Diferencias de género y patrones de consumo de tabaco en la desinhibición conductual
La influencia de la desinhibición conductual puede variar según la forma en que se evalúe y con relación a los diferentes patrones de tabaquismo. Este estudio evaluó la influencia del sexo, los diferentes niveles de adicción, la privación de nicotina y los patrones de tabaquismo sobre la desinhibici...
- Autores:
-
de Almeida Cunha, Nelson Bruno
de Almeida, Thiago Rodrigo
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2025
- Institución:
- Universidad de San Buenaventura
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio USB
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/28996
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10819/28996
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.7338
- Palabra clave:
- Smokers
Nonsmokers
Behavioral Disinhibition
Stop Signal Task
Smoking patterns
Fumadores
No fumadores
Desinhibición conductual
Stop Signal Task
Patrones de consumo
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
SANBUENAV2_54e8c0056a0423c38e092a10e14522a7 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/28996 |
| network_acronym_str |
SANBUENAV2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio USB |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Diferencias de género y patrones de consumo de tabaco en la desinhibición conductual |
| dc.title.translated.spa.fl_str_mv |
Diferencias de género y patrones de consumo de tabaco en la desinhibición conductual |
| title |
Diferencias de género y patrones de consumo de tabaco en la desinhibición conductual |
| spellingShingle |
Diferencias de género y patrones de consumo de tabaco en la desinhibición conductual Smokers Nonsmokers Behavioral Disinhibition Stop Signal Task Smoking patterns Fumadores No fumadores Desinhibición conductual Stop Signal Task Patrones de consumo |
| title_short |
Diferencias de género y patrones de consumo de tabaco en la desinhibición conductual |
| title_full |
Diferencias de género y patrones de consumo de tabaco en la desinhibición conductual |
| title_fullStr |
Diferencias de género y patrones de consumo de tabaco en la desinhibición conductual |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Diferencias de género y patrones de consumo de tabaco en la desinhibición conductual |
| title_sort |
Diferencias de género y patrones de consumo de tabaco en la desinhibición conductual |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
de Almeida Cunha, Nelson Bruno de Almeida, Thiago Rodrigo |
| dc.contributor.author.eng.fl_str_mv |
de Almeida Cunha, Nelson Bruno de Almeida, Thiago Rodrigo |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Smokers Nonsmokers Behavioral Disinhibition Stop Signal Task Smoking patterns |
| topic |
Smokers Nonsmokers Behavioral Disinhibition Stop Signal Task Smoking patterns Fumadores No fumadores Desinhibición conductual Stop Signal Task Patrones de consumo |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Fumadores No fumadores Desinhibición conductual Stop Signal Task Patrones de consumo |
| description |
La influencia de la desinhibición conductual puede variar según la forma en que se evalúe y con relación a los diferentes patrones de tabaquismo. Este estudio evaluó la influencia del sexo, los diferentes niveles de adicción, la privación de nicotina y los patrones de tabaquismo sobre la desinhibición conductual en fumadores y no fumadores. Se reclutó una muestra de 180 participantes entre 18 a 30 años para completar el Go/No-Go Paramétrico (PGNG) y el Stop Signal Task (SST). Los resultados identificaron que los fumadores tienen más dificultades para inhibir una respuesta prepotente que los no fumadores en SST, pero no en PGNG. Las mujeres no fumadoras presentaron una SSRT más corta que los hombres no fumadores y fumadores. La dependencia de nicotina de moderada a alta influyó en la escasa precisión en los ensayos no-go del PGNG. La investigación futura debería centrarse en el entrenamiento y/o en enfoques farmacológicos para mejorar la desinhibición conductual. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-05-22T14:24:40Z 2025-08-22T16:59:34Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-05-22T14:24:40Z 2025-08-22T16:59:34Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-05-22 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv |
Journal article |
| dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.21500/20112084.7338 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-7922 |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-2084 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10819/28996 |
| dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.7338 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.21500/20112084.7338 2011-7922 2011-2084 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10819/28996 https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.7338 |
| dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/7338/5672 |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
92 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv |
1 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv |
82 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.eng.fl_str_mv |
18 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.eng.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Psychological Research |
| dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv |
Ames, S.L., Wong, S.W., Bechara, A., Cappelli, C., Dust, M., Grenard, J.L., Stacy, A.W., (2014). Neural correlates of a Go/NoGo task with alcohol stimuli in light and heavy young drinkers. Behavioral Brain Research, 274, 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.08.039. Ashare, R.L., & Hawk Jr., L.W. (2012). Effects of smoking abstinence on impulsive behavior among smokers high and low in ADHD-like symptoms. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 219 (2), 537-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2324-2.47. Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65 – 94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65 Becoña, E., & Vázquez, F. L. (1998). The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence in a Spanish sample. Psychological Reports, 83(3Pt2), 1455-1458. doi: 10.2466/PR0.83.7.1455-1458. Bos, J., Hayden, M.J., Lum, J.A.G., & Staiger, P.K. (2019). UPPS-P impulsive personality traits and adolescent cigarette smoking: a meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend, 197, 335–343. Charles-Walsh, K., Furlong, L., Munro, D.G., & Hester, R. (2014). Inhibitory control dysfunction in nicotine dependence and the influence of short-term abstinence. Drug Alcohol Dependence, 143 (1), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.008. De Almeida Cunha, N. B., & Martínez-Munguía, C. E. (2021). Interaction effects of response inhibition and affectivity in tobacco craving. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Adicciones, 7(2), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.28931/riiad.2021.2.01 DeBry, S.C., & Tiffany, S.T. (2008). Tobacco-induced neurotoxicity of adolescent cognitive development (TINACD): A proposed model for the development of impulsivity in nicotine dependence. Nicotine Tobacco Research, 10, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200701767811. Detandt, S., Bazan, A., Schroder, E., Olyff, G., Kajosch, H., Verbanck, P., Campanella, S. (2017). A smoking-related background helps moderate smokers to focus: an event-related potential study using a Go-NoGo task. Clin Neurophysiol, 128 (10), 1872–1885. De Wit, H. (2009). Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addict Biol, 14, 22 – 31. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00129.x Durazzo, T.C., Meyerhoff, D.J., Mon, A., Abe, C., Gazindski, S., & Murray, D.E. (2016). Chronic cigarette smoking in healthy middle-aged individuals is associated with decreased regional brain N-acetylaspartate and glutamate levels. Biol Psychiatry, 79, 481–488. Fattore, L., & Melis, M. (2016) Sex differences in impulsive and compulsive behaviors: a focus on drug addiction. Addiction Biology, 21 (5), 1043-1051, https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12381. Fields, S.A., Sabet, M., Peal, A., & Reynolds, B. (2011) Relationship between weight status and delay discounting in a sample of adolescent cigarette smokers. Behavioural Pharmacology 22 (3), 266-268, DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328345c855 Fillmore, M. T. (2003). Drug abuse as a problem of impaired control: current approaches and findings. Behavioral & Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 2, 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582303257007 Galván, A., Poldrack, R., Baker, C. McGlennen, K., & London, E. (2011). Neural Correlates of Response Inhibition and Cigarette Smoking in Late Adolescence. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36, 970–978. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.235. Harrison, E.L., Coppola, S., & McKee, S.A. (2009). Nicotine deprivation and trait impulsivity affect smokers' performance on cognitive tasks of inhibition and attention. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17 (2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015657. Kalhan, S., Chen, L.P.E., Garrido, M.I., & Hester, R. (2022). People with tobacco use disorder exhibit more prefrontal activity during preparatory control but reduced anterior cingulate activity during reactive control. Addiction Biology, 27(2), e13159. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.13159. Kolokotroni, K.Z., Fozard, T.E., Selby, D. L., & Harrison, A.A. (2024). Is impulsivity related to attentional bias in cigarette smokers? An exploration across levels of nicotine dependency and deprivation. Behav Pharmacol, 35 (4), 172-184. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000775. Kräplin, A., Scherbaum, S., Bühringer, G., & Goschke, T. (2019). Decision-making and inhibitory control after smoking-related priming in nicotine dependent smokers and never-smokers. Addictive behaviors, 88, 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.020 Langenecker, S. A., Zubieta, J.-K., Young, E. A., Akil, H., & Nielson, K. A. (2007). A task to manipulate attentional load, set-shifting, and inhibitory control: Convergent validity and test-retest reliability of the Parametric Go/No-Go Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29, 842-853. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490490515720 Le, T.M., Potvin, S., Zhornitsky, S., & Li, C.R. (2021). Distinct patterns of prefrontal cortical disengagement during inhibitory control in addiction: A meta-analysis based on population characteristics. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 127, 255-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.028. Liu, Y., Wildenberg, W.P., Graaf, Y.D., Ames, S.L., Baldacchino, A., Bø, R., Cadaveira, F., et al. (2019). Is (poly-) substance use associated with impaired inhibitory control? A mega-analysis controlling for confounders. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 288-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.006. Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91 (3), 295-327. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295 Logemann, H.N., Böcker, K.B., Deschamps, P.K., Kemner, C., & Kenemans, J.L. (2014). Differences between nicotine-abstinent smokers and non-smokers in terms of visuospatial attention and inhibition before and after single-blind nicotine administration. Neuroscience, 277 (26), 375-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.016. Luijten, M., Machielsen, M.W.J., Veltman, D.J., Hester, R., de Haan, L., & Franken, I.H.A. (2014). Systematic review of ERP and fMRI studies investigating inhibitory control and error processing in people with substance dependence and behavioural addictions. Journal of Psychiatry & Neurosciemce, 39, 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.130052. Mashhoon, Y., Betts, J., Farmer, S.L., & Lukas, S.E. (2018). Early onset tobacco cigarette smokers exhibit deficits in response inhibition and sustained attention. Drug Alcohol Depend, 184, 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.11.020 Potvin, S., Tikasz, A., Dinh-Williams, L., Bourque, J. & Mendrek, A. (2015). Cigarette cravings, impulsivity, and the brain. Front. Psychiatry, 6, 1 – 11. Round, J.T., Fozard, T.E., Harrison, A.A., & Kolokotroni, K.Z. (2020). Disentangling the effects of cannabis and cigarette smoking on impulsivity. J Psychopharmacol, 34, 955–968. Smith, J. L., Mattick, R. P., Jamadar, S. D., & Iredale, J. M. (2014). Deficits in behavioural inhibition in substance abuse and addiction: A meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 145, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.009. Strickland, J. C., & Johnson, M. W. (2021). Rejecting impulsivity as a psychological construct: A theoretical, empirical, and sociocultural argument. Psychological Review, 128 (2), 336-361. doi: 10.1037/rev0000263. Tsaur, S., Strasser, A.A., Souprountchouk, V., Evans, G.C., Ashare, R.L. (2015). Time dependency of craving and response inhibition during nicotine abstinence. Addict Res Theory, 23 (3), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2014.953940. Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33 (5), 647-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014 Weidacker, K., Whiteford, S., Boy, F. & Johnston, S. (2016). Response inhibition in the parametric go/no-go task and its relation to impulsivity and subclinical psychopathy. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1135350 Wilcockson TDW, Pothos EM, Osborne AM, Crawford TJ (2021). Top-down and bottom-up attentional biases for smoking-related stimuli: comparing dependent and non-dependent smokers. Addict Behav 118, 106886. Yin J, Yuan K, Feng D, Cheng J, Li Y, Cai C, et al. (2016). Inhibition control impairments in adolescent smokers: electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study. Brain Imaging Behav 10, 497–505. Zhao, X., Liu, X., Zan, X., Jin, G., & Maes, J.H. (2016). Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters. PLoS One, 11 (8), e0160595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160595 |
| dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv |
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia) |
| dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/7338 |
| institution |
Universidad de San Buenaventura |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/88b857ef-2a33-46a0-90bf-d1a138e6831e/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
b1dd37bcdd782dc197b1e7b9c628f84c |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
| _version_ |
1851053552461414400 |
| spelling |
de Almeida Cunha, Nelson Brunode Almeida, Thiago Rodrigo2025-05-22T14:24:40Z2025-08-22T16:59:34Z2025-05-22T14:24:40Z2025-08-22T16:59:34Z2025-05-22La influencia de la desinhibición conductual puede variar según la forma en que se evalúe y con relación a los diferentes patrones de tabaquismo. Este estudio evaluó la influencia del sexo, los diferentes niveles de adicción, la privación de nicotina y los patrones de tabaquismo sobre la desinhibición conductual en fumadores y no fumadores. Se reclutó una muestra de 180 participantes entre 18 a 30 años para completar el Go/No-Go Paramétrico (PGNG) y el Stop Signal Task (SST). Los resultados identificaron que los fumadores tienen más dificultades para inhibir una respuesta prepotente que los no fumadores en SST, pero no en PGNG. Las mujeres no fumadoras presentaron una SSRT más corta que los hombres no fumadores y fumadores. La dependencia de nicotina de moderada a alta influyó en la escasa precisión en los ensayos no-go del PGNG. La investigación futura debería centrarse en el entrenamiento y/o en enfoques farmacológicos para mejorar la desinhibición conductual.The influence of behavioral disinhibition may vary according to the