Integrated Water Resource Management under Ecosystem Services Approach—The Chimulala Micro-watershed, Peru
This study evaluates the sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services (ES) within the Chimulala micro-watershed, Peru, to inform Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM). Using surveys and focus groups, we gathered data from 35 stakeholders (11 institutional and 24 local actors) to assess percep...
- Autores:
-
Cifuentes Herrera, Luisa Fernanda
Romero-Duque, Luz Piedad
Angulo Núñez, Oscar Eduardo
Trilleras, Jenny M.
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2025
- Institución:
- Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales U.D.C.A
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Institucional UDCA
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.udca.edu.co:11158/6352
- Acceso en línea:
- https://repository.udca.edu.co/handle/11158/6352
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02092-z
https://repository.udca.edu.co/
- Palabra clave:
- 570 - Biología::577 - Ecología
Conservación de los recursos naturales
Grupos Focales
Abastecimiento de Agua
Recurso hídrico
Conservación de aguas
Ecosistema
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.es
Summary: | This study evaluates the sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services (ES) within the Chimulala micro-watershed, Peru, to inform Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM). Using surveys and focus groups, we gathered data from 35 stakeholders (11 institutional and 24 local actors) to assess perceptions, orientations, and anticipated changes regarding 15 identified ES. A land cover map was developed to support an expert-led ES assessment, categorizing capacity levels across different land types. Results showed unanimous agreement on the vital importance of the water supply service, with local actors identifying and valuing a broader array of ES than institutional counterparts. Multiple correspondence analysis highlighted differences in ES recognition between stakeholder groups, revealing that local actors ascribed greater importance to cultural and regulatory ES, while institutional actors prioritized provisioning services. Conflicts were identified regarding responsibilities for changes in ES provision, with local communities attributing threats primarily to mining, while institutional actors cited land use changes. This research underscores the value of sociocultural ES assessments in bridging divergent perspectives and enhancing the participatory foundation of IWRM, ultimately aiding in the design of inclusive, resilient water management policies. |
---|