Teacher evaluation system, institutions of technology higher education: quality guidelines

Due to the globalization of education, it has become prevalent to strengthen the quality systems to ensure that educational actors in higher education institutions are the best. In this context teachers are given a main role since they are cornerstones in educational processes. Currently, teacher qu...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6822
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/13419
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/praxis_saber/article/view/4171
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/13419
Palabra clave:
teacher evaluation
technology assessment
educational quality guidelines.
evaluación docente
evaluación tecnológica
calidad educativa
lineamientos.
évaluation de l’enseignant
évaluation technologique
qualité éducative
lignes directrices
avaliação docente
avaliação tecnológica
qualidade educativa
lineamentos.
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf323
id REPOUPTC2_da0cc02df746fd39cb57cd3af3f5fad6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/13419
network_acronym_str REPOUPTC2
network_name_str RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv Teacher evaluation system, institutions of technology higher education: quality guidelines
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Sistema de evaluación docente, instituciones de educación superior tecnológica: lineamientos de calidad
dc.title.fr-FR.fl_str_mv Système d’évaluation de l’enseignant, institutions d’éducation supérieure technologique: lignes directrices de qualité
dc.title.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Sistema de avaliação docente, instituições de educação superior tecnológica: lineamentos de qualidade
title Teacher evaluation system, institutions of technology higher education: quality guidelines
spellingShingle Teacher evaluation system, institutions of technology higher education: quality guidelines
teacher evaluation
technology assessment
educational quality guidelines.
evaluación docente
evaluación tecnológica
calidad educativa
lineamientos.
évaluation de l’enseignant
évaluation technologique
qualité éducative
lignes directrices
avaliação docente
avaliação tecnológica
qualidade educativa
lineamentos.
title_short Teacher evaluation system, institutions of technology higher education: quality guidelines
title_full Teacher evaluation system, institutions of technology higher education: quality guidelines
title_fullStr Teacher evaluation system, institutions of technology higher education: quality guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Teacher evaluation system, institutions of technology higher education: quality guidelines
title_sort Teacher evaluation system, institutions of technology higher education: quality guidelines
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv teacher evaluation
technology assessment
educational quality guidelines.
topic teacher evaluation
technology assessment
educational quality guidelines.
evaluación docente
evaluación tecnológica
calidad educativa
lineamientos.
évaluation de l’enseignant
évaluation technologique
qualité éducative
lignes directrices
avaliação docente
avaliação tecnológica
qualidade educativa
lineamentos.
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv evaluación docente
evaluación tecnológica
calidad educativa
lineamientos.
dc.subject.fr-FR.fl_str_mv évaluation de l’enseignant
évaluation technologique
qualité éducative
lignes directrices
dc.subject.pt-BR.fl_str_mv avaliação docente
avaliação tecnológica
qualidade educativa
lineamentos.
description Due to the globalization of education, it has become prevalent to strengthen the quality systems to ensure that educational actors in higher education institutions are the best. In this context teachers are given a main role since they are cornerstones in educational processes. Currently, teacher quality is assessed through an assessment or evaluation system. Almost every university evaluates its teachers, but there is no legal regulation on how to do it, in most institutions there is a professional in charge of designing and applying assessment instruments according to the authors he/she prefers. In most universities, on the one hand, it is used a traditional questionnaire aiming to collect data about dimensions associated with teaching, on the other hand, there is another option in which assessment models include self-evaluation, as in some cases in Chile. That’s why one of the concerns of this research is to propose guidelines for a more qualitative and formative assessment not exclusively following political parameters –based on administrative decisions–, but following emerging proposals with a deeper analysis. Nowadays the main actors in teacher evaluation are teachers, students and administrative staff, every six months these actors are evaluated by using an assessment tool that they usually do not know. The research investigates the perception actors in teacher evaluation have regarding its objectives, methods and stages, so they put forward ideas on how to restructure the current institutional assessment and propose improvements aiming at both the quantitative aspect and the qualitative analysis of performances and skills.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-05T19:04:12Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-05T19:04:12Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6822