way this parameter is assessed and in relation to different patterns of smoke. This study evaluated the influence of sex, different levels of addiction, nicotine deprivation and smoking patterns on behavioral disinhibition in smokers and nonsmokers. The sample of 180 participants from 18 to 30 years old were recruited to complete the Parametric Go/No-Go (PGNG) and Stop Signal Task (SST). The results identified that smokers have more difficulty inhibiting a prepotent response than nonsmokers in SST, but not with PGNG. Female nonsmokers presented shorter SSRT than male nonsmokers and smokers. Moderate to high nicotine dependence influenced the poor precision on no-go trials of PGNG. Future research should focus on training and/or medication approaches to improve behavioral disinhibition.application/pdf10.21500/20112084.73382011-79222011-2084https://hdl.handle.net/10819/28996https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.7338engUniversidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/7338/56729218218International Journal of Psychological ResearchAmes, S.L., Wong, S.W., Bechara, A., Cappelli, C., Dust, M., Grenard, J.L., Stacy, A.W., (2014). Neural correlates of a Go/NoGo task with alcohol stimuli in light and heavy young drinkers. Behavioral Brain Research, 274, 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.08.039. Ashare, R.L., & Hawk Jr., L.W. (2012). Effects of smoking abstinence on impulsive behavior among smokers high and low in ADHD-like symptoms. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 219 (2), 537-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2324-2.47. Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65 – 94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65 Becoña, E., & Vázquez, F. L. (1998). The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence in a Spanish sample. Psychological Reports, 83(3Pt2), 1455-1458. doi: 10.2466/PR0.83.7.1455-1458. Bos, J., Hayden, M.J., Lum, J.A.G., & Staiger, P.K. (2019). UPPS-P impulsive personality traits and adolescent cigarette smoking: a meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend, 197, 335–343. Charles-Walsh, K., Furlong, L., Munro, D.G., & Hester, R. (2014). Inhibitory control dysfunction in nicotine dependence and the influence of short-term abstinence. Drug Alcohol Dependence, 143 (1), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.008. De Almeida Cunha, N. B., & Martínez-Munguía, C. E. (2021). Interaction effects of response inhibition and affectivity in tobacco craving. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Adicciones, 7(2), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.28931/riiad.2021.2.01 DeBry, S.C., & Tiffany, S.T. (2008). Tobacco-induced neurotoxicity of adolescent cognitive development (TINACD): A proposed model for the development of impulsivity in nicotine dependence. Nicotine Tobacco Research, 10, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200701767811. Detandt, S., Bazan, A., Schroder, E., Olyff, G., Kajosch, H., Verbanck, P., Campanella, S. (2017). A smoking-related background helps moderate smokers to focus: an event-related potential study using a Go-NoGo task. Clin Neurophysiol, 128 (10), 1872–1885. De Wit, H. (2009). Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addict Biol, 14, 22 – 31. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00129.x Durazzo, T.C., Meyerhoff, D.J., Mon, A., Abe, C., Gazindski, S., & Murray, D.E. (2016). Chronic cigarette smoking in healthy middle-aged individuals is associated with decreased regional brain N-acetylaspartate and glutamate levels. Biol Psychiatry, 79, 481–488. Fattore, L., & Melis, M. (2016) Sex differences in impulsive and compulsive behaviors: a focus on drug addiction. Addiction Biology, 21 (5), 1043-1051, https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12381. Fields, S.A., Sabet, M., Peal, A., & Reynolds, B. (2011) Relationship between weight status and delay discounting in a sample of adolescent cigarette smokers. Behavioural Pharmacology 22 (3), 266-268, DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328345c855 Fillmore, M. T. (2003). Drug abuse as a problem of impaired control: current approaches and findings. Behavioral & Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 2, 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582303257007 Galván, A., Poldrack, R., Baker, C. McGlennen, K., & London, E. (2011). Neural Correlates of Response Inhibition and Cigarette Smoking in Late Adolescence. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36, 970–978. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.235. Harrison, E.L., Coppola, S., & McKee, S.A. (2009). Nicotine deprivation and trait impulsivity affect smokers' performance on cognitive tasks of inhibition and attention. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17 (2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015657. Kalhan, S., Chen, L.P.E., Garrido, M.I., & Hester, R. (2022). People with tobacco use disorder exhibit more prefrontal activity during preparatory control but reduced anterior cingulate activity during reactive control. Addiction Biology, 27(2), e13159. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.13159. Kolokotroni, K.Z., Fozard, T.E., Selby, D. L., & Harrison, A.A. (2024). Is impulsivity related to attentional bias in cigarette smokers? An exploration across levels of nicotine dependency and deprivation. Behav Pharmacol, 35 (4), 172-184. