Comparative response of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chysomelidae) to Momordica charantia and Acalypha wilkesiana powders in stored cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) (Walp.)

Post-harvest preservation of cowpea in developing countries has been a major challenge owing to Callosobruchus maculatus infestation. The study compares response of C. maculatus (F) to Momordica charantia and Acalypha wilkesiana powders in stored cowpea seeds under laboratory atmosphere. Five pairs...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7180
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/16888
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/9840
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16888
Palabra clave:
Bio-insecticides
Seeds
Postharvest preservation
Adult mortality
IPM
Seeds
Bean
Bioinsecticidas
Semillas
Preservación poscosecha
Mortalidad de adultos
IPM
Semillas
Frijol
Rights
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas
id REPOUPTC2_dbe0b8ba34f9c6706236ee9e0fe577fe
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/16888
network_acronym_str REPOUPTC2
network_name_str RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv Comparative response of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chysomelidae) to Momordica charantia and Acalypha wilkesiana powders in stored cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) (Walp.)
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Respuesta comparativa de Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chysomelidae) a polvos de Momordica charantia y Acalypha wilkesiana en caupí almacenado (Vigna unguiculata) (Walp.)
title Comparative response of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chysomelidae) to Momordica charantia and Acalypha wilkesiana powders in stored cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) (Walp.)
spellingShingle Comparative response of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chysomelidae) to Momordica charantia and Acalypha wilkesiana powders in stored cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) (Walp.)
Bio-insecticides
Seeds
Postharvest preservation
Adult mortality
IPM
Seeds
Bean
Bioinsecticidas
Semillas
Preservación poscosecha
Mortalidad de adultos
IPM
Semillas
Frijol
title_short Comparative response of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chysomelidae) to Momordica charantia and Acalypha wilkesiana powders in stored cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) (Walp.)
title_full Comparative response of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chysomelidae) to Momordica charantia and Acalypha wilkesiana powders in stored cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) (Walp.)
title_fullStr Comparative response of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chysomelidae) to Momordica charantia and Acalypha wilkesiana powders in stored cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) (Walp.)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative response of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chysomelidae) to Momordica charantia and Acalypha wilkesiana powders in stored cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) (Walp.)
title_sort Comparative response of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chysomelidae) to Momordica charantia and Acalypha wilkesiana powders in stored cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) (Walp.)
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv Bio-insecticides
Seeds
Postharvest preservation
Adult mortality
IPM
Seeds
Bean
topic Bio-insecticides
Seeds
Postharvest preservation
Adult mortality
IPM
Seeds
Bean
Bioinsecticidas
Semillas
Preservación poscosecha
Mortalidad de adultos
IPM
Semillas
Frijol
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv Bioinsecticidas
Semillas
Preservación poscosecha
Mortalidad de adultos
IPM
Semillas
Frijol
description Post-harvest preservation of cowpea in developing countries has been a major challenge owing to Callosobruchus maculatus infestation. The study compares response of C. maculatus (F) to Momordica charantia and Acalypha wilkesiana powders in stored cowpea seeds under laboratory atmosphere. Five pairs of freshly emerged C. maculatus adults were introduced into Petri-dish containing 20 g of cowpea admixed with 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 g of each plant powder, replicated thrice and arranged in a complete randomization design. Adult mortality was recorded at 24 h interval for 5 days, oviposition was recorded after 48 h. While newly emerged insects were recorded 30-35 days after infestation and weight loss was also determined. The treatments showed significant increase in C. maculatus adult mortality as the time of exposure and dosage increases, with highest values (90 and 100% for A. wilkesiana and M. charantia, respectively) at 120 h of exposure and 0.8 g dosage level. At 0.8 g, A. wilkesiana (66.3) and M. charantia (63.0) treated seeds recorded significantly lower number of eggs laid. Similar trend was equally observed for adult emergence and percentage weight loss. The study revealed that both plants had significant insecticidal effects and clearly showed that M. charantia was more effective than A. wilkesiana, but did not show higher significant differences in all the parameters assessed. This indicated that these plant powders have prospective to safeguard cowpea seeds in store from C. maculatus infestation and damage. Therefore, these plant should be included in the Integrated Pest Management Strategies for cowpea storage by small scale farmers.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-08T14:42:39Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-08T14:42:39Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-01
dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv Texto
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7180
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a764
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7180
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/9840
10.17584/rcch.2020v14i2.9840
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16888
url https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/9840
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16888
identifier_str_mv 10.17584/rcch.2020v14i2.9840
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/9840/9892