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a406
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6822
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/praxis_saber/article/view/4171
10.19053/22160159.4171
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/13419
url https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/praxis_saber/article/view/4171
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/13419
identifier_str_mv 10.19053/22160159.4171
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/praxis_saber/article/view/4171/3597
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/praxis_saber/article/view/4171/html
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf323
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf323
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Praxis & Saber; Vol. 7 No. 13 (2016): Prácticas, Saberes y Sujetos; 177 - 198
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Praxis & Saber; Vol. 7 Núm. 13 (2016): Prácticas, Saberes y Sujetos; 177 - 198
dc.source.fr-FR.fl_str_mv Praxis & Saber; Vol. 7 No 13 (2016): Prácticas, Saberes y Sujetos; 177 - 198
dc.source.it-IT.fl_str_mv Praxis & Saber; V. 7 N. 13 (2016): Prácticas, Saberes y Sujetos; 177 - 198
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Praxis & Saber; v. 7 n. 13 (2016): Prácticas, Saberes y Sujetos; 177 - 198
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2462-8603
2216-0159
institution Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co
_version_ 1839633889480409088
spelling 2016-01-042024-07-05T19:04:12Z2024-07-05T19:04:12Zhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/praxis_saber/article/view/417110.19053/22160159.4171https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/13419Due to the globalization of education, it has become prevalent to strengthen the quality systems to ensure that educational actors in higher education institutions are the best. In this context teachers are given a main role since they are cornerstones in educational processes. Currently, teacher quality is assessed through an assessment or evaluation system. Almost every university evaluates its teachers, but there is no legal regulation on how to do it, in most institutions there is a professional in charge of designing and applying assessment instruments according to the authors he/she prefers. In most universities, on the one hand, it is used a traditional questionnaire aiming to collect data about dimensions associated with teaching, on the other hand, there is another option in which assessment models include self-evaluation, as in some cases in Chile. That’s why one of the concerns of this research is to propose guidelines for a more qualitative and formative assessment not exclusively following political parameters –based on administrative decisions–, but following emerging proposals with a deeper analysis. Nowadays the main actors in teacher evaluation are teachers, students and administrative staff, every six months these actors are evaluated by using an assessment tool that they usually do not know. The research investigates the perception actors in teacher evaluation have regarding its objectives, methods and stages, so they put forward ideas on how to restructure the current institutional assessment and propose improvements aiming at both the quantitative aspect and the qualitative analysis of performances and skills.Frente a la globalización de la educación se ha hecho imperante fortalecer los sistemas de calidad que garanticen que los actores educativos involucrados en las instituciones de educación superior sean los mejores, siendo protagonistas los profesores como ejes fundamentales en los procesos educativos. La forma como actualmente se evalúa la calidad del docente es a través de una evaluación o un sistema de evaluación. La evaluación docente se hace en casi todas las universidades, pero no existe una reglamentación legal que obligue a hacerla de alguna manera, en la mayoría de las instituciones existe un profesional frente a la tarea de aplicar y diseñar instrumentos de evaluación de acuerdo a su inclinación por algún autor. En la mayoría de las universidades se utiliza el tradicional cuestionario que intenta obtener datos sobre dimensiones asociadas a la labor, la otra opción establece modelos de evaluación con autoevaluación como en algunos casos de Chile. Es por eso que una de las preocupaciones de esta investigación es proponer lineamientos para una evaluación más cualitativa y formativa que no siga ligada a los parámetros exclusivamente políticos, resultados de tomar decisiones administrativas, si no a propuestas emergentes con mayor profundidad de análisis. Los principales actores de la evaluación docente son hoy los profesores, los estudiantes y los administrativos, semestralmente estos actores son evaluados con un instrumento de evaluación que muchas veces ellos mismos desconocen. El trabajo de investigación indaga sobre la percepción de los actores de la evaluación docente desde sus objetivos, métodos y momentos, de tal forma que se planteen ideas para reestructurar la actual evaluación institucional y generar propuestas de mejora no solo en términos cuantitativos si no que incorporen el estudio cualitativo de desempeños y competencias.Face à la mondialisation de l’éducation il devient impératif de renforcer les systèmes de qualité garantissant que les acteurs éducatifs, impliqués dans les institutions d’éducation supérieure, soient