
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	178
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	2
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	155
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	8
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Criterios
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Argyris, C. & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. MA: Addison-Wesley. Arthur, B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Arthur, B. (1992). On learning and adaptation in the economy. Queen´s Economics Department, Working Paper N.o 854. Bachrach, P. & Baratz, M. (1962). Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review, 56 (4): 947-952. Barrados, M; & Mayne, J. (2003). Can Public Sector Organizations Learn? OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3(3): 87-104. Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R. C., & Vedung, E. O. (2007). Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation. New Jersey: Transaction. Bennett, C. & Howlett, M. (1992). The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25: 275-294. Berends, H; Boersma, K. & Weggeman, M. (2003). The Structuration of Organizational Leaning. Human Relations, 56(9): 1035–56. Blindenbacher, R. (2010). The Black Box of Governmental Learning: the Learning Spiral—a Concept to Organize Learning in Governments. Washington: The World Bank. Bowles, S. (1998). Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVI: 75-111. Capano, G. (2009). Understanding Policy Change as an Epistemological and Theoretical Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11 (1): 7-31. Capoccia, G. & Kelemen, D. (2007). The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics, 59 (3): 341-369. Chapman, J. (2004). System Failure. Why Governments Must Learn to Think Differently. London: Demos. Collier, R & Collier, D. (2002) Shaping the political arena. Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–37. David, P. (2000). Path Dependence, Its Critics and the Quest for ‘Historical Economics’. Working Paper. Department of Economics Stanford University. Grin, J & Loeber, A. (2007). Theories of Policy Learning: Agency, Structure, and Change. In: Handbook of Public Policy Analysis, Theory, Politics, and Methods. Fischer, F; Miller, G & Sidney, M. Eds. London: CRC Press. Pp. 201-2015. Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the State: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. In: Comparative Politics, 25 (3): 275-296. Hall, P. & Taylor, R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Discussion Paper No 96, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung. Hay, C. & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies, 46 (5): 951-957. Hood, C. (2007): Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after Two Decades. In: Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20 (1): 127–144. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons?. Public Administration, 69: 3-19. Ikenberry, J. (1994). History´s heavy hand. Institutions and the politics of the state. Paper Prepared for a Conference on “New perspectives on institutions” University of Maryland, 1st October 1994. Available: http://scholar.princeton.edu/gji3/files/HistorysHeavyHand.pdf Immergut, E. (1998). The theoretical core of the New Institutionalism. Politics and society, 26 (1): 5-34. Katznelson, I. & Weingast, B. Ed. (2005). Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection Between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Kerr, P. (2002). Saved from Extinction: Evolutionary Theorising, Politics and the State. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4 (2): 330–358. Kim, D. (1993). The Link between Individual and Organizational Learning, Management Review, 15: 37-50. Lascoumes, P. & Le Galès, P. (2007). Understanding Public Policy through Its InstrumentsFrom the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation, Governance, 20 (1). Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. Levinthal, D. & March, J. (1993). The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (Special Issue: Organizations, Decision Making and Strategy): 95-112. Lindblom, Ch. (1959). The Science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review, 19 (2): 79-88. Linder, S. & Peters, G. (1989). Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9 (01): 35-58. Mahoney, J. (2001). Path-Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in Comparative Perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36 (1): 111–141. Page, S. (2008). Uncertainty, Difficulty, and Complexity. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 20: 115-149. Page, S. (2005). An Essay on The Existence and Causes of Path Dependence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Palier, B. (2007). Tracking the Evolution of a Single Instrument Can Reveal Profound Changes: The Case of Funded Pensions in France. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20 (1): 85–107. Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11 (98). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0378 Peters, G. (2000). Institutional Theory: Problems and Prospects. Political Science Series, 69. Vienna: Institute for advanced studies. Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: explaining institutional origins and change. Governance: An international journal of policy and administration, 13 (4): 475-499. Pierson, P. (1993). When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change, World Politics, 45 (4): 595-628. Pierson, P. & Skocpol, T. (2008). El institucionalismo histórico en la ciencia política contemporánea. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 17 (1): 7-38. Sabatier, P. & Weible, C. (2007). Theories of the Policy Process, Cambridge: Westview Press. Sabatier, P. Ed. pp. 189-222. Salamon, L. (2000). The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action: An Introduction. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28 (5): 1611-1674. Schulz, M. (2001). Organizational Learning. En: Joel A. C. Baum (ed) Companion to Organizations. Washington: Blackwell. Steinmo, S. (2008). What is Historical Institutionalism?. In: Approaches in the Social Sciences, Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating (Eds.). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tilly, C. (1995). To Explain Political Processes. American Journal of Sociology, 100 (6): 1594-1610. Walker, W., Rahman, A., Adnan, S & Cave, J. (2001). Adaptive policies, policy analysis and policymaking. European Journal of Operational Research, 128 (20), 282 – 289. Young, P. (1996). The Economics of Convention. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (2): 105-122. Zittoun, P. (2011). From Instrument to Policy: Observing the Meaning Process to Make a Decision. Political Science Review, 48 (5): 106-124.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Criterios - 2016
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Criterios - 2016 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad San Buenaventura
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/criterios/article/view/2207
institution	Universidad de San Buenaventura
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/7e53aab3-e5f3-4ea7-a127-8d3d0ddc4e64/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	ffbdf7419ce90613ce2da5d3acffed87
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1851053519947169792
spelling	Martínez Coral, Patricia2015-11-30T00:00:00Z2025-08-22T13:56:44Z2015-11-30T00:00:00Z2025-08-22T13:56:44Z2015-11-30El presente artículo expone dos contribuciones teóricas del institucionalismohistórico a la ciencia política que, a diferencia de losestudios más representativos que ha orientado esta corriente de pensamiento en la disciplina, se centran en el ámbito del análisis político antes que en la reconstrucción de macrodinámicas de cambio institucional.La primera de ellas corresponde al esclarecimiento conceptualde la capacidad que tienen los instrumentos de acción pública para estructurar el contenido sustancial de la política, la incidencia que tienen en la representación de los problemas públicos, y el rol que ejercen sobre la formación y/o transmisión de preferencias. La segunda se refiere a las implicaciones de la dimensión temporal de las políticas, con base en la cual es posible controvertir gran parte de las aproximaciones convencionales de la disciplina en torno a los procesos de aprendizaje.application/pdf10.21500/20115733.22072011-5733https://hdl.handle.net/10819/28447https://doi.org/10.21500/20115733.2207spaUniversidad San Buenaventurahttps://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/criterios/article/download/2207/1931Núm. 2 , Año 2015 : (Julio-Diciembre)17821558CriteriosArgyris, C. & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. MA: Addison-Wesley. Arthur, B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Arthur, B. (1992). On learning and adaptation in the economy. Queen´s Economics Department, Working Paper N.o 854. Bachrach, P. & Baratz, M. (1962). Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review, 56 (4): 947-952. Barrados, M; & Mayne, J. (2003). Can Public Sector Organizations Learn? OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3(3): 87-104. Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R. C., & Vedung, E. O. (2007). Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation. New Jersey: Transaction. Bennett, C. & Howlett, M. (1992). The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25: 275-294. Berends, H; Boersma, K. & Weggeman, M. (2003). The Structuration of Organizational Leaning. Human Relations, 56(9): 1035–56. Blindenbacher, R. (2010). The Black Box of Governmental Learning: the Learning Spiral—a Concept to Organize Learning in Governments. Washington: The World Bank. Bowles, S. (1998). Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVI: 75-111. Capano, G. (2009). Understanding Policy Change as an Epistemological and Theoretical Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11 (1): 7-31. Capoccia, G. & Kelemen, D. (2007). The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics, 59 (3): 341-369. Chapman, J. (2004). System Failure. Why Governments Must Learn to Think Differently. London: Demos. Collier, R & Collier, D. (2002) Shaping the political arena. Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–37. David, P. (2000). Path Dependence, Its Critics and the Quest for ‘Historical Economics’. Working Paper. Department of Economics Stanford University. Grin, J & Loeber, A. (2007). Theories of Policy Learning: Agency, Structure, and Change. In: Handbook of Public Policy Analysis, Theory, Politics, and Methods. Fischer, F; Miller, G & Sidney, M. Eds. London: CRC Press. Pp. 201-2015. Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the State: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. In: Comparative Politics, 25 (3): 275-296. Hall, P. & Taylor, R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Discussion Paper No 96, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung. Hay, C. & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies, 46 (5): 951-957. Hood, C. (2007): Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after Two Decades. In: Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20 (1): 127–144. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons?. Public Administration, 69: 3-19. Ikenberry, J. (1994). History´s heavy hand. Institutions and the politics of the state. Paper Prepared for a Conference on “New perspectives on institutions” University of Maryland, 1st October 1994. Available: http://scholar.princeton.edu/gji3/files/HistorysHeavyHand.pdf Immergut, E. (1998). The theoretical core of the New Institutionalism. Politics and society, 26 (1): 5-34. Katznelson, I. & Weingast, B. Ed. (2005). Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection Between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Kerr, P. (2002). Saved from Extinction: Evolutionary Theorising, Politics and the State. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4 (2): 330–358. Kim, D. (1993). The Link between Individual and Organizational Learning, Management Review, 15: 37-50. Lascoumes, P. & Le Galès, P. (2007). Understanding Public Policy through Its InstrumentsFrom the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation, Governance, 20 (1). Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. Levinthal, D. & March, J. (1993). The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (Special Issue: Organizations, Decision Making and Strategy): 95-112. Lindblom, Ch. (1959). The Science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review, 19 (2): 79-88. Linder, S. & Peters, G. (1989). Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9 (01): 35-58. Mahoney, J. (2001). Path-Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in Comparative Perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36 (1): 111–141. Page, S. (2008). Uncertainty, Difficulty, and Complexity. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 20: 115-149. Page, S. (2005). An Essay on The Existence and Causes of Path Dependence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Palier, B. (2007). Tracking the Evolution of a Single Instrument Can Reveal Profound Changes: The Case of Funded Pensions in France. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20 (1): 85–107. Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11 (98). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0378 Peters, G. (2000). Institutional Theory: Problems and Prospects. Political Science Series, 69. Vienna: Institute for advanced studies. Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: explaining institutional origins and change. Governance: An international journal of policy and administration, 13 (4): 475-499. Pierson, P. (1993). When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change, World Politics, 45 (4): 595-628. Pierson, P. & Skocpol, T. (2008). El institucionalismo histórico en la ciencia política contemporánea. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 17 (1): 7-38. Sabatier, P. & Weible, C. (2007). Theories of the Policy Process, Cambridge: Westview Press. Sabatier, P. Ed. pp. 189-222. Salamon, L. (2000). The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action: An Introduction. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28 (5): 1611-1674. Schulz, M. (2001). Organizational Learning. En: Joel A. C. Baum (ed) Companion to Organizations. Washington: Blackwell. Steinmo, S. (2008). What is Historical Institutionalism?. In: Approaches in the Social Sciences, Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating (Eds.). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tilly, C. (1995). To Explain Political Processes. American Journal of Sociology, 100 (6): 1594-1610. Walker, W., Rahman, A., Adnan, S & Cave, J. (2001). Adaptive policies, policy analysis and policymaking. European Journal of Operational Research, 128 (20), 282 – 289. Young, P. (1996). The Economics of Convention. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (2): 105-122. Zittoun, P. (2011). From Instrument to Policy: Observing the Meaning Process to Make a Decision. Political Science Review, 48 (5): 106-124.Criterios - 2016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/criterios/article/view/2207Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis políticoLos procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis políticoArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2598https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/7e53aab3-e5f3-4ea7-a127-8d3d0ddc4e64/downloadffbdf7419ce90613ce2da5d3acffed87MD5110819/28447oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/284472025-08-22 08:56:44.324https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Los procesos dependientes de su trayectoria: aportes teóricos del institucionalismo histórico al análisis político*

Publicaciones similares