dc.rights.en-US.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf681
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf681
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.en-US.fl_str_mv Nigeria; Ondo; Akure
dc.coverage.es-ES.fl_str_mv Nigeria; Ondo; Akure
dc.publisher.en-US.fl_str_mv Sociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTC
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2020); 224-230
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2020); 224-230
dc.source.fr-FR.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 14 No 2 (2020); 224-230
dc.source.it-IT.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; V. 14 N. 2 (2020); 224-230
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; v. 14 n. 2 (2020); 224-230
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2422-3719
2011-2173
institution Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co
_version_ 1839633899409375232
spelling 2020-05-012024-07-08T14:42:39Z2024-07-08T14:42:39Zhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/984010.17584/rcch.2020v14i2.9840https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16888Post-harvest preservation of cowpea in developing countries has been a major challenge owing to Callosobruchus maculatus infestation. The study compares response of C. maculatus (F) to Momordica charantia and Acalypha wilkesiana powders in stored cowpea seeds under laboratory atmosphere. Five pairs of freshly emerged C. maculatus adults were introduced into Petri-dish containing 20 g of cowpea admixed with 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 g of each plant powder, replicated thrice and arranged in a complete randomization design. Adult mortality was recorded at 24 h interval for 5 days, oviposition was recorded after 48 h. While newly emerged insects were recorded 30-35 days after infestation and weight loss was also determined. The treatments showed significant increase in C. maculatus adult mortality as the time of exposure and dosage increases, with highest values (90 and 100% for A. wilkesiana and M. charantia, respectively) at 120 h of exposure and 0.8 g dosage level. At 0.8 g, A. wilkesiana (66.3) and M. charantia (63.0) treated seeds recorded significantly lower number of eggs laid. Similar trend was equally observed for adult emergence and percentage weight loss. The study revealed that both plants had significant insecticidal effects and clearly showed that M. charantia was more effective than A. wilkesiana, but did not show higher significant differences in all the parameters assessed. This indicated that these plant powders have prospective to safeguard cowpea seeds in store from C. maculatus infestation and damage. Therefore, these plant should be included in the Integrated Pest Management Strategies for cowpea storage by small scale farmers.La preservación poscosecha del caupí en los países en desarrollo ha sido un desafío importante debido a la infestación de Callosobruchus maculatus. El estudio compara la respuesta de C. maculatus (F) a los polvos de Momordica charantia y Acalypha wilkesiana en semillas de caupí almacenadas en atmósfera de laboratorio. Se introdujeron cinco pares de adultos de C. maculatus recién emergidos en una placa de Petri que contenía 20 g de caupí mezclados con 0,2, 0,4, 0,6 y 0,8 g de cada polvo de planta, replicados tres veces y dispuestos en un diseño completamente al azar. La mortalidad adulta se registró en un intervalo de 24 h durante 5 días, la oviposición se registró después de 48 h. Mientras que los insectos recién emergidos se registraron 30-35 días después de la infestación y también se determinó la pérdida de peso. Los tratamientos mostraron un aumento significativo en la mortalidad de adultos de C. maculatus a medida que aumenta el tiempo de exposición y la dosis, con valores más altos (90 y 100% para A. wilkesiana y M. charantia, respectivamente) a las 120 h de exposición y dosis de 0,8 g. Con 0,8 g, las semillas tratadas de A. wilkesiana (66,3) y M. charantia (63,0) registraron un número significativamente menor de huevos puestos. Se observó igualmente una tendencia similar para la emergencia de adultos y el porcentaje de pérdida de peso. El estudio reveló que ambas plantas tenían efectos insecticidas significativos y mostró claramente que M. charantia fue más eficaz que A. wilkesiana, pero no mostró diferencias significativas más altas en todos los parámetros evaluados. Esto indicó que estos polvos de plantas tienen posibilidades de proteger las semillas de caupí almacenadas de la infestación y el daño de C. maculatus. Por lo tanto, estas plantas deben incluirse en las Estrategias de Manejo Integrado de Plagas para el almacenamiento de caupí por parte de pequeños agricultores.application/pdfengengSociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTChttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/9840/9892Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf681http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2020); 224-230Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2020); 224-230Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; Vol. 14 No 2 (2020); 224-230Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; V. 14 N. 2 (2020); 224-230Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas; v. 14 n. 2 (2020); 224-2302422-37192011-2173Bio-insecticidesSeedsPostharvest preservationAdult mortalityIPMSeedsBeanBioinsecticidasSemillasPreservación poscosechaMortalidad de adultosIPMSemillasFrijolComparative response of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chysomelidae) to Momordica charantia and Acalypha wilkesiana powders in stored cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) (Walp.)Respuesta comparativa de Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chysomelidae) a polvos de Momordica charantia y Acalypha wilkesiana en caupí almacenado (Vigna unguiculata) (Walp.)TextTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7180http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a764http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Nigeria; Ondo; AkureNigeria; Ondo; AkureAdeboye, Oyewale RufusOni, Mercy OlayinkaAdesina, Jacobs Mobolade001/16888oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/168882025-07-18 11:49:44.217https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCrepositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co