les meilleurs, les professeurs étant les protagonistes en tant qu’axes fondamentaux dans les processus éducatifs. La manière dont est évaluée, actuellement, la qualité des enseignants se fait au moyen d’une évaluation ou d’un système d’évaluation. L’évaluation des enseignants se réalise dans presque toutes les universités, mais il n’existe aucune réglementation légale obligeant à la réaliser d’une certaine manière, dans la majorité des institutions, il existe un professionnel dont la tâche est d’appliquer et concevoir des outils d’évaluations, conformément à son penchant pour certains auteurs. Dans la majorité des universités on utilise le questionnaire traditionnel qui vise à obtenir des données quant aux dimensions associées au travail, l’autre option établit des modèles d’évaluation par autoévaluation comme c’est le cas par exemple au Chili. C’est la raison pour laquelle une des préoccupations de cette recherche est de proposer des lignes directrices, pour une évaluation plus qualitative et formative et qui ne reste plus associée à des paramètres exclusivement politiques, résultant de prises de décisions administratives, sinon à des propositions émergentes ayant un approfondissement d’analyse plus important. Les principaux acteurs de l’évaluation des enseignants sont, de nos jours, les professeurs, les étudiants et le personnel administratif, semestriellement, ces intervenants sont évalués au moyen d’un outil d’évaluation que bien souvent ils ne connaissent pas euxmêmes. Le travail de recherche enquête au sujet de la perception des acteurs de l’évaluation des enseignants selon leurs objectifs, leurs méthodes et le moment, de telle manière que l’on formule des idées pour restructurer l’actuelle évaluation institutionnelles et élaborer des propositions d’amélioration, non seulement sur le plan quantitatif, mais incorporant également l’étude qualitative de rendements et de compétences.Frente à globalização da educação se tem feito imperante os sistemas de qualidade que garantissem que os atores educativos envolvidos nas instituições de ensino superior sejam os melhores, sendo protagonistas os professores como eixos fundamentais nos processos educacionais. A forma como atualmente se avalia a qualidade do professor é a traves de uma avaliação ou um sistema de avaliação. A avaliação docente se faz em quase todas as universidades, mas não existe uma regulamentação legal que bligue a fazê-la de alguma forma, na maioria das instituições existe um profissional na frente da tarefa de aplicar e desenhar instrumentos de avaliação em acordo a sua inclinação por algum autor. Na maioria das universidades se utiliza o tradicional questionário que tenta obter dados sobre dimensões associadas à tarefa, a outra opção estabelece modelos de avaliação com auto-avaliação como em alguns casos do Chile. Por causa disso uma das preocupações desta pesquisa é propor lineamentos para uma avaliação mais qualitativa e formativa que não siga ligada aos parâmetros exclusivamente políticos, resultados de tomar decisões burocráticas, se não a propostas emergentes com maior profundidade de análise. Os principais atores da avaliação docente são hoje os professores, os alunos e os administrativos, semestralmente estes atores são avaliados com um instrumento de avaliação que muitas vezes estes mesmos desconhecem. O trabalho de pesquisa indaga a percepção de atores da avaliação docente desde seus objetivos, métodos e momentos, e assim se explanam ideias para reestruturar a atual avaliação institucional e gerar propostas de melhora que não só apontem ao quantitativo se não ao estudo qualitativo de desempenho e competências.application/pdftext/htmlspaspaUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiahttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/praxis_saber/article/view/4171/3597https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/praxis_saber/article/view/4171/htmlPraxis & Saber; Vol. 7 No. 13 (2016): Prácticas, Saberes y Sujetos; 177 - 198Praxis & Saber; Vol. 7 Núm. 13 (2016): Prácticas, Saberes y Sujetos; 177 - 198Praxis & Saber; Vol. 7 No 13 (2016): Prácticas, Saberes y Sujetos; 177 - 198Praxis & Saber; V. 7 N. 13 (2016): Prácticas, Saberes y Sujetos; 177 - 198Praxis & Saber; v. 7 n. 13 (2016): Prácticas, Saberes y Sujetos; 177 - 1982462-86032216-0159teacher evaluationtechnology assessmenteducational quality guidelines.evaluación docenteevaluación tecnológicacalidad educativalineamientos.évaluation de l’enseignantévaluation technologiquequalité éducativelignes directricesavaliação docenteavaliação tecnológicaqualidade educativalineamentos.Teacher evaluation system, institutions of technology higher education: quality guidelinesSistema de evaluación docente, instituciones de educación superior tecnológica: lineamientos de calidadSystème d’évaluation de l’enseignant, institutions d’éducation supérieure technologique: lignes directrices de qualitéSistema de avaliação docente, instituições de educação superior tecnológica: lineamentos de qualidadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6822http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a406http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf323http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Parada Romero, Laura Belkis001/13419oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/134192025-07-18 11:44:11.567metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCrepositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co