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000775. Kräplin, A., Scherbaum, S., Bühringer, G., & Goschke, T. (2019). Decision-making and inhibitory control after smoking-related priming in nicotine dependent smokers and never-smokers. Addictive behaviors, 88, 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.020 Langenecker, S. A., Zubieta, J.-K., Young, E. A., Akil, H., & Nielson, K. A. (2007). A task to manipulate attentional load, set-shifting, and inhibitory control: Convergent validity and test-retest reliability of the Parametric Go/No-Go Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29, 842-853. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490490515720 Le, T.M., Potvin, S., Zhornitsky, S., & Li, C.R. (2021). Distinct patterns of prefrontal cortical disengagement during inhibitory control in addiction: A meta-analysis based on population characteristics. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 127, 255-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.028. Liu, Y., Wildenberg, W.P., Graaf, Y.D., Ames, S.L., Baldacchino, A., Bø, R., Cadaveira, F., et al. (2019). Is (poly-) substance use associated with impaired inhibitory control? A mega-analysis controlling for confounders. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 288-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.006. Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91 (3), 295-327. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295 Logemann, H.N., Böcker, K.B., Deschamps, P.K., Kemner, C., & Kenemans, J.L. (2014). Differences between nicotine-abstinent smokers and non-smokers in terms of visuospatial attention and inhibition before and after single-blind nicotine administration. Neuroscience, 277 (26), 375-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.016. Luijten, M., Machielsen, M.W.J., Veltman, D.J., Hester, R., de Haan, L., & Franken, I.H.A. (2014). Systematic review of ERP and fMRI studies investigating inhibitory control and error processing in people with substance dependence and behavioural addictions. Journal of Psychiatry & Neurosciemce, 39, 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.130052. Mashhoon, Y., Betts, J., Farmer, S.L., & Lukas, S.E. (2018). Early onset tobacco cigarette smokers exhibit deficits in response inhibition and sustained attention. Drug Alcohol Depend, 184, 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.11.020 Potvin, S., Tikasz, A., Dinh-Williams, L., Bourque, J. & Mendrek, A. (2015). Cigarette cravings, impulsivity, and the brain. Front. Psychiatry, 6, 1 – 11. Round, J.T., Fozard, T.E., Harrison, A.A., & Kolokotroni, K.Z. (2020). Disentangling the effects of cannabis and cigarette smoking on impulsivity. J Psychopharmacol, 34, 955–968. Smith, J. L., Mattick, R. P., Jamadar, S. D., & Iredale, J. M. (2014). Deficits in behavioural inhibition in substance abuse and addiction: A meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 145, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.009. Strickland, J. C., & Johnson, M. W. (2021). Rejecting impulsivity as a psychological construct: A theoretical, empirical, and sociocultural argument. Psychological Review, 128 (2), 336-361. doi: 10.1037/rev0000263. Tsaur, S., Strasser, A.A., Souprountchouk, V., Evans, G.C., Ashare, R.L. (2015). Time dependency of craving and response inhibition during nicotine abstinence. Addict Res Theory, 23 (3), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2014.953940. Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33 (5), 647-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014 Weidacker, K., Whiteford, S., Boy, F. & Johnston, S. (2016). Response inhibition in the parametric go/no-go task and its relation to impulsivity and subclinical psychopathy. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1135350 Wilcockson TDW, Pothos EM, Osborne AM, Crawford TJ (2021). Top-down and bottom-up attentional biases for smoking-related stimuli: comparing dependent and non-dependent smokers. Addict Behav 118, 106886. Yin J, Yuan K, Feng D, Cheng J, Li Y, Cai C, et al. (2016). Inhibition control impairments in adolescent smokers: electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study. Brain Imaging Behav 10, 497–505. Zhao, X., Liu, X., Zan, X., Jin, G., & Maes, J.H. (2016). Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters. PLoS One, 11 (8), e0160595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160595info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/7338SmokersNonsmokersBehavioral DisinhibitionStop Signal TaskSmoking patternsFumadoresNo fumadoresDesinhibición conductualStop Signal TaskPatrones de consumoDiferencias de género y patrones de consumo de tabaco en la desinhibición conductualDiferencias de género y patrones de consumo de tabaco en la desinhibición conductualArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2573https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/88b857ef-2a33-46a0-90bf-d1a138e6831e/downloadb1dd37bcdd782dc197b1e7b9c628f84cMD5110819/28996oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/289962025-08-22 11:59:34.517http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com |