Design of Psychometric Tests for the Evaluation of Audio Coding Systems

El presente trabajo se enfoca en la evaluación psicoacústica subjetiva de algunas tecnologías de codificación de audio con un conjunto de métodos psicométricos. Las partes clave de la implementación de los pruebas son la selección adecuada de señales críticas, metodologías de evaluación y personas-...

Full description

Autores:: Herrera Martínez, Marcelo
Rodríguez, Belman Jahir

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2015

Institución:: Universidad de San Buenaventura

Repositorio:: Repositorio USB

Idioma:: spa

id	SANBUENAV2_45ca02551ecef6697b5faf9a57ff9e55
oai_identifier_str	oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/28696
network_acronym_str	SANBUENAV2
network_name_str	Repositorio USB
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Design of Psychometric Tests for the Evaluation of Audio Coding Systems
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Design of Psychometric Tests for the Evaluation of Audio Coding Systems
title	Design of Psychometric Tests for the Evaluation of Audio Coding Systems
spellingShingle	Design of Psychometric Tests for the Evaluation of Audio Coding Systems Psicoacústica Tecnologías de codificación de audio Psicometría Codificadores perceptuales Señales de audio.
title_short	Design of Psychometric Tests for the Evaluation of Audio Coding Systems
title_full	Design of Psychometric Tests for the Evaluation of Audio Coding Systems
title_fullStr	Design of Psychometric Tests for the Evaluation of Audio Coding Systems
title_full_unstemmed	Design of Psychometric Tests for the Evaluation of Audio Coding Systems
title_sort	Design of Psychometric Tests for the Evaluation of Audio Coding Systems
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Herrera Martínez, Marcelo Rodríguez, Belman Jahir
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Herrera Martínez, Marcelo Rodríguez, Belman Jahir
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Psicoacústica Tecnologías de codificación de audio Psicometría Codificadores perceptuales Señales de audio.
topic	Psicoacústica Tecnologías de codificación de audio Psicometría Codificadores perceptuales Señales de audio.
description	El presente trabajo se enfoca en la evaluación psicoacústica subjetiva de algunas tecnologías de codificación de audio con un conjunto de métodos psicométricos. Las partes clave de la implementación de los pruebas son la selección adecuada de señales críticas, metodologías de evaluación y personas-escucha, para poder realizar un test efectivo. Basado en claves teoréticas y experimentales de la psicoacústica, el autor diseña una serie de pruebas, cuyo resultado puede ser interpretado como la Calidad de Servicio del algoritmo de compresión dado. Tres métodos psicométricos son aplicados. El método Constante, comparación por pares, y el DBTS (Double-Blind Triple-Stimulus with hidden reference), recomendado por el ITU-BS 1117 [1]. Los resultados son procesados estadísticamente.
publishDate	2015
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2015-08-13T00:00:00Z 2025-08-22T14:06:53Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2015-08-13T00:00:00Z 2025-08-22T14:06:53Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2015-08-13
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.21500/01247492.1675
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0124-7492
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://hdl.handle.net/10819/28696
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.21500/01247492.1675
identifier_str_mv	10.21500/01247492.1675 0124-7492
url	https://hdl.handle.net/10819/28696 https://doi.org/10.21500/01247492.1675
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Ingenium/article/download/1675/1475
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 32 , Año 2015 : INGENIUM
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	125
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	32
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	118
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	16
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Ingenium
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BS.1116-1. Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems including multichannel sound systems. 1994-1997. MELKA, A. Zaklady experimentalní psychoakustiky. HAMU, 2005. AES. Tutorial CD-ROM, Perceptual Audio Coders, What to listen for. New York, 2002. HERRERA, M. “Evaluation of audio coding artifacts”. In Proceedings of the 10th International Student Conference on Electrical Engineering POSTER 2006. Prague (Czech Republic), 2006. RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BS.1534-1. Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of coding systems. 2001-2003. BECH, S., ZACHAROV, N. Perceptual Audio Evaluation. Ed. Wiley, 2006. SOULODRE, G. A., LAVOIE, M. C. ”Subjective Evaluation of Large and Small Impairments in Audio Codecs”. In 17th International AES Conference: High Quality Audio Coding, 1999. WALKER, R. HOEG, W., CHRISTENSEN L. Subjective assessment of audio quality – the means and methods within the EBU. EBU Technical Review Winter 1997. EBU-TECH 3339. EBU Evaluations of Multichannel Audio Codecs. Phase 3. Geneva, 2010. RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BS.1284-1. General methods for the subjective assessment of sound quality. 