Actitudes de los empleados y la responsabilidad social corporativa: lo sustantivo y lo simbólico desde la identidad organizacional

Autores:
Domínguez Aguirre, Luis Roberto
Lozano Jiménez, Israel
Marcelino Aranda, Mariana
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2025
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/20152
Acceso en línea:
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/20152
https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.01211048.18040
Palabra clave:
Responsabilidad Social Corporativa
identidad organizacional
RSC simbólica
RSC sustantiva
legitimidad
arraigo
Corporate social responsibility
organizational identity
symbolic CSR
substantive CSR
legitimacy
embeddedness
Rights
openAccess
License
Luis Roberto Domínguez-Aguirre, Israel Lozano-Jiménez, Mariana Marcelino-Aranda - 2025
id REPOUPTC2_dfae2f29db29517bbc68f9242e53a835
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/20152
network_acronym_str REPOUPTC2
network_name_str RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Actitudes de los empleados y la responsabilidad social corporativa: lo sustantivo y lo simbólico desde la identidad organizacional
title Actitudes de los empleados y la responsabilidad social corporativa: lo sustantivo y lo simbólico desde la identidad organizacional
spellingShingle Actitudes de los empleados y la responsabilidad social corporativa: lo sustantivo y lo simbólico desde la identidad organizacional
Responsabilidad Social Corporativa
identidad organizacional
RSC simbólica
RSC sustantiva
legitimidad
arraigo
Corporate social responsibility
organizational identity
symbolic CSR
substantive CSR
legitimacy
embeddedness
title_short Actitudes de los empleados y la responsabilidad social corporativa: lo sustantivo y lo simbólico desde la identidad organizacional
title_full Actitudes de los empleados y la responsabilidad social corporativa: lo sustantivo y lo simbólico desde la identidad organizacional
title_fullStr Actitudes de los empleados y la responsabilidad social corporativa: lo sustantivo y lo simbólico desde la identidad organizacional
title_full_unstemmed Actitudes de los empleados y la responsabilidad social corporativa: lo sustantivo y lo simbólico desde la identidad organizacional
title_sort Actitudes de los empleados y la responsabilidad social corporativa: lo sustantivo y lo simbólico desde la identidad organizacional
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Domínguez Aguirre, Luis Roberto
Lozano Jiménez, Israel
Marcelino Aranda, Mariana
dc.contributor.author.eng.fl_str_mv Domínguez Aguirre, Luis Roberto
Lozano Jiménez, Israel
Marcelino Aranda, Mariana
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Responsabilidad Social Corporativa
identidad organizacional
RSC simbólica
RSC sustantiva
legitimidad
arraigo
Corporate social responsibility
organizational identity
symbolic CSR
substantive CSR
legitimacy
embeddedness
topic Responsabilidad Social Corporativa
identidad organizacional
RSC simbólica
RSC sustantiva
legitimidad
arraigo
Corporate social responsibility
organizational identity
symbolic CSR
substantive CSR
legitimacy
embeddedness
publishDate 2025
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2025-05-03 00:00:00
2026-04-16T17:28:25Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2025-05-03 00:00:00
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2025-05-03
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.content.none.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0121-1048
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/20152
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.19053/uptc.01211048.18040
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2422-3220
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.01211048.18040
identifier_str_mv 0121-1048
10.19053/uptc.01211048.18040
2422-3220
url https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/20152
https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.01211048.18040
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv
language_invalid_str_mv
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079 Aledo‐Ruiz, M. D., Martínez‐Caro, E., & Santos‐Jaén, J. M. (2022). The influence of corporate social responsibility on students' emotional appeal in the HEIs: The mediating effect of reputation and corporate image. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(3), 578–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2221 Buddu, A., & Scheepers, C. B. (2022). CSR and shared value in multi-stakeholder relationships in South African mining context. Social Responsibility Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2020-0129 Chang, T.-W., Chen, Y.-S., & Lin, C.-Y. (2022). The myth of organizational change process: a study of uniting organizational identity, promoting organizational performance, and member behavior. SAGE Open, 12(1), 215824402210798. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079891 Chen, X., Hansen, E., Cai, J., & Xiao, J. (2023). The differential impact of substantive and symbolic CSR attribution on job satisfaction and turnover intention. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(4), 1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12572 Contreras-Pacheco, O. E., Talero-Sarmiento, L. H. y Camacho-Pinto, J. C. (2018). Efectos de la responsabilidad social empresarial sobre la identificación organizacional de los empleados: Autenticidad o falacia. Contaduría y Administración, 64(4), 123. https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2018.1631 Dinc, M. S., Zaim, H., Hassanin, M., & Alzoubi, Y. I. (2022). The effects of transformational leadership on perceived organizational support and organizational identity. Human Systems Management, 41(6), 699–716. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-211563 Donia, M. B. L., Ronen, S., Tetrault-Sirsly, C. A., & Bonaccio, S. (2019). CSR by Any Other Name? The Differential Impact of Substantive and Symbolic CSR Attributions on Employee Outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3673-5 Donia, M. B. L., & Tetrault-Sirsly, C.-A. (2016). Determinants and consequences of employee attributions of corporate social responsibility as substantive or symbolic. European Management Journal, 34(3), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.004 Donia, M. B. L., Tetrault-Sirsly, C.