Prison memory in the Shining Path and the Tupumaro National Liberation Movement (1982-2017)
The following study is written within the works of history of memory. It seeks to analyze how the prison memory of two subversive, leftist Latin American organizations created a whole discursive corpus based on political propaganda. The cornerstone of the construct is «the militant hero», which will...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/13844
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_memoria/article/view/9572
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/13844
- Palabra clave:
- memory
heroism
prisons
Shining Path
Tupumaro National Liberation Movement
memoria
herocidad
cárceles
Sendero Luminoso
Movimiento de Liberación Nacional Tupamaro
Mémoire
héroïsme
prisons
Sendero Liminoso
Movimiento de Liberación Nacional Tupamaro
- Rights
- License
- Derechos de autor 2020 Historia Y MEMORIA
Summary: | The following study is written within the works of history of memory. It seeks to analyze how the prison memory of two subversive, leftist Latin American organizations created a whole discursive corpus based on political propaganda. The cornerstone of the construct is «the militant hero», which will be analyzed from the narrative reconstruction of the prison memory of both organizations. More concretely, this investigation aims to answer the following questions: what is the objective of these organizations in making an effort to rebuild a memory of confinement? Wouldn't this effort be contradictory, taking into account the Tupumaro National Liberation Movement political conquest and the Shining Path's plan to have a place in politics? This comparative study intends to demonstrate that this construction intends to present a suprahuman image of the prisoners who belong to these two guerrilla groups and, also, an inhuman image of those who had to face them. All of the above, to denounce the reaction of the state through the words that were denied to them 40 years before, and of building, therefore, a memory that allows them to tell another version that fosters greater social acceptance and facilitates their political participation. |
---|