1997-2003. ZIELIN´SKI, S., RUMSEY F., BECH S. “On Some Biases Encountered in Modern Audio Quality Listening Tests—A Review”. In: J. Audio Eng. Soc., Vol. 56, No. 6, 2008 June. STOLL, G., KOZAMERNIK, F. “EBU Listening Tests on Internet Audio Codecs,” Tech. Rev. 283, European Broadcasting Union, Geneva, Switzerland (2000). ITU-T. P.800. “Methods for Subjective Determination of Transmission Quality”. International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland (1996). ITU-R. Rep. BT.1082-1. “Studies toward the Unification of Picture Assessment Methodology”. International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 1990. HANDS, D. “Multimodal Quality Perception: The Effects of Attending to Content on Subjective Quality Ratings”, in Proc IEEE 3rd Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, 1999. ZIELINSKI, S., RUMSEY, F., BECH, S., de BRUYN, B., KASSIER, R., “Computer Games and Multichannel Audio Quality – The Effect of Division of Attention between Auditory and Visual Modalities”, presented at the AES 24th Int. Conf., 2003. BIRNBAUM, M. H., “Controversies in Psychological Measurements”, in Social Attitudes and Psychophysical Measurement. B. Wegener, Ed., 1982. MEILGAARD, M., CIVILLE, G. V., CARR, B. T. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. CRC Press, New York, 1999. TOOLE, F. E. “Turning Opinion into Fact”. J. Audio Eng. Soc. Vol 30, 1982. GROSS, L., CHATEAU, S., BUSSON, S. “Effects of Context on the Subjective Assessment of Time-Varying Speech Quality: Listening/Conversation, Laboratory/Real Environment”. Acustica/Acta Acustica, vol. 90, 2004. ALDRIDGE, R., DAVIDOFF, M., GHANBARI, M., HANDS, D., PEARSON D. “Recency Effect in the Subjective Assessment of Digitally-Codec Television Pictures”, in Proc. 5th IEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing and its Applications. Edinburgh, 1995. SEFERIDIS V., GHANBARI, M., PEARSON, D. E. “Forgiveness Effect in Subjective Assessment of Packet Video”. Electron. Lett., vol. 28. 1992. HAMBERG, R., de RIDDER, H. “Continuous Assessment of Perceptual Image Quality”. J. Opt. Soc. Am., vol. 12, 1995. WATSON, A. “Assessing the Quality of Audio and Video Components in Desktop Multimedia Conferencing”, Ph. D. Thesis, University College London, 1999. LIPSHITZ, S. P., VANDERKOOY, J. “The Great Debate: Subjective Evaluation”. J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 29, 1981. BECH, S. “Selection and Training of Subjects for Listening Tests on Sound-Reproducing Equipment”. J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 40, 1992. [27] BLAUERT, J. Communication Acoustics. Springer, 2005. BECH, S. “Training of Subjects for Auditory Experiments”. Acta Acustica, vol. 1, 1993. NEHER, T. “Towards a Spatial Ear Trainer”. Ph. D. Thesis, Institute of Sound Recording, 2004. FASTL, H. “Psycho-Acoustics and Sound Quality”. In Communication Acoustics. Ed. Springer, 2005. LETOWSKI, T. “Sound Quality Assessment: Cardinal Concepts”, presented at the 87th Convention of the AES, 1989. BLAUERT, J., JEKOSCH, U. “Sound Quality Evaluation – A Multi-Layered Problem”. Acustica/Acta Acustica, vol. 83., 1997.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Ingenium - 2015
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Ingenium - 2015 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Ingenium/article/view/1675
institution	Universidad de San Buenaventura
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/5079afb7-a5e0-4483-9e4b-1acd9e342932/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	a6f04450a25d52a8721bc646a48a65e0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1851053546711023616
spelling	Herrera Martínez, MarceloRodríguez, Belman Jahir2015-08-13T00:00:00Z2025-08-22T14:06:53Z2015-08-13T00:00:00Z2025-08-22T14:06:53Z2015-08-13 El presente trabajo se enfoca en la evaluación psicoacústica subjetiva de algunas tecnologías de codificación de audio con un conjunto de métodos psicométricos. Las partes clave de la implementación de los pruebas son la selección adecuada de señales críticas, metodologías de evaluación y personas-escucha, para poder realizar un test efectivo. Basado en claves teoréticas y experimentales de la psicoacústica, el autor diseña una serie de pruebas, cuyo resultado puede ser interpretado como la Calidad de Servicio del algoritmo de compresión dado. Tres métodos psicométricos son aplicados. El método Constante, comparación por pares, y el DBTS (Double-Blind Triple-Stimulus with hidden reference), recomendado por el ITU-BS 1117 [1]. Los resultados son procesados estadísticamente.application/pdf10.21500/01247492.16750124-7492https://hdl.handle.net/10819/28696https://doi.org/10.21500/01247492.1675spaUniversidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Ingenium/article/download/1675/1475Núm. 32 , Año 2015 : INGENIUM1253211816IngeniumRECOMMENDATION ITU-R BS.1116-1. Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems including multichannel sound systems. 1994-1997.MELKA, A. Zaklady experimentalní psychoakustiky. HAMU, 2005.AES. Tutorial CD-ROM, Perceptual Audio Coders, What to listen for. New York, 2002.HERRERA, M. “Evaluation of audio coding artifacts”. In Proceedings of the 10th International Student Conference on Electrical Engineering POSTER 2006. Prague (Czech Republic), 2006.RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BS.1534-1. Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of coding systems. 2001-2003.BECH, S., ZACHAROV, N. Perceptual Audio Evaluation. Ed. Wiley, 2006.SOULODRE, G. A., LAVOIE, M. C. ”Subjective Evaluation of Large and Small Impairments in Audio Codecs”. In 17th International AES Conference: High Quality Audio Coding, 1999.WALKER, R. HOEG, W., CHRISTENSEN L. Subjective assessment of audio quality – the means and methods within the EBU. EBU Technical Review Winter 1997.EBU-TECH 3339. EBU Evaluations of Multichannel Audio Codecs. Phase 3. Geneva, 2010.RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BS.1284-1. General methods for the subjective assessment of sound quality. 1997-2003.ZIELIN´SKI, S., RUMSEY F., BECH S. “On Some Biases Encountered in Modern Audio Quality Listening Tests—A Review”. In: J. Audio Eng. Soc., Vol. 56, No. 6, 2008 June.STOLL, G., KOZAMERNIK, F. “EBU Listening Tests on Internet Audio Codecs,” Tech. Rev. 283, European Broadcasting Union, Geneva, Switzerland (2000).ITU-T. P.800. “Methods for Subjective Determination of Transmission Quality”. International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland (1996).ITU-R. Rep. BT.1082-1. “Studies toward the Unification of Picture Assessment Methodology”. International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 1990.HANDS, D. “Multimodal Quality Perception: The Effects of Attending to Content on Subjective Quality Ratings”, in Proc IEEE 3rd Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, 1999.ZIELINSKI, S., RUMSEY, F., BECH, S., de BRUYN, B., KASSIER, R., “Computer Games and Multichannel Audio Quality – The Effect of Division of Attention between Auditory and Visual Modalities”, presented at the AES 24th Int. Conf., 2003.BIRNBAUM, M. H., “Controversies in Psychological Measurements”, in Social Attitudes and Psychophysical Measurement. B. Wegener, Ed., 1982.MEILGAARD, M., CIVILLE, G. V., CARR, B. T. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. CRC Press, New York, 1999.TOOLE, F. E. “Turning Opinion into Fact”. J. Audio Eng. Soc. Vol 30, 1982.GROSS, L., CHATEAU, S., BUSSON, S. “Effects of Context on the Subjective Assessment of Time-Varying Speech Quality: Listening/Conversation, Laboratory/Real Environment”. Acustica/Acta Acustica, vol. 90, 2004.ALDRIDGE, R., DAVIDOFF, M., GHANBARI, M., HANDS, D., PEARSON D. “Recency Effect in the Subjective Assessment of Digitally-Codec Television Pictures”, in Proc. 5th IEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing and its Applications. Edinburgh, 1995.SEFERIDIS V., GHANBARI, M., PEARSON, D. E. “Forgiveness Effect in Subjective Assessment of Packet Video”. Electron. Lett., vol. 28. 1992.HAMBERG, R., de RIDDER, H. “Continuous Assessment of Perceptual Image Quality”. J. Opt. Soc. Am., vol. 12, 1995.WATSON, A. “Assessing the Quality of Audio and Video Components in Desktop Multimedia Conferencing”, Ph. D. Thesis, University College London, 1999.LIPSHITZ, S. P., VANDERKOOY, J. “The Great Debate: Subjective Evaluation”. J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 29, 1981.BECH, S. “Selection and Training of Subjects for Listening Tests on Sound-Reproducing Equipment”. J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 40, 1992. [27] BLAUERT, J. Communication Acoustics. Springer, 2005.BECH, S. “Training of Subjects for Auditory Experiments”. Acta Acustica, vol. 1, 1993.NEHER, T. “Towards a Spatial Ear Trainer”. Ph. D. Thesis, Institute of Sound Recording, 2004.FASTL, H. “Psycho-Acoustics and Sound Quality”. In Communication Acoustics. Ed. Springer, 2005.LETOWSKI, T. “Sound Quality Assessment: Cardinal Concepts”, presented at the 87th Convention of the AES, 1989.BLAUERT, J., JEKOSCH, U. “Sound Quality Evaluation – A Multi-Layered Problem”. Acustica/Acta Acustica, vol. 83., 1997.Ingenium - 2015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Ingenium/article/view/1675PsicoacústicaTecnologías de codificación de audioPsicometríaCodificadores perceptualesSeñales de audio.Design of Psychometric Tests for the Evaluation of Audio Coding SystemsDesign of Psychometric Tests for the Evaluation of Audio Coding SystemsArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2588https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstreams/5079afb7-a5e0-4483-9e4b-1acd9e342932/downloada6f04450a25d52a8721bc646a48a65e0MD5110819/28696oai:bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co:10819/286962025-08-22 09:06:53.913https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Design of Psychometric Tests for the Evaluation of Audio Coding Systems

Publicaciones similares