-A., & Ronen, S. (2017). Employee attributions of corporate social responsibility as substantive or symbolic: validation of a measure. Applied Psychology, 66(1), 103–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12081 Elembilassery, V. (2023). Evolutionary influences on corporate social responsibility literature: a review and prognosis. Society and Business Review, 18(3), 504–522. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-05-2022-0136 Ferro-Soto, C., Macías-Quintana, L., & Vázquez-Rodríguez, P. (2018). Effect of stakeholders-oriented behavior on the performance of sustainable business. Sustainability, 10(12), 4724. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124724 Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0066 Glavas, A., & Piderit, S. K. (2009). How does doing good matter? Effects of corporate citizenship on employees. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 36, 36–51. Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600305 Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. He, L., Gan, S., & Zhong, T. (2022). The impact of green credit policy on firms’ green strategy choices: green innovation or green-washing? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(48), 73307–73325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20973-w Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382 Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Humphreys, A., & Latour, K. A. (2013). Framing the game: assessing the impact of cultural representations on consumer perceptions of legitimacy. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/672358 Jones, D. A., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2013). How perceptions of fairness can change. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(2), 138–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386612461665 Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202 McShane, L., & Cunningham, P. (2012). To thine own self be true? Employees’ judgments of the authenticity of their organization’s corporate social responsibility program. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1064-x Nejati, M., & Shafaei, A. (2023). Why do employees respond differently to corporate social responsibility? A study of substantive and symbolic corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 2066–2080. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2474 Ng, T. W. H. (2015). The incremental validity of organizational commitment, organizational trust, and organizational identification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.03.003 Paliwoda-Matiolanska, A., Smolak-Lozano, E., & Nakayama, A. (2020). Corporate image or social engagement: Twitter discourse on corporate social responsibility (CSR) in public relations strategies in the energy sector. Profesional de la información, 29(3), e290333. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.33 Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 Preston, L. E., & Post, J. E. (2012). Private Management and Public Policy. The Principle of Public Responsibility. Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005 Sun, Z., & Zhang, W. (2019). Do government regulations prevent greenwashing? An evolutionary game analysis of heterogeneous enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1489–1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.335 van Breukelen, W., van der Vlist, R., & Steensma, H. (2004). Voluntary employee turnover: combining variables from the ‘traditional’ turnover literature with the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(7), 893–914. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.281 Walker, K., & Wan, F. (2012). The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1122-4 Zhong, M., Zhao, W., & Shahab, Y. (2022). The philanthropic response of substantive and symbolic corporate social responsibility strategies to COVID-19 crisis: Evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(2), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2204
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv e18040
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv 2
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv e18040
dc.relation.citationvolume.eng.fl_str_mv 25
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.eng.fl_str_mv Inquietud Empresarial
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/inquietud_empresarial/article/download/18040/15770
dc.relation.citationedition.eng.fl_str_mv Núm. 2 , Año 2025 : Inquietud Empresarial 25(2) July-December
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Luis Roberto Domínguez-Aguirre, Israel Lozano-Jiménez, Mariana Marcelino-Aranda - 2025
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Luis Roberto Domínguez-Aguirre, Israel Lozano-Jiménez, Mariana Marcelino-Aranda - 2025
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv Unidad Editorial UPTC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/inquietud_empresarial/article/view/18040
institution Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/bitstreams/d8b752aa-965b-484f-86ce-ed1dab583fa5/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 80b8bbacc4a75bf3561cdd7c9bd2fcb5
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1881673970580717568
spelling Domínguez Aguirre, Luis RobertoLozano Jiménez, IsraelMarcelino Aranda, Mariana2025-05-03 00:00:002026-04-16T17:28:25Z2025-05-03 00:00:002025-05-030121-1048https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/2015210.19053/uptc.01211048.180402422-3220https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.01211048.18040application/pdfUnidad Editorial UPTCLuis Roberto Domínguez-Aguirre, Israel Lozano-Jiménez, Mariana Marcelino-Aranda - 2025https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/inquietud_empresarial/article/view/18040Responsabilidad Social Corporativaidentidad organizacionalRSC simbólicaRSC sustantivalegitimidadarraigoCorporate social responsibilityorganizational identitysymbolic CSRsubstantive CSRlegitimacyembeddednessActitudes de los empleados y la responsabilidad social corporativa: lo sustantivo y lo simbólico desde la identidad organizacionalArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079 Aledo‐Ruiz, M. D., Martínez‐Caro, E., & Santos‐Jaén, J. M. (2022). The influence of corporate social responsibility on students' emotional appeal in the HEIs: The mediating effect of reputation and corporate image. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(3), 578–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2221 Buddu, A., & Scheepers, C. B. (2022). CSR and shared value in multi-stakeholder relationships in South African mining context. Social Responsibility Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2020-0129 Chang, T.-W., Chen, Y.-S., & Lin, C.-Y. (2022). The myth of organizational change process: a study of uniting organizational identity, promoting organizational performance, and member behavior. SAGE Open, 12(1), 215824402210798. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079891 Chen, X., Hansen, E., Cai, J., & Xiao, J. (2023). The differential impact of substantive and symbolic CSR attribution on job satisfaction and turnover intention. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(4), 1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12572 Contreras-Pacheco, O. E., Talero-Sarmiento, L. H. y Camacho-Pinto, J. C. (2018). Efectos de la responsabilidad social empresarial sobre la identificación organizacional de los empleados: Autenticidad o falacia. Contaduría y Administración, 64(4), 123. https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2018.1631 Dinc, M. S., Zaim, H., Hassanin, M., & Alzoubi, Y. I. (2022). The effects of transformational leadership on perceived organizational support and organizational identity. Human Systems Management, 41(6), 699–716. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-211563 Donia, M. B. L., Ronen, S., Tetrault-Sirsly, C. A., & Bonaccio, S. (2019). CSR by Any Other Name? The Differential Impact of Substantive and Symbolic CSR Attributions on Employee Outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3673-5 Donia, M. B. L., & Tetrault-Sirsly, C.-A. (2016). Determinants and consequences of employee attributions of corporate social responsibility as substantive or symbolic. European Management Journal, 34(3), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.004 Donia, M. B. L., Tetrault-Sirsly, C.-A., & Ronen, S. (2017). Employee attributions of corporate social responsibility as substantive or symbolic: validation of a measure. Applied Psychology, 66(1), 103–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12081 Elembilassery, V. (2023). Evolutionary influences on corporate social responsibility literature: a review and prognosis. Society and Business Review, 18(3), 504–522. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-05-2022-0136 Ferro-Soto, C., Macías-Quintana, L., & Vázquez-Rodríguez, P. (2018). Effect of stakeholders-oriented behavior on the performance of sustainable business. Sustainability, 10(12), 4724. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124724 Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0066 Glavas, A., & Piderit, S. K. (2009). How does doing good matter? Effects of corporate citizenship on employees. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 36, 36–51. Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600305 Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. He, L., Gan, S., & Zhong, T. (2022). The impact of green credit policy on firms’ green strategy choices: green innovation or green-washing? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(48), 73307–73325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20973-w Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382 Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Humphreys, A., & Latour, K. A. (2013). Framing the game: assessing the impact of cultural representations on consumer perceptions of legitimacy. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/672358 Jones, D. A., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2013). How perceptions of fairness can change. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(2), 138–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386612461665 Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202 McShane, L., & Cunningham, P. (2012). To thine own self be true? Employees’ judgments of the authenticity of their organization’s corporate social responsibility program. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1064-x Nejati, M., & Shafaei, A. (2023). Why do employees respond differently to corporate social responsibility? A study of substantive and symbolic corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 2066–2080. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2474 Ng, T. W. H. (2015). The incremental validity of organizational commitment, organizational trust, and organizational identification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.03.003 Paliwoda-Matiolanska, A., Smolak-Lozano, E., & Nakayama, A. (2020). Corporate image or social engagement: Twitter discourse on corporate social responsibility (CSR) in public relations strategies in the energy sector. Profesional de la información, 29(3), e290333. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.33 Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 Preston, L. E., & Post, J. E. (2012). Private Management and Public Policy. The Principle of Public Responsibility. Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005 Sun, Z., & Zhang, W. (2019). Do government regulations prevent greenwashing? An evolutionary game analysis of heterogeneous enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1489–1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.335 van Breukelen, W., van der Vlist, R., & Steensma, H. (2004). Voluntary employee turnover: combining variables from the ‘traditional’ turnover literature with the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(7), 893–914. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.281 Walker, K., & Wan, F. (2012). The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1122-4 Zhong, M., Zhao, W., & Shahab, Y. (2022). The philanthropic response of substantive and symbolic corporate social responsibility strategies to COVID-19 crisis: Evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(2), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2204e180402e1804025Inquietud Empresarialhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/inquietud_empresarial/article/download/18040/15770Núm. 2 , Año 2025 : Inquietud Empresarial 25(2) July-DecemberPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2738https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/bitstreams/d8b752aa-965b-484f-86ce-ed1dab583fa5/download80b8bbacc4a75bf3561cdd7c9bd2fcb5MD51falseAnonymousREAD001/20152oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/201522026-10-30 06:39:06